High Court of Gujarat

DEEPAK ENTERPRISE THRO DIPINBHAI GUNVANTBHAI PATELversusALPESH STEEL THRO ALPESHBHAI J. PATEL

Disposal: 27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
Bench: SANJEEV THAKER

Holding

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The appellant, Deepak Enterprise through Dipinbhai Patel, filed a criminal appeal (No. 845 of 2023) seeking leave to appeal. The respondent, Alpes h Steel through Alpeshbhai Patel and others, were served with notice. No party appeared in court even after a second call, and no request for adjournment was made. Consequently, the court dismissed the matter for want of prosecution. The order was pronounced by Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker on 8 January 2026.

Subjects

procedural lawwant of prosecutiondismissalcriminal appeal

Judgment

       R/CR.MA/5944/2023                                                                  ORDER DATED: 08/01/2026




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL) NO. 5944 of
                            2023

                                   In R/CRIMINAL APPEAL/845/2023

                                             With
                               R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 845 of 2023
==========================================================
        DEEPAK ENTERPRISE THRO DIPINBHAI GUNVANTBHAI PATEL
                               Versus
            ALPESH STEEL THRO ALPESHBHAI J. PATEL & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
TATVDEEP J JANI(7227) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR MAHESHB BARIYA(2234) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR RAVINDRA P PATEL(5276) for the Respondent(s) No. 1
MR YUVRAJ BRAHMBHATT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================

   CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                                  Date : 08/01/2026

                                                    ORAL ORDER


                      None present even in the second call nor any

request for adjournment is made.

                      In view of the same, this matter is dismissed for

want of prosecution.


                                                                                       (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
SRILATHA


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: SRILATHA VENKATARAO UPADHYAYULA(HC00185), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 08/01/2026 17:44:51




                                                          Page 1 of 1

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "procedural law"Sign in to search