Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

B SUDERSHAN REDDY

96 judgments delivered by benches including this judge.

PARAMJIT SINGH@ MITHU SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH SECRETARY (HOME)

2007 INSC 111531 October 2007Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the murder of Harnek Singh by four of his brothers, who attacked him with gandasas and a dang, leading to his death. The appellant, Mithu Singh, challenged his conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC, arguing that his injuries were not fatal, that there was an unreasonabl

STATE OF U.P.versusPREETAM & ORS.

2011 INSC 24831 March 2011Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh charged Preetam and four others with murder, assault and rioting under Sections 302, 149, 307 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code for the killing of Guiab and Chhatrapal. The trial court convicted them, but the Allahabad High Court acquitted them on the ground of self‑defence, finding serious in

DEEPAK AGARWAL & ANR.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS.

2011 INSC 25031 March 2011Dismissed

The appellants, a Technical Officer and a Statistical Officer in the Uttar Pradesh Excise Group ‘A’ Service, challenged a 1999 amendment that excluded their cadres from promotion to Deputy Excise Commissioner, arguing that ten vacancies that arose before the amendment should be filled under the old 1983 rules. The Supr

ANOKH SINGHversusPUNJAB STATE ELECTION COMMISSION

2010 INSC 75829 October 2010Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether a Lambardar in Punjab, who receives a monthly honorarium of Rs.900, holds an "office of profit" that disqualifies him from contesting Panchayat elections. The Court noted that the land‑revenue system had been abolished, so the Lambardar receives no salary, only a compensatory allowanc

STATE OF U.P. & ORS.versusBHUPENDRA NATH TRIPATHI & ORS.

2010 INSC 75929 October 2010Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh issued an order restricting eligibility for the Special Basic Training Course (BTC) 2007 to candidates whose B.Ed. degrees were from institutions recognized by the National Council for Teacher Education (NCTE). Several candidates whose degrees were from institutions that were later recognized

P. SESHADRIversusS. MANGATI GOPAL REDDY AND ORS.

2011 INSC 23329 March 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanam (TTD) Board extended the service of retired Parpathedar P. Seshadri on a contract basis beyond the age of sixty. Respondent S. Mangati Gopal Reddy filed a writ petition, styled as a public‑interest litigation, alleging that the extensions violated Rule 13 of the TTD Service Rules, 198

M. JAGDISH VYAS AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS

2010 INSC 17829 March 2010Dismissed

The appellants, permanent employees of the Postal Department, sought inclusion in the list of successful candidates for Junior Accounts Officer (JAO) positions in the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) after appearing in the JAO Part‑11 examination for deputationists. The dispute centered on whether the relaxation

M.D., M/S. T. NADU MAGNESITE LTD.versusS. MANICKAM & ORS.

2010 INSC 17929 March 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved three employees of the Tamil Nadu Magnesite Limited (TANMAG), a state-owned company, who were permanently transferred to a joint venture (JVC) with Kaitan Supermag Ltd. When the JVC was later closed, the employees sought re‑absorption into TANMAG, invoking the doctrine of promissory/equitable estoppel

STATE THROUGH C.B.I.versusMAHENDER SINGH DAHIYA

2011 INSC 8028 January 2011Dismissed

The State alleged that Dr. Mahender Singh Dahiya strangulated his wife Namita during their honeymoon in Brussels, dismembered her body and disposed of the parts, while the prosecution failed to produce a weapon, reliable forensic identification of the body parts, or a clear motive. The trial court convicted Dahiya unde

PRATHAP & ANR.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2010 INSC 54527 August 2010Dismissed

The deceased Kochukuttan and his companion attacked the appellants, prompting the appellants and nine others to retaliate with swords and other deadly weapons, causing fatal injuries to Kochukuttan. Eye‑witnesses PW‑1 (the brother‑in‑law of the deceased) and PW‑2 positively identified the appellants and described the i

SHAIKH SATTARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2010 INSC 54627 August 2010Dismissed

The appellant, Shaikh Sattar, was convicted under Sections 302 and 498A IPC for murdering his wife, who was found dead with head injuries and a heavy stone nearby. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including the husband's demand for money, prior abuse, the location of the body and stone, and medical te

KILLICK NIXON LTD.versusTHE CUSTODIAN AND ORS.

