DR. P.N. PURI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 14329 January 1996Dismissed
The petitioners, who were employees of urban local bodies, filed a writ petition seeking equal pay on par with Medical Officers at a scale of Rs. 2200‑4000 and arrears dating back to 1986. The Anomaly Committee had recommended that such employees be placed on the said pay scale, effective from 7 November 1994, and the …
LALJI KHIMJI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT
1993 INSC 2929 January 1993Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether an agreement dated 7 November 1966, entered into by the Executive Engineer (Canal Officer) of the Gujarat Irrigation Department with farmers, was binding on the State. The Court held that the agreement was a statutory compromise made under the Bombay Irrigation Act, 1879, and not a co…
INDIAN EX-SERVICES LEAGUE AND ORS. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.
1991 INSC 1629 January 1991Dismissed
Ex‑servicemen filed writ petitions under Article 32 seeking a "one rank, one pension" rule, equal death‑cum‑retirement gratuity and backward merger of dearness allowance, claiming that the Supreme Court’s decision in D.S. Nakara required the same pension for all retirees irrespective of retirement date. The petitioners…
GENERAL MANAGER (MARKETING) HINDUSTAN FERTILIZER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. & ORS.versusSUBODH CHANDRA DAS & ORS.
1988 INSC 3129 January 1988Appeal(s) allowed
Subodh Chandra Das, an operator with Hindustan Fertilizer Corporation, claimed that his date of birth recorded as 1‑June‑1931 was incorrect and sought its alteration to 20‑Oct‑1938 based on a medical certificate. The Patna High Court rejected the alteration but, citing his domestic problems, ordered that he be reappoin…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusDEWADAS & ORS.
1982 INSC 1029 January 1982Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Madhya Pradesh sought to appeal an acquittal under section 378(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, and filed an application for leave under section 378(3). By prevailing practice in the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the leave application was listed before a Single Judge under Rule 1(q) of the High Court …
A.V. NACHANE & ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER
1981 INSC 21128 December 1981Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Life Insurance Corporation (Amendment) Act 1981, the accompanying Ordinance and the Bonus and Dearness Allowance Rules, which sought to retrospectively nullify the 1974 settlements granting cash bonuses to Class III and IV employees of the Life Insurance Cor…
A. K. ROY, ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
1981 INSC 21028 December 1981Disposed off
The petitioners, including A.K. Roy, challenged the National Security Ordinance, 1980 and the subsequent National Security Act, 1980 on grounds that the President's ordinance‑making power under Article 123 is an executive power and not "law" within the meaning of Article 21, that the provisions of the Act are vague, un…
S.P. GUPTA & ORS. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC. ETC.
1981 INSC 20928 December 1981Dismissed
The case involved multiple writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of a circular letter issued by the Law Minister on March 18, 1981, seeking consent from additional judges for appointment to other High Courts, short-term extensions of additional judges, and transfers of Chief Justices. The Court address…
JAI PRAKASHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS
2019 INSC 129428 November 2019Dismissed
The case concerned the murder of Ravi Prakash, alleged to have been committed by accused Nos.1, 2 and 4 under Sections 302 and 120B IPC. The trial court convicted the three accused based on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses and medical evidence, but the High Court acquitted them, finding material inconsistencies in th…
THE ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ORS.versusPRANJAL KUMAR SARMA & ORS.
2019 INSC 129728 November 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The Assam Public Service Commission (APSC) advertised 65 Assistant Engineer (Civil) posts on 21‑12‑2018 and conducted a screening test on 30‑06‑2019 under the 2010 Rules, which did not provide for negative marking. The APSC later introduced a new 2019 Procedure effective 01‑04‑2019, containing Clause 12.2 that purporte…
R. R. INAMDARversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
2019 INSC 129828 November 2019Disposed off
The appellant, R.R. Inamdar, a Scheduled Caste teacher, was promoted to the solitary post of Lecturer in English in a Karnataka school based on roster points. The senior fifth respondent, who was appointed earlier, challenged the appointment, arguing that reservation under Article 16(4) could not apply to a solitary po…
M/S DEEP INDUSTRIES LIMITEDversusOIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LIMITED & ANR.
2019 INSC 129928 November 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Deep Industries Ltd, was contractually terminated by ONGC for allegedly supplying second‑hand equipment and was subsequently black‑listed for two years. The dispute was referred to arbitration, where the arbitrator stayed the blacklist order conditionally, and the first appeal under Section 37 was dismis…
S.K. RATTANversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2013 INSC 79328 November 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a Deputy Superintendent of Police in the CBI, was transferred by executive order to the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) in 1988. While his pay was initially protected, a later pay revision granted to his CBI batchmates was not extended to him, resulting in a lower salary and pension. The appellant s…
STATE OF HARYANAversusSURJIT SINGH
2008 INSC 136028 November 2008Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, Surjit Singh, was convicted under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and acquitted under Section 13(2). The State of Haryana sought leave to appeal the acquittal under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, but the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the application witho…
NAGENDRA CHANDRA ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.
2007 INSC 119528 November 2007Dismissed
A large number of police constables were appointed in 1990 by posting vacancies on a notice board, contrary to Rule 663(d) of the Bihar Police Manual which mandates advertisement in newspapers and through the employment exchange. When the irregularity was discovered, the Director General ordered their dismissal, which …
SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR (L.A.)versusN. VASUDEVRAO AND ORS.
2007 INSC 119728 November 2007Disposed off
The case concerned about 24.82 acres of government land that had been assigned to respondents on pattas, which the authorities later attempted to resume without paying the ex‑gratia stipulated in GO No.1307. The respondents filed writ petitions and, after a single High Court judge ordered them to make representations, …
BAR COUNCIL OF INDIAversusBOARD OF MANG. DAYANAND COLLEGE OF LAW AND ORS.
2006 INSC 92028 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The Bar Council of India (BCI) challenged two Allahabad High Court writ orders that upheld the appointment of a philosopher, respondent No. 5, as Principal of Dayanand College of Law despite his lack of legal qualifications. The High Court had held that the Uttar Pradesh State Universities Act, 1973, being a later stat…
M.P.A.L.T. PERMIT OWNERS ASSN. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2003 INSC 68128 November 2003Appeal(s) allowed
The Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicle Taxation Act, 1991 (as amended in 1999) inserted sections permitting confiscation of a vehicle for non‑payment of tax, linking the power to offences under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (Section 66 read with Section 192‑A). Petitioners challenged these provisions as repugnant to the centr…
HEMALATHA GARGYAversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
2002 INSC 50028 November 2002Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether the three‑month payment period prescribed in Section 67(1) of the Voluntary Disclosure of Income Scheme, 1997 could be extended. The Court held that the word "shall" makes the deadline mandatory and that Section 67(2) expressly deems a declaration invalid if payment is not made within…
SING HAI RAKESH KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2000 INSC 54428 November 2000Dismissed
The appellant, S.R. Kumar, sold agricultural lands situated within the municipal limits of Bina for the assessment years 1981-82 and 1983-84 and was assessed to capital gains tax. The Income Tax Officer levied tax, the Tribunal held that the profit was not capital gains, and the High Court dismissed the appellant's wri…
RAJIV MITTALversusMAHARSHI DAYANAND UNIVERSITY AND ORS.
1997 INSC 76728 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned admission to the MBBS programme at Rohtak Medical College, where 60 seats were divided into 49 open‑category and 11 backward‑class reserved seats. Sunil Yadav (S) ranked first in the backward‑class list but 62nd in the open list; he failed to obtain an open‑category seat in the first counselling and …
"COMMON CAUSE", A REGISTERED SOCIETY THROUGH ITS DIRECTORversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 140228 November 1996Disposed off
The Supreme Court issued a clarificatory order modifying its earlier judgment (1 May 1996) in Writ Petition (C) No. 1128 of 1986, which had provided for discharge or acquittal of accused whose criminal trials were pending for a prescribed period. The Court held that the relief does not apply where the pendency is cause…
STATE OF KERALA AND ANR.versusBUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF IND!A AND ORS.
1996 INSC 140328 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 introduced optional alternate taxation provisions (Section 7(7), 7A, 7B, 11, 12) allowing contractors to pay a fixed percentage of the contract value instead of tax under Section 5(1)(iv). Several contractors who had not opted for this scheme challenged the validity of those sub‑s…
J.S. CHHABRA ETC.versusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 140428 November 1996
The Madhya Pradesh Government, unable to fill lecturer posts through the Public Service Commission, upgraded 21 casualty medical officer (CMO) posts to the lecturer grade and appointed doctors on an ad‑hoc basis in 1971. Their services were later regularised under the M.P. Regularisation of Ad‑hoc Appointment Rules, 19…
RANJIT KUMAR MAJUMDARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1995 INSC 79628 November 1995Dismissed
Ranjit Kumar Majumdar, a civilian employee holding a civil post in the defence services, was suspended under Rule 10(1) of the Central Civil Services (Classification Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 while a criminal prosecution was pending. He challenged the suspension before the Central Administrative Tribunal, arguing…
STATE OF U.P.versusSHAKEEL AHMED
1995 INSC 79728 November 1995Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, Shakeel Ahmed, was detained on July 31, 1989 under Section 3(1)(iii) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974. He challenged the detention, and the Allahabad High Court set aside the order on two grounds: a one‑month delay in disposing his representation a…
BIHAR STATE FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATIONversusNARENDRA KUMAR MISHRA AND ANR.
