UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusMUNSHI RAM
2022 INSC 114131 October 2022Dismissed
The case concerned commission vendors of the Northern Railway who, after being absorbed into regular railway service, sought to have 50% of their pre‑absorption service counted as qualifying service for pension benefits, as had been granted to similarly situated vendors in other railway zones. The Union of India appeal…
REENA HAZARIKAversusSTATE OF ASSAM
2018 INSC 102931 October 2018Leave Granted & Allowed
The appellant, Reena Hazarika, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for allegedly killing her husband, based largely on circumstantial evidence and the "last seen" theory. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the prosecution had established a continuous chain of circumstances that left no reasonable hypothesis …
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITEDversusPRANAY SETHI AND ORS.
2017 INSC 106831 October 2017Reference answered
The Supreme Court examined the computation of compensation under Sections 163‑A, 166 and 168 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 in death claims, focusing on the appropriate multiplier, the addition of future prospects to the deceased's income, and the quantification of conventional heads such as loss of estate, loss of co…
VIRENDRA KRISHNA MISHRAversusUNION OF INDIAAND OTHERS
2014 INSC 102231 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed
Virendra Krishna Mishra, an Information Officer (IO) in the DANICS cadre, challenged the Cadre Review Committee's decision to encadre only three Deputy Resident Commissioner (DRC) posts while excluding Tourist Information Officer (TIO) and IO posts, alleging violation of Article 14 of the Constitution. The Central Admi…
IN RE: PRASHANT BHUSHAN AND ANR.versusIN RE:
2020 INSC 48931 August 2020Disposed off
The Supreme Court, hearing a suo motu criminal contempt petition against senior advocate Prashant Bhushan, affirmed his conviction for scandalising the judiciary through tweets and an affidavit alleging misconduct by judges. The Court held that the defence of truth under Section 13 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r…
TAMIL NADU MEDICAL OFFICERS ASSOCIATION & ORSversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
2018 INSC 33231 August 2020Disposed off
The petitions challenged the validity of Regulation 9 of the Medical Council of India (MCI) Post‑Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000, alleging that it barred State governments from reserving seats for in‑service doctors in postgraduate degree courses. The Court examined the constitutional distribution of power…
MUKESH SINGHversusSTATE (NARCOTIC BRANCH OF DELHI)
2020 INSC 52431 August 2020Reference answered
Mukesh Singh challenged his conviction under the NDPS Act on the ground that the police officer who lodged the FIR was also the investigating officer, alleging that this dual role vitiated the trial. The Supreme Court examined the statutory scheme of the CrPC (ss.154, 156, 157) and the NDPS Act (ss.41‑44, 50‑53, 58, 35…
M/S. INNOVENTIVE INDUSTRLES LTD.versusICICI BANK & ANR.
2017 INSC 83731 August 2017Dismissed
Innoventive Industries Ltd., a corporate debtor, defaulted on its financial obligations and a financial creditor (ICICI Bank) filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The debtor argued that a notification under the Maharashtra Relief Undertakings (Special Provisions) Act, …
KEDAR NATH YADAVversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
2016 INSC 63931 August 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined the acquisition of about 1,000 acres of land in Singur, West Bengal for Tata Motors' small‑car project. The Court held that the acquisition was made at the instance of a private company, not for a public purpose, and that the State failed to follow the mandatory procedures under Part VII of t…
M.C. GUPTAversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, DEHRADUN
2012 INSC 36831 August 2012Disposed off
The appellants, M.C. Gupta and Mohan Lal Gupta, were convicted for misappropriating company funds by issuing a bank draft in 1988, an offence that occurred before the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 came into force. An FIR was lodged in 1990 under the repealed Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, and the trial court …
PADI KAUSHIK REDDY ETC.versusTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AND OTHERS ETC.
2025 INSC 91231 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
Three BRS MLAs who were elected to the Telangana Legislative Assembly joined the INC, prompting two other BRS MLAs to file disqualification petitions under the Tenth Schedule. The Speaker delayed issuing notices for over seven months, leading the petitioners to approach the High Court, which only directed the Speaker t…
S.N. VIJAYLAKSHMI & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR.
2025 INSC 91731 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, owners of a Bangalore property, entered into an Agreement to Sell (ATS) with the complainant, who later alleged they cheated him and filed a private complaint that led to an FIR charging them under multiple IPC sections. The High Court dismissed the appellants' petition to quash the FIR, but the Supreme…
KHEM SINGH (D) THROUGH LRSversusSTATE OF UTTARANCHAL (NOW STATE OF UTTARAKHAND) & ANOTHER ETC.
2025 INSC 102431 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The original appellant, Khem Singh, had filed special leave petitions challenging the acquittal of three accused in a 1992 murder case. While the petitions were pending, Khem Singh died and his son, Raj Kumar, applied to set aside the abatement of the appeals and to be substituted as appellant. The Supreme Court examin…
SUKH SAGAR MEDICAL COLLEGE & HOSPITALversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
2020 INSC 47431 July 2020Dismissed
The Gujarat Sukh Sagar Medical College & Hospital Trust obtained an Essentiality Certificate in 2014 to establish a medical college in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh. Despite conditional permission for the 2016‑17 academic year, the Medical Council of India (MCI) repeatedly denied renewal of permission for three successive s…
TALAT FATIMA HASAN THROUGH HER CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY SH. SYED MEHDI HUSAINversusNAWAB SYED MURTAZA ALI KHAN (D) BY LRS. & ORS.
2019 INSC 84031 July 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiff, a granddaughter of the late Nawab Raza Ali Khan of Rampur, sought partition of the Nawab's private properties, arguing that succession should follow Muslim personal law as the Nawab was a Shia. The defendants contended that the properties were attached to the Gaddi of the State and thus governed by the r…
SREENIVASA COOPERATIVE BUILDING SOCIETYversusPUVVADA RAMA (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.
2018 INSC 65131 July 2018Dismissed
Lakshmi Sreenivasa Cooperative Building Society filed suits for specific performance of alleged sale agreements of land against Puvvada Rama (deceased) and others. The trial court dismissed the suits, finding the Society failed to prove execution of the agreements, payment of earnest money, and possession, noting the a…
JANHIT MANCH & ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2017 INSC 68731 July 2017Disposed off
The petitioners filed a public interest litigation (PIL No.17 of 2017) in the Bombay High Court challenging a Municipal Commissioner order dated 31‑08‑2016 concerning refuge areas and floor‑space‑index (FSI) in a high‑rise building. The same issues were already pending before the Supreme Court in several Special Leave …
SANJAY GUPTA & ORS.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2014 INSC 51331 July 2014Hearing Adjourned
A fire broke out at a consumer exhibition in Meerut on 10 April 2006, killing 64 people and injuring more than a hundred. The victims filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking damages from the State of Uttar Pradesh and the event organizers. The State had appointed a one‑man Commission of Inqui…
IN RE: DISTRIBUTION OF ESSENTIAL SUPPLIES AND SERVICES DURING PANDEMICversus.
2021 INSC 30231 May 2021Directions issued
The Supreme Court, hearing a suo motu writ petition concerning the management of the COVID‑19 pandemic, examined the Central Government's Liberalised Vaccination Policy, which shifted free vaccination for the 18‑44 age group to State/UT governments and private hospitals and introduced differential pricing. The petition…
ZULFIQUAR HAIDER & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2025 INSC 48031 March 2025Disposed off
The appellants' residential buildings in Prayagraj were demolished by the Prayagraj Development Authority (PDA) under Section 27 of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973. The PDA issued a show‑cause notice on 18 December 2020 but merely affixed it without making genuine attempts at personal service…
DR. Y. IBEHAIBI DEVI (D) BY LRS. & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF MANIPUR REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER (HIGHER AND TECHICAL EDUCATION) GOVERNMENT OF MANIPUR & ANR.
2022 INSC 37531 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, eight retired assistant professors and a college librarian from Manipur, claimed a revised pension entitlement effective from 1 April 2010 based on an Office Memorandum (OM) dated 5 May 2010, which was issued by the Governor and had statutory force. The State Government issued a later OM on 24 December …
REP. BY SEC. AND ORSversusK. BALU & ANR.
2017 INSC 30231 March 2017Disposed off
The Supreme Court revisited its earlier directions prohibiting the grant of liquor licences within 500 metres of national and state highways, hearing numerous interlocutory applications for extensions or modifications. It held that the Court’s directions, grounded in public‑health policy and the constitutional right to…
K.J.S. BUTTARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
2011 INSC 24931 March 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a former Indian Army captain who was invalided out in 1979 with a 50% disability, sought a War Injury Pension, an increase of his disability rating to 75%, a service element for his full ten‑year short service commission, and revised pension rates, relying on the Ministry of Defence letter dated 31‑Jan‑2…
DEEPAK AGARWAL & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2011 INSC 25031 March 2011Dismissed
The appellants, a Technical Officer and a Statistical Officer in the Uttar Pradesh Excise Group ‘A’ Service, challenged a 1999 amendment that excluded their cadres from promotion to Deputy Excise Commissioner, arguing that ten vacancies that arose before the amendment should be filled under the old 1983 rules. The Supr…
DALCO ENGINEERING PRIVATE LTD.versusSHREE SATISH PRABHAKAR PADHYE AND ORS.
