DR. MAHAK SINGHversusCHANCELLOR, CH. CHARAN SINGH UNIVERSITY, MEERUT AND ORS.
1996 INSC 125931 October 1996Dismissed
Three senior lecturers (Dr. Mahak Singh, Dr. S.P. Singh and Dr. Rajvir Singh) of a college affiliated to Meerut University contested who should be appointed Acting Principal after the principal’s vacancy in October 1993. All were senior lecturers drawing the same salary, but their dates of promotion to senior lecturer …
STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusM/S. AROORAN SUGARS LTD.
1996 INSC 125831 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, Arooran Sugars Ltd., owned over 3,400 acres of land that was declared surplus under the Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1961. The original compensation rate was nine times the net annual income, but the 1972 Fourth Amendment reduced it to two times. A 1974 amendment (Act 7 of …
BINAY KUMAR SINGHversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR
1996 INSC 126031 October 1996Dismissed
The case arose from a 1980 massacre in Paras Bigha, Bihar, where 13 people were killed and many injured. The appellants were convicted under Sections 302 and 149 of the IPC for participation in an unlawful assembly. They challenged the conviction on several grounds, including that the FIR should have been based on an e…
STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusSIVARASAN @RAGHU @SIVARASA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 126131 October 1996Case Partly allowed
The State of Tamil Nadu appealed the acquittal of nine accused, members of the LTTE, for alleged possession of explosives and conspiracy under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) and the Explosive Substances Act. The trial court had excluded two typewritten confessional statements on the gro…
UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARHversusKRISHAN BHANDARI
1996 INSC 126231 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Krishan Bhandari, originally appointed as a temporary Science Master in the Union Territory of Chandigarh, was later transferred to the post of Science Supervisor on his own pay scale and later confirmed as a Science Master. He claimed that, because he performed the same duties as a District Science Supervisor in Punja…
BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ORS.versusMANOJ KUMAR PANDEY AND ORS.
1996 INSC 126331 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC) introduced a system of centralised evaluation of answer books for the 38th Combined Competitive Examination, a decision taken by the Chairman and a majority of members on 18 September 1993. The High Court set aside this decision, holding that the process of adopting centralise…
STATE OF KERALAversusSASI
1996 INSC 126431 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
On 2 November 1990 the respondent struck the deceased on the head with a bamboo stick, causing severe skull fractures and brain injury. The deceased died eleven days later in hospital. The trial court convicted the respondent for murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to life imprisonment. …
INDIAN FARMERS FERTILISER COOPERATIVE LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, AHMEDABAD
1996 INSC 80831 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Indian Farmers Fertiliser Co‑operative Ltd., a urea manufacturer, obtained raw naphtha at a concessional excise rate to produce ammonia. The ammonia was used not only in the urea plant but also in off‑site facilities – water‑treatment, steam‑generation, inert‑gas generation and effluent‑treatment plants – which the app…
SRI JAGATHIGOWDA C.N. AND ORS.versusCHAIRMAN, CAUVERY GRAMINA BANK AND ORS.
1996 INSC 80931 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Cauvery Gramina Bank, a Regional Rural Bank, promoted several officers to Senior Manager posts using a Director's Committee that assessed candidates on performance appraisal scores and interview marks, following NABARD circulars of 1984 and 1986. Unsuccessful officers filed writ petitions in the Karnataka High Cour…
SH. SATISH MEHRAversusDELHI ADMINISTRATION AND ANR.
1996 INSC 81031 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Satish Mehra appealed against the Delhi Sessions Court’s decision to frame charges under IPC sections 354 and 376 read with 511 for alleged incestuous sexual abuse of his daughter Nikita. The allegations originated from a complaint filed by his estranged wife Anita Mehra, who had previously made a false accusation in t…
DECORATIVE LAMINATES (INDIA) PVT. LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BANGALORE
1996 INSC 81131 July 1996Dismissed
Decorative Laminates (India) Pvt Ltd processes commercial plywood by applying phenol‑formaldehyde resin under heat and pressure and coating it with wire mesh to produce slip‑proof plywood. The Assistant Collector of Central Excise held that the finished product is a different commodity and liable to excise duty under C…
CENTRAL BANK OF INDIAversusS. SATYAM AND OTHERS
1996 INSC 81231 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court considered a civil appeal by the Central Bank of India against a High Court order that granted re‑employment relief to a group of workmen who had been retrenched between 1974 and 1976. The workmen filed a writ petition in 1982 invoking Section 25‑H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, seeking prefere…
ANSAL ENGINEERING PROJECTS LTD.versusTEHRI HYDRO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. AND ANR.
