Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

SHRI KRUSHNA CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY THROUGH BHAVESH PRAVINCHANDRA RAICHURAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The Krishna Credit Co‑operative Society filed a criminal appeal (No. 39113 of 2024) against the State of Gujarat. A hearing was scheduled before Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker, but neither the applicant nor the respondent appeared even on the second call. No request for adjournment was made by any party. The court, observing the procedural rule that an unrepresented matter may be dismissed for want of prosecution, ordered the dismissal of the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to non‑appearance of the parties and no request for adjournment

Subjects

criminal appealdismissalwant of prosecutionprocedural defaultnon‑appearance

Judgment

          R/CR.MA/20268/2024                                                                   ORDER DATED: 27/01/2026




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) NO. 20268
                               of 2024

                                     In F/CRIMINAL APPEAL/39113/2024

                                               With
                                 F/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 39113 of 2024
    ==========================================================
    SHRI KRUSHNA CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY THROUGH BHAVESH
                    PRAVINCHANDRA RAICHURA
                              Versus
                     STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
    ==========================================================
    Appearance:
    MS. SHIVANGI M RANA(7053) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
    NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2
    MS MEGHA CHITALIYA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
    ==========================================================

       CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                                      Date : 27/01/2026

                                                        ORAL ORDER


                          None present even in the second call nor any

    request for adjournment is made.

                          In view of the same, this matter is dismissed for

    want of prosecution.

                                                                                           (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
    SRILATHA



Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: SRILATHA VENKATARAO UPADHYAYULA(HC00185), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 27/01/2026 17:30:05




                                                              Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "criminal appeal"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.