2010 INSC 18331 March 2010
The case concerned two writ petitions challenging the termination of a disabled employee by a private limited company and the termination of a contract with a public trust. Both petitioners sought relief under section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation)…
JOSEPH SHINEversusUNION OF INDIA
2023 INSC 8731 January 2023Disposed off
The Union of India filed a miscellaneous application seeking clarification of the Supreme Court’s decision in Joseph Shine v. Union of India, which struck down Section 497 of the IPC, asking whether the judgment also affects the applicability of Sections 45, 63 of the Army Act, 1950 and analogous provisions in the Air …
NATIONAL HIGH SPEED RAIL CORPORATION LIMITEDversusMONTECARLO LIMITED & ANR
2022 INSC 12431 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSRCL) issued a tender for the Mumbai‑Ahmedabad Bullet Train project, which is funded by a loan from Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). Monte Carlo Limited submitted a technical bid that was rejected by NHSRCL as non‑responsive due to material deviations, a…
BASHEERA BEGAMversusMOHAMMED IBRAHIM & ORS.
2020 INSC 11631 January 2020Dismissed
The case concerned the alleged murder of D2 and D1 in December 1990, for which eight accused were convicted under sections 120B, 302 and 34 of the IPC. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence – a lorry purchase, broken glass, alleged iron‑rod attacks and a purported conspiracy at a hotel – but failed to prove…
MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI AND ORS.versusPANNA MAHESH CHANDRA DAVE AND ANR.
2020 INSC 11731 January 2020Dismissed
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai demolished the superstructures of a chawl on land owned by the heirs of Dattatray Angare and occupied by eleven tenants, citing road‑widening requirements. The Bombay High Court ordered that the owners be allowed to apply for Transferable Development Rights (TDR) and that the…
N. SANKARANARAYANANversusTHE CHAIRMAN, TAMIL NADU HOUSING BOARD & ORS.
2019 INSC 11731 January 2019Dismissed
The appellant, N. Sankaranarayanan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus against the Tamil Nadu Housing Board and other authorities to restrain his family members (respondent Nos. 2 and 3) from operating a petrol pump and a marriage hall on a piece of land that was the subject …
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ETC.versusMOHINDER SINGH AND OTHERS ETC.
2017 INSC 8131 January 2017Dismissed
The State of Haryana employed conductors and drivers under the Haryana Transport Department (Group C) Haryana Roadways Service (Amended) Rules, 2003, initially paying them as daily wagers, then as contract labourers, and finally on the regular pay‑scale. One hundred ninety‑five employees filed writ petitions seeking re…
MRS. IVY C.DA.CONCEICAOversusSTATE OF GOA & ORS.
2017 INSC 8831 January 2017Appeal(s) allowed
Mrs. Ivy C. Da Conceicao, a Grade‑I teacher with 21 years of service, claimed she was the most senior and qualified candidate for the post of principal in a minority‑run school in Goa, but the school appointed junior teachers in violation of the Goa School Education Rules. The school relied on its autonomy under Articl…
NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR TEACHER EDUCATION AND OTHERSversusSHRI SHYAM SHIKSHA PRASHIKSHAN SANSTHAN AND OTHERS ETC. ETC.
2011 INSC 8631 January 2011Disposed off
The private institutions applied in late 2007‑2008 for NCTE recognition to start B.Ed. courses, but the Northern Regional Committee rejected them citing that the cut‑off dates for application submission (31 Oct) and decision communication (15 May) prescribed in Regulation 5 of the 2007 Regulations, as amended on 1 July…
ANIL KUMAR SINGHversusV!JAY PAL SINGH & ORS.
2017 INSC 116130 November 2017Appeal(s) allowed
Anil Kumar Singh filed a civil suit for a permanent injunction over a parcel of land and obtained an ex‑parte temporary injunction. He later filed an application under Order XXIII Rule 1 of the CPC seeking to withdraw the suit, which the trial court allowed subject to payment of Rs 350 as costs to the defendant, a deci…
THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE & ANR.versusS. SAMUTHIRAM
2012 INSC 55030 November 2012Appeal(s) allowed
S. Samuthiram, a police officer of the Tamil Nadu Armed Reserve, was charged with eve‑teasing a married woman at a bus stand while intoxicated and with being absent from duty. A departmental inquiry found the charges proved and dismissed him from service. While his service appeal was pending, a criminal court acquitted…
GAJANAN SAMADHAN LANDEversusSANJAY SHYAMRAO DHOTRE
2011 INSC 82630 November 2011Dismissed
The appellant, a voter, challenged the election of the respondent, a Lok Sabha MP, alleging disqualification under Section 100(1)(a) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 on the ground that he was a director of the Maharashtra Seeds Corporation, a government‑owned company. The High Court held that the respondent wa…
ARUN LAL & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2010 INSC 83530 November 2010Dismissed
The Government of India had granted 3.563 acres of land in the Agra Cantonment to Hamid Ali Khan, who built a bungalow and later sold it with its appurtenant land to the petitioners. The petitioners sued the Union of India for arrears of rent, damages, and vacant possession of the bungalow and the surrounding land, whi…
DR. ASHISH RANJANversusDR. ANUPAMA TANDON AND ANR.
2010 INSC 83630 November 2010Disposed off
The Supreme Court heard a contempt petition filed by Dr. Ashish Ranjan, who alleged that Dr. Anupama Tandon and her mother deliberately violated a Lok Adalat compromise order dated 3 May 2008 that granted the mother physical custody of their child and the father visitation rights. The Court found that the respondents h…
ORBIT ELECTRICALS PRIVATE LIMITEDversusDEEPAK KISHAN CHHABRIA & ORS.
2023 INSC 96730 October 2023Disposed off
The Supreme Court had directed the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) to postpone pronouncing its judgment in a pending appeal until the result of Finolex Cables Limited's Annual General Meeting (AGM) was declared. Despite being apprised of this order, the NCLAT bench pronounced its judgment on 13 October …
J. S. LUTHRA ACADEMY & ANOTHERversusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & OTHERS
2018 INSC 101830 October 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The J.S. Luthra Academy, a private educational institution, was evicted from a Wakf‑owned site and sought alternative land from the Jammu & Kashmir government, which allotted four kanals in Channi Himmat, charging full price for two kanals and granting the other two for free. Residents challenged the allotment, arguing…
ATUL KUMARversusTHE CHAIRMAN (JOINT SEAT ALLOCATION AUTHORITY) AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 74930 September 2024Disposed off
The petitioner, a Scheduled Caste student, secured a seat in Electrical Engineering at IIT Dhanbad after ranking 1455 in his category in JEE Advanced 2024. He attempted to pay the required admission fee of Rs 17,500 before the 5 pm deadline on 24 June 2024, logging into the portal six times between 3:12 pm and 4:57 pm,…
AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIAversusCENTRE FOR AVIATION POLICY, SAFETY & RESEARCH (CAPSR) & OTHERS
2022 INSC 104730 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The Airport Authority of India (AAI) issued Request for Proposals for ground handling services at various airport groups, setting eligibility criteria that included regional clustering, a 36‑month experience requirement for scheduled flights, and a minimum annual turnover of Rs 30 crore (later reduced to Rs 18 crore). …
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.versusMS. MADHURI MARUTI VIDHATE (SINCE AFTER MARRIAGE SMT. MADHURI SANTOSH KOLI)
2022 INSC 105730 September 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The father, a government clerk, died in harness and his wife was appointed on compassionate grounds; she later died. The elder married daughter’s application for compassionate appointment was rejected on the ground that a married daughter is not a dependent. The younger married daughter (respondent) also applied and wa…
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (R AND B) AND OTHERSversusGOKUL CHANDRA KANUNGO (DEAD) THR. HIS LRS.
2022 INSC 104330 September 2022Case Partly allowed
The appellants, contractors, obtained an arbitral award that granted them a sum of money plus interest at 18% per annum for the pre‑reference, pendente lite and post‑award periods. The arbitrator did not provide any reasons for fixing the rate of interest. The respondents had remained silent for long periods (1977‑1989…
ANUPAL SINGH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS
2019 INSC 109930 September 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The Uttar Pradesh government revised the category‑wise vacancy numbers for the Technical Assistant Group‑C recruitment after discovering that diploma holders had been wrongly counted against the OBC quota. The revised requisition (20‑08‑2014) and the UPPSC Office Memorandum (12‑10‑2014) were used to conduct the written…
STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusZ.U. ANSARI
2016 INSC 93430 September 2016Matter referred to larger bench
Z.U. Ansari, a retired Junior Engineer of the Uttar Pradesh Rural Engineering Department, was subjected to disciplinary proceedings for alleged financial irregularities. The proceedings were initiated after the Minister-in-charge of the department sanctioned the enquiry, invoking Regulation 351‑A of the Civil Services …
SELVI J. JAYALALITHAA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
2013 INSC 66330 September 2013Disposed off
The petitioners, accused of possessing assets disproportionate to their known income under the Prevention of Corruption Act, had their trial transferred to Karnataka where the Supreme Court directed the appointment of a Special Public Prosecutor (SPP). After a seven‑month tenure, the Karnataka Government withdrew the a…
STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS .versusSHANKAR LAL PARMAR
2011 INSC 73330 September 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Rajasthan issued an Office Order in 1992 granting Selection Grades to Class IV and subordinate employees after 9, 18 and 27 years of service, provided their service record was satisfactory. A 1992 circular initially held that a censure would not affect eligibility, but a later Office Order in 1995 clarifie…
DNYANESHWAR RANGANATH BHANDARE & ANR.versusSADHU DADU SHETTIGAR (SHETTY) & ANR.