2010 INSC 24527 April 2010Dismissed

M/s Dhanraj Mills Private Ltd (the notified party) was found to have perpetrated fraudulent securities transactions and was sued by the Custodian for recovery of interest‑free loans advanced to Killick Nixon Ltd and its group. The Special Court under the Special Courts (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Sec

CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, SUPREME COURT OF INDIAversusSUBHASH CHANDRA AGRAWAL

2010 INSC 82026 November 2010Matter referred to larger bench

Subhash Chandra Agrawal filed a RTI application with the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the Supreme Court seeking copies of files and correspondence concerning the appointment and transfer of judges, and asked that Section 6(3) of the RTI Act not be invoked. The CPIO replied that such records were not mai

COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE, MEERUTversusM/S. MONSANTO MANUFACTURE PVT. LTD.

2010 INSC 82226 November 2010Dismissed

M/s. Monsanto Manufacture Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer of ice‑cream, entered into a sourcing agreement with Brooke Bond Lipton India Ltd. and Unilever (later Hindustan Lever Ltd.) and declared the price of its product based on that agreement, paying excise duty accordingly. The Central Excise Department issued a show‑caus

COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARHversusM/S. KWALITY ICE CREAM CO.

2010 INSC 82326 November 2010Dismissed

The Commissioner of Central Excise appealed against the CEGAT order that held Kwality Ice Cream Co. and its buyer, Brooke Bond Lipton India Ltd. (later HLL), were not "related persons" under Section 4(4)(c) of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The revenue argued that the sourcing agreement gave the buyer control ove

SUDHAKARANversusSTATE OF KERALA

2010 INSC 74226 October 2010Dismissed

The appellant, Sudhakar, was accused of murdering his wife by striking her on the neck with a chopper, an act witnessed by neighbours who saw him carrying the blood‑stained weapon and his infant child. The trial court and the Kerala High Court convicted him under Section 302 IPC, rejecting his claim of insanity under S

STATE OF U.P.versusMUNI RAM & ORS.

2010 INSC 73726 October 2010Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh prosecuted Munni Ram and others for assault, homicide and offences under the Cattle Trespass Act arising from a dispute over trespassing buffaloes. The trial court convicted the accused, but the Allahabad High Court acquitted them after finding the prosecution witnesses unreliable and giving

M.K BALAKRISHNAN & OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

2009 INSC 41226 March 2009Hearing Adjourned

The Supreme Court entertained a writ petition under Article 32 concerning the protection of wetlands and the acute water shortage in India. The petitioners highlighted that ponds, tanks, and other water‑conservation bodies have been illegally filled and built upon, exacerbating the crisis. Relying on earlier judgments

CHAIRMAN, D.A., RANI LAKSHMI BAI K.G.BANKversusJAGDISH SHARAN VARSHNEY AND ORS.

2009 INSC 41326 March 2009Case Partly allowed

Jagdish Sharan Varshney, an employee of Rani Lakshmibai Kshetriya Gramin Bank, was charge‑sheeted and disciplined by fixing his pay scale under Regulation 38(1) (Kha‑11) of the Officers and Employees Service Rules, 2000. He appealed to the Board of Directors, which dismissed the appeal on 4 September 2003 without givin

BIMAN BASUversusKALLOL GUHA THAKURTA & ANR.

2010 INSC 54025 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents filed a criminal contempt petition in the Calcutta High Court against Biman Basu for making derogatory statements about a sitting High Court judge. The petition was filed under Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, but without the written consent of the Advocate General, which the High Court t

DURBALversusSTATE OF U.P.

2011 INSC 6825 January 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved an alleged assault and murder of the father and nephew of PW‑1 (Kaldhari) by three accused (A‑1, A‑2, A‑3) using knives and spears. The prosecution’s case rested solely on the testimony of PW‑1 and two other eyewitnesses (PW‑2, PW‑3), who claimed to have identified the accused with the aid of a lanter

M/S. B.FINE ART AUCTIONEERS PVT. LTD. & ORS.versusC.B.I. & ANR

2011 INSC 7025 January 2011Dismissed

The appellants, two fine‑art auctioneers, auctioned two paintings that were later seized by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) as antiques. The CBI, relying on the ASI report, registered an FIR under IPC s.120B and the Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972 s.25(1) read with s.3, and filed a charge‑sheet. The ap

KANAKA REKHA NAIKversusMANOJ KUMAR PRADHAN & ANR.