1995 INSC 80028 November 1995Dismissed
The respondent, an Assistant Godown Manager, misappropriated Rs. 2,61,859.30 in 1976. A departmental enquiry began in 1979 and prosecution was initially filed in 1985 without the mandatory sanction under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, leading to his discharge. After obtaining the sanction in 1991,…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC. ETC.versusMRS. KAMAL SUKUMAR DURGULE AND ORS. ETC.
1984 INSC 21928 November 1984Dismissed
The petitioners, owners of plots in Bandra, Bombay, were ordered by the Municipal Corporation and the State to demolish buildings constructed without permission and the lands were later declared "vacant" under the Maharashtra Vacant Lands (Prohibition of Unauthorised Occupation and Summary Eviction) Act, 1975. They cha…
DHARMENDRA KUMAR SINGHversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2020 INSC 61428 October 2020Disposed off
The appellants, holders of mining leases in Sonbhadra, Uttar Pradesh, sought extension of their leases for periods during which mining was prohibited by orders of the National Green Tribunal and subsequent state notifications. The State argued that neither the Uttar Pradesh Mining Minerals (Concession) Rules, 1963 nor …
KRISHNANAND (D) THROUGH. LRS.versusDEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION & ORS.
2014 INSC 102028 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute concerned the ownership of Khata No. 201 in Sultanpur, where Kamla Devi claimed a share inherited from her father Ram Samujh, while Krishna Nand and Shiv Ram asserted title based on a 1938 purchase recorded in their uncle Ram Adhar's name. Three consolidation authorities under the Uttar Pradesh Consolidatio…
PUNJAB AND SIND BANK AND ORS.versusMOHINDER PAL SINGH AND ORS.
2005 INSC 53828 October 2005
Amarjit Singh Sahni, a cashier‑clerk of Punjab and Sind Bank, applied for voluntary retirement under the bank's scheme (effective 1‑31 Dec 2000) but withdrew his application on 22 Dec 2000 before the bank had accepted it. The bank later treated him as relieved from service on 28 Jan 2001 and denied his reinstatement, d…
SPECIAL REFERENCE NO. I OF 2002versus.
2002 INSC 44528 October 2002Reference answered
The President referred three questions to the Supreme Court concerning the interplay of Article 174(1) (which mandates that six months shall not intervene between the last sitting of a state legislature and its next session) and Article 324 (which vests the Election Commission with the superintendence, direction and co…
MATHURAM AGRAWALversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
1999 INSC 49828 October 1999Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, joint owners of thirteen houses, were assessed a property tax by the Raigarh Municipal Council under the Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961, which aggregated the annual letting values of all their properties and taxed the aggregate despite each property’s individual letting value being below Rs.1,8…
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, THROUGH ITS REGISTRARversusSHASHIKANT S. PATIL AND ANR.
1999 INSC 49928 October 1999Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned a Joint Civil Judge (Junior Division) who was accused of ordering a wrongful arrest. A departmental inquiry was ordered, and the Inquiry Officer exonerated him, but the High Court’s Disciplinary Committee rejected the report and recommended compulsory retirement, which was approved by the Governor. T…
SPECIAL REFERENCE NO. I OF 1998versus-----
1998 INSC 40228 October 1998Reference answered
The President referred nine questions to the Supreme Court concerning the constitutional process for appointing and transferring judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts. The Court clarified that "consultation with the Chief Justice of India" under Articles 217(1) and 222(1) requires a plurality of judges – the four…
KUNWAR ARUN KUMARversusU.P. HILL ELECTRONICS CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 123628 October 1996Dismissed
The petitioner was appointed on probation on 15 January 1990 with a clause allowing termination without assigning any reason during the probation period. He was terminated on 16 January 1991 on the ground that his work performance was unsatisfactory and he was regularly absent. The petitioner challenged the termination…
RAGHU SEEDS AND FARMS AND OTHERS ETC.versusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.
1993 INSC 35128 October 1993
The petitioners challenged the validity of the Central Government's notification dated 24 February 1983 declaring seeds of food‑crops, fruits and vegetables as essential commodities under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and the consequent Seeds (Control) Order, 1983 which required licences for dealing in such seed…
B.K. MOHAPATRAversusSTATE OF ORISSA
1987 INSC 29828 October 1987Disposed off
B.K. Mohapatra, an assistant teacher appointed in a 'B' type High School in 1953, challenged a 1964 rationalisation scheme that counted his seniority only from the date the schools were converted into government schools (June 1, 1964) and dealt with the contributory provident fund. The State of Orissa argued that the 1…
DR. P. NALLA THAMBY THERAversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
1983 INSC 16628 October 1983Disposed off
The petitioner, a railway commuter, filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking a mandamus directing the Union of India to implement the recommendations of the Kunzru, Wanchoo and Sikri Committee reports, appoint a fact‑finding commission and improve railway safety, invoking Articles 19 and 21. The Union, through a …
S. L. SACHDEV & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
1980 INSC 20228 October 1980Case Partly allowed
The petitioners, Upper Division Clerks (UDCs) transferred from the Posts & Telegraphs Audit Offices to the Savings Bank Control‑Internal Check Organisation (SBCO‑ICO), challenged the Director‑General’s circulars that limited promotion of UDCs from the Audit Offices to 10 % of Selection‑Grade posts and 20 % of Head‑Cler…
MALOOK SINGH AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
2021 INSC 56628 September 2021Disposed off
The appellants were appointed as clerks on an ad hoc basis in 1975‑76 and were regularized on 3 May 1977 with seniority backdated to 1 April 1977. A 1991 writ petition had granted them seniority by counting their ad hoc service, but the High Court later redrew the seniority list excluding ad hoc periods, a decision cha…
INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSN.versusSTATE OF KERALA 561 INDIAN YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION & ORS.V. THE STATE OF KERALA & ORS.
2017 INSC 104028 September 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court of India, by a 4:1 majority, struck down the practice of excluding women aged 10 to 50 from the Sabarimala temple in Kerala. The Court held that the devotees of Lord Ayyappa do not constitute a separate religious denomination under Article 26 of the Constitution. The exclusionary practice was found no…
SPEAKER HARYANA VIDHAN SABHAversusKULDEEP BISHNOI & ORS.
2012 INSC 43728 September 2012Disposed off
Five Haryana MLAs merged with the Indian National Congress and the Speaker accepted the merger. Kuldeep Bishnoi filed disqualification petitions under Article 191 and the Tenth Schedule, alleging the merger violated paragraph 4(1). The High Court, invoking Order 41 Rule 33 CPC, directed the Speaker to decide the petiti…
MANUBHAI RATILAL PATEL TR. USHABENversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
2012 INSC 43828 September 2012Dismissed
An FIR for offences under sections 467, 468, 471, 409 and 114 IPC was filed against the appellant. He sought quashing of the FIR and a stay of investigation under Section 482 CrPC, but was arrested before the stay order took effect. The magistrate remanded him to police custody and later to judicial custody. The High C…
RAM NANDAN SINGH AND ORS.versusAG OFFICE EMPLOYEES CO-OP HOUSE CONSTRUCTION SOCIETY, RANCHI AND ORS.
2007 INSC 99628 September 2007Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned members of the AG Office Employees Co‑op House Construction Society who challenged irregularities in the society’s management and amendments allowing outsiders to obtain land. An enquiry by the Registrar of Cooperative Societies under the Bihar Cooperative Societies Act led to the suspension of the m…
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusMADRAS TELEPHONE SC & ST SOCIAL WELFARE ASSOCIATION
2006 INSC 66228 September 2006Disposed off
The Supreme Court was asked to clarify whether seniority and promotion granted to certain Telegraph Engineering Service officers, based on earlier judgments of the Allahabad High Court and the Central Administrative Tribunal that had attained finality, could be altered by later Supreme Court judgments interpreting the …
COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX, U.P.versusM/S SWADESHI POLYTAX LTD., GHAZIABAD
2005 INSC 45428 September 2005Appeal(s) allowed
Swadeshi Polytax Ltd., a dealer of polyester staples fiber, collected sales tax in excess of the prescribed rate and deposited the amount with the Government Treasury. The dealer sought a refund of the excess amount, but the Trade Tax Tribunal ordered a refund contrary to Section 29-A of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, which m…
GANGADHAR JANARDAN MHATREversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
2004 INSC 55628 September 2004Dismissed
The appellant, Gangadhar Janardan Mhatre, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking transfer of the investigation of a FIR in which his brother was allegedly killed. The High Court dismissed the petition, holding that the case was already before the Sessions Court and that the writ was not the appropriate remedy.…
DANIAL LATIFI AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA
2001 INSC 46828 September 2001Dismissed
The petitioners, a group of Muslim women, challenged the constitutional validity of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, arguing that it discriminated against them by excluding Muslim divorced women from the protection of Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Court examined whether…
DELHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY UNDERTAKINGversusBASANTI DEVI AND ANR.
1999 INSC 44428 September 1999Disposed off
The Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) offered a Salary Savings Scheme under which Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking (DESU) deducted insurance premiums from its employees' salaries and remitted them to LIC. DESU failed to remit premiums for two months, after which an employee died and his widow claimed the policy benefit…
DR. H. MUKHERJEE AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1993 INSC 31228 September 1993Appeal(s) allowed
Dr. H. Mukherjee and others challenged the decision of the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC) to reject the Union Public Service Commission’s (UPSC) recommendation for S.K. Bhargava as Chief Controller of Explosives. The ACC had relied on an adverse remark in Bhargava’s 1987 Confidential Report and on a CBI in…
FASIH CHAUDHARYversusDIRECTOR GENERAL, DOORDARSHAN & ORS.