2011 INSC 73030 September 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, sons of a deceased property owner, claimed ownership of two rooms and alleged that the respondents were merely gratuitous licencees, while the respondents asserted they were tenants paying rent since 1982. The trial court found the respondents were licencees and granted possession to the appellants; the…
STATE OF HARYANAversusMUKESH KUMAR & ORS.
2011 INSC 73130 September 2011Dismissed
The State of Haryana, through the Superintendent of Police, filed a civil suit claiming ownership of a parcel of land on the basis of adverse possession. The defendants, who were the registered owners, contested the claim, and the trial court, appellate court, and High Court all dismissed the suit, holding that the Sta…
SURAJ SINGH GUJAR & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.
2024 INSC 66130 August 2024Disposed off
The appellants were convicted under IPC sections 323, 324 and 325 read with section 34 for an assault incident that occurred between close relatives. They later executed a compromise deed on 29 January 2024, seeking the Court’s permission to compound the offences. The Supreme Court examined whether the conviction for t…
MAHADEO & ORSversusSMT. SOVAN DEVI & ORS
2022 INSC 88830 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The widow of a permanently disabled ex‑serviceman, Smt. Sovan Devi, claimed that a 1971 inter‑departmental letter from the Soldier Welfare Department to the District Collector constituted a valid allotment of 25 bighas of land to her late husband under the Rajasthan Special Assistance to Disabled Ex‑Servicemen Rules, 1…
BIR SINGHversusDELHI JAL BOARD & ORS.
2018 INSC 76630 August 2018Reference answered
The Supreme Court examined whether the Presidential Orders under Articles 341 and 342, which list Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) for each State or Union Territory (UT), limit a State or UT's power under Article 16(4) to provide reservation for backward classes. It held that reservation must be confined…
DR. JAGAT NARAIN SUBHARTI CHARITABLE TRUST AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2017 INSC 82530 August 2017Case Allowed
The Dr. Jagat Narain Subharti Charitable Trust applied for permission to establish a new medical college in Dehradun for the 2016‑17 session. The Medical Council of India (MCI) flagged deficiencies in faculty, residents, OPD attendance, bed occupancy and questioned land‑ownership compliance, leading the Central Governm…
ANEESH D. LAWANDE & OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF GOA AND OTHERS
2013 INSC 58030 August 2013Disposed off
The petitioners, students admitted to postgraduate medical and dental courses in Goa on the basis of NEET ranks, challenged the State of Goa's order cancelling their admissions after the Supreme Court had protected those admissions. The Supreme Court held that the State could not rescind the NEET‑based admissions, as t…
KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI, NARSINGHPURversusM/S. SHIV SHAKTI KHANSARI UDYOG AND OTHERS
2012 INSC 36430 August 2012Dismissed
The respondents, operators of sugar factories in Madhya Pradesh, challenged notices issued by market committees that required them to obtain licences under the Madhya Pradesh Krishi Upaj Mandi Act, 1972 and to pay market fees on purchases of sugarcane. The High Court quashed the notices, holding that the transactions w…
RAJAN PUROHIT & ORS.versusRAJASTHAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCE & ORS.
2012 INSC 36330 August 2012Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court examined admissions to a private unaided medical college in Rajasthan where 117 students were admitted without a competitive entrance test, contrary to Regulation 5(2) of the MCI Regulations. The Court held that there was no consensual agreement between the college and the State to admit students on t…
SANJOY NARAYAN EDITOR IN CHIEF HINDUSTAN & ORS.versusHON. HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD THR. R.G.
2011 INSC 62330 August 2011Disposed off
The Hindustan Times published an article on 20 September 2010 containing adverse and unverified information about the then Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court, leading to contempt of court proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act. The appellants, including Sanjoy Narayan, Editor‑in‑Chief of Hindustan, appeale…
MRS. ASHA SHARMAversusCHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION AND ORS.
2011 INSC 62630 August 2011Disposed off
The appellant, a retired IAS officer appointed as State Information Commissioner, sought to retain the government house she occupied in Chandigarh beyond the four‑to‑six‑month period prescribed under Rule 13 of the Government Residences (Chandigarh Administration General Pool) Allotment Rules, 1996. The Estate Officer …
MADDURI GANGARAJU @ BABU RAOversusMADDURI SUNANDA & OTHERS
2025 INSC 99130 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The marriage between Madduri Venkateswara Rao and Madduri Sunanda was dissolved by a California divorce decree in 2007. After returning to India, Sunanda filed a matrimonial suit, a domestic violence case, and an FIR under sections 494 and 498A IPC against her husband and his relatives. The parties later resolved all d…
YASH DEVELOPERSversusHARIHAR KRUPA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED & ORS.
2024 INSC 55930 July 2024Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the termination of a development agreement between Yash Developers (appellant) and Harihar Krupa Co‑Operative Housing Society (respondent) under Section 13 of the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, which had been upheld by the Bombay High Court. The C…
GAURAV KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2024 INSC 55830 July 2024Disposed off
Gaurav Kumar filed a writ petition challenging the fees levied by State Bar Councils (SBCs) at the time of enrolment, alleging that the amounts far exceed the Rs. 750 (general) and Rs. 125 (SC/ST) prescribed in Section 24(1)(f) of the Advocates Act, 1961, and that additional miscellaneous fees are being made a conditio…
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT), MUMBAIversusM/S. DILIP KUMAR AND COMPANY & ORS.
2018 INSC 64630 July 2018Reference answered
The case concerned the interpretation of Customs Notification No. 20/1999, under which the respondents claimed a concessional customs duty rate for imported vitamin E50 feed powder. The Customs department denied the benefit, classifying the goods under a higher duty heading, leading to a series of appeals up to the Sup…
YAKUB ABDUL RAZAK MEMONversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
2015 INSC 53730 July 2015Dismissed
SECR. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.versusGRADE-I DASS OFFICERS ASSOCIATION & ORS.
2014 INSC 51030 July 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents, Grade‑I officers of the Delhi Administration Subordinate Service (DASS), claimed a second financial upgradation under the Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACPS) after completing 24 years of service. Because the feeder grade (Grade‑I DASS) and the next promotional grade (Grade‑II of the Delhi Andaman …
SMT. MOUMITA PODDARversusINDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. & ANR.
2010 INSC 45630 July 2010Dismissed
The Supreme Court heard appeals by Smt. Moumita Poddar challenging the appointment of a retail outlet dealership to respondent No.2 (Alpana Saha) by Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. The High Court had set aside the entire selection on the ground that the Selection Committee failed to follow the policy circular dated 4‑Sept‑…
H.C. KULWANT SINGH & ORS.versusH.C. DAYA RAM & ORS.
2014 INSC 42330 June 2014Dismissed
The case concerned the promotion of constables to head constables under the Punjab Police Rules, 1934, which were amended in 1982 and 1988. The tribunal had held that constables confirmed before the 1988 amendment possessed a vested right to promotion based on seniority, and it ordered a fresh seniority list, which the…
U.0.I.versusS.P. NAYYAR
2014 INSC 43630 June 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, S.P. Nayyar, a Commandant in the Border Security Force, sought promotion to Additional DIG. The Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) did not recommend him, alleging he was not fit, despite his ACRs being graded ‘Very Good’ by the Initiating and Reviewing Officers. He alleged that the Accepting Officer…
DR. (MRS.) MALATHI RAVI, M.D.versusDR. B.V. RAVI M.D.
2014 INSC 42630 June 2014Disposed off
The husband, Dr. B.V. Ravi, filed a petition for divorce under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act alleging desertion, and also sought restitution of conjugal rights. The Family Court found no proof of desertion and granted restitution, but the wife, Dr. Malathi Ravi, later lodged FIRs against the husband, lead…
RAM KARAN (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.
2014 INSC 43330 June 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Ram Karan (deceased) through legal representatives, purchased agricultural land in 1962 from a Scheduled Caste vendor and obtained mutation in 1966. The State of Rajasthan, via a Tehsildar, filed a suit under Section 175 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act in 1993 seeking ejectment, alleging the sale violated t…
GAYATRI BALASAMYversusM/S ISG NOVASOFT TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
2025 INSC 60530 April 2025Disposed off
The Supreme Court was asked to resolve a long‑standing controversy over whether courts exercising jurisdiction under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 can modify an arbitral award. The issue arose from the earlier decision in Project Director, NHAI v. M. Hakeem, where the Court held that …
PAVUL YESU DHASANversusTHE REGISTRAR, STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.
2025 INSC 67730 April 2025Dismissed
The appellant, an Inspector of Police, refused to register a First Information Report (FIR) lodged by the complainant and used objectionable language while speaking to the complainant's mother. The State Human Rights Commission of Tamil Nadu held that this conduct violated the complainant's human rights and directed th…
BANK OF INDIA & ORS.versusPANKAJ SRIVASTAVA
2024 INSC 53830 April 2024Dismissed
Pankaj Srivastava filed a writ petition seeking a compassionate appointment as a clerk after the death of his father, a Bank of India employee. The bank opposed, invoking Clause 10(iv) of its compassionate appointment scheme and a 2002 board letter that required Government approval where disciplinary proceedings could …
AJAY ISHWAR GHUTE & ORS.versusMEHER K. PATEL & ORS.
