M.K BALAKRISHNAN & OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
- Citation
- 2009 INSC 412
- Decided
- 26 March 2009
- Disposal
- Hearing Adjourned
Holding
The Court ordered the Ministry of Science and Technology to file a counter‑affidavit on measures taken to resolve water shortage and to implement the scientific‑research directives, and allowed the impleadment of the newly added states.
Summary
The Supreme Court entertained a writ petition under Article 32 concerning the protection of wetlands and the acute water shortage in India. The petitioners highlighted that ponds, tanks, and other water‑conservation bodies have been illegally filled and built upon, exacerbating the crisis. Relying on earlier judgments that recognize the right to water as part of the right to life under Article 21, the Court expanded the scope of the petition to include all water‑conservation structures. It recalled its earlier directions in State of Orissa v. Government of India, directing the Centre to constitute a body of eminent scientists to devise inexpensive water‑saving technologies. The Court ordered the Secretary, Ministry of Science and Technology, to file a counter‑affidavit within four weeks detailing measures taken to address the water shortage and to implement the earlier recommendations, and it allowed the impleadment of the newly added states. The matter was listed for further hearing on 28 April 2009.
Issues considered
- The extent to which the right to water is encompassed within Article 21 of the Constitution.
- Whether the Centre and States are obligated to protect wetlands and other water‑conservation structures.
- Implementation of the Supreme Court's earlier directions in State of Orissa v. Government of India regarding scientific research on water shortage.
- The procedural propriety of issuing a notice to the Ministry of Science and Technology and allowing impleadment of additional states.
Subjects
Judgment
[2009] 4 S.C.R 1190
A M.K BALAKRISHNAN & OTHERS
v
UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Writ Petition(C) No. 230 of 2001
MARCH 26, 2009
B
[MARKANDEY KAT JU AND B. SUDERHSAN
REDDY, JJ]
ENVIRONMENTAL LAW:
c Preservation of environment and maintaining the
ecology - protection of wet land - Need to maintain water
conservation bodies such as ponds, tanks, small lakes etc.,
emphasized - Notice Issued to newly added States - Notice
a/so issued to Secretary, Ministry of Science and Technology,
D Union of India to file counter affidavit stating as to what
measures are being taken to solve water shortage problem in
the country and for implementing the recommendations made
1
by the Court in State of Orissa vs. Government of /ndia .
Hinch Lal Tiwari vs. Kamala Devi AIR SC 3215 - referred
E to.
Case Law Reference
AIR 2001 SC 3215 referred to para 9
F CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Writ Petition (Civil)
No(s). 230 of 2001
[UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF
INDIA]
Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Radhakrishna Kumar,
G Parmanand Pandey, Naresh Kumar, for the Appellants.
Manish Singhvi, Manjit Singh, and Shail Kumar Dwivedi,
1
2009 ( 1) SCR 992 = JT 2009 (2) SC 233
H 1190
M.K. BALAKRISHNAN & OTHERS V 1191
UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
AAGs, R. Shunmugh Sundram, R. Shunmugasundaram. S.R. A
Singh, T.S.Doabia, Anuvrat Sharma,Alka Sinha, Sunita Sharma,
B.V Balaram Das, Riku Sarma, (for M/s Corporate Law Group),
Avijit Bhattacharjee, Saumya Kundu, Kamini Jaiswal, Pinky
Behera. Hemantika Wahi, Radha Shyam Jena, Naresh K.
Sharma, Aruna Mathur, Vimal Dubay, Arputham Aruna & Co.. B
Khwairakpam Nobin Singh, Sangitaa Singh, Manish Kumar,
Gopal Singh, B.S.Banthia, Milind Kumar, R.S.Suri, Ranjan
Mukherjee, Sunita Hazarika, R.Ayyam Perumal, Anil Shrivastav,
K.N.Madhusoodhanan, M.K.Michael, R. Nedumaran,
V.G.Pragasam, S.J.Aristotle, Prabu Rama Subramanian, C
P.V.Dinesh, Sindhu T.P., Tabrez Ahmad, Anis Suhrawardy, Anil
Kumar Jha, Sanjay R.Hegde, A.Rohen Singh, Edward Belho,
Rituraj Biswas, P.Athuimei R. Naga, A.Subhashini, Manoj
Saxena, Rajnish K. Singh, Rahul Shukla, Sanjay V.Kharde, Asha
G.Nair, T.Harish Kumar, Harikesh Singh, Kamal Mohan Gupta, D
for the Respondents.
