Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

RUPESHKUMAR @ RAJU RAMESHBHAI NAT (MARWADI)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The court held that the applicant is not entitled to temporary bail as the seriousness of the offence and unsatisfactory jail conduct do not justify its grant.

Summary

The applicant, Rupeshkumar @ Raju Rameshbhai Nat (Marwadi), filed a temporary bail application through jail. The jail records indicated that he had been released in July 2025, is implicated in a serious offence, and his conduct while in custody was unsatisfactory. The court examined whether these circumstances warranted the grant of temporary bail. Finding that the seriousness of the alleged crime and the poor jail conduct provided no sufficient ground for bail, the court rejected the application. The order was directed to be communicated to the jail authority.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant is entitled to temporary bail despite the seriousness of the offence and unsatisfactory jail conduct?

Subjects

temporary bailcriminal procedurebail denialjail conductserious offence

Judgment

       R/CR.MA/8072/2026                                                            ORDER DATED: 09/04/2026




          IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD


R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL) NO.
                      8072 of 2026

================================================
    RUPESHKUMAR @ RAJU RAMESHBHAI NAT (MARWADI)
                            Versus
                 STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
================================================
Appearance:
THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MS MONALI BHATT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

                                              Date : 09/04/2026

                                               ORAL ORDER

1.        This application, through jail, is filed by the applicant seeking
temporary bail.


2.        The jail remarks indicate that the applicant was earlier released in
July 2025 and is involved in a serious offence. Further, his jail conduct
is also not satisfactory. Considering the same, no case is made out. The
application is rejected, accordingly.


3.        Registry to communicate this order to the concerned jail
authority.


                                                                                            [ P. M. Raval, J. ]
hiren/14tss9426




 Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
 Digitally signed by: HIREN VIRENDRABHAI MER(HC00351), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 09/04/2026 14:13:31


                                                      Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "temporary bail"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.