2024 INSC 35330 April 2024Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court examined an appeal challenging a Bombay High Court order that disposed of a writ petition by adopting a "Minutes of Order" signed by counsel, without impleading parties who would be affected by the construction of a compound wall. The writ petition sought police protection for the wall's construction,…
LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.
2024 INSC 35830 April 2024Dismissed
Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) issued several insurance policies in Rajasthan between 1993-94 and 2001-02 and, due to the unavailability of India Insurance stamps in the state, purchased the stamps from Maharashtra. The Rajasthan government issued show‑cause notices demanding payment of stamp duty on those p…
IN RE: DISTRIBUTION OF ESSENTIAL SUPPLIES AND SERVICES DURING PANDEMICversus.
2021 INSC 28030 April 2021Directions issued
The Supreme Court, exercising suo motu jurisdiction under Article 32, examined the humanitarian crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and issued directions to the Union and State governments on the supply of oxygen, essential drugs, and vaccines, as well as on hospital admission policies and protection of individuals …
THE STATE OF RAJASTHANversusNEMI CHAND MAHELA AND OTHERS
2019 INSC 58830 April 2019Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined a long‑running dispute concerning the award of domicile‑based bonus marks in appointments of primary school teachers in Rajasthan. Earlier judgments (Kailash Chand Sharma and Manmohan Sharma) had declared such bonus marks unconstitutional and applied the doctrine of prospective overruling, li…
MOONS TECHNOLOGIES LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGIES INDIA LTD.) & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA
2019 INSC 59730 April 2019Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the Central Government's order under Section 396 of the Companies Act, 1956 that compulsorily amalgamated 63 Moons Technologies Ltd. (FTIL) with its wholly‑owned subsidiary National Spot Exchange Ltd. (NSEL). The Court held that the order was ultra vires because the statutory conditions prece…
SWARNALATHA & ORS.versusKALAVATHY & ORS.
2022 INSC 37230 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The married couple Mannar Reddiar and Adhilakshmiammal executed separate wills bequeathing their properties to their two sons, excluding their daughter Kalavathy who had earlier received gifts. After the death of the testators, the daughter and the second son filed a suit for partition and contested the probate of the …
IN RE: TO ISSUE CERTAIN GUIDELINES REGARDING INADEQUACIES AND DEFICIENCIES IN CRIMINAL TRIALSversus.
2017 INSC 30130 March 2017Directions issued
During a hearing of Criminal Appeal No.400/2006, Senior Counsel Mr. R. Basant highlighted several common inadequacies in criminal trial procedures, such as lack of standardized witness and exhibit lists, poor recording of depositions, and inconsistent referencing of parties and evidence. He urged the Supreme Court to i…
STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.versusBRIJESHWAR SINGH CHAHAL & ANR.
2016 INSC 28730 March 2016Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether the Punjab and Haryana governments could be challenged for appointing law officers without a transparent, merit‑based process, alleging arbitrariness violative of Art.14 of the Constitution. The petitioners, who were law officers on contract, claimed that the States had no realistic a…
R. MOHAJAN & ORS.versusSHEFALI SENGUPTA & ORS.
2012 INSC 15530 March 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents, transferred to the Indian Railways, sought seniority and promotion benefits under a 2005 order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT). The department allegedly failed to fully implement the order, prompting the respondents to file a contempt petition before the CAT, which in 2010 directed the app…
STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusREKHA RANI
2011 INSC 23830 March 2011Appeal(s) allowed
MINERAL AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ETC.versusM/S. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ORS.
2011 INSC 23730 March 2011Matter referred to larger bench
The Supreme Court, hearing a civil appeal filed by the Mineral Area Development Authority against the Steel Authority of India, noted a conflict between two earlier decisions—one by a five‑Judge Bench in State of West Bengal v. Kesoram Industries Ltd. and another by a seven‑Judge Bench in India Cement Ltd. v. State of …
PARIMAL KUMAR & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.
2025 INSC 13430 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, who had passed the Jharkhand Teacher Eligibility Test (JTET) under the 2022 Recruitment Rules, challenged a High Court order that allowed candidates who cleared the Central Teacher Eligibility Test (CTET) or neighbouring states' Teacher Eligibility Tests (STET) to participate in the ongoing recruitment …
AMIT KUMAR DAS, JOINT SECRETARY, BAITANIK, A REGISTERED SOCIETYversusSHRIMATI HUTHEESINGH TAGORE CHARITABLE TRUST
2024 INSC 7330 January 2024Case Partly allowed
The Trust obtained a decree for possession of premises occupied by the Society, but the High Court stayed execution pending the Society's appeal and imposed a conditional stay requiring deposits and a status‑quo. The Society later let out the premises for exhibitions, violating the stay conditions, leading the Trust to…
SHATRUGHNA ATMARAM PATIL & ORS.versusVINOD DODHU CHAUDHARY & ANR.
2024 INSC 7530 January 2024
The deceased owner of a property allegedly named his tenants as abettors in a suicide note, leading the police to detain the tenants and demolish the premises with the help of the deceased's relatives. The two tenants filed complaints under Section 156(3) of the Cr.P.C., which were initially mishandled by the magistrat…
SUNIL SAINI & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
2023 INSC 71530 January 2023Disposed off
The petitioners, who were witnesses to a 2016 Jat community agitation in Haryana that involved arson and loss of life, alleged that the trial in Jhajjar was compromised by the influence of a powerful advocate, threats to witnesses, and a biased prosecuting team. They filed a transfer petition under Article 139A(2) of t…
CHAIRMAN/MANAGING DIRECTOR, U.P. POWER CORPORATION LTD. & OTHERSversusRAM GOPAL
2020 INSC 10930 January 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd. (UPPCL) cancelled the results of a 1978 recruitment for Class IV posts after discovering irregularities, terminating all appointees including Ram Gopal and Shyam Behari Lal. Shyam Behari Lal obtained relief from the Allahabad High Court on equitable grounds, which was later set …
M.V. JAYARAJANversusHIGH COURT OF KERALA & ANR.
2015 INSC 7830 January 2015Disposed off
M.V. Jayarajan delivered a public speech in Kannur criticizing a Kerala High Court order that prohibited meetings on public roads, using language that the court deemed abusive, including calling judges "idiots" and employing the regional term "sumbhan". The High Court convicted him of criminal contempt under Section 12…
STATE OF KARNATAKAversusM/S PRO LAB & ORS. ETC.
2015 INSC 7630 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Entry 25 of Schedule VI of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, which levies tax on the processing and supply of photographs, photo prints and photo negatives. The issue centered on whether the State could tax the goods component of a works contract after the 46th…
CHARULATA BEHERAversusPRAVATI PARIDA & ORS.
2015 INSC 7930 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant and respondent No.1 both applied for the post of Anganwadi Worker in Odisha. The selection committee initially appointed the appellant, but the Sub‑Collector remanded the case on 26‑12‑2009, leading to a reconsideration where the appellant again emerged as the most eligible candidate. Respondent No.1 file…
BABUBHAI BHIMABHAI BOKHIRIA & ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
2013 INSC 6630 January 2013Case Allowed
The petitioners were added as co-accused under Section 319 of the CrPC in a murder trial that had already examined 134 witnesses. They sought a stay of the addition and of the trial, arguing that a blanket stay violated their right to a speedy trial under Article 21. The Supreme Court examined whether the stay order of…
AMANDEEP SINGH SARANversusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH
2023 INSC 102829 November 2023Disposed off
The appellant, Amandeep Singh Saran, was charged with offences including IPC Section 409, which carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment or up to ten years, and was being tried before the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) of Raipur, a court that can impose at most seven years imprisonment. Having already spent ove…
STATE OF- UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERSversusSUBHASH CHANDRA JAISWAL AND OTHERS
2016 INSC 108329 November 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Uttar Pradesh challenged a writ petition filed under Art.226 that sought mandamus against certain respondents for alleged violations of excise licence rules and alleged fraud. The High Court, after examining the investigation, issued a series of sweeping directions ordering the creation of a separate inves…
RAVINDRA RAMCHANDRA WAGHMAREversusINDORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS.
2016 INSC 107529 November 2016Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined challenges by landowners to the Municipal Corporations of Bhopal and Indore who, under Section 305 of the Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1956, issued notices to remove or set back building portions projecting beyond the regular line of a public street for a Bus Rapid Transit System…
AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKET COMMITTEEversusBIOTOR INDUSTRIES LTD. & ANR.
2013 INSC 80029 November 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) filed a special civil application seeking to levy market fee on Biotor Industries Ltd for its purchase of castor seeds and to declare Rule 48(2) of the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Rules, 1965 ultra vires of Sections 28A and 59 of the Gujarat Agricultural Produce…
SARABJEET SINGH MOKHAversusTHE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, JABALPUR & ORS.
