DHARMESH SHAILESHBHAI FATEKAR THRO. KAILASHBEN DHARMESHBHAI FATEKARversusSTAET OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH
- Bench
- GITA GOPI
Holding
The High Court set aside the order of the 4th Additional Sessions Judge and granted bail to the applicant upon deposit of Rs.5,00,000 and execution of a personal bond, allowing him to file the appeal with a fresh delay‑condonation application.
Summary
The applicant, Dharmesh Shaileshbai Fatekar, had a non‑bailable warrant converted to a bailable warrant on the condition of paying 20% of a cheque amount, which he could not initially arrange due to financial constraints. The 4th Additional Sessions Judge refused to condone a 403‑day delay in filing a criminal appeal, citing procedural lapses. The applicant later produced a demand draft of Rs.5,00,000 deposited before the Nazir of the District Court, prompting the High Court to set aside the lower court’s order. The High Court allowed the revision application, directed that the applicant be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000 with a surety, and permitted him to file the appeal with a fresh delay‑condonation application. The order also imposed conditions that the applicant not misuse his liberty and not leave India without permission.
Issues considered
- Whether the order of the 4th Additional Sessions Judge refusing to condone the 403‑day delay should be set aside.
- Whether the applicant is entitled to bail after depositing the required amount and furnishing a personal bond.
- Whether the applicant may be permitted to file a criminal appeal with a fresh delay‑condonation application.
Subjects
Judgment
R/CR.RA/1121/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/04/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST ORDER PASSED BY
SUBORDINATE COURT) NO. 1121 of 2026
==========================================================
DHARMESH SHAILESHBHAI FATEKAR THRO. KAILASHBEN
DHARMESHBHAI FATEKAR
Versus
STAET OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR SHAIVAL M PATEL(9950) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR NIRAJ SHARMA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI
Date : 30/04/2026
ORDER
1. It is submitted by learned advocate Mr. Shaival M.Patel that
non-bailable warrant issued against the applicant was
converted into bailable warrant by the order of this Court on
01.01.2025, but the applicant was put to condition of paying
20% of the cheque amount, the applicant, at that time being
in financial crunch, could not make arrangement of fund, and
the learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge observing the facts
that the proceedings before the High Court had been
suppressed and the order of the High Court has not been
followed, and thereafter, the applicant had changed his
address and finding him in continuous breach of the law, did
not deem it fit to condone the delay of 403 days.
2. Today, learned advocate Mr. Patel has produced copy of the
Demand Draft of Rs.5,00,000/-, which was deposited before
Page 1 of 2
R/CR.RA/1121/2026 ORDER DATED: 30/04/2026
the Nazir of the District Court, Ahmedabad and the
endorsement of the Nazir of the District Court, Ahmedabad is
recorded thereon.
3. Having considered this fact, the order dated 20.03.2026
passed in Criminal Misc. Application No.711 of 2026 by the 4 th
Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) is set aside.
4. Since the applicant has deposited the amount of
Rs.5,00,000/-, let the concerned Judge now permit the
applicant to move again for filing the Criminal Appeal along
with delay condonation application.
5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the
case and when 20% of the cheque amount has been
deposited, the applicant herein is ordered to be released on
bail, if not required in any other case, on executing a personal
bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with one
surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court
and subject to the conditions that the applicant shall;
[a] not take undue advantage of liberty or misuse
liberty;
[b] not leave India without prior permission of this
Court;
6. The present application is allowed. Direct service is permitted.
Registry to communicate this order to the concerned
Court/authority by Fax or Email forthwith.
(GITA GOPI,J)
Maulik
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: MAULIK RAJESH PANDYA(HC00205), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 30/04/2026 16:28:12
Page 2 of 2
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.