The following Order of the Court was delivered
Heard learned counsel for the parties. E
Pursuant to this Court's order dated 26th February, 2009,
• the Chief Secretaries, State of Haryana and Uttar Pradesh are
personally present in the Court. Their personal presence is
dispensed with unless directed in future. F
The present Writ Petition under Article 32 of the
Constitituion of India relates to conservation of wet lands which
in our opinion would include ponds, tanks, canals, creeks, water
channels, reservoirs, rivers, streams and lakes. Although, the
~ writ petition as framed related to protection of wetlands in the G
country for preservation of the environment and maintaining the
ecology, we have suo motu expanded its scope as mentioned
below.
There is acute shortage of water in our country and one of H
1192 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2009] 4 S.C.R.
A the main reasons for that is that most of the water conservation
bodies in our country such as ponds, tanks. small lakes etc.
have been filled up in recent times by some greedy persons
and such persons have constructed buildings, shops etc. on
the same.
B
Our ancestors were wise people who realised that because
of droughts or some other reasons there may be shortage of
water in future and hence they made the provision of a pond
near every village, tanks in or near temples. etc .. The whole idea
behind this was that whenever there is a shortage of water due
C to drought etc., people may not suffer and they may use the
water available in ponds, tanks etc. Unfortunately, people have
forgotten the wisdom of our ancestors and that is why some
greedy people for their personal interest and to make money
have filled up most of these ponds, tanks etc. and have
D constructed buildings thereon with the result that in most parts
of India, there is a terrible water shortage and people are
suffering terribly, particularly, in the summer season both in rural
and urban areas. When water is not available, people come to
the streets and there are chakka jams (road blocks), riots etc.
E to awaken the government authorities to take some measures
to make available the necessity of life to the general public
called water.
In many cities, in many colonies, people get water for half
an hour in a day and sometimes not even that e.g. in Delhi,
F Tamil Nadu, Rajasthan, U.P., Northeast etc. In large parts of rural
areas there is a shortage of water for irrigation and drinking
purpose. Rivers in India are drying up, ground water is being
rapidly depleted and canals are polluted. The Yamuna in Delhi
looks like a black drain. Several perennial rivers like the Ganga
G and Bahamputra are rapidly becoming seasonal. Rivers are ~
dying or declining, and acquifers are getting over-pumped.
Industries, hotels, etc. are pumping out groundwater at an
alarming rate, causing sharp decline in the groundwater levels.
Farmers are having a hard time finding ground water for their
H crops e.g. in Punjab. In many'places there are serpentine queu8s
M.K. BALAKRISHNAN & OTHERS V. 1193
UNION OF !NOIA & OTHERS
of exhausted housewives waiting for hours to fill their buckets of A
water. In this connection, John Briscoe has authored a detailed
World Bank report, in which he has mentioned that despite this
alarming situation there is widespread complacency on the part
of the authorities in India.
This Court in State of Orissa vs. Government of India & B
Another, JT 2009 (2) SC 233, in which one of us [Hon'ble Mr.
Justice Markandey Katju] was a member, while agreeing fully
with the reasoning and directions of the other Hon'ble Judge on
the Bench Hon'ble Altamas Kabir, J., has recommended to the
Central Government to immediately constitute a body of eminent C
scientists in the field who should be requested to do scientific
research in this area on a war footing to find out scientific ways
and means of solving the water shortage problem in the country.
It was also recommended that the said body shall be given all
\
the financial, technical and administrative help by the Central D
and State Governments for this purpose. The help and advice
of foreign scientific experts and/or Indian scientists settled
abroad who are specialized in this field may also be taken, since
the solution to the problem will not only help India but also foreign
countries which are facing the same problem, some of which E
may already have progressed significantly in this area. The
present known methods e.g. distillation or reverse osmosis are
very expensive. We have to find out cheaper methods and this
is possible only by scientific research on a war footing. The said
body of scientists was requested to, inter alia, perform the F
following tasks:
(i) to find out an inexpensive method or methods of
converting saline water into fresh water.
