High Court of Gujarat

PUROHIT KIRITKUMAR GANESHBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal: 27-WITHDRAWN @ ADM.STAGE
Bench: SANJEEV THAKER

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Purohit Kiritkumar Ganesbhai, filed an anticipatory bail application (R/Cr.MA/6033/2026) before the High Court of Gujarat. Initially, advocates Krunal S. Mehta and Fehad A. Memon appeared for the applicant. During the hearing, advocate Karan Vyas sought to appear on behalf of the applicant and was allowed to file a vakalatnama. Subsequently, the applicant, through counsel, requested permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. Justice Sanjeev J. Thaker granted the request, ordering that the application be disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

Whether an anticipatory bail application may be withdrawn at the applicant's request

Subjects

anticipatory bailwithdrawal of applicationcriminal procedurehigh court order

Judgment

           R/CR.MA/6033/2026                                                                  ORDER DATED: 11/06/2026




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

    R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL) NO. 6033
                              of 2026

   ==========================================================
                                   PUROHIT KIRITKUMAR GANESHBHAI
                                                Versus
                                         STATE OF GUJARAT
   ==========================================================
   Appearance:
   KRUNAL S MEHTA(9227) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
   MR FEHAD A MEMON(13378) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
   MS CHETNA SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
   ==========================================================

       CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                                     Date : 11/06/2026

                                                        ORAL ORDER


                          Learned advocate Mr. Karan Vyas submits that he

   has instructions to appear for the applicant in place of

   learned advocate Mr.Krunal Mehta. He is permitted to file

   vakalatnama in the Registry. Registry to accept the same.

                          Learned advocate for the applicant/s, after arguing

   the matter for sometime, under instructions, seeks permission

   to withdraw this application.

                          Permission,                 as        prayed            for,        is       granted.              This

   application stands disposed of as withdrawn.


                                                                                          (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
   SRILATHA


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: SRILATHA VENKATARAO UPADHYAYULA(HC00185), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 11/06/2026 15:52:01




                                                             Page 1 of 1

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "anticipatory bail"Sign in to search