2021 INSC 70229 October 2021Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a hospital director, was detained under the National Security Act (NSA) on 12 May 2021 for allegedly procuring fake Remdesivir injections. He filed a representation against the detention on 18 May 2021, which was communicated to the State and Central Governments, but the authorities delayed considering i…
TOFAN SINGHversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU
2020 INSC 62029 October 2020Directions issued
The Supreme Court considered whether officers invested with powers under Section 53 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) are 'police officers' within the meaning of Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and whether a statement recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act can be use…
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.versusHEEM SINGH
2020 INSC 62129 October 2020Appeal(s) allowed
Heem Singh, a Rajasthan police constable, was dismissed after a departmental enquiry found him guilty of misconduct for allegedly committing murder while on leave. He had been acquitted of the murder charge in a criminal trial because key witnesses turned hostile and the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasona…
KALPANA VYASversusRAJ KUMAR RANGWANI
2018 INSC 101229 October 2018Leave Granted & Allowed
The appellant, a landlady, sought eviction of her tenant under Section 9 of the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, claiming a bona‑fide need to use the premises for construction for her children and guests. The Rent Tribunal dismissed the petition, holding the landlady could meet her need elsewhere, but the Rent Appellate Tri…
S. MAHESHversusTHE CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPORATION LTD. NEYVELI TAMIL NADU & ORS.
2018 INSC 101529 October 2018Leave Granted & Allowed
S. Mahesh, a Scheduled Caste candidate, was appointed by Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. (NLC) but could not produce his original caste certificate. He informed the corporation and asked to be treated as a general‑category candidate; the corporation accepted, allowed him to join service and later promoted him. Years l…
POONAMversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
2015 INSC 81329 October 2015Dismissed
The appellant, a visually‑handicapped allottee of a fair‑price shop, challenged an appellate order that restored the original allottee's licence and cancelled her own allotment. The High Court dismissed her writ petition on the ground that she was not a necessary party. The Supreme Court examined whether a subsequent a…
RATHNAVATHI & ANOTHERversusKAVITA GANASHAMDAS
2014 INSC 75129 October 2014Disposed off
The plaintiff entered into a 1989 agreement to purchase a house from defendant No.2, paid the full consideration, but the seller failed to execute the sale deed. The plaintiff filed two suits: one for permanent injunction to prevent dispossession by defendant No.1 and No.2, and another for specific performance of the s…
AJMER VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM & ORSversusNAVIN KUMAR SAINI ETC.
2010 INSC 75329 October 2010Case Partly allowed
The respondents were initially appointed as work‑charge helpers in 1979 and later selected as Junior Clerks in 1984 after a limited competitive exam. They claimed that, having performed the duties of Junior Clerks, they were entitled to the Junior Clerk pay scale retroactively from 1979 and from 1 April 1982, invoking …
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. AND ORS.versusDIBYENDU BHATTACHARYA
2010 INSC 75129 October 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a Speech Therapist/Audiologist appointed in the non‑executive S‑6 grade at Durgapur Steel Plant, sought parity in pay and cadre with a senior employee (B.V. Prabhakar) holding an executive E‑1 grade at Rourkela Steel Plant. The company rejected the claim, citing its personnel manual which allows each pl…
STATE OF U.P. & ORS.versusBHUPENDRA NATH TRIPATHI & ORS.
2010 INSC 75929 October 2010Dismissed
The State of Uttar Pradesh issued an order restricting eligibility for the Special Basic Training Course (BTC) 2007 to candidates whose B.Ed. degrees were from institutions recognized by the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE). Several candidates whose degrees were from institutions that were later recognized…
M/S PRIME PROPERTIESversusSANA LAKSHMI DEVI (DIED) THROUGH HER LRS. & ORS.
2022 INSC 104129 September 2022Disposed off
The case involved a series of civil suits filed in 2001 that had been repeatedly amended and impleaded, leading to a long pendency. The plaintiff sought to file a rejoinder after the defendants had filed written statements, but the trial court initially rejected the application, later allowing it on review. The High Co…
XversusTHE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
2022 INSC 74029 September 2022Disposed off
The appellant, an unmarried woman in a consensual relationship, sought to terminate a 22‑week pregnancy under Section 3(2)(b) of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act and Rule 3B of the MTP Rules. The Delhi High Court held that Rule 3B applied only to married women and denied the relief, prompting a Special Le…
RAMGOPAL & ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2021 INSC 56829 September 2021Disposed off
The appellants were convicted of offences under the IPC and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention) Act for assaulting the complainants in separate incidents in 2000 and 1995. After the convictions, the parties entered into amicable settlements, and the appellants sought to have the non‑compoundable offe…
THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & ORS.versusSHAHEENA MASARAT & ANR.
2021 INSC 57329 September 2021Disposed off
The State of Jammu & Kashmir sought to appoint a Re‑T (teaching guide) under its Rehbar‑e‑Taleem scheme. An advertisement dated 29‑Nov‑2002 stipulated an upper age limit of 35 years as on 1‑Jan‑2002, with the phrase "as far as possible" regarding age qualification. Respondent No.2, born on 28‑Dec‑1965, was selected des…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.versusAMIT SHRIVAS
2020 INSC 56529 September 2020Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Amit Shrivas claimed a compassionate appointment after his father, a work‑charged driver, died in service; the father had become a permanent employee after 15 years but was still paid from the contingency fund. The 2008 Madhya Pradesh policy excluded work‑charged/contingency employees from compassionate a…
JAMALUDDINversusSTATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND ORS.
2011 INSC 72529 September 2011Dismissed
Jamal Uddin, a Scheduled Tribe candidate born on 31‑01‑1965, applied for a regular Munsif post in Jammu & Kashmir after serving as an adhoc Munsif. The 2002 Public Service Commission notification required candidates to be not more than 35 years old as of 1 January of the examination year, and his application was reject…
M/S. ROYAL ORCHID HOTELS LIMITED AND ANOTHERversusG. JAYARAM REDDY AND ORS.
2011 INSC 72629 September 2011Dismissed
The Karnataka State Tourism Development Corporation acquired 37 acres of land for a golf‑cum‑hotel resort under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, but later transferred portions of the land to private entities. Several landowners challenged the acquisition, alleging fraud and diversion of public purpose. The High Court, a…
M/S TARACHAND LOGISTIC SOLUTIONS LIMITEDversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ORS.
2025 INSC 105229 August 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a logistics company, was awarded a contract to handle and store iron and steel at the central dispatch yard of Visakhapatnam Steel Plant (RINL) and deployed 36 motor vehicles exclusively within the enclosed premises. It sought exemption from motor vehicle tax under Section 3 of the Andhra Pradesh Motor V…
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT, JODHPUR & ANR.versusNEETU HARSH & ANR.
2019 INSC 97829 August 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The Rajasthan High Court had directed the state to consider a candidate, who had applied for a Civil Judge post as a General category applicant and paid the general fee, for one of the two vacancies reserved for persons with disabilities after she later claimed visual impairment based on a disability certificate showin…
ASHRAF KOKKURversusK.V. ABDUL KHADER ETC.
2014 INSC 57529 August 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, K.V. Abdul Khader, was Chairperson of the Kerala State Wakf Board and was elected to the Kerala Legislative Assembly. The appellant, Ashraf Kokkurr, filed an election petition alleging that the respondent was disqualified under Article 191(1)(a) of the Constitution because he held an office of profit. T…
SALAUDDIN AHMED & ANR.versusSAMTA ANDOLAN
2012 INSC 35929 August 2012Appeal(s) allowed
The Rajasthan Government issued notifications granting reservation in promotion for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, which were later quashed by the Rajasthan High Court because the State had not complied with the quantifiable data requirements laid down in M. Nagaraj's case. General‑category employees filed civi…
MOHAMMED AJMAL MOHAMMAD AMIR KASAB @ ABU MUJAHIDversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2012 INSC 35729 August 2012Dismissed
The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab, was one of ten Pakistani terrorists who launched a coordinated attack on Mumbai on November 26, 2008, killing 166 people and injuring 238. He was convicted by the trial court on multiple charges including waging war against the Government of India, murder, and terroris…
MD. MURTAZA & ORS.versusSTATE OF ASSAM & ORS.
2011 INSC 62029 August 2011
The appellants, wholesale vegetable and fruit vendors, were ordered by the Gauhati High Court to vacate the Machkhowa market in Guwahati to make way for an administrative building, and were directed to shift to a new market at Ganeshguri. They challenged the order, claiming a violation of their fundamental right to car…
SUKHDEV YADAV @ PEHALWANversusSTATE OF (NCT OF DELHI) & OTHERS
2025 INSC 96929 July 2025Disposed off
The appellant Sukhdev Yadav was convicted of murder, kidnapping and related offences and sentenced to life imprisonment fixed at twenty years without remission, along with fines. After serving the full twenty‑year term on 9 March 2025, he sought release but the Delhi High Court had earlier denied his furlough applicati…
AJWARversusWASEEM AND ANOTHER R1: WASEEM R2: STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2025 INSC 96829 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Ajwar filed a criminal appeal challenging a bail order granted by the Allahabad High Court to respondent No.1, Waseem, who had been repeatedly granted and then cancelled bail by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court had earlier cancelled the bail on two occasions, directing that any future bail could be so…
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA & ORS.versusJAGDEV SINGH
2016 INSC 56429 July 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a judicial officer, opted for a revised pay scale under the Haryana Civil Services (Judicial Branch) and Haryana Superior Judicial Service Revised Pay Rules 2001 and gave an undertaking to refund any excess salary. After his compulsory retirement, the pay rules were revised again in 2003, and an audit s…
YAKUB ABDUL RAZAK MEMONversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS
2015 INSC 53429 July 2015Dismissed
The petitioner, convicted under the 1993 Bombay bomb blasts and sentenced to death by a TADA court, sought a writ under Article 32 to stay the execution of the death warrant dated 30 April 2015, alleging procedural irregularities and that his curative petition had not been decided by a bench constituted as per Supreme …
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusMIS. N.S. RATHNAM & SONS
2015 INSC 52929 July 2015Disposed off
The Union of India challenged the validity of Notification Nos.102/87‑CE and 103/87‑CE which granted exemption from excise duty on iron and steel scrap from ship‑breaking only to importers who had paid customs duty at Rs.1,400 per Light Displacement Tonnage (LDT). The respondent, N.S. Rathnam & Sons, had paid a lower c…
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusMAHAVEER C. SINGHVI
2010 INSC 45229 July 2010Dismissed
Mahaveer C. Singhvi, an Indian Foreign Service probationer appointed in 1999, was discharged on 13 June 2002. He challenged the discharge before the Central Administrative Tribunal, the Delhi High Court, and finally this Court, alleging that the order was punitive, based on alleged misconduct uncovered through a secret…