1988 INSC 30628 September 1988Dismissed
Doordarshan invited proposals for TV serials on themes such as national integration and set detailed guidelines for submission. Fasih Chaudhary (petitioner) submitted a complete proposal on Mirza Ghalib, while Gulzar (respondent No.2) initially sent only a theme letter but later completed his proposal. Doordarshan sele…
GURPAL TULI AND ORS., ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
1984 INSC 18728 September 1984Dismissed
The appellants, teachers (Masters/Mistresses) employed in Punjab state schools, held postgraduate qualifications but were paid under the Rs 220‑500 scale. They claimed entitlement to higher pay grades (Rs 300‑450/600 or Rs 250‑400/550) prescribed in paragraph 2 of the State Government Circular Letter dated 29 July 1967…
JATINDER KUMAR & ORSversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
1984 INSC 18428 September 1984Dismissed
The petitioners were candidates selected by the Subordinate Service Selection Board for the post of Assistant Sub‑Inspector of Police. The Board recommended 144 names, but only 57 vacancies existed and the anticipated 170 vacancies never materialised because the Government rejected the proposal to disband the Punjab Ar…
SALABUDDIN MOHAMED YUNUSversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
1984 INSC 18628 September 1984Appeal(s) allowed
S.M. Yunus, a former civil servant of the erstwhile State of Hyderabad who retired in 1956, claimed a pension of Rs 1,000 per month in Indian currency, arguing that his right had vested at retirement. The Andhra Pradesh Government had, by a 1971 notification, retrospectively reduced the maximum pension to Rs 857.15 per…
DR. RAHAMATULLAHversusSTATE OF BLHAR AND ANR.
1981 INSC 17328 September 1981Case Allowed
The petitioner was detained under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980 and the State Government confirmed the detention after an Advisory Board reported sufficient grounds. The petitioner submitted a representation against the detention, but the State Government waited for the Board's opinion before consider…
IN RE: MEPUNG TADAR BAGE, MEMBER, ARUNACHAL PRADESH PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION versus
2025 INSC 104728 August 2025Reference answered
The President of India referred a matter under Article 317(1) of the Constitution seeking the removal of Ms. Mepung Tadar Bage, a member of the Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission (APPSC), alleging misbehaviour in connection with the leakage of the Assistant Engineer (Civil) Mains Examination question paper in …
PRADHAN BABU AND OTHERSversusNACHIMUTHU NAGAR KUDIYIRUPPOR NALA SANGAM AND OTHERS
2024 INSC 104728 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute concerned a 11,200 sq ft parcel in Nachimuthu Nagar that was earmarked for public purpose in a layout plan approved in 1978 and revised in 1981 under the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act. After the original owner, Nachimuthu Mudaliar, died in 2004, his heirs sold the land to the appellants in 2009 a…
K. NIRMALA & ORS.versusCANARA BANK & ANR.
2024 INSC 63428 August 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants were appointed by Canara Bank and other central government undertakings in the Scheduled Caste category based on caste certificates issued under Karnataka state circulars that listed their community as a synonymous Scheduled Caste. After the Supreme Court’s decision in State of Maharashtra v. Milind, the…
UNION OF INDIAversusASHOK KUMAR SHARMA AND OTHERS
2020 INSC 51728 August 2020Disposed off
The Union of India challenged a High Court order that quashed an FIR registered under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for the alleged sale of unlicensed drugs, holding that prosecution for offences under Chapter IV of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 must be initiated only by persons named in Section 32 of the A…
COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX,versusM/S. ADANI GAS LTD.
2020 INSC 51328 August 2020Dismissed
The Commissioner of Service Tax appealed against M/s. Adani Gas Ltd. challenging the taxability of charges collected for supplying pipelines and measurement (SKID) equipment to gas consumers. The issue was whether Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of the Finance Act, 1994 applied, i.e., whether the supply of such tangible goods f…
PRANEETH K. AND ORS.versusUNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION (UGC) AND ORS.
2020 INSC 51928 August 2020Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined a batch of writ petitions challenging the University Grants Commission (UGC) guidelines dated 06 July 2020, which required all Indian universities to complete final year examinations by 30 September 2020 amid the COVID‑19 pandemic. Petitioners argued that the guidelines were ultra‑violet of A…
STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.versusLORD NORTHBOOK AND ORS.
2019 INSC 96928 August 2019Matter referred to larger bench
The testator, Raja Sardar Singh, died in 1987 without apparent legal heirs and had executed a will bequeathing his assets to the Khetri Trust. The Trust sought probate, which was dismissed by the Delhi High Court, while agnates also objected. The Rajasthan Collector, after an inquiry, initiated escheat proceedings unde…
MAR KOORILOS (DEAD) AND ANR. ETC.versusM. PAPPY (DEAD) AND ANOTHER ETC.
2018 INSC 75028 August 2018Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, the Metropolitan of Quilon Diocese and a Vicar appointed by him, sued the parishioners of St. Mary's Church, Kattachira, seeking a declaration that they alone have the right to conduct religious services and manage the church and its cemetery, based on an assignment‑cum‑gift deed (Ext‑A3). The trial cou…
SAMAJ PARIVARTANA SAMUDAYA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.
2017 INSC 81628 August 2017Disposed off
The Supreme Court considered an interlocutory application filed by the Federation of Indian Industries (Southern Region) seeking permission to sell iron‑ore and manganese‑ore in Karnataka without the e‑auction mechanism overseen by the Court‑appointed Monitoring Committee. The Court examined the past experience of ille…
NARAYAN MANIKRAO SALGARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2012 INSC 35428 August 2012Case Partly allowed
The appellants were convicted under Sections 148, 302 read with 149, 341, and 323 of the IPC for the death of Khushal Salgar. The prosecution relied on the testimony of two eye‑witnesses, a dying declaration, and forensic evidence. The Supreme Court examined whether the evidence established a common object to cause mur…
V. RAVI CHANDRANversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2009 INSC 108728 August 2009Hearing Adjourned
Petitioner V. Ravi Chandran filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking custody of his minor son, alleging that the child's mother had taken the child to India in violation of a New York Supreme Court custody order that granted joint custody and later sole legal custody to the petitioner.…
MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPN. AND ANR.versusCASTERIBE RAJYA P. KARMCHARI SANGHATANA
2009 INSC 109128 August 2009Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined whether Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) could be compelled to grant permanent status, wages and benefits to bus‑cleaners who had been employed as casuals, and whether complaints filed by an unrecognised union under item 6 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of T…
SUCHITA SRIVASTAVA & ANR.versusCHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION
2009 INSC 108628 August 2009Disposed off
The case concerned a 19‑20‑year‑old woman with mild to moderate mental retardation, an orphan residing in a government welfare home, who became pregnant around the 19th week of gestation after an alleged rape. The Chandigarh Administration sought the High Court’s approval to terminate the pregnancy, invoking the Medica…
B. SRINIVASA REDDYversusKARNATAKA URBAN WATER SUPPLY AND DRAINAGE BOARD EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION AND ORS.
2006 INSC 56128 August 2006Appeal(s) allowed
B. Srinivasa Reddy, a retired Chief Engineer, was re‑appointed as Managing Director of the Karnataka Urban Water Supply & Drainage Board on a contractual basis "until further orders". The Karnataka Urban Water Supply & Drainage Board Employees' Association, an unregistered trade union, challenged the appointment by fil…
NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIAversusM/S. GANGA ENTERPRISES AND ANR.
2003 INSC 43428 August 2003Appeal(s) allowed
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) issued a tender for toll collection requiring a bid security of Rs 50 lakh in the form of an on‑demand bank guarantee, which could be forfeited if the bidder withdrew his bid within the 120‑day validity period. Ganga Enterprises submitted the bid, became the highest bidde…
ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY AND ORS.versusMANSOOR ALI KHAN ETC.
2000 INSC 41628 August 2000Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined two civil appeals filed by Aligarh Muslim University challenging High Court judgments that had quashed termination orders against laboratory assistants who had taken extraordinary leave for foreign employment. The employees had been granted two years of leave, sought extensions, were warned t…
NATIONAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CORPORATIONversusS. RAGHUNATHAN AND ORS.
1998 INSC 32528 August 1998Case Allowed
The respondents, engineers deputed from the Central Public Works Department to the National Building Construction Corporation (NBCC) for projects in Iraq, were paid a foreign allowance of 125% of their basic salary. After the Fourth Pay Commission revised their basic pay, they sought a direction that the foreign allowa…
DAYARAM DAYALversusSTATE OF M.P. AND ANR.
1997 INSC 62828 August 1997Appeal(s) allowed
Dayaram Dayal was appointed Civil Judge, Class II in Madhya Pradesh in 1985 with a two‑year probation that could be extended for a further two years, making a maximum probation of four years under Rule 24 of the M.P. Judicial Services Rules, 1955. After several adverse performance reports, suspensions and a full‑court …
VELLORE CITIZENS WELFARE FORUMversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 95228 August 1996Disposed off
The Supreme Court entertained a public‑interest writ under Article 32 filed by the Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum alleging that tanneries in five districts of Tamil Nadu were discharging untreated effluents, contaminating surface and groundwater, rendering 35,000 hectares of agricultural land unfit for cultivation and …
JANTA DAL ETC. ETC.versusH.S. CHOWDHARY AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
1992 INSC 22628 August 1992Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined a petition filed by H.S. Chowdhary, claiming to be a public‑interest litigant, seeking to quash a FIR and stop a letter rogatory to Switzerland in the Bofors scandal. The Court held that Chowdhary had no locus standi and that the petition did not fall within the definition of public‑interest …
SONI DEVRAJBHAI BABUBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.
