High Court of Gujarat

SANDIP BHARATBHAI BERAWALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal: 47-DISPOSAL IN ANY OTHER MODE FH
Bench: ILESH VORA

Holding

The application for successive regular bail was disposed of as not pressed.

Summary

In a criminal miscellaneous application for successive regular bail before the chargesheet, Sandip Bharatbhai Berawala sought an order directing the trial court to conclude the trial within two months, as the case was at the stage of recording the investigating officer's evidence. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Ishan R. Vyas, informed the court that the applicant would not press the application. Consequently, the High Court disposed of the application as not pressed, without addressing any substantive bail issues.

Subjects

bailcriminal proceduretrial delayapplication not pressed

Judgment

                  R/CR.MA/8629/2026                                                            ORDER DATED: 12/06/2026




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

            R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL -
                       BEFORE CHARGESHEET) NO. 8629 of 2026

           ==========================================================
                                           SANDIP BHARATBHAI BERAWALA
                                                      Versus
                                                STATE OF GUJARAT
           ==========================================================
           Appearance:
           MR ISHAN R VYAS(10865) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
           MR RONAK RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
           ==========================================================

              CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA

                                                         Date : 12/06/2026

                                                            ORAL ORDER


                     Mr.Ishan Vyas, learned advocate for the applicant, upon
           instructions, states that the matter pending before the Trial Court is at
           the stage of recording the evidence of the Investigating Officer.
                     In such circumstances, the Trial Court is requested to conclude
           the trial proceedings, in accordance with law, within a period of two
           months from the date of this order.
                     In that view of the matter, learned advocate for the applicant
           does not press this application.
                     Accordingly, present application stands disposed of as not
           pressed.




                                                                                                      (ILESH J. VORA,J)
           Rakesh



Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: RAKESH MAHESHKUMAR KOSHTI(HC00950), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 12/06/2026 16:38:40




                                                                 Page 1 of 1

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "bail"Sign in to search