High Court of Gujarat
MEENAKSHI DISTRIBUTORSversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 40-WITHDRAWN @ FH
- Bench
- P M RAVAL
Holding
The application is dismissed for default for want of prosecution.
Summary
Meenakshi Distributors & Anr. filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking to quash and set aside an FIR/order. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Apurva A. Dave, failed to appear for the second hearing, indicating a lack of intention to pursue the matter. The Court held that such non‑appearance amounted to a want of prosecution. Consequently, the application was dismissed for default, the notice was discharged and any interim relief was vacated.
Issues considered
- Whether the criminal miscellaneous application for quashing the FIR can proceed despite the applicant's counsel being absent for the second hearing?
Subjects
default judgmentprocedural defaultcriminal miscellaneous applicationcourt procedureapplication dismissed
Judgment
R/CR.MA/3999/2019 ORDER DATED: 16/04/2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 3999 of 2019
(FOR QUASHING & SET ASIDE FIR/ORDER)
=======================================================
MEENAKSHI DISTRIBUTORS & ANR.
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
=======================================================
Appearance:
MR APURVA A DAVE(3777) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2
HARSHANG H PATEL(7349) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR LB DABHI APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
=======================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DIVYESH A. JOSHI
Date : 16/04/2024
ORAL ORDER
Even in second call, learned advocate, Mr. Apurva
Dave has not remained present, which shows that he does
not wish to continue with the present proceeding.
Hence, this application stands dismissed for default
for want of prosecution. Notice is discharged. Interim
relief, if any, stands vacated.
(DIVYESH A. JOSHI, J.)
Gautam
Page 1 of 1
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.
Try "default judgment"Sign in to search