1991 INSC 21428 August 1991Dismissed
The petitioner’s daughter died in August 1986 and the petitioner filed a criminal complaint under Section 498-A IPC. After the Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, 1986 inserted Section 304‑B IPC (dowry death) with effect from 19 November 1986, the petitioner sought to have the case transferred to a Court of Session for …
AIR INDJA ETC. ETC.versusNERGESH MEERZA & ORS. ETC. ETC.
1981 INSC 15228 August 1981Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of Air India Employees Service Regulations 46 and 47, which mandated retirement of air hostesses (AHs) at age 35, on marriage within four years of service, or on first pregnancy, and allowed the Managing Director to extend service up to age 45. The Court held that the pr…
CHIRAG SEN AND ANOTHER ETC.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ANOTHER
2025 INSC 90328 July 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, prominent badminton players and their coach, were accused in a private complaint of falsifying birth records to gain entry into age‑restricted tournaments, leading to the registration of an FIR under Sections 420, 468, 471 and 34 IPC. The complaint relied mainly on an unauthenticated 1996 GPF nomination…
VERNONversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.
2023 INSC 65528 July 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from the Bhima‑Koregaon violence of December 2017, after which the National Investigation Agency (NIA) expanded the investigation, searched the residences of several activists and arrested Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira. The prosecution alleged that the two were members of the banned CPI (Maoist) and…
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANRversusB. R. MURALIDHAR & ORS.
2022 INSC 76128 July 2022Disposed off
The State of Karnataka issued a land acquisition notification under Section 17 of the Karnataka Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1973. The petitioners challenged the notification on grounds of inadequate consideration of objections, alleged lapse of the acquisition process, and the constitutionality of Secti…
THE STATE OF KERALAversusK. AJITH & ORS.
2021 INSC 36628 July 2021Dismissed
During the 2015 Kerala budget presentation, several opposition MLAs climbed onto the Speaker's dais and damaged furniture, leading to a criminal case under IPC sections 427, 447, 34 and the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. The public prosecutor sought to withdraw the prosecution under Section 321 of t…
YAKUB ABDUL RAZAK MEMONversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR. THE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT AND ORS.
2015 INSC 52728 July 2015Matter referred to larger bench
The petitioner Yakub Abdulrazak Memon, whose death sentence under the TADA Act had been confirmed by the Supreme Court, filed a review petition and a curative petition challenging the order dated 9 April 2015. The curative petition was considered by a bench of the three senior-most judges, but not by the judges who had…
ANAND SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.
2010 INSC 44328 July 2010Dismissed
The Gorakhpur Development Authority (GOA) sought to acquire land for a residential colony and, under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, invoked the urgency clause of Section 17(4) to dispense with the mandatory Section 5A enquiry. The appellants, land owners, challenged the validity of this dispensation, arguing that no m…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.versusRAMESH CHANDRA BAJPAI
2009 INSC 95628 July 2009Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a Physical Training Instructor in a Government Ayurvedic College, claimed that his pay should be fixed at the UGC scale granted to teachers in the School Education Department. The High Court had ordered his pay to be fixed in that scale, relying on the doctrine of equal pay for equal work. On appeal, th…
CHAIRMAN, LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION AND ORS.versusRAJIV KUMAR BHASKER
2005 INSC 32028 July 2005Disposed off
The Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) had introduced a Salary Savings Scheme under which employers were required to deduct insurance premiums from employees' salaries and remit them to LIC. When an employer failed to make the deductions, the employee’s policy lapsed and the claimant sought the assured sum after the empl…
TALCHER MUNICIPALITYversusTALCHER REGULATED MKT. COMMITTEE AND ANR.
2004 INSC 40628 July 2004Dismissed
Talcher Municipality constructed a market under the Orissa Municipal Act. The Talcher Regulated Market Committee, invoking Section 4(4) of the Orissa Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1956, requisitioned the transfer of the market to itself. The municipality failed to comply, leading to a writ petition in the Orissa Hi…
DWARKA PRASAD AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS.
2003 INSC 33628 July 2003Dismissed
The appellants, Preventive Officers (POs) appointed in Central Services Group C, challenged the Department of Revenue (Customs Appraisers Recruitment) Rules, 1988 which fixed a 20% quota for POs and a 75% quota for Examining Officers (EOs) for promotion to the post of Appraiser (Group B), alleging arbitrariness and vio…
THE STATE OF MADHYPRADESH AND ORS.versusGOPAL D. TIRTHANI AND ORS.
2003 INSC 33728 July 2003Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court examined the validity of Madhya Pradesh's scheme reserving 20% of postgraduate medical seats for doctors employed by the State and the procedures for their admission. It held that the quota constitutes a separate channel of entry, not a communal reservation, and therefore satisfies Article 14. The Cou…
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusLT. GENERAL RAJENDRA SINGH KADYAN AND ANR.
2000 INSC 35828 July 2000Appeal(s) allowed
Lt. General Rajendra Singh Kadyan, the senior-most Lt. General, challenged the appointment of Lt. General H.R.S. Kalkat as Army Commander, arguing that the post is filled on seniority and that he satisfied the fitness and experience criteria, including a six‑month waiver. The Union of India appealed the High Court's or…
ANIL KUMAR GUPTA, ETC.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.
1995 INSC 42828 July 1995Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the admission process for medical courses in Uttar Pradesh where Lucknow University had applied a 15% horizontal reservation for five special categories (dependents of freedom fighters, children of soldiers, physically handicapped, hill area and Uttarakhand area) alongside vertical reservatio…
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusM/S. GRAPHIC INDUSTRIES CO. AND ORS.
1994 INSC 29228 July 1994Appeal(s) allowed
Graphic Industries Co. supplied stores worth about Rs. 50 lakh to Eastern Railways, but payment was delayed. The company filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus for payment, relying on correspondence between the Railway Minister and officials. The Calcutta High Court Division Benc…
J.R. RAGHUPATHY, ETC.versusSTATE OF A.P. & ORS. ETC.
1988 INSC 19328 July 1988Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined writ petitions filed under Art.226 challenging the location of Revenue Mandal Headquarters in Andhra Pradesh, which had been notified under sub‑section (5) of Section 3 of the Andhra Pradesh Districts (Formation) Act, 1974. The High Court had, in some cases, quashed the final notifications an…
MOHINUDDIN @ MOIN MASTERversusDISTRICT MAGISTRATE, BEED & ORS.
1987 INSC 18728 July 1987Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant was detained under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980 and filed two representations – one to the Chief Minister and another to the Advisory Board – seeking release. While the Advisory Board considered the second representation promptly, the Chief Minister’s office delayed consideration of the…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusRAMDAS SHRINIVAS NAYAK & ANR.
1982 INSC 5728 July 1982Dismissed
The State of Maharashtra filed a Special Leave Petition under Article 136 challenging a Bombay High Court order that the Governor should exercise his own discretion, not the advice of the Council of Ministers, when deciding whether to grant sanction under Section 6 of the Prevention of Corruption Act for the prosecutio…
KAVITA W/O SUNDER SHANKARDAS DEVIDASANI ETC.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ETC. ETC.
1981 INSC 13028 July 1981Dismissed
The husband of petitioner Kavita was detained under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA) to prevent alleged smuggling. He made representations against his detention, which were rejected, and the Advisory Board later reported sufficient cause to…
AMANULLA KHAN KUDEATALLA KHAN PATHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.
1999 INSC 26728 June 1999Dismissed
The appellant, Amanulla Khan, a member of a notorious gang, was detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person" after allegedly extorting money by threatening death and assaulting victims on three separate occasions. He challenged the detention, arguing that a single cr…
CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATIONversusREGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS
2025 INSC 78628 May 2025Disposed off
The Chandigarh Administration appealed against several orders of the Punjab and Haryana High Court that directed the construction of a verandah in front of Court Room No.1 of the High Court and the laying of green paver blocks in a kutcha parking area. The Administration argued that the verandah could jeopardise the UN…
BINDU KAPUREAversusSUBHASHISH PANDA & ORS.
2025 INSC 78428 May 2025
The Supreme Court examined the Delhi Development Authority's (DDA) unauthorised felling of over a thousand trees in the Delhi Ridge and its failure to disclose this during a hearing, despite pending applications for permission. The Court held that these actions amounted to wilful disobedience of its 1996 order in M.C. …
KARAN SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.
