Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

NOTIYAR MAMAD MUSTAKSIDHIKversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
37-DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT @ ADMISSION

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant’s non‑appearance.

Summary

The petitioner, Notiyar Mamad Mustaksidhik, filed an anticipatory bail application before the Gujarat High Court against the State of Gujarat. The petitioner’s counsel, Ms. Ketki P. Jha, withdrew her appearance, prompting the Registrar to issue a notice to the applicant. Despite multiple notices dated 16‑06‑2026, 23‑06‑2026 and 30‑06‑2026, the petitioner failed to appear before the Court. A fresh notice was also served, but again there was no appearance. The Court held that the application could not proceed in the absence of the applicant and dismissed it for want of prosecution. Consequently, the anticipatory bail relief was not granted.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application may be dismissed for want of prosecution when the applicant fails to appear despite notice.

Subjects

anticipatory bailwant of prosecutionnon‑appearancecriminal procedurebail

Judgment

      R/CR.MA/4232/2026                                                  ORDER DATED: 18/08/2026




         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL) NO. 4232
                            of 2026
================================================================
                            NOTIYAR MAMAD MUSTAKSIDHIK
                                       Versus
                                 STATE OF GUJARAT
================================================================
Appearance:
NOTICE UNSERVED for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR YUVRAJ BRAHMBHATT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================
  CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                        Date : 18/08/2026
                                         ORAL ORDER

         By an order dated 07.05.2026, the Registrar Judicial has
observed          that     learned         advocate         Ms.       Ketki       P.     Jha       had

withdrawn her appearance and the office was directed to

issue advocate notice to the applicant.

         On 16.06.2026, 23.06.2026 and 30.06.2026, this Court

has observed that none present though the advocate notice

has been served. Thereafter, fresh notice is also served but
none has remained present.



         In view of the same, the present application stands

dismissed for want of prosecution.


                                                                      (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)



Manoj Kumar Rai




Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: MANOJKUMAR RAI(HC01072), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 18/08/2026 17:09:59




                                              Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "anticipatory bail"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.