G. MOHAN RAO & ORS.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.
2021 INSC 31129 June 2021Dismissed
The Tamil Nadu legislature enacted three land‑acquisition statutes (1978, 1997 and 2001) which were later held repugnant to the Central Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The Madras High Court declared the three state statutes void and quashed acq…
BIKRAM CHATTERJI & ORSversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2021 INSC 31329 June 2021Disposed off
The Supreme Court considered several interim applications concerning the La‑Residentia residential project, which was marketed as an Amrapali Group development promising delivery within 36 months. After a forensic audit, the Court had earlier ordered that 19.75% of the project (632 flats) be surrendered to the Amrapali…
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.versusLAL SINGH @ MANJIT SINGH & ORS.
2016 INSC 46329 June 2016Appeal(s) allowed
Lal Singh, convicted under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act and sentenced to life imprisonment, applied for premature release under CrPC ss.432 and 433 after being transferred to a Punjab jail. The Gujarat Government rejected his application; the Punjab High Court directed Gujarat to reconsider …
SAMBHAVANAversusUNIVERSITY OF DELHI
2013 INSC 36429 May 2013Disposed off
The appellant organisation Sambhavna filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the University of Delhi to introduce bridge and foundation courses, provide accessible reading material, train teachers, and include disability representatives in university bodies for visually impaired students. The University resp…
THE SECRETARY, MIN.OF DEFENCE & ORS.versusPRABHASH CHANDRA MIRDHA
2012 INSC 25229 May 2012Disposed off
The case concerned an Assistant Foreman of an Ordnance Factory who was served a charge memo alleging bribery and challenged the disciplinary proceedings on the ground that the charge memo was issued by an authority subordinate to his appointing authority. The Central Administrative Tribunal quashed the charge memo, a d…
RUTU MIHIR PANCHAL & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2025 INSC 59329 April 2025Disposed off
The petitioners challenged the constitutionality of sections 34(1), 47(1)(a)(i) and 58(1)(a)(i) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which base the pecuniary jurisdiction of district, state and national consumer commissions on the value of consideration paid rather than the compensation claimed. The challenge arose fr…
ARATHY RAMACHANDRANversusBIJAY RAJ MENON
2025 INSC 58729 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The mother, a working professional, filed a petition seeking permanent custody of her two minor children, alleging the father might forcibly remove them. The Family Court restrained the father and granted limited visitation, which the father appealed. The High Court then ordered a 15‑day monthly interim custody for eac…
K. VALARMATHI & ORS.versusKUMARESAN
2025 INSC 60629 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, legal heirs of the deceased Kathiresan, filed suits seeking declaration of title and injunction over a suit land purchased by Kathiresan. The respondent, a relative, invoked Article 227 of the Constitution before the Madras High Court, seeking rejection of the plaints on the ground that they were barred…
A (MOTHER OF X)versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
2024 INSC 37129 April 2024Disposed off
A 14‑year‑old girl, X, who alleged sexual assault, became pregnant and sought termination of her pregnancy beyond the statutory 24‑week limit. The High Court denied the request, relying on a clarificatory opinion of a medical board that did not assess the impact on X's physical and mental health. The Supreme Court set …
WAQF BOARD, RAJASTHANversusJINDAL SAW LIMITED & ORS
2022 INSC 49329 April 2022Dismissed
The Rajasthan Waqf Board claimed that a structure identified as the Qalandari Masjid on Tiranga Hill was a waqf religious site situated within Survey No. 6731, which had been leased to Jindal Saw Ltd for mining. The High Court allowed the mining lease to proceed, prompting the Board to appeal. The Supreme Court examine…
DINESH KUMAR GUPTA AND OTHERSversusHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF RAJASTHAN OTHERS
2020 INSC 37629 April 2020Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined multiple writ petitions challenging the seniority and appointment of judicial officers in Rajasthan's District Judge cadre after the 2010 Judicial Service Rules came into force. The petitioners argued that officers promoted ad‑hoc to Fast Track Courts should retain seniority from their initia…
HINDUSTAN SANITARYWARE AND INDUSTRIES LTD. & OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF HARYANA
2019 INSC 58429 April 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Haryana issued notifications under Section 5(2) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 fixing and revising minimum rates of wages, including provisions that classified unskilled workers as semi‑skilled after a certain period of experience, prohibited segregation of wages into allowances, included security staff as…
M/S. ESCORTS LTD.versusCOMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, FARIDABAD
2015 INSC 37129 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether the transmission assembly, an intermediate component produced during the manufacture of tractors by M/s. Escorts Ltd., attracted excise duty under the Central Excise and Salt Act. The Court held that transmission assemblies are distinct, commercially known products and therefore quali…
K. MADHAVA REDDY & ORS.versusGOVT. OF A.P. & ORS.
2014 INSC 35129 April 2014Disposed off
The employees of the Andhra Pradesh Labour Department challenged G.O.M. No.14 (1994) and No.22 (1996) which allowed promotion by transfer to the post of Assistant Labour Officer. The State Administrative Tribunal struck down those G.O.M.s as ultra vires the Presidential Order but held the striking down to be prospectiv…
PINAK PANI MOHANTYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2023 INSC 32029 March 2023Disposed off
The Union of India, through the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, sought Supreme Court directions to transfer Rs 5,000 crore from the unutilized balance of Rs 24,979.67 crore lying in the "Sahara‑SEBI Refund Account" to the Central Registrar of Cooperative Societies for disbursement to the genuine depositors of the Sahara…
BALU SUDAM KHALDE & ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2023 INSC 31429 March 2023Dismissed
The appellants were convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC for the murder of Abbas Baig, based primarily on the oral testimony of three eyewitnesses. They challenged the conviction, arguing that the eyewitness evidence was unreliable, that the defence counsel's suggestions during cross‑examination …
CENTRAL BANK OF LNDIAversusM. SETHUMADHAVAN & ORS.
2017 INSC 28929 March 2017Disposed off
The Central Bank of India and other nationalised banks (appellants) challenged the validity of a cut‑off date they fixed for calculating gratuity payable to retired employees (respondents) under their Regulation 46. The respondents argued that the cut‑off date, which limited the benefit of revised pay scales to retiree…
P. SESHADRIversusS. MANGATI GOPAL REDDY AND ORS.
2011 INSC 23329 March 2011Appeal(s) allowed
The Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam (TTD) Board extended the service of retired Parpathedar P. Seshadri on a contract basis beyond the age of sixty. Respondent S. Mangati Gopal Reddy filed a writ petition, styled as a public‑interest litigation, alleging that the extensions violated Rule 13 of the TTD Service Rules, 198…
RAMDAS ATHAWALEversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2010 INSC 17729 March 2010Dismissed
Ramdas Athawale, a Lok Sabha member, filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the validity of the Lok Sabha's resumption on 29 January 2004, arguing that the President’s special address under Article 87 was required because it was the first session of the year. The Court held that the December 2003 session wa…
VEDANTA LIMITEDversusTHE STATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS
2024 INSC 17529 February 2024Dismissed
Vedanta Limited operates a copper smelter at the SIPCOT industrial complex in Thoothukudi, Tamil Nadu. The Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board and the State Government ordered its closure for repeated violations of environmental norms, including operating without consent, improper hazardous waste management, and dumping…
HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION, ALLAHABADversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
2024 INSC 15029 February 2024Reference answered
The Supreme Court was asked to consider whether, under its Article 142 powers, it could issue blanket directions that all interim stays granted by High Courts should automatically lapse after six months and that High Courts must dispose of such cases on a day‑to‑day basis. The Court examined the object of interim order…
THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, M.P.versusS.K. DUBEY & ANR.
2012 INSC 12229 February 2012Matter referred to larger bench
The case concerned a former High Court judge who, after retirement, served as President of the Madhya Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission for nearly five years. He claimed pension for that period based on a 2002 executive order of the State Government, although the Madhya Pradesh Consumer Protection Ru…
DR. TANVI BEHLversusSHREY GOEL & ORS.
