KIRAN S/O SURESHBHAI PATNI (MAANWALA)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

   R/CR.MA/19156/2026                               ORDER DATED: 18/08/2026




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

   R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - BEFORE
               CHARGESHEET) NO. 19156 of 2026

==========================================================
               KIRAN S/O SURESHBHAI PATNI (MAANWALA)
                                Versus
                          STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR JAY H PATEL(11511) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MS DHWANI TRIPATHI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HASMUKH D. SUTHAR

                             Date : 18/08/2026

                                 ORDER

         Leave to amend name of father of present applicant is
allowed. Necessary amendment to be carried out forthwith.


[1.0] RULE. Learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent-
State.


[2.0] The present application is #led under Section 483 of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for
regular        bail     in    connection         with       FIR        being
C.R.No.11191037261031           of   2026      registered    with     Odhav
Police Station, Ahmedabad City, for the o/ences under Sections
305(a), 331(4) and 54 of BNS, 2023.


[3.0] Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the applicant
submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely
implicated in the o/ence. Substantial part of investigation is over.
Nothing is required to be recovered or discovered. He therefore
submits that, considering the nature of the o/ence, the applicant



                                 Page 1 of 5
   R/CR.MA/19156/2026                               ORDER DATED: 18/08/2026




may be enlarged on regular bail by imposing suitable conditions.


[4.0] Learned APP appearing on behalf of the respondent-State has
opposed the present application and requested to dismiss the
present application for regular bail on the ground that the
applicant is very much involved in the present o/ence and
considering the gravity of o/ence, no case is made out to entertain
present bail application.        Chargesheet is yet to be #led. If the
applicant is released on bail, possibility cannot be ruled out that
the applicant will 5ee from justice and tamper with the evidence.
Therefore, present application does not deserve consideration.


[5.0] While granting bail, the Court has to consider the involvement
of the accused in the alleged o/ence, the jurisdiction to grant bail
has to be exercised on the basis of the well settled principles
having regard to the facts and circumstances of each case and the
following    factors    are to    be   taken into   consideration       while
considering an application for bail: (i) the nature of accusation and
the severity of the punishment and the nature of the materials
relied upon by the prosecution; (ii) reasonable apprehension of
tampering with the witnesses and threat to the complainant or the
witnesses; (iii) reasonable possibility of securing the presence of
the accused at the time of trial or the likelihood of his abscondence;
(iv) character behaviour and standing of the accused and the
circumstances which are peculiar to the accused; (v) larger interest
of the public or the State and similar other considerations are
required to be considered.


[6.0] I have heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the
respective parties and perused the investigation papers. Allegation
against the present applicant is that the applicant along with the



                                   Page 2 of 5
   R/CR.MA/19156/2026                              ORDER DATED: 18/08/2026




co-accused trespassing the house of the complainant stolen
muddamal worth Rs.58,000/- During the investigation, muddamal is
recovered. Following aspects have been considered:


      (1)     Substantial part of investigation is over;
      (2)     Applicant is behind the bar since 11/06/2026;
      (3)     There is nothing to be recovered or discovered from the
      applicant;
      (4)     Muddamal is recovered;
      (5)     Co-accused having similarly situated role are enlarged
      on regular bail and therefore, on the ground of parity also
      (Rameshbhai Batubhai Dhabi Vs. State of Gujarat
      reported in 2011 (3) GLR 1999), present application
      deserves consideration;
      (6)     The applicant is having no past antecedents;
      (7)     Muddamal is recovered;
      (8)     Obviously commencement and conclusion of trial will
      take its own time;


[7.0] This Court has also taken into consideration the law laid down
by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Sanjay Chandra vs.
Central Bureau of Investigation reported in [2012]1 SCC 40 as
well as in the case of Gudikanti Narasimhulu And Ors vs.
Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh reported in
(1978)1 SCC 240. Obviously, the conclusion of trial will take time
and keeping the accused behind the bars is nothing but amounts to
pre-trial conviction and therefore, considering the celebrated
principle of bail jurisprudence is that “bail is a rule and jail is
exception” as well as the concept of personal liberty guaranteed
under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, present application
deserves consideration.



                                 Page 3 of 5
   R/CR.MA/19156/2026                                     ORDER DATED: 18/08/2026




[8.0] In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the
nature of the allegations made against the applicant in the FIR,
without discussing the evidence in detail, prima facie, this Court is
of the opinion that this is a #t case to exercise the discretion and
enlarge    the    applicant   on   regular       bail.   Hence,     the    present
application is allowed. The applicant is ordered to be released on
regular        bail     in     connection            with        FIR         being
C.R.No.11191037261031              of   2026      registered       with     Odhav
Police Station, Ahmedabad City, on executing a personal bond
of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-#ve Thousand only) with one surety
of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject
to the conditions that he/she shall;


   (a)    not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty;
   (b)    not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the
          prosecution & shall not obstruct or hamper the police
          investigation and shall not to play mischief with the
          evidence collected or yet to be collected by the police;
   (c)    surrender passport, if any, to the Trial Court within a
          week;
   (d)    not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of
          the Trial Court concerned;
   (e)    mark presence before the concerned Police Station once in
          a week till #ling of the chargesheet and after #ling of the
          chargesheet, mark presence before the concerned police
          station once in a month for a period of six months;
   (f)    furnish the Aadhaar card, email ID/present address of
          his residence to the Investigating O/icer and also to the
          Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not
          change the residence/contact number without prior



                                   Page 4 of 5
      R/CR.MA/19156/2026                                                        ORDER DATED: 18/08/2026




              permission of Trial Court;
      (g)     not to indulge in any illegal activity failing which learned
              trial Court shall issue warrant and cancel the bail of the
              applicant;


[9.0] The authorities will release the applicant only if he is not
required in connection with any other o/ence for the time being. If
breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the Sessions
Judge concerned will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate
action in the matter.


[10.0] Bail bond to be executed before the lower Court having
jurisdiction to try the case. It will be open for the concerned Court
to delete, modify and/or relax any of the above conditions, in
accordance with law.


[11.0] At the trial, the trial Court shall not be in5uenced by the
observations of preliminary nature qua the evidence at this stage
made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.


[12.0] Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service
is permitted.




                                                                 (HASMUKH D. SUTHAR,J)
ILA


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: ILA PRAFULKUMAR PATEL(HC00194), Principal Pvt Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 18/08/2026 14:53:58




                                                   Page 5 of 5