2011 INSC 7225 January 2011Appeal(s) allowed

Manoj Kumar Pradhan, a sitting MLA, was convicted under IPC sections 147, 326 read with 149 and sentenced to seven years' rigorous imprisonment. He and another convict appealed, and the Orissa High Court granted him bail on the same day, citing his status as an MLA. The appellant, Kanaka Rekha Naik, the wife of the dec

LANKA VENKATESWARLU (D) BY LRS.versusSTATE OF A.P. & ORS.

2011 INSC 15924 February 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The original plaintiff, Lanka Venkateswarlu, filed a suit for title and injunction which was appealed after his death in 1990. The High Court ordered the government pleader to bring the legal heirs on record within a week, failing which the appeal would be dismissed. The appeal was dismissed on 6 February 1998 for non‑

JAI SINGH AND ORS.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR.

2010 INSC 64223 September 2010Disposed off

The landlords (Jai Singh and others) filed an eviction suit under Section 14(1)(b) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 alleging that the Delhi Transport Corporation (OTC) had sublet the premises to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) without written consent. The Additional Rent Controller (ARC) and the Additional

STATE OF U.P.versusGURU CHARAN & OTHERS

2010 INSC 11623 February 2010Dismissed

The State of Uttar Pradesh appealed to the Supreme Court under Article 136 against the Allahabad High Court’s acquittal of Guru Charan, Sunil, Pramod and Brahma Pal for the alleged murder of Ramesh Narain and Jitendra (Guddu) and the murderous assault on Nathu Singh. The trial court had convicted the accused under IPC

KIRPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 11723 February 2010Dismissed

The appellant, Kirpal Singh, was convicted for murdering Ram Kumar Singh after allegedly firing a gunshot during a family dispute. The trial court and High Court relied on the medical testimony confirming a homicidal death and on eyewitness accounts of the appellant's wife and son, which were corroborated by the FIR fi

WEST BENGAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSIONversusHINDALCO INDUSTRIES LTD. & ORS.

2010 INSC 23122 April 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The West Bengal Electricity Regulatory Commission (WBERC) appealed an order of the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity that had remanded the determination of wheeling charges for Hindalco Industries Ltd. for the year 2005‑06. Hindalco argued that no units of power were wheeled during that period, so no wheeling charges

ALL INDIA FEDERATION OF TAX PRACTITIONERS & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2007 INSC 84921 August 2007Dismissed

The All India Federation of Tax Practitioners challenged the levy of service tax on chartered accountants, cost accountants and architects under the Finance Acts of 1994 and 1998, arguing that such tax fell within State List Entry 60 (taxes on professions) and was barred by Article 276. The Supreme Court examined the c

KARNATAKA BANK LTD.versusSTATE OF A.P. & ORS.

2008 INSC 7721 January 2008Dismissed

The appellants, including Karnataka Bank Ltd., Shaw Wallace & Co., and a partnership firm, challenged notices requiring each of their branches in Andhra Pradesh to pay profession tax of Rs.2500 per annum, arguing that the explanation to the definition of "person" in the Andhra Pradesh Tax on Professions, Trades, Callin

IRIDIUM INDIA TELECOM LTD.versusMOTOROLA INCORPORATED & ORS.

2010 INSC 71320 October 2010Appeal(s) allowed

Iridium India Telecom Ltd. filed a criminal complaint alleging cheating by Motorola Inc. (respondent No.1) for misleading investors about the Iridium satellite system. The Bombay High Court, invoking Article 227 and Section 482 of the CrPC, quashed the magistrate's process, holding that a corporation cannot possess the

RANJEET SINGH @ DARAversusSTATE OF MADHYA.PRADESH

2010 INSC 62520 September 2010Dismissed

The appellant, Ranjit Singh, was found in a locked room with a blood‑stained sword after the step‑mother was discovered dead with incised wounds. The trial and High Courts convicted him under Section 302 IPC based on oral, medical and documentary circumstantial evidence, rejecting his claim that he was already in polic

DLF UNIVERSAL LTD. AND ANR.versusDIRECTOR, T & C. PLANNING HARYANA AND ORS.