2013 INSC 35528 May 2013Dismissed
Karan Singh was convicted for the murder of Raj under IPC s.302, the prosecution alleging a motive of non‑payment of Rs 47,000 for a buffalo. Eye‑witnesses Maya Devi (PW‑3) and her daughter Birma (PW‑4) saw the appellant dragging the victim with a rope, and an independent witness (PW‑8) corroborated the allegation. The…
SR. TEWARIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
2013 INSC 36128 May 2013Disposed off
S.R. Tewari, an IPS officer on deputation with the BSF, was subjected to disciplinary proceedings resulting in eight charges, of which only charges 4 and 6 were held proved. The disciplinary authority initially dismissed him, the Central Administrative Tribunal reinstated him, and the Delhi High Court directed a fresh …
P. V. NIDHISH & ORS.versusKERALA STATE WAKF BOARD & ANR.
2023 INSC 45228 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, long‑time tenants of premises that later became part of a Wakf, were facing civil eviction when the Wakf Act, 1995 was amended in 2013 adding a penal provision (Section 52A) and a definition of "encroacher". The Wakf Board filed a criminal complaint under Section 52A alleging the appellants were encroac…
MATHURA VRINDAVAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANOTHERversusRAJESH SHARMA AND OTHERS
2023 INSC 44828 April 2023Disposed off
The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals filed by the Mathura Vrindavan Development Authority, other development authorities and the State of Uttar Pradesh against several writ petitions that challenged demand notices for various fees levied by the authorities under the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Ac…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusPHOOLCHAND RATHORE
2023 INSC 44428 April 2023Dismissed
The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the High Court's acquittal of Phoolchand Rathore, who had been convicted and sentenced to death for the murder of his wife under sections 302 and 201 IPC. The prosecution's case rested on alleged motive (a dispute over jewellery), a disclosure statement and recovery of blood…
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED & ANR.versusSANDEEP CHOUDHARY & ORS.
2022 INSC 48928 April 2022Dismissed
BSNL conducted a recruitment exam for Telecom Technical Assistants. Two OBC candidates (Alok Kumar Yadav and Dinesh Kumar) scored higher than the last selected general‑category candidate. The question was whether such OBC candidates must be adjusted to the general‑category pool and not counted against the OBC quota, wi…
PAWAN KUMARversusSTATE OF H.P.
2017 INSC 41528 April 2017Dismissed
The appellant, previously acquitted of kidnapping and rape offences, repeatedly threatened and teased the victim, a teenage girl, leading her to set herself ablaze and die. The victim’s dying declaration, recorded by a Head Constable in the presence of a doctor, implicated the appellant as the sole cause of her death. …
A.C. MUTHIAHversusBOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIA AND ANR.
2011 INSC 33728 April 2011Matter referred to larger bench
The appellant, a former President of the BCCI, challenged an amendment to Clause 6.2.4 of the BCCI's Regulations that exempted IPL, Champions League and Twenty‑20 events from the ban on administrators having commercial interests. He argued that the amendment was made to benefit the second respondent, who as a BCCI offi…
S. KHUSHBOOversusKANNIAMMAL AND ANR.
2010 INSC 24728 April 2010Appeal(s) allowed
The actress S. Khushboo made remarks in a 2005 news‑magazine survey endorsing societal acceptance of premarital sex and live‑in relationships. Several members of the PMK political party filed criminal complaints alleging defamation, obscenity, indecent representation of women and incitement under the IPC and the Indece…
M.K. BALAKRISHNAN & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2009 INSC 63028 April 2009Hearing Adjourned
The petitioners raised a writ under Article 21 of the Constitution, contending that the chronic shortage of water for drinking and irrigation violated the fundamental right to life. The Court examined precedents that recognized water as an essential component of the right to life, including Delhi Water Supply & Sewage …
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusM/S. GREEN ALLOYS P. LTD.
2009 INSC 63228 April 2009Case Partly allowed
The Union of India filed a civil appeal against M/s Green Alloys Ltd. challenging a Punjab & Haryana High Court order that allowed the release of raw material seized under the Central Excise authorities on the sole condition of an undertaking to pay duty, without requiring cash security or a bank guarantee. The dispute…
SUNEET GUPTAversusANIL TRILOKNATH SHARMA & ORS.
2008 INSC 53528 April 2008Dismissed
The appellant, Suneet Gupta, entered into a partnership with M/s K.M. Agencies, which later faced a dispute when the other partner joined M/s Mangla Agencies and allegedly misrepresented the firm's status to the principal, Johnson & Johnson, resulting in payment to the latter firm. Gupta filed a criminal complaint unde…
JAGDISH SINGHversusMADHURI DEVI
2008 INSC 53628 April 2008Case Allowed
The husband filed a petition for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on the grounds of desertion and cruelty. The Family Court examined the evidence in detail and granted the decree of divorce. The wife appealed, and the High Court set aside the Family Court's decree, holding that there were no spe…
M/S. SUNRISE ASSOCIATESversusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.
2006 INSC 26128 April 2006Reference answered
The Supreme Court examined whether the sale of lottery tickets falls within the definition of "goods" for the purpose of State sales tax statutes. The Court held that a lottery ticket is merely a token evidencing a chance to win a prize, which constitutes an actionable claim under the Transfer of Property Act, not a mo…
ANIL KUMAR VITTHAL SHETE AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.
2006 INSC 26228 April 2006Disposed off
The petitioners, comprising judges of Small Causes Courts of Bombay and Gujarat, chief judges, metropolitan magistrates and assistant judges, challenged the placement of their posts in the newly created Category 2 of the three‑tier judicial cadre, alleging demotion and violation of the Shetty Commission’s recommendatio…
M/S. KUSUM INGOTS AND ALLOYS LTD.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
2004 INSC 31928 April 2004Dismissed
Mis. Kusum Ingots and Alloys Ltd., a Mumbai‑registered company, obtained a loan from the Bhopal branch of State Bank of India and was served a repayment notice under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The company challenged the constitutional validi…
TAMIL NADU TEACHERS ASSOCIATION ETCversusASSOCIATION OF THE HEAD OF THE GOVT. (B WING) HIGH AND HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOLS AND ORS. ETC
1998 INSC 20128 April 1998Dismissed
The dispute concerned the integration of teachers in Tamil Nadu's A‑Wing (regular government schools) and B‑Wing (former District Board schools) and the date from which seniority should be calculated. The State had issued several Government Orders (GOs 1583, 1584, 37, 603) attempting to alter the integration date from …
MOHD. HADI RAJA ETC.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.
1998 INSC 20328 April 1998Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether officers of public sector undertakings and government companies, which may be deemed "State" under Article 12 because of deep governmental control, fall within the definition of "public servant" for the purposes of Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). The petitioners arg…
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusK.G. RADHAKRISHNA PANICKER AND OTHERS
1998 INSC 20028 April 1998Disposed off
The case concerned Project Casual Labour employees of the Southern Railway who were later absorbed into regular posts and sought to have their service rendered before 1 January 1981 counted as qualifying service for pension and other retiral benefits. The Railway Board’s 1980 order allowed half of the service after att…
J. RANGASWAMYversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.
1995 INSC 31328 April 1995Disposed off
J. Rangaswamy, holding a diploma in Radiological Physics from BARC, was serving in a special ad‑hoc post with pay higher than that of a professor and sought to be recognized as Professor of Radiological Physics, arguing that his diploma was an adequate qualification in lieu of a Ph.D. He filed a writ petition, a civil …
NADODI JAYARAMAN ETC.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU
1992 INSC 12828 April 1992Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved a trade‑union rivalry that culminated in the murder of Prathab Chandran, a union vice‑president, on 15 June 1972. Six accused, including A‑2 (Nadodi Jayaraman) and A‑3 (Dilli Bai), assaulted the victim with iron rods and pipes, causing multiple injuries; the head injury was fatal. The trial court conv…
STATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.versusPJ. KAMPAVAT AND ORS.
1992 INSC 13128 April 1992Appeal(s) allowed
In 1985 the Gujarat Government permitted the Chief Minister and other ministers to appoint persons on a purely contractual basis, co‑terminus with the ministers' tenure and without any right of absorption. Twelve such appointees were terminated in December 1989 when a new government came to power. They filed writ petit…
MALWA BUS SERVICE (P) LTD.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB & OTHERS
1983 INSC 5028 April 1983Dismissed
The petitioners, owners of stage‑carriage motor vehicles in Punjab, challenged a 1981 amendment that raised the motor‑vehicle tax to Rs 500 per seat (maximum Rs 35,000) alleging it was expropriatory, violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 301 and 304(b) of the Constitution and was beyond the State’s legislative competence. Th…
PATEL SURESHBHAI JASHBHAIversusPATEL SATABHAI MATHURBHAI
1983 INSC 5228 April 1983Dismissed
The case concerned a dispute under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 concerning land deemed purchased by a tenant on the tillers' day (1 April 1957). The respondent, who had failed to appear before the Agricultural Lands Tribunal under s.320 and whose sale was declared ineffective, later applied under…
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND & ORS.versusRUKMA KESH MISHRA
2025 INSC 41228 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a civil servant of Jharkhand, was dismissed after disciplinary proceedings for alleged misconduct, including financial irregularities and forgery. The draft charge‑sheet and a proposal to suspend him were placed before the Chief Minister, who approved the proposal on 21 March 2014, after which the charg…
IMRAN PRATAPGADHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR
2025 INSC 41028 March 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a Rajya Sabha member, posted a video of a mass‑marriage on the social‑media platform X, in which a poem was recited in the background. The poem was alleged to promote communal enmity, leading the police to register an FIR under Sections 196, 197(1), 299, 302, 57 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. T…
VISHAL ASHWIN PATELversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 25(3) & ORS.