2025 INSC 12529 January 2025Disposed off
The case concerned the Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh, which reserved 64 postgraduate (PG) medical seats under its State quota – 32 for candidates who had studied at the college (institutional preference) and 32 for candidates deemed "residents" of Chandigarh based on broad residence criteria. The …
NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAUversusLAKHWINDER SINGH
2025 INSC 19029 January 2025Dismissed
The Narcotic Control Bureau appealed against a High Court order that suspended the ten‑year rigorous imprisonment sentence of Lakhwinder Singh, convicted under the NDPS Act, and granted him bail pending appeal after he had served 4½ years. The issue was whether the appellate court could grant such relief when the convi…
M.S. SANJAYversusINDIAN BANK & ORS.
2025 INSC 17729 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant purchased a mortgaged property at an auction conducted on 31 July 2007 and received a sale certificate on 30 November 2007, thereafter developing the property. The guarantor of the original borrower challenged the auction before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, which set aside the sale; the decision was later …
SHANKAR LAL SHARMAversusRAJESH KOOLWAL & ORS.
2025 INSC 20029 January 2025Disposed off
Shankar Lal Sharma, a 73‑year‑old man of limited means, filed a Special Leave Petition against Rajesh Koolwal & Ors. The Court appointed Sanchar Anand as amicus curiae, who represented the petitioner pro bono on fourteen occasions. The Court examined the duty of advocates to assist indigent litigants and the broader co…
AJAY MALIKversusSTATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR.
2025 INSC 11829 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from FIR No. 60/2017 alleging wrongful confinement, trafficking and conspiracy against Ajay Malik for employing a tribal domestic worker. Malik sought quashing of the criminal proceedings and compounding of the offences, supported by a no‑objection affidavit from the complainant, while the State opposed …
MANJIT AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
2021 INSC 4929 January 2021Dismissed
The petitioners, wards of serving railway employees, sought appointment under the Largess Scheme, which allowed entry into railway service without competitive examination. The Punjab and Haryana High Court and the Supreme Court had earlier directed the Union of India to reconsider the scheme on constitutional grounds. …
SHRIPAL BHATI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
2020 INSC 10229 January 2020Dismissed
The New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) appointed respondent No.4 as Project Engineer (Electrical) on deputation from the U.P. Power Corporation in February 2014 and later absorbed him in May 2015. The appellants, who were Assistant Project Engineers, challenged the appointment and absorption, arguing th…
MUKESH KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
2020 INSC 10329 January 2020Dismissed
Mukesh Kumar, a death‑row convict in the Nirbhaya gang‑rape case, filed a mercy petition under Articles 72 and 161 of the Constitution, which was rejected by the Lieutenant Governor on 15 January 2020 and by the President on 17 January 2020. He challenged the rejection before the Supreme Court, alleging that relevant m…
SUSHILA AGGARWAL AND OTHERSversusSTATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANOTHER
2020 INSC 10629 January 2020Directions issued
The Supreme Court examined two questions referred to a larger bench: whether an order of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) must be limited to a fixed period, and whether such bail terminates when the accused is summoned or when charges are framed. Relying on the Constitution Benc…
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE DHQPO NEW DELHI & ORS.versusWG. CDR. SUBRATA DAS (19942-H)
2019 INSC 10329 January 2019Disposed off
Four Indian Air Force officers were granted Premature Separation from Service (PSS) under the Air Force Human Resource Policy, subsequently withdrew their requests and sought to continue in service. The Air Headquarters rejected their withdrawal applications, citing Paragraph 18 of the policy which permits withdrawal o…
HIRANDRA KUMARversusHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD & ANR.
2019 INSC 11129 January 2019Dismissed
The petitioners applied for direct recruitment to the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service (UPHJS) but were debarred because they exceeded the age ceiling prescribed in Rule 12 of the UP Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. They challenged the constitutional validity of Rule 8(1), which mandates recruitment at interva…
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusSALEENA
2016 INSC 11129 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the detention of Abdu Rahiman under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA). The detenu filed a representation against his detention, which was rejected by the competent authority; the rejection was communicated to him by an under‑secretary rat…
COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALAversusMIS K.T.C. AUTOMOBILES
2016 INSC 10629 January 2016Dismissed
The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes of Kerala challenged a penalty of Rs.86 lakh imposed on K.T.C. Automobiles for allegedly evading Kerala sales tax by registering 263 cars sold from its Mahe branch under the Pondicherry Sales Tax Act. The High Court set aside the penalty, holding that the sale was completed at Mahe …
JAI PRAKASHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS
2019 INSC 129428 November 2019Dismissed
The case concerned the murder of Ravi Prakash, alleged to have been committed by accused Nos.1, 2 and 4 under Sections 302 and 120B IPC. The trial court convicted the three accused based on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses and medical evidence, but the High Court acquitted them, finding material inconsistencies in th…
THE ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS.versusPRANJAL KUMAR SARMA & ORS.
2019 INSC 129728 November 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The Assam Public Service Commission (APSC) advertised 65 Assistant Engineer (Civil) posts on 21‑12‑2018 and conducted a screening test on 30‑06‑2019 under the 2010 Rules, which did not provide for negative marking. The APSC later introduced a new 2019 Procedure effective 01‑04‑2019, containing Clause 12.2 that purporte…
R. R. INAMDARversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
2019 INSC 129828 November 2019Disposed off
The appellant, R.R. Inamdar, a Scheduled Caste teacher, was promoted to the solitary post of Lecturer in English in a Karnataka school based on roster points. The senior fifth respondent, who was appointed earlier, challenged the appointment, arguing that reservation under Article 16(4) could not apply to a solitary po…
M/S DEEP INDUSTRIES LIMITEDversusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR.
2019 INSC 129928 November 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Deep Industries Ltd, was contractually terminated by ONGC for allegedly supplying second‑hand equipment and was subsequently black‑listed for two years. The dispute was referred to arbitration, where the arbitrator stayed the blacklist order conditionally, and the first appeal under Section 37 was dismis…
S.K. RATTANversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2013 INSC 79328 November 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a Deputy Superintendent of Police in the CBI, was transferred by executive order to the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) in 1988. While his pay was initially protected, a later pay revision granted to his CBI batchmates was not extended to him, resulting in a lower salary and pension. The appellant s…
DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINGHversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2020 INSC 61428 October 2020Disposed off
The appellants, holders of mining leases in Sonbhadra, Uttar Pradesh, sought extension of their leases for periods during which mining was prohibited by orders of the National Green Tribunal and subsequent state notifications. The State argued that neither the Uttar Pradesh Mining Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963 nor …
KRISHNANAND (D) THROUGH. LRS.versusDEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION & ORS.
2014 INSC 102028 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute concerned the ownership of Khata No. 201 in Sultanpur, where Kamla Devi claimed a share inherited from her father Ram Samujh, while Krishna Nand and Shiv Ram asserted title based on a 1938 purchase recorded in their uncle Ram Adhar's name. Three consolidation authorities under the Uttar Pradesh Consolidatio…
MALOOK SINGH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
2021 INSC 56628 September 2021Disposed off
The appellants were appointed as clerks on an ad hoc basis in 1975‑76 and were regularized on 3 May 1977 with seniority backdated to 1 April 1977. A 1991 writ petition had granted them seniority by counting their ad hoc service, but the High Court later redrew the seniority list excluding ad hoc periods, a decision cha…
INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSN.versusSTATE OF KERALA 561 INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION & ORS.V. THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS.
2017 INSC 104028 September 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court of India, by a 4:1 majority, struck down the practice of excluding women aged 10 to 50 from the Sabarimala temple in Kerala. The Court held that the devotees of Lord Ayyappa do not constitute a separate religious denomination under Article 26 of the Constitution. The exclusionary practice was found no…
SPEAKER HARYANA VIDHAN SABHAversusKULDEEP BISHNOI & ORS.
2012 INSC 43728 September 2012Disposed off
Five Haryana MLAs merged with the Indian National Congress and the Speaker accepted the merger. Kuldeep Bishnoi filed disqualification petitions under Article 191 and the Tenth Schedule, alleging the merger violated paragraph 4(1). The High Court, invoking Order 41 Rule 33 CPC, directed the Speaker to decide the petiti…
MANUBHAI RATILAL PATEL TR. USHABENversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
2012 INSC 43828 September 2012Dismissed
An FIR for offences under sections 467, 468, 471, 409 and 114 IPC was filed against the appellant. He sought quashing of the FIR and a stay of investigation under Section 482 CrPC, but was arrested before the stay order took effect. The magistrate remanded him to police custody and later to judicial custody. The High C…
IN RE: MEPUNG TADAR BAGE, MEMBER, ARUNACHAL PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION versus
2025 INSC 104728 August 2025Reference answered
The President of India referred a matter under Article 317(1) of the Constitution seeking the removal of Ms. Mepung Tadar Bage, a member of the Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission (APPSC), alleging misbehaviour in connection with the leakage of the Assistant Engineer (Civil) Mains Examination question paper in …
PRADHAN BABU AND OTHERSversusNACHIMUTHU NAGAR KUDIYIRUPPOR NALA SANGAM AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 104728 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute concerned a 11,200 sq ft parcel in Nachimuthu Nagar that was earmarked for public purpose in a layout plan approved in 1978 and revised in 1981 under the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act. After the original owner, Nachimuthu Mudaliar, died in 2004, his heirs sold the land to the appellants in 2009 a…
K. NIRMALA & ORS.versusCANARA BANK & ANR.
2024 INSC 63428 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were appointed by Canara Bank and other central government undertakings in the Scheduled Caste category based on caste certificates issued under Karnataka state circulars that listed their community as a synonymous Scheduled Caste. After the Supreme Court’s decision in State of Maharashtra v. Milind, the…
UNION OF INDIAversusASHOK KUMAR SHARMA AND OTHERS
2020 INSC 51728 August 2020Disposed off
The Union of India challenged a High Court order that quashed an FIR registered under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for the alleged sale of unlicensed drugs, holding that prosecution for offences under Chapter IV of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 must be initiated only by persons named in Section 32 of the A…
COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX,versusM/S. ADANI GAS LTD.