2010 INSC 79319 November 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, DLF Universal Ltd. and another, were licensed under the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975 to develop residential colonies and entered into private agreements with plot and flat buyers that included clauses for extension fees and maintenance charges. The Director, Town and Count

ABU THAKIR AND ORS.versusSTATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TAMIL NADU

2010 INSC 22219 April 2010Dismissed

The appellants were convicted of murder (Section 302 IPC) based largely on the testimony of three eye‑witnesses (PWs 2‑4) who claimed to have seen the assailants stabbing the deceased. The defence challenged the conviction, arguing that the presence of these witnesses at the scene was doubtful and that the statements r

SHAMIMA KAUSERversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

2010 INSC 22419 April 2010Disposed off

The petitioners, parents of victims of alleged police encounters in Gujarat, filed writ petitions seeking a CBI investigation into the deaths, alleging the encounters were staged. The Gujarat High Court constituted an Investigation Team and, after a Metropolitan Magistrate’s inquiry under Section 176 CrPC found the enc

G. SURYAKUMARI & ANR.versusB. CHANDRAMOULI & ORS.

2009 INSC 132218 December 2009Dismissed

The plaintiffs, G. Suryakumari and others, sued B. Chandramouli and others for a perpetual injunction to prevent interference with their possession of a 1,200‑sq‑yard plot purchased from Gramodyog Cooperative Housing Society. The defendants claimed ownership of a 382‑sq‑yard portion of the same land, alleging purchase

SALES TAX OFFICERS AND ORS.versusM/S. DUTTA TRADERS

2007 INSC 94218 September 2007Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a wholesale biscuit dealer, was stopped while unloading goods when a vigilance officer detected irregularities and the Sales Tax Officer (Vigilance) levied tax of Rs.32,592 and a penalty of Rs.54,320 under Section 16‑D of the Orissa Sales Tax Act. The dealer challenged the officer's authority, arguing t

BHOLANATH MUKHERJEE & ORS.versusR.K. MISSION V. CENTENARY COLLEGE & ORS.

2011 INSC 30918 April 2011Dismissed

The appellants, senior teachers of RK Mission Vivekananda Centenary College, challenged the appointment of a monk (respondent No.3) as principal, alleging he was junior and lacked the statutory qualifications prescribed in Government Order No. 149‑Edn(CP) 1994 and the West Bengal College Acts. The High Court’s Single J

ALAMELU & ANR.versusSTATE REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE

2011 INSC 5518 January 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were convicted under Sections 366 and 376 IPC read with Section 109 for alleged abduction, forced marriage and rape of PW‑2, a girl claimed to be a minor. The High Court affirmed the trial court's convictions, but the Supreme Court, exercising its Article 136 jurisdiction, examined the evidentiary record

DWARIKA PRASADversusRAMESHWAR DAYAL KHANDELWAL AND ORS.

2009 INSC 131617 December 2009Dismissed

Respondent No.1 filed a suit (Suit No. 35‑A of 2006) to declare a sale deed invalid and to obtain an injunction. The appellant first moved the trial court under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC to have the plaint dismissed for lack of cause of action; the application was rejected. After the Supreme Court stayed the suit, the appell

DWARIKA PRASADversusNIRMALA AND ORS.

2009 INSC 131717 December 2009Dismissed

The father of the respondent filed a partition suit in 1955 which was decreed, but after a series of appeals the suit was dismissed as withdrawn through applications that were later alleged to be forged. After the father's death, the daughter, as his legal representative, sought restoration of the suit, claiming that t

RAM BHAROSEYversusSTATE OF U.P.

2009 INSC 124017 November 2009Dismissed

The appellant Ram Bharosey was convicted for the murder of Puran Singh under Section 302 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. The prosecution proved that the appellant and co‑accused fired shots at the victim, resulting in his death, and identified the appellant through the first informant’s testimony and other evidence. The

. SAU PANCHASHLLA DADA MESSHRAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2009 INSC 124117 November 2009Case Partly allowed

The appellant, Sau Panchashila Dada Messhram, and her husband confined their two‑year‑old daughter in a bathroom for 14 days without food or water, leading to the child's death by starvation. The trial court convicted them under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and sentenced them to life imprisonment; the High Cour

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHIversusSHASHNAK STEEL INDUSTRIES (P) LTD.

2008 INSC 130617 November 2008Dismissed

The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) sought to hold Shashnak Steel Industries liable for property tax under Section 120(1)(c) of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, alleging that a perpetual sub‑lease dated 20‑Feb‑1981 operated as a conveyance transferring leasehold rights to the sub‑lessee. The sub‑lease wa

STATE OF M.P. & ORS.versusLALIT JAGGI

2008 INSC 105317 September 2008Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh issued a Liquor Policy for 2005‑06 containing clauses that required retailers to pay the annual licence fee in 24 fortnightly instalments and allowed revocation of the licence for default. A circular clarified that liquor would only be supplied against such deposits. The High Court struck do

STATE OF WEST BENGALversusSUBHAS KUMAR CHATTERJEE & ORS.