2022 INSC 35328 March 2022Appeal(s) allowed
Vishal Ashwin Patel and others challenged the reopening of their income‑tax assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by filing writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petitions in a terse order stating it was not inclined to entertain them, without …
ASIAN RESURFACING OF ROAD AGENCY PVT. LTD. & ANR.V. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
2018 INSC 28228 March 2018Directions issued
The petitioners, Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency and others, challenged the order of charge framed by a Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, alleging that it was an interlocutory order barred by Section 19(3)(c) of the Act and by Section 397(2) of the CrPC. The Supreme Court examined whether suc…
KRISHANAKANT TAMRAKARversusTHE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2018 INSC 28828 March 2018Disposed off
Krishanakant Tamrakar, convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, had been in custody for over ten years while his appeal against the conviction was pending before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. He applied for bail, arguing that the prolonged delay rendered the appeal meaningless. The Supreme Court, while…
IN RE: GANG RAPE ON ORDERS OF COMMUNITY PANCHAYATversusIN RE: GANG RAPE ON ORDERS OF COMMUNITY PANCHAYAT
2014 INSC 22728 March 2014Disposed off
The Supreme Court, acting suo motu, examined a gang rape of a 20‑year‑old woman in West Bengal ordered by a community panchayat as punishment for an inter‑community relationship. The Court directed a district judge and chief magistrate to investigate, and later required the State to furnish the FIR, investigation repor…
DR. SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY & ORS.versusRAJU THR. MEMBER JUVENILE JUSTICE BOARD & ANR.
2014 INSC 22128 March 2014Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (as amended) after a 23‑year‑old woman was murdered and one of the accused, Raju, was a minor. Petitioners sought to have the Act read down so that juveniles who commit serious offences could be tr…
PRESIDENT, SUICversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.
2006 INSC 18228 March 2006Disposed off
The President of the Southern India Undivided Church (SIUC) challenged Kerala State notifications that treated Hindu Nadars and Christian Nadars as a single Other Backward Class for reservation purposes under Article 16(4) of the Constitution. The Kerala High Court had held those notifications illegal, directing that t…
AVAS VIKAS SANSTHAN AND ANR.versusAVAS VIKAS SANSTHAN ENGINEERS ASSN. AND ORS.
2006 INSC 18528 March 2006Disposed off
The Rajasthan Government dissolved Avas Vikas Sansthan (AVS) after it incurred heavy losses and offered its 604 employees alternative employment in various local bodies, conditional on affidavits that they would not claim continuity of service or pay protection. The employees accepted the scheme, but the Rajasthan High…
SHARDAversusDHARMPAL
2003 INSC 18928 March 2003Dismissed
The husband filed for divorce under Sections 12(1)(b) and 13(1)(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, seeking a court order that his wife undergo a medical examination to determine unsoundness of mind. The District Judge ordered the examination, the High Court dismissed the revision, and the wife appealed to the Supreme Cour…
SETH CHAND RATANversusPANDIT DURGA PRASAD (D) BY LRS. AND ORS.
2003 INSC 19128 March 2003Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute concerned the status of Shri Madan Mohan Mandir and adjoining shops in Harda, Madhya Pradesh. Two applications were filed under the Madhya Pradesh Public Trusts Act, 1951: one by Pandit Kamta Prasad (case No. 73) seeking registration as a public trust, which he later withdrew, and another by Seth Champalal …
VASHISHT NARAIN KARWARIAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.
1990 INSC 11328 March 1990Appeal(s) allowed
Vashisht Narain Karwaria was detained under Section 3(3) of the National Security Act, 1980 after a police report described him as a hardened criminal with a gang and alleged many pending cases, although only one case was on record. The detaining authority relied on these extraneous statements, which were not part of t…
KOTHANDRAN SPG. MILLS PVT. LTD. & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
1989 INSC 9728 March 1989Dismissed
Kothandran Spg. Mills Pvt. Ltd. was taken over by the National Textile Corporation under the Sick Textile Undertakings (Taking Over of Management) Act, 1972, and later the Sick Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1974 came into force. The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the consti…
PALURU RAMKRISHNAIAH & ORS. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
1989 INSC 9828 March 1989Dismissed
The petitioners, appointed as Supervisors Grade ‘A’ in Indian Ordnance Factories between 1962 and 1966, claimed that a 1962 circular promised automatic promotion to Chargeman II after two years of satisfactory service, and that they were discriminated against when not promoted. The respondents argued that promotions we…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusVYANKATLAL & ANR.
1985 INSC 7328 March 1985Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents, owners of Jaora Sugar Mills, were required under the Madhya Bharat Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1948 to deposit the difference between the supply price and ex‑factory price of sugar into a government Sugar Fund. They deposited Rs 50,000 under protest and sued the State for a refund of the…
SARITA CHOUDHARYversusHIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANOTHER
2025 INSC 28928 February 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined the termination of two women judicial officers, Sarita Choudhary and Aditi Kumar Sharma, who were dismissed during their probation on the basis of low case disposal rates, adverse Annual Confidential Report (ACR) remarks, and pending complaints. The petitioners argued that the adverse remarks…
SHAH NEWAZ KHAN & ORS.versusSTATE OF NAGALAND & ORS
2023 INSC 17628 February 2023Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants filed a suit in the District Court of Dimapur, Nagaland and later applied under Section 24 of the CPC for its transfer to the District Court of Guwahati, Assam, invoking the jurisdiction of the Gauhati High Court, which is a common High Court for Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh. The Gauhat…
STATE OF PUNJABversusPRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNOR OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
2023 INSC 18128 February 2023Disposed off
The Punjab government, through its Council of Ministers, recommended that the Governor summon the Vidhan Sabha for its Budget Session on 3 March 2023. The Governor sought extensive information from the Chief Minister under Article 167 and, after receiving a tweet and a letter that he deemed derogatory, said he would se…
MUNICIPAL COUNCIL GONDIAversusDIVI WORKS & SUPPLIERS, HUF & ORS.
2022 INSC 24428 February 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The Municipal Council of Gondia issued a work order to Divi Works & Suppliers for school furniture, but suspended and later cancelled it due to the COVID‑19 pandemic and a government circular restricting non‑priority expenditure. The original petitioner claimed it had already manufactured the customized goods and sough…
CHHANGA @ MANOJversusSTATE OF M. P.
2017 INSC 18628 February 2017Dismissed
The appellant, Chhanga (Manoj), was part of a four‑person group that hurled two bombs at a shop where an informant was present, causing only minor injuries because the bombs exploded at a distance. The appellant shouted "kill him" and was charged under Section 307 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for attem…
GANDI DODDABASAPPA @ GANDHI BASAVARAJversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2017 INSC 126828 February 2017Dismissed
The appellant, Gandi Doddabasappa, was convicted by the Karnataka High Court for killing his daughter Shilpa, allegedly because she married a man of a lower caste. The trial court had acquitted him, dismissing the sole eyewitness testimony of PW‑18, but the High Court relied on that testimony, corroborated by forensic …
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2013 INSC 12928 February 2013Disposed off
The State of Andhra Pradesh filed a suit under Article 131 of the Constitution seeking to restrain Maharashtra from constructing the Babhali barrage within the water spread area of Andhra's Pochampad dam and from drawing water from it. The dispute centered on the interpretation of the 6 October 1975 water‑sharing agree…
HARYANA STATE COOP. LAND DEVELOPMENT BANKversusNEELAM
2005 INSC 10928 February 2005Appeal(s) allowed
Neelam was appointed on an ad‑hoc basis as a typist with Haryana State Cooperative Land Development Bank from January 1985 until May 1986, after which she joined the Haryana Urban Development Authority. Following a successful industrial dispute by similarly situated employees, she filed a writ petition in the Punjab & …
SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. AND ANR.versusM. SENTHIL KUMAR
2005 INSC 11028 February 2005Appeal(s) allowed
The Tamil Nadu Service Recruitment Board reserved 10% of police constable posts for the children/wards of serving, retired, deceased or medically invalidated police personnel and ministerial staff. M. Senthil Kumar applied for a post but was rejected on the grounds of unsatisfactory performance, and the Central Adminis…
JAMAL UDDIN AHMADversusABU SALEH NAJMUDDIN AND ANR.
2003 INSC 13228 February 2003Dismissed
The petitioners challenged the election of the respondent to the Assam Legislative Assembly, alleging that the election petition was invalidly presented to the Stamp Reporter of the Gauhati High Court. The respondents argued that the presentation complied with Chapter VIII‑A of the Gauhati High Court Rules and was ther…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusLALJIT RAJSHI SHAH AND ORS.
2000 INSC 10828 February 2000Dismissed
The State of Maharashtra appealed against a Bombay High Court decision that held the chairman and managing committee members of a cooperative society were not "public servants" for purposes of Section 21 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA). The respondents had been prosecuted for o…
STATE OF HARYANAversusGHASEETA RAM
1997 INSC 20528 February 1997Dismissed
Ghaseta Ram, a life‑imprisoned prisoner, participated in an unlawful assembly to escape from jail and assaulted a jail warden. He was tried and convicted by the Sessions Court and sentenced to several terms under the IPC. Earlier, the Superintendent of the District Jail, invoking para 633‑A of the Punjab Jail Manual an…
RAE BARELI KSHETRIYA GRAMIN BANKversusBHOLA NATH SINGH AND ORS.
1997 INSC 21028 February 1997Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a cashier‑cum‑clerk of Rae Bareli Kshetriya Gramin Bank, was charged with forging signatures and fraudulently withdrawing Rs 28,500. An ex‑parte inquiry found him guilty, a show‑cause notice was issued, and the disciplinary authority dismissed him; the dismissal was affirmed by the Board. The respondent…
STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusTHIRU K.S. MURUGESAN AND ORS.
