High Court of Gujarat

RAVAL NITESHKUMAR VASUDEVBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal: 53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE
Bench: GITA GOPI

Holding

The Court condoned the 130‑day delay and allowed the revision application.

Summary

The petitioner filed a criminal revision application (No. 10922/2026) but delayed filing by 130 days. The petitioner sought condonation of this delay. The High Court examined the averments in the application and found no sufficient reason to reject condonation. Consequently, the Court condoned the 130‑day delay and allowed the revision application. The parties were permitted to settle the matter, and the Court directed that the main matter be placed before the Lok Adalat. Additionally, the Court permitted Advocate Ms. Himani Patel to file a Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.2.

Issues considered

Whether a delay of 130 days in filing a criminal revision application can be condoned.

Subjects

condonation of delaycriminal revisionLok AdalatsettlementHigh Court of Gujarat

Judgment

    R/CR.MA/6352/2026                               ORDER DATED: 13/03/2026




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO.
                        6352 of 2026

            In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/10922/2026

==========================================================
                        RAVAL NITESHKUMAR VASUDEVBHAI
                                     Versus
                            STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR KAMLESH S KOTAI(6150) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI

                                Date : 13/03/2026

                                 ORAL ORDER


      Heard learned Advocates for the respective parties.

      In view of the averments made in the application,

delay of 130 days occurred in preferring the captioned

revision application is condoned. Application is allowed.

      The parties are permitted to settle the matter.

      Learned Advocate Ms. Himani Patel seeks permission

to file Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no.2. Let the

Vakalatnama be accepted.




                                    Page 1 of 2
        R/CR.MA/6352/2026                                                    ORDER DATED: 13/03/2026




           Since both the parties have agreed to settle the

  matter, office to place the main matter in the ensuing Lok

  Adalat.




                                                                                         (GITA GOPI,J)
  PARMAR KRISH/SB-1-01




Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: PARMAR KRISH(HC02348), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 13/03/2026 12:16:23




                                                  Page 2 of 2

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "condonation of delay"Sign in to search