2010 INSC 51917 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed

Senior Laboratory Assistants in West Bengal sought a higher pay scale, leading to a High Court order granting scale 11. Subsequent pay commissions fixed lower scales, and the State framed statutory rules (ROPA Rules) reflecting those scales. Research Assistants later applied to the State Administrative Tribunal for pay

ONGOLE RAVIKANTHversusSTATE OF A.P.

2009 INSC 85617 June 2009Dismissed

The appellant was married to the deceased and, after repeated quarrels, the wife poured kerosene on herself and brought a match. The husband snatched the match and lit it, causing severe burns that led to her death. The trial court convicted him under Section 324 IPC, but the High Court upgraded the conviction to Secti

RAVINDRA PAL SINGHversusAJIT SINGH & ANR

2011 INSC 21717 March 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, whose son was allegedly killed in a fake police encounter, filed a criminal case against five police officers under Sections 120B, 364, 302, 201 and 1208 of the IPC. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) investigated the matter and submitted a charge‑sheet implicating the officers. The accused applie

RAVINDRA PAL SINGHversusSANTOSH KUMAR JAISWAL & ORS.

2011 INSC 22017 March 2011Disposed off

The father of a deceased student filed a transfer petition under Section 46 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, alleging that his son was killed in a fake police encounter in Dehradun and that the local police continued to exert undue influence over the CBI investigation. The petitioner claimed threats from police offic

SURENDRA PAL & ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. & ANR.

2010 INSC 62216 September 2010Dismissed

The appellants, who had earlier demanded a compromise in a kidnapping case, allegedly opened fire with country‑made pistols and a rifle, killing three members of the victim's family and injuring three others. The first informant, PW‑1, lodged an FIR within five hours of the incident and identified the accused in both m

M/S. JINDAL STAINLESS LTD. & ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

2010 INSC 21516 April 2010Matter referred to larger bench

The petitioners, including M/s. Jindal Stainless Ltd., challenged the validity of various State entry tax statutes on the ground that they violated Articles 301, 302, 303 and 304 of the Constitution. The Division Bench observed that several High Courts had treated Article 304(a) and 304(b) as independent, concluding th

L.L.C. OF INDIA AND ANR.versusRAM PAL SINGH BISEN

2010 INSC 15116 March 2010Dismissed

The respondent, a Development Officer of LIC, was dismissed following a departmental inquiry that he alleged was conducted without a copy of the inquiry report and without a proper opportunity to be heard, violating natural justice. In the suit challenging his dismissal, the employer (appellant) did not lead any oral e

KOOTHA PERUMALversusSTATE TR. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VIGILANCE & ANTI CORRUPTION

2010 INSC 88315 December 2010Dismissed

The appellant, a municipal officer, was accused of demanding a Rs.50 bribe for issuing a tax certificate and was caught in a police‑laid trap using phenolphthalein‑treated currency notes. He was convicted under Sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and the conviction was affirmed by the High Cour

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.versusSANGAM NATH PANDEY AND ORS.

2010 INSC 88115 December 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Uttar Pradesh sought to fill 367 reserved‑category vacancies through a special recruitment, treating them as backlog vacancies, while eight general‑category candidates challenged this exclusion as illegal. The High Court held the State’s action unjustified and ordered a fresh result as if the vacancies wer

ALLAHABAD BANK & ANR.versusALL INDIA ALLAHABAD BANK RETIRED EMPS. ASSN.

2009 INSC 130315 December 2009Disposed off

The All India Allahabad Bank Retired Employees Association filed writ petitions seeking gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, alleging that the bank’s pension scheme, which employees had opted for, could not deprive them of statutory gratuity. The Allahabad High Court held that the retirees were entitled to

STATE OF GOA & ANR.versusGOPAL BABURAO GAUDO & ORS.

2009 INSC 113414 September 2009Dismissed

The State of Goa sought compensation for a 2,715 sq. m. strip of land acquired for the Panda By‑pass road, arguing that because the land lay within the 40‑metre prohibited‑construction zone alongside a highway it had no development potential and therefore should be valued as valueless. The Supreme Court held that such

LAKHAN LALversusSTATE OF BIHAR

2011 INSC 5014 January 2011Case Partly allowed

Lakhan Lal and Pappu Lal were convicted of murder under IPC s.302 read with s.34 and sentenced to life imprisonment. At the time of the offence (9 May 1985) they were about 16 years old, i.e., minors under the age of 18. The Supreme Court examined whether they could be treated as juveniles under the Juvenile Justice (C

SANGAPPA SANGANABASAPPA M. & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS.