1995 INSC 14728 February 1995Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Tamil Nadu punished Thiru K.S. Murugesan with stoppage of three increments for misconduct in 1982, a penalty that was reaffirmed after a fresh enquiry in 1984. When his promotion to Deputy Director of Statistics for the 1983‑84 year was considered under Rule 8 of the Tamil Nadu Statistics Service Rules, hi…
STATE OF U.P.versusU.P. UNIVERSITY COLLEGES PENSIONERS ASSOCIATION
1994 INSC 9428 February 1994Disposed off
The State of Uttar Pradesh issued a Government Order in 1980 offering two pension schemes to teachers of aided degree colleges, one of which provided pension without gratuity for those retiring at 60. Most teachers chose this scheme, but the Association challenged the computation of pension on the basis of the last pay…
WORKMEN OF THE FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIAversusM/S. FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA
1985 INSC 4028 February 1985Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned 464 labourers at the Food Corporation of India's Siliguri depot who were originally employed through a contractor. In 1973 the corporation abolished the contractor and introduced a direct payment system, paying wages directly to the workers via Sardar/Mondal agents. The corporation later, in 1975, re…
GASKET RADIATORS PVT. LTDversusEMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPN. & ANR.
1985 INSC 4128 February 1985Dismissed
Gasket Radiators Pvt. Ltd., incorporated in 1964, was initially exempted from paying the special contribution imposed by Chapter V‑A of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, until the scheme was extended to its area. The exemption was withdrawn on 31 May 1969 and the company challenged the liability, arguing that t…
IVAN RATHINAMversusMILAN JOSEPH
2025 INSC 11528 January 2025Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Ivan Rathinam, was alleged by the respondent and his mother to be the biological father of the respondent, who was born during the respondent's mother's marriage to Mr. Raju Kurian. The parties litigated in a Munsiff Court, a Sub‑Judge Court and a Family Court over a declaration of paternity, a DNA test,…
PARSI ZOROASTRIAN ANJUMAN, MHOWversusTHE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER/THE REGISTRAR OF PUBLIC TRUSTS & ANR.
2022 INSC 10828 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The Parsi Zoroastrian Anjuman, a registered public trust in Mhow, applied to the Registrar of Public Trusts for prior sanction under Section 14 of the Madhya Pradesh Public Trusts Act, 1951, to sell five immovable properties in order to augment its income. The Registrar rejected the application, citing potential prejud…
ASHISH SHELAR & ORS.versusTHE MAHARASHTRA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY & ANR.
2022 INSC 11628 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The petitioners, twelve BJP MLAs, were suspended for one year by a resolution of the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly after a heated monsoon session. They challenged the resolution under Articles 14, 21 and 190(4) of the Constitution, arguing that the suspension exceeded the period allowed by Rule 53 of the Assembly Ru…
JARNAIL SINGH & ORSversusLACHHMI NARAIN GUPTA & ORS
2022 INSC 10528 January 2022Directions issued
The Supreme Court examined the legal framework governing reservation in promotions for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes under Articles 16(4‑A) and 16(4‑B) of the Constitution. It clarified that the State must collect quantifiable, cadre‑wise data to demonstrate backwardness and inadequate representation, but no fi…
DEEPAK S/O LAXMAN DONGREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2022 INSC 11028 January 2022Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Deepak Dongre, was ordered to leave District Jalna for two years under Section 56(1)(a)(b) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951, based on five offences (three dated 2013‑2018 and two from 2020) and confidential witness statements. He challenged the externment order through a statutory appeal and a writ pe…
RAJENDRA KHAREversusSWAATI NIRKHI AND ORS.
2021 INSC 4528 January 2021
Rajendra Khare, who lodged FIR No.39/2016, was not made a party to a transfer petition filed by the accused seeking to move the trial of Criminal Case No.3483 of 2017 from Delhi to Allahabad. The Supreme Court transferred the case on 18 May 2018 without issuing notice under Order XXXIX Rule 2, and the petitioner’s subs…
SATYA RAJ SINGHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2019 INSC 9728 January 2019Dismissed
The appellant Satya Raj Singh was convicted for murder under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, based on eyewitness testimony that he stabbed the deceased on the neck with a knife. He challenged the conviction on the grounds that the trial courts erred in accepting the eye‑witnesses' statements and that the …
R. MUTHUKRISHNANversusTHE REGISTRAR GENERAL OF THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
2019 INSC 9928 January 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The petition filed by advocate R. Muthukrishnan challenged the validity of the Madras High Court's amended Rules 14A‑14D, which purported to empower the High Court to debar advocates for various forms of professional misconduct. The core issue was whether Section 34 of the Advocates Act, 1961 authorises a High Court to…
VIJAY A. MITTAL & ORS.versusKULWANT RAI (DEAD) THR. LRS. & ANR.
2019 INSC 9628 January 2019Disposed off
The plaintiffs filed a suit for specific performance of a 1979 agreement to purchase a property from defendant Amar Nath, alleging they had paid earnest money and were ready to perform, but Amar Nath sold the property to other defendants at a higher price. The trial court dismissed the suit on the ground that Amar Nath…
PRAFULL GORADIAversusUNION OF INDIA
2011 INSC 8228 January 2011Dismissed
Prabull Goradia, a Hindu, filed a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of the Haj Committee Act, 2002, alleging that taxes he pays are used to fund the Muslim Haj pilgrimage, thereby violating Articles 27, 14 and 15 of the Constitution. The Court examined the scope of Article 27, holdi…
KAMLAKAR BHIMRAO PATILversusMAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEV. CORPN.
2009 INSC 8028 January 2009Disposed off
The appellant, a director of M/s Everest Realtors Private Ltd., deposited money for land allotted by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (the Corporation) but the Corporation later sent a letter refusing to consider the allotment and returned the pay orders without giving any reason. The appellant filed …
SOBHA HYMAVATHI DEVIversusSETTI GANGADHARA SWAMY AND ORS.
2005 INSC 5128 January 2005Dismissed
The Supreme Court upheld the Andhra Pradesh High Court's decision that Sobha Hyma Vathi Devi, elected from a Scheduled Tribe (ST) reserved assembly constituency, was ineligible because she belonged to the forward Patnaik Sistu Karnam caste, not the Bhagatha ST community. The Court affirmed that the marriage of a non‑tr…
MEHSANA DISTRICT CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. AND ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.
2004 INSC 6428 January 2004Dismissed
Mehsana District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd., a cooperative bank registered under the Gujarat Co‑operative Societies Act, 1961, invested in a mutual fund without obtaining the State Government's permission required under Section 71 of that Act. The State of Gujarat sought a writ of mandamus directing authorities to i…
PARENTS ASSOCIATION AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2000 INSC 3228 January 2000Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the Central Government's revised quota system for higher‑education and public‑employment seats in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, which reduced the 10‑year‑education locals' reservation from 35% to 20% and restored a 50% reservation for pre‑ and post‑1942 settlers. The petitioners argued tha…
THE NEDUNGADI BANK LTD.versusK.P. MADHAVANKUTTY AND ORS.
2000 INSC 3628 January 2000Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a clerk of Nedungadi Bank Ltd., was dismissed in 1972 for misappropriation of funds following a disciplinary inquiry. After about seven years he sought reinstatement, alleging discrimination because two other dismissed employees had been reinstated, and applied to the Central Government under Section 10…
THE CHAIRMAN, RAILWAY BOARD AND ORS.versusMRS. CHANDRIMA DAS AND ORS.
2000 INSC 3828 January 2000Dismissed
A Bangladeshi woman, Hanuffa Khatoon, was gang‑raped by several Railway employees at the Yatri Niwas, Howrah Station. Advocate Chandrima Das filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking compensation of Rs 10 lakh and other reliefs. The Calcutta High Court awarded the compensation, holding that the offence violated t…
BIHAR STATE HOUSING BOARD AND ORS.versusSATYA NARAYAN PRASAD (DEAD) BY L.RS. AND ORS.
1998 INSC 4328 January 1998Appeal(s) allowed
The Bihar State Housing Board cancelled a residential plot allotted to S.N. Prasad in Sri Krishna Nagar because he already possessed another plot in Sri Krishna Puri, contrary to the Rules for Settlement of Land Acquired and Developed by the State Government at Patna. Prasad had sworn affidavits stating he and his fami…
SH. K.B. SHARMA AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
1998 INSC 4428 January 1998Dismissed
The appellants, who had risen from clerks to assistant managers in the New Bank of India, were placed in the Junior Management Grade Scale I along with accountants after the bank was taken over by the Union of India under the Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1980. They challenged Regula…
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIAversusSTATE OF KERALA
1997 INSC 7328 January 1997Dismissed
The Food Corporation of India (FCI) purchased food grains from the State of Uttar Pradesh under levy orders issued pursuant to Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, and also distributed fertilizers under the Fertilizer (Control) Order, 1957. The State sought to levy purchase tax and a 5% surcharge on the FC…
R.K. SETHI AND ANOTHER ETC.versusOIL AND NATURAL GAS COMMISSION
1997 INSC 7528 January 1997Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined the merger of Telex Operators into the Assistant Grade‑II (AG‑II) cadre of the Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC) and the consequent seniority and promotion issues. The Telex Operators were redesignated as AG‑II employees on 25 April 1980 and placed en bloc below regular AG‑II staff, with …
SH. BILESHWAR KHAND UDYOG KHEDUT SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR.