2020 INSC 51328 August 2020Dismissed
The Commissioner of Service Tax appealed against M/s. Adani Gas Ltd. challenging the taxability of charges collected for supplying pipelines and measurement (SKID) equipment to gas consumers. The issue was whether Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994 applied, i.e., whether the supply of such tangible goods f…
PRANEETH K. AND ORS.versusUNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION (UGC) AND ORS.
2020 INSC 51928 August 2020Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined a batch of writ petitions challenging the University Grants Commission (UGC) guidelines dated 06 July 2020, which required all Indian universities to complete final year examinations by 30 September 2020 amid the COVID‑19 pandemic. Petitioners argued that the guidelines were ultra‑violet of A…
STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.versusLORD NORTHBOOK AND ORS.
2019 INSC 96928 August 2019Matter referred to larger bench
The testator, Raja Sardar Singh, died in 1987 without apparent legal heirs and had executed a will bequeathing his assets to the Khetri Trust. The Trust sought probate, which was dismissed by the Delhi High Court, while agnates also objected. The Rajasthan Collector, after an inquiry, initiated escheat proceedings unde…
MAR KOORILOS (DEAD) AND ANR. ETC.versusM. PAPPY (DEAD) AND ANOTHER ETC.
2018 INSC 75028 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, the Metropolitan of Quilon Diocese and a Vicar appointed by him, sued the parishioners of St. Mary's Church, Kattachira, seeking a declaration that they alone have the right to conduct religious services and manage the church and its cemetery, based on an assignment‑cum‑gift deed (Ext‑A3). The trial cou…
SAMAJ PARIVARTANA SAMUDAYA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
2017 INSC 81628 August 2017Disposed off
The Supreme Court considered an interlocutory application filed by the Federation of Indian Industries (Southern Region) seeking permission to sell iron‑ore and manganese‑ore in Karnataka without the e‑auction mechanism overseen by the Court‑appointed Monitoring Committee. The Court examined the past experience of ille…
NARAYAN MANIKRAO SALGARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2012 INSC 35428 August 2012Case Partly allowed
The appellants were convicted under Sections 148, 302 read with 149, 341, and 323 of the IPC for the death of Khushal Salgar. The prosecution relied on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses, a dying declaration, and forensic evidence. The Supreme Court examined whether the evidence established a common object to cause mur…
CHIRAG SEN AND ANOTHER ETC.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER
2025 INSC 90328 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, prominent badminton players and their coach, were accused in a private complaint of falsifying birth records to gain entry into age‑restricted tournaments, leading to the registration of an FIR under Sections 420, 468, 471 and 34 IPC. The complaint relied mainly on an unauthenticated 1996 GPF nomination…
VERNONversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
2023 INSC 65528 July 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from the Bhima‑Koregaon violence of December 2017, after which the National Investigation Agency (NIA) expanded the investigation, searched the residences of several activists and arrested Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira. The prosecution alleged that the two were members of the banned CPI (Maoist) and…
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANRversusB. R. MURALIDHAR & ORS.
2022 INSC 76128 July 2022Disposed off
The State of Karnataka issued a land acquisition notification under Section 17 of the Karnataka Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1973. The petitioners challenged the notification on grounds of inadequate consideration of objections, alleged lapse of the acquisition process, and the constitutionality of Secti…
THE STATE OF KERALAversusK. AJITH & ORS.
2021 INSC 36628 July 2021Dismissed
During the 2015 Kerala budget presentation, several opposition MLAs climbed onto the Speaker's dais and damaged furniture, leading to a criminal case under IPC sections 427, 447, 34 and the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. The public prosecutor sought to withdraw the prosecution under Section 321 of t…
YAKUB ABDUL RAZAK MEMONversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT AND ORS.
2015 INSC 52728 July 2015Matter referred to larger bench
The petitioner Yakub Abdulrazak Memon, whose death sentence under the TADA Act had been confirmed by the Supreme Court, filed a review petition and a curative petition challenging the order dated 9 April 2015. The curative petition was considered by a bench of the three senior-most judges, but not by the judges who had…
ANAND SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2010 INSC 44328 July 2010Dismissed
The Gorakhpur Development Authority (GOA) sought to acquire land for a residential colony and, under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, invoked the urgency clause of Section 17(4) to dispense with the mandatory Section 5A enquiry. The appellants, land owners, challenged the validity of this dispensation, arguing that no m…
CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATIONversusREGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 78628 May 2025Disposed off
The Chandigarh Administration appealed against several orders of the Punjab and Haryana High Court that directed the construction of a verandah in front of Court Room No.1 of the High Court and the laying of green paver blocks in a kutcha parking area. The Administration argued that the verandah could jeopardise the UN…
BINDU KAPUREAversusSUBHASHISH PANDA & ORS.
2025 INSC 78428 May 2025
The Supreme Court examined the Delhi Development Authority's (DDA) unauthorised felling of over a thousand trees in the Delhi Ridge and its failure to disclose this during a hearing, despite pending applications for permission. The Court held that these actions amounted to wilful disobedience of its 1996 order in M.C. …
KARAN SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.
2013 INSC 35528 May 2013Dismissed
Karan Singh was convicted for the murder of Raj under IPC s.302, the prosecution alleging a motive of non‑payment of Rs 47,000 for a buffalo. Eye‑witnesses Maya Devi (PW‑3) and her daughter Birma (PW‑4) saw the appellant dragging the victim with a rope, and an independent witness (PW‑8) corroborated the allegation. The…
SR. TEWARIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
2013 INSC 36128 May 2013Disposed off
S.R. Tewari, an IPS officer on deputation with the BSF, was subjected to disciplinary proceedings resulting in eight charges, of which only charges 4 and 6 were held proved. The disciplinary authority initially dismissed him, the Central Administrative Tribunal reinstated him, and the Delhi High Court directed a fresh …
P. V. NIDHISH & ORS.versusKERALA STATE WAKF BOARD & ANR.
2023 INSC 45228 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, long‑time tenants of premises that later became part of a Wakf, were facing civil eviction when the Wakf Act, 1995 was amended in 2013 adding a penal provision (Section 52A) and a definition of "encroacher". The Wakf Board filed a criminal complaint under Section 52A alleging the appellants were encroac…
MATHURA VRINDAVAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANOTHERversusRAJESH SHARMA AND OTHERS
2023 INSC 44828 April 2023Disposed off
The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals filed by the Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority, other development authorities and the State of Uttar Pradesh against several writ petitions that challenged demand notices for various fees levied by the authorities under the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Ac…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusPHOOLCHAND RATHORE
2023 INSC 44428 April 2023Dismissed
The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the High Court's acquittal of Phoolchand Rathore, who had been convicted and sentenced to death for the murder of his wife under sections 302 and 201 IPC. The prosecution's case rested on alleged motive (a dispute over jewellery), a disclosure statement and recovery of blood…
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED & ANR.versusSANDEEP CHOUDHARY & ORS.
2022 INSC 48928 April 2022Dismissed
BSNL conducted a recruitment exam for Telecom Technical Assistants. Two OBC candidates (Alok Kumar Yadav and Dinesh Kumar) scored higher than the last selected general‑category candidate. The question was whether such OBC candidates must be adjusted to the general‑category pool and not counted against the OBC quota, wi…
PAWAN KUMARversusSTATE OF H.P.
2017 INSC 41528 April 2017Dismissed
The appellant, previously acquitted of kidnapping and rape offences, repeatedly threatened and teased the victim, a teenage girl, leading her to set herself ablaze and die. The victim’s dying declaration, recorded by a Head Constable in the presence of a doctor, implicated the appellant as the sole cause of her death. …
A.C. MUTHIAHversusBOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA AND ANR.
2011 INSC 33728 April 2011Matter referred to larger bench
The appellant, a former President of the BCCI, challenged an amendment to Clause 6.2.4 of the BCCI's Regulations that exempted IPL, Champions League and Twenty‑20 events from the ban on administrators having commercial interests. He argued that the amendment was made to benefit the second respondent, who as a BCCI offi…
S. KHUSHBOOversusKANNIAMMAL AND ANR.
2010 INSC 24728 April 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The actress S. Khushboo made remarks in a 2005 news‑magazine survey endorsing societal acceptance of premarital sex and live‑in relationships. Several members of the PMK political party filed criminal complaints alleging defamation, obscenity, indecent representation of women and incitement under the IPC and the Indece…
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.versusRUKMA KESH MISHRA
2025 INSC 41228 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a civil servant of Jharkhand, was dismissed after disciplinary proceedings for alleged misconduct, including financial irregularities and forgery. The draft charge‑sheet and a proposal to suspend him were placed before the Chief Minister, who approved the proposal on 21 March 2014, after which the charg…