2010 INSC 60513 September 2010Dismissed

The case involved a double murder where the deceased Irappa and his brother Kenchappa were killed after confronting Sangappa (A‑1) over an earlier assault on their son. The trial court acquitted all seven accused, but the Karnataka High Court convicted three of them (A‑1, A‑2, A‑4) under section 302 IPC read with secti

M.C. ALI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2010 INSC 20713 April 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined appeals by six accused who had been acquitted by the trial court but later convicted by the High Court for murder, attempted murder and offences under sections 149 and 34 of the IPC. The trial court had found the prosecution's evidence unreliable, noting the darkness of the night, lack of tor

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARHversusM/S SUPREME FABRICS LTD.

2007 INSC 128012 December 2007Dismissed

Mis Supreme Fabrics Ltd claimed that loading charges incurred while clearing goods from its factory gate should be treated as cum‑duty price, allowing an abatement of excise duty payable on those charges. The Assessing Officer held the charges were includible in assessable value and denied the deduction. The Commission

AMIT KUMAR & ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2010 INSC 50412 August 2010Dismissed

The appellants Amit Kumar and Brij Bhushan were convicted under Sections 302 and 34 of the IPC for the murder of Anita Rani, who was set on fire allegedly over dowry demands. The prosecution relied on the victim's dying declaration recorded by a Judicial Magistrate, corroborated by eyewitnesses who saw the fire and ide

INDIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2011 INSC 38812 May 2011Disposed off

The Army College of Medical Sciences (ACMS), run by the Army Welfare Education Society, admitted only wards of army personnel based on a Delhi Government exemption, ignoring merit and statutory reservations. The Indian Medical Association and several candidates challenged this policy, arguing that ACMS is a private una

UNION OF INDIAversusSHAH ALAM & ANR.

2009 INSC 85511 June 2009Dismissed

The Union of India appealed the acquittal of Shah Alam and Mazzum Haq, who had been convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for possessing 100 grams of heroin each and sentenced to ten years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine. The Allahabad High Court set aside the conviction, holding t

JARNAIL SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 11911 February 2011Dismissed

The appellant was apprehended while carrying a bag that contained 1.75 kg of opium and was convicted under Section 18 of the NDPS Act. He challenged the conviction on several grounds, including non‑compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act, the admissibility of his consent statement under Section 25 of the Evidence Ac

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORSversusBIDYUT KUMAR MITRA AND ORS.

2011 INSC 2911 January 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a former Branch Manager of State Bank of India, was dismissed after a departmental inquiry found him guilty of granting loans beyond his discretionary powers. He later challenged the dismissal, alleging denial of natural justice because the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) report and certain defence d

GAYATHRI WOMEN WELFARE ASSOCIATIONversusGOWRAMMA AND ANR.

2011 INSC 3011 January 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The Gayathri Women Welfare Association sued for a permanent injunction to protect its possession of land. The trial court granted the injunction, but the Karnataka High Court set aside the decree and remanded the case. After remand, the respondents amended their written statement to add a counter‑claim for demolition a

GAJULA SURYA PRAKASARAOversusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

2009 INSC 122610 November 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Gajula Surya Prakasa Rao was convicted under Sections 302 and 307 IPC for murdering a farmer and attempting to kill his wife, based primarily on the testimony of the deceased’s wife (PW‑3) and daughter (PW‑4). The Supreme Court examined the credibility of these eye‑witnesses, noting that their statements

MONICA BEDIversusSTATE OF AP.

