M/S. INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALversusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOMBAY - I
- Citation
- 1996 INSC 1438
- Decided
- 5 December 1996
- Disposal
- Dismissed
- Bench
- S P BHARUCHAS C SEN
Holding
The expression ‘used in any dyeing process’ qualifies only synthetic organic derivatives and not synthetic organic dyestuffs.
Summary
The case concerned the interpretation of Item 14‑D of the Central Excise Tariff, which reads ‘Synthetic organic dyestuffs (including pigment dyestuffs) and synthetic organic derivatives used in any dyeing process.’ The appellant argued that the phrase ‘used in any dyeing process’ applied to both dyestuffs and derivatives, while the respondent contended it applied only to derivatives. The Court examined the language and observed that dyestuffs are inherently used in dyeing, making the phrase redundant if applied to them; therefore the phrase must qualify only the synthetic organic derivatives. No external aids to construction were deemed necessary. The Court affirmed the view of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
Issues considered
- Whether the words ‘used in any dyeing process’ in Item 14‑D of the Central Excise Tariff qualify both synthetic organic dyestuffs and synthetic organic derivatives or only the derivatives.
Subjects
Judgment
M/S. INDUSTRIAL CHEMICAL A;
• v.
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOMBAY·l.
DECEMBER 5, 1996
[S.P. BHARUCHA AND S.C. SEN, JJ.] B
Central Excise Tariff :
Item 14-D-lnterpretation of-Expression 'used in any dyeing process'-
Whether qualify synthetic organic dyestuffs and synthetic organic derivatives C
or only synthetic organic derivatives-Held apply only to synthetic derivatives
which are used in the dyeing process-Words being clear no assistance from
external source is necessary for their interpretation.
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 1908 of
~ D
From the Judgment and Order dated 27.5.87 of the Customs Excise
and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in A. No.
ED/SB/860/83-C.
B.V. Desai, P.J. Mehta and Ms. Shasbi Soharu for the Appellant. E
KC. Diwan for the Respondent.
The following Order of the Court was delivered :
The short question here relates to the interpretation of Tariff Item F
14D of the Central Excise Tariff. It reads thus :
"Synthetic organic dyestuffs (including pigment dyestuffs) and syn-
thetic organic derivatives used in auy dyeing process.".
The question is, do the words 'used in any dyeing process' qualify synthetic G
organic dyestuffs and synthetic organic derivatives or only synthetic organic
derivatives.
Dyestuffs are used in the dyeing process and, therefore, the use of
the words "used in any dyeing process" with reference to dyestuffs would
be tautology. The words can, therefore, apply only to synthetic derivatives H
553
554 SUPREME COURT REPORTS (1996] SUPP. 9 S.C.R.
A which are used in the dyeing process.
This is the view that was taken by the Customs, Excise and Gold
.
(Control) Appellate Tribunal in an earlier judgment, which has been
followed by the Tribunal in the present case.
B The words being so clear, we do not think that assistance from any
external source for their interpretation is called for.
TJie appeal is dismissed, with n<? order as to costs.
T.N.A. Appeal dismissed.
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.