(ii) to find out an inexpensive and practical method of G
utilizing the water, which is in the form of ice, in the
Himalayas.
(iii) to find out a viable method of utilizing rain water.
(iv) to utilize the flood water by harnessing the rivers so H
1194 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2009] 4 S.C.R
A that the. excess water in the floods, may instead of causing
damage, be utilized for the people who are short of water,
or be stored in reservoirs for use when there is drought
In the said decision the Court also observed:
B "42. It is indeed sad that a country like India which solved
the problem of town planning 6000 years ago in the Indus
Valley Civilization and which discovered the decimal
system in Mathematics and Plastic Surgery in Medicine
in ancient times, and is largely managing Silicon Valley in
c U.S.A. today has been unable to solve the problem of
water shortage till now. In my opinion there is no dearth of
eminent scientists in the field who can solve this problem,
but they have not been organized and brought together
and not been requested by the Central and State
D Governments to solve this problem, nor given the facilities
for this.
43.ln my opinion the right to get water is a part of right to
life guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution. In this
conne11tion, it has been observed in Delhi Water Supply &
E Sewage Disposal Undertaking and Anr. vs. State of
Haryana and Ors. [JT 1996 (6) SC 107; 1996 (2) SCC
572]:
"Water is a gift of nature. Human hand cannot be permitted
to convert this bounty into a curse, an oppression. The
F
primary use to which water is put being drinking, it would
be mocking nature to force the people who live on the
bank of a river to remain thirsty" .....
44. Similarly in Chameli Singh & Ors. v. State of U.P. &
G Ors. [JT 1995 (9) SC 380. 1996 (2) SCC 549] this Court
observed:
" ..... Right to live guaranteed in any civilized society implies
the right to food, water, decent environment, education,
medical care and shelter. These are basic human rights
H known to any civilized society. All civil. political, social and
M.K. BALAKRISHNAN & OTHERS V 1195
UNION OF /NOIA & OTHERS
cultural rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of A
Human Rights and Convention or under the Constitution
of India cannot be exercised without these basic human
rights" .....
In Hinch Lal Tiwari vs. Kamala Devi, AIR 2001S.C.3215,
8
this Court observed (vide paragraphs 13 and 14):
"13. It is important to note that material resources of the
community like forests, tanks, ponds, hillock, mountain
etc. are nature's bounty. They maintain delicate ecological
balance. They need to be protected for a proper and healthy c
environment which enable people to enjoy a quality life
which is essence of the guaranteed right under Article 21
of the Constitution. The Government, including revenue
authorities, i.e. respondents 11 to 13, having noticed that
a pond is falling in disuse, should have bestowed their D
attention to develop the same which would, on one hand,
have prevented ecological disaster and on the other
provided better environment for the benefit of public at
large. Such vigil is the best protection against knavish
attempts to seek allotment in non-abadi sites.
E
14.For the aforementioned reasons, we set aside the
order of the High Court, restore the order of the Additional
Collecto~ dated February 25, 1999 confirmed by the
Commissioner on March 12, 1999. Consequently,
respondents 1 to 10 shall vacate the land, which was F
allotted to them, within six months from today. they will,
however, be permitted to take awar the material of the
houses which they have constructed on the said land. If
responaents 1 to 10 do not vacate the land within the said
period the official respondents i.e. respondents 11 to 13 G
shall demolish the construction and get possession of the
said land in accordance with law. The State including
respondents 11 to 13 shall restore the pond, develop and
maintain the same as a recreational spot which will
undoubtedly be in the best interest of the villagers. Further H
1196 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2009) 4 S.C.R
A it will also help in maintaining ecological balance and
protecting environment in regard to which this Court has
repeatedly expressed its concern. Such measures must
begun at the grass-root level if they were to become the
nation's pride."
B
Let notice be issued to the Secretary, Ministry of Science
and Technology, Union of India which will file its counter affidavit
within four weeks stating what measures are being taken to solve
the water shortage problem in the country and for implementing
the recommendation of Hon'ble Markandey Katju, J. in the
C aforesaid decision in State of Orissa vs. Government of India &
Another, JT 2009 (2) SC 233.
The application for impleadment is allowed. Let notice
issue to the newly added States.
List this matter on 28th April, 2009. •
R.P. Matter adjourned.
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.