2010 INSC 7659 November 2010Disposed off

Monica Bedi and four co‑accused were convicted under the Indian Penal Code (sections 120‑B, 419, 420) and the Prevention of Corruption Act for a conspiracy to obtain a passport in an assumed name. Bedi argued that her conviction violated Article 20(2) of the Constitution because she had already been tried and sentenced

OM PAL SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

2010 INSC 7669 November 2010Dismissed

The appellant Om Pal Singh was convicted for the murder of Rishipal Singh under Section 302 IPC. The prosecution established a long-standing enmity, prior attempts on the victim's life, and presented eyewitness testimony of PW‑2 and PW‑3 who described the shooting. A dying declaration recorded by the Tehsildar, though

HARICHARAN & ANR.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS,

2011 INSC 1949 March 2011Dismissed

The case concerned the custodial death of Mathura, who was taken into police custody, subjected to electric shock torture, and died shortly after release. The trial court acquitted the police officers, but the High Court convicted them under IPC sections 304 Part II and 330, relying on medical evidence of scrotal burns

NILESH DINKAR PARADKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2011 INSC 1959 March 2011Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Nilesh Dinkar Paradkar, was convicted under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act (MCOCA) and the IPC based largely on voice identification of a recorded telephone conversation. The High Court upheld his conviction while acquitting the other accused, relying on the officer's identification of th

SANGAPPA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2010 INSC 1369 March 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were tried for offences under Sections 447, 504, 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC and were acquitted by the trial court. The State appealed, and the High Court reversed the acquittal, convicting them under Section 304(Part‑II) read with Section 34, without providing a detailed re‑appreciation of the e

JAVED MASOOD AND ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

2010 INSC 1389 March 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants Javed Masood and another were convicted for murder (Sec. 302 IPC) based primarily on the testimony of the deceased's brother (PW‑5), who lodged a Parcha Bayan. Independent witnesses, including the shop owner (PW‑6) and several police personnel (PW‑18, PW‑29, PW‑30), testified that the brother and other a

SARV U.P. GRAMIN BANKversusMANOJ KUMAR SINHA

2010 INSC 909 February 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a bank employee, was found guilty of financial irregularities, fraud and misappropriation and was punished with a reduction of pay after a departmental enquiry. The High Court set aside the punishment on the ground that the enquiry report had not been served to the employee, alleging a breach of natural

UTPAL DAS & ANR.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2010 INSC 2947 May 2010Dismissed

The victim, a married woman with two children, was intercepted while traveling by rickshaw, taken to a house under construction and forcibly raped by the two appellants, Utpal Das and Haradhan Sutradar. She was later rescued, identified the accused, and lodged an FIR. The trial court acquitted the appellants, but the C

UNNI MENONversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

2011 INSC 237 January 2011Dismissed

Unni Menon, an Assistant Accounts Officer on deputation to the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), was promoted in his parent department and later absorbed as an Accounts Officer in CAT. He claimed that, under a 1992 Government circular granting a promotional grade to "Organized Accounts Cadres," he was entitled to

KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD & ANR.versusMIS. PRAKASH DAL MILL & ORS.

2011 INSC 2736 April 2011Dismissed

The Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board allotted industrial sites to respondents under lease‑cum‑sale agreements that contained a clause allowing the Board to fix the final price "as soon as it may be convenient." After a gap of 13 years the Board issued letters demanding a substantially higher final price, wh

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusGUJARAT MARITIME BOARD

2007 INSC 12325 December 2007Dismissed

The Gujarat Maritime Board (GMB), a statutory authority created under the Gujarat Maritime Board Act, 1981 to develop minor ports, applied to be registered as a charitable institution under Section 12A of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961 to claim exemption under Section 11. The Commissioner of Income Tax rejected the applicati

KANWAR NATWAR SINGHversusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR

2010 INSC 6765 October 2010Dismissed

Kanwar Natwar Singh and others appealed against the Directorate of Enforcement after a show‑cause notice was issued under Rule 4(1) of the Foreign Exchange Management (Adjudication Proceedings and Appeal) Rules, 2000. The appellants demanded that the adjudicating authority furnish copies of all documents in its possess

DEBASHIS DAW & ORS.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

2010 INSC 4795 August 2010Disposed off

The appellants were convicted for forming an unlawful assembly armed with deadly weapons, assaulting a victim who later died, and injuring another person. The trial court and High Court upheld the convictions under Sections 148, 149, 324 and 304 IPC based on eyewitness testimony of the victim, his parents, and medical

VINAYKISHORE PUNAMCHAND MUNDHADA & ANRversusSHRI BHUMI KALPATARU & ORS.