1992 INSC 3028 January 1992Dismissed
Sh. Bileshwarkhan Udyog Khedut Sahakari Mandali Ltd. challenged a levy imposed by the Gujarat Government under Section 58A of the Bombay Prohibition Act, which required licensees to pay the cost of excise staff for supervising the manufacture of industrial alcohol. The High Court upheld the levy as a fee within the Sta…
OM PARKASH AGARWAL ETC.ETC.versusGIRL RAJ KISHORI & ORS. ETC.ETC.
1986 INSC 828 January 1986Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, dealers in agricultural produce operating in notified market areas of Haryana, challenged the Haryana Rural Development Fund Act, 1983 which imposed a 1% cess on the sale proceeds of agricultural produce and credited the amount to a state‑vested fund for rural development. They contended that the levy w…
M. R. MINI (MINOR) REPRESENTED BY HER GUARDIAN & FATHER M. P. RAJAPPANversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANR .
1980 INSC 1228 January 1980Dismissed
The petitioners, a minor represented by her guardian and father, sought admission to an MBBS course in Kerala, arguing that because she belonged to the backward Calicut district she should be treated as a Calicut University student and benefit from that university's quota. The State of Kerala allocated seats on a unive…
JAGDISH SARAN & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS .
1980 INSC 1128 January 1980Dismissed
The University of Delhi reserved 70% of its 250 post‑graduate medical seats for its own graduates, denying admission to a Madras University graduate who had qualified in the entrance test. The petitioner challenged the rule under Articles 14, 15 and 16 of the Constitution, arguing it was discriminatory. The Supreme Cou…
ARNAB MANORANJAN GOSWAMIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
2020 INSC 66527 November 2020Disposed off
The appellant, a news‑channel editor, was arrested in November 2020 in connection with an FIR under Sections 306 and 34 of the IPC alleging his role in the suicide of a contractor who claimed unpaid dues. He filed a petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution and Section 482 of the CrPC seeking quashing of the …
MADRAS BAR ASSOCIATIONversusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.
2020 INSC 66627 November 2020Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualification, Experience and other Conditions of Service of Members) Rules, 2020 (the 2020 Rules) and the mechanisms for appointment, tenure, and service conditions of members of 19 tribunals. It held that the R…
VURIMI PULLARAO S/O SATYANARAYANAversusVEMARI VYANKATA RADHARANI W/O DHANKOTESHWARRAO & ANR
2019 INSC 129127 November 2019Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant filed a suit for injunction to prevent the defendant from obstructing possession of agricultural land, and six months later filed a suit for specific performance of the same agreement to sell. The trial court dismissed the specific performance suit, holding that the appellant had omitted to claim that rel…
STATE OF ASSAMversusBHASKAR JYOTI SARMA & ORS. ETC.
2014 INSC 81827 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Assam claimed that surplus land, declared under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, had been vested in the government after possession was taken in December 1991, and that the later repeal of the 1976 Act by the 1999 Repeal Act did not affect that vesting. The heirs of the original owner cha…
CHATURBHUJversusSITA BAI
2007 INSC 119027 November 2007Dismissed
The wife filed an application under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking maintenance, claiming she was unemployed and unable to maintain herself. The husband contended that she earned income from house rent and the sale of agricultural land and could therefore maintain herself. The trial court, after eval…
THE SECRETARY, MALANKARA SYRIAN CATHOLIC COLLEGEversusT. JOSE AND ORS.
2006 INSC 91527 November 2006Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether an aided minority college could be bound by Section 57(3) of the Kerala University Act, which requires the principal to be appointed on a seniority‑cum‑fitness basis. The college, a minority institution, had appointed Rev. Daniel as principal, a decision challenged by senior lecturers…
PHOOLAN DEVI ETC.versusSTATE. OF M.P. AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 139227 November 1996Disposed off
Phoolan Devi surrendered in Madhya Pradesh in 1983 and was released on parole after serving eleven years of custody. She filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking her release and the quashing of about 55 criminal prosecutions pending in Uttar Pradesh, alleging violation of her Article 21 right to a speedy trial an…
SITA RAM BANSAL AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
1996 INSC 139527 November 1996Dismissed
The petitioners, non‑provincialised employees of municipal committees, challenged a government pension scheme that was introduced on 1 April 1990 for All India Gazetted and Punjab Civil Services officers and later extended to non‑provincialised staff on 28 July 1994. They argued that the cut‑off date excluded retirees …
JASWANT SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
1990 INSC 36827 November 1990Appeal(s) allowed
Jaswant Singh, a police constable, was dismissed by the Assistant Inspector‑General of Police under Punjab Police Rules on the ground that he threatened to obstruct any departmental enquiry and to harm witnesses. The authority invoked clause (b) of the second proviso to Article 311(2) of the Constitution, claiming it w…
M/S VARIETY EMPORIUMversusV. R. M. MOHD. IBRAHIM NAINA
1984 INSC 21727 November 1984Appeal(s) allowed
The landlord filed seven eviction suits under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960, claiming a bona‑fide personal requirement for the premises. The trial court decreed eviction against all tenants; the appellate authority upheld the decrees for the four ground‑floor shop tenants and one first‑flo…
SATYA NARAIN SINGH ETC. ETC.versusTHE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD & ORS., ETC. ETC.
1984 INSC 21627 November 1984Dismissed
The petitioners, members of the Uttar Pradesh Judicial Service, applied for direct recruitment to the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service, claiming they had completed seven years of practice at the bar before joining the service and thus were eligible under Article 233(2) of the Constitution. The Allahabad High Court…
ANANT RAJ LTD. (FORMERLY M/S. ANANT RAJ INDUSTRIES LTD.)versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS.
2021 INSC 68027 October 2021Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the State of Haryana's practice of granting licences for group housing colonies on a "First Come First Serve" (FCFS) basis under the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975. The Court found that neither the public notice nor the Final Development Plan or the 2012 policy in…
SATYAMA DUBEY & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2020 INSC 61227 October 2020Disposed off
The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions and intervention applications filed under Article 32 seeking a fair investigation into the gang‑rape and murder of a 19‑year‑old girl in Hathras, Uttar Pradesh, and alleging illegal cremation of the victim. The State Government had already ordered the Central Bureau of …
C.K. JIDHEESHversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
2005 INSC 53627 October 2005Dismissed
The petitioner, who runs a colour photographic film developing and printing business, challenged a Ministry of Finance letter that clarified the Service Tax provisions of the Finance Act, 1994 (as amended by Act 14 of 2001). The letter stated that the taxable value of photography services is the gross amount charged, e…
DR. MAHACHANDRA PRASAD SINGHversusCHAIRMAN, BIHAR LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL AND ORS.
2004 INSC 62127 October 2004Dismissed
The petitioner, elected to the Bihar Legislative Council on an Indian National Congress ticket, contested a Lok Sabha election as an independent (and in a second petition as a Samajwadi Party candidate). The Chairman of the Council disqualified him under paragraph 2(1)(a) of the Tenth Schedule, holding that he had volu…
M.S. AHLAWATversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.
1999 INSC 49327 October 1999Appeal(s) allowed
M.S. Ahlawat, a police officer, filed forged affidavits and made false statements before the Supreme Court, which subsequently convicted him under Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code (perjury) and Article 129 of the Constitution (contempt) by way of a show‑cause notice. Ahlawat challenged the perjury conviction, conte…
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR.versusBALAJANGAM SUBBARAJAMMA
1988 INSC 33027 October 1988Dismissed
The respondent was detained under the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of Essential Commodities Act, 1980 and the matter was referred to an Advisory Board. The Board heard senior police officials representing the State but denied the detainee any assistance of a lawyer or a ‘friend’, despite th…
MUNICIPAL BOARD OF ABU ROADversusJAISHIV & ORS. ETC.
1987 INSC 29127 October 1987Appeal(s) allowed
The State Government of Rajasthan, under section 104 of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959, issued notifications revising octroi rates for cloth in the Abu Road municipality (1964) and later for all cloth in Sujangarh municipality (1976). Both were challenged on the ground of discrimination and violation of Article…
DAILY RATED CASUAL LABOUR EMPLOYED UNDER P & T DEPARTMENT THROUGH BHARTIYA DAK TAR MAZDOOR MANCHversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
1987 INSC 29327 October 1987Disposed off
The petitioners were daily‑rated casual labourers in the Posts and Telegraphs Department who were classified into unskilled, semi‑skilled and skilled categories and further divided by length of service, receiving wages far below the minimum pay of regular employees. They sought equal pay, regularisation and a scheme fo…
K.S. VORA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND OTHERS
1987 INSC 29427 October 1987Dismissed
The appellants, who had joined the Gujarat Subordinate Secretariat Service as clerks‑cum‑typists before the 1960 bifurcation of Bombay State, challenged the Gujarat Subordinate Secretariat Service (Seniority of Assistants) Rules, 1977. The Rules, framed with retrospective effect from May 1, 1960, fixed seniority among …
PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, PATIALA & ANR. ETC.versusRAVINDER KUMAR SHARMA & ORS., ETC.
1986 INSC 22027 October 1986Dismissed
Ravinder Kumar Sharma, a line‑man employed by the Punjab State Electricity Board, was senior to several colleagues who were promoted to the post of line‑superintendent in 1977. The Board had fixed a quota reserving a percentage of promotions for diploma‑holding line‑men, thereby bypassing Sharma, who, although a non‑di…