2010 INSC 4845 August 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The landlords alleged that the original tenant partnership "Bhumi Kalpataru" clandestinely sub-let the premises to a new firm "Shri Bhumi Kalpataru" without their written permission. The Rent Controller held that a sub‑tenancy existed and granted relief under clause 13(3)(iii) of the C.P. & Berar Letting of Houses and

NANDINI SUNDAR AND ORS.versusSTATE OF CHATTISGARH

2011 INSC 4515 July 2011Hearing Adjourned

The Supreme Court examined a public‑interest writ petition filed by civil‑society activists alleging that the State of Chhattisgarh, with the Union's financial support, was employing thousands of barely literate tribal youths as Special Police Officers (SPOs) and arming them to combat Maoist/Naxalite insurgents, thereb

M/S. BHANWARLAL DUGAR & ORS.versusBRIDHICHAND PANNALAL & ORS.

2010 INSC 3455 July 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The landlords appealed against a High Court revision that had set aside the trial and appellate courts' findings that the tenant was a wilful defaulter and that the landlords required the commercial premises for their own business. Both the trial court and the first appellate court, exercising jurisdiction under Sectio

K. BALAKRISHNAN NAMBIARversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

2011 INSC 3565 May 2011Dismissed

The appellant held a lease of 75 acres of land within the East Aletty Reserved Forest, originally granted in 1949 for areca nut cultivation. The lease expired in 1999-2000 and the appellant sought renewal, but the Karnataka State Government refused, citing the Forest Conservation Act, 1980 and concerns that extending t

NARESH K. AGGARWALA AND CO.versusCANBANK FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. AND ANR.

2010 INSC 2725 May 2010Dismissed

The appellant, a stock broker, entered into three share purchase contracts with the respondent: two for Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) shares on 14‑Feb‑1992 and 23‑Mar‑1992, and one for Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL) shares on 27‑Feb‑1992. The respondent delivered only one lakh RIL shares and claimed the fi

NARWINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2011 INSC 115 January 2011Dismissed

The wife of Narwinder Singh, who was pregnant, committed suicide within four years of marriage. The trial court convicted the husband and his parents under Section 304‑B IPC for dowry death, but the High Court, finding no dowry demand at the time of death, converted the husband's conviction to Section 306 IPC (abetment

SHABANA BANOversusIMRAN KHAN

2009 INSC 12844 December 2009Appeal(s) allowed

Shabana Bano, a Muslim woman, filed a petition under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code for maintenance against her husband, Imran Khan, after being divorced and left with a newborn child. The husband contended that under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, she was not entitled to main

SWADESI JAGARAN MANCHversusSTATE OF ORISSA & ANR.

2011 INSC 4334 July 2011Hearing Adjourned

The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of Rule 44 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, which bans the sale and manufacture of non‑iodised common salt. Several writ petitions and transfer petitions challenging this rule were consolidated, and the Court allowed the transfer of five pending cases

RAM JETHMALANI AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDLA AND ORS.

2011 INSC 4344 July 2011Hearing Adjourned

The Supreme Court entertained a writ petition filed by former Union Law Minister Ram Jethmalani and others alleging that large sums of unaccounted money were being held by Indian individuals and entities in foreign banks, notably involving Hassan Ali Khan and the Tapurias, and that the Union of India had been sluggish

EUREKA FORBES LIMITEDversusALLAHABAD BANK AND ORS.

2010 INSC 2683 May 2010Case Partly allowed

Eureka Forbes Ltd. granted a licence to two respondents to use its factory premises. When the licencees failed to pay fees, Eureka sold the stock in the premises, which was hypothecated to Allahabad Bank, without the bank's consent. The bank sued Eureka and the licencees for recovery of the hypothecated goods. The issu

VISA INTERNATIONAL LTD.versusCONTINENTAL RESOURCES (USA) LTD.

2008 INSC 13872 December 2008Case Allowed

Visa International Ltd. and Continental Resources (USA) Ltd. entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (14‑Feb‑2005) and a subsequent agreement (15‑Feb‑2005) to set up an integrated aluminium complex, containing Clause VI which provided that any dispute not settled amicably would be finally settled under the Arbitrati

SANTOKH SINGH & ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

2010 INSC 5671 September 2010Dismissed

The case involved the murder of Sanjay Kumar, a union leader, who was shot with his own licensed pistol after being taken to a hotel by four accused Union members. The trial court convicted all four under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC, but the High Court upheld the conviction of only two appellants, Santo

MYLADIMMAL SURENDRAN & ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2010 INSC 5681 September 2010Dismissed

The case involves the murder of a BJP leader in Kerala, allegedly carried out by workers of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) as part of a political rivalry. The victim's wife, along with two other eyewitnesses, identified the assailants, and a dying declaration of the victim corroborated their testimony. The tria

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search