1996 INSC 80731 July 1996Dismissed
Ansal Engineering Projects Ltd entered into a construction contract with Tehri Hydro Development Corporation Ltd (THDC) and furnished a bank guarantee of Rs 57,57,970 issued by UCO Bank in favor of THDC. After THDC terminated the contract, it invoked the guarantee and demanded payment. Ansal sought an injunction under …
C. KASTURI AND ORS. ETC .versusSECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY AND ANR. ETC.
1996 INSC 15431 January 1996Dismissed
The appellants, private stage‑carriage operators, held temporary permits to ply a town‑service route (Chandragiri‑Renigunta via Tirupati) and relied on a government memorandum stating that town‑service routes could extend up to 8 km beyond municipal limits. The respondents, the Regional Transport Authority, contended t…
SURJIT SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
1996 INSC 15731 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Surjit Singh, a Deputy Superintendent of Police, underwent emergency bypass surgery in London while on leave and claimed Rs 3 lakh reimbursement. The State of Punjab initially refused, later paying Rs 40,000 based on AIIMS rates. Singh appealed, seeking reimbursement at the higher rates of Escorts Heart Institute, a ho…
CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, PUNJAB NATIONAL BANKversusRAJENDRA NATH CHAWLA
1996 INSC 15531 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant bank promoted the respondent officer to MMG Scale II on the condition that he serve two years in a rural branch, and barred any officer who refused such posting from promotion for two years. The respondent refused the rural posting in 1990, later cancelled a subsequent posting in 1992, and applied for pro…
U.P. JAL NIGAM AND ORS.versusPRABHA T CHANDRA JAIN AND ORS.
1996 INSC 15831 January 1996Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered a petition by U.P. Jal Nigam challenging the view that downgrading entries in an employee's annual confidential report (ACR) are adverse entries requiring mandatory communication and a representation under service rules. The High Court had held that any reduction in the rating, even without…
U.P. JAL NIGAM AND ORSversusNARINDER KUMAR AGARWAL
1996 INSC 15631 January 1996Dismissed
The appellant, U.P. Jal Nigam, challenged the promotion of a Junior Engineer, N.K. Agarwal, who claimed entitlement to promotion under the 25% quota and a 5% graduate quota prescribed in the U.P. Jal Nigam Engineers (Public Health Branch) Service Regulations, 1978. Agarwal, a graduate with ten years of service, was not…
M.C.MEHTAversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 153430 December 1996Disposed off
The Supreme Court entertained a public‑interest writ petition filed by environmental activist M.C. Mehta alleging that emissions from coke/coal‑using industries in the Taj Trapezium Zone (TTZ) were causing severe atmospheric pollution and damaging the Taj Mahal. Expert reports (NEERI, Varadharajan Committee) establishe…
BUFFALO TRADERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION AND ANOTHERversusMANEKA GANDHI AND ORS.
1996 INSC 142030 November 1996Disposed off
The Supreme Court considered two interlocutory applications concerning the Idgah Slaughter House in Delhi, which had been declared a hazardous/noxious industry and ordered to cease operations by 30 November 1996. The petitioners sought to set aside the July 8, 1996 order (IA No. 22) that modified a prior status‑quo ord…
M/S J.B. BODA AND CO. PVT. LTD.versusCENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES, NEW DELHI
1996 INSC 125430 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Mis J.B. Boda & Co. Pvt. Ltd., a reinsurance broker, received a commission in US dollars after deducting its fee from the gross reinsurance premium it remitted to foreign reinsurers with RBI approval. The company claimed that the retained commission constituted "income received in convertible foreign exchange" under Se…
HINDUSTAN PAPER CORPORATIONversusPURNENDU CHAKROBARTY AND ORS.
1996 INSC 125530 October 1996Disposed off
Purnendu Chakrobarty, a senior employee of Hindustan Paper Corporation, was charged in a murder case and repeatedly applied for leave without proper sanction or medical certificates, resulting in unauthorised absence for more than eight consecutive days. The corporation invoked Rule 23(vi)(E) of its Conduct, Discipline…
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.versusSHRI SURAJ BHAN
1996 INSC 125630 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Shri Suraj Bhan, a driver employed since 1970, was declared medically unfit to drive heavy vehicles in 1992 and retired in 1995. He sought a compassionate appointment for his son, and the Punjab and Haryana High Court ordered the appellant corporation to appoint the son on compassionate grounds. On appeal, the Supreme …
MITHILESH KUMARversusMANOHAR LAL
1996 INSC 125730 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Mithlesh Kumar filed a suit for perpetual injunction against Manohar Lal to prevent construction that would violate a 1964 agreement restricting openings and structures on the land purchased by the respondent. The respondent argued that the agreement, though unregistered, was a compulsorily registrable document under S…
PRAKASH K. AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 112530 September 1996Dismissed
The Karnataka Service Commission recruited teachers before 17 November 1993, appointing candidates in excess of the 50% reservation for backward classes and weaker sections. The appointments were challenged on 15 June 1995, more than a year after the selections were made. The Karnataka Administrative Tribunal held that…
AVINASH NAGRAversusNAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SAMITI ETC.
1996 INSC 112630 September 1996Dismissed
Avinash Nagra, a temporary postgraduate teacher at Navodaya Vidyalaya, was terminated on the ground of immoral sexual behaviour towards a girl student. The termination was effected under the Navodaya Vidyalaya notification of 23 December 1993, which permits dispensing with a regular disciplinary inquiry in cases of mor…
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AMRITSARversusM/S SHIV PRAKASH JANAK RAJ AND CO. PVT. LTD.
1996 INSC 112730 September 1996Case Partly allowed
The assessee company had advanced a loan to a firm whose partners were also its shareholders and directors. Interest was charged on the loan in the 1966-67 and 1967-68 assessment years, establishing it as an interest‑bearing loan. For the 1968-69 assessment year the company passed a resolution before the end of its acc…
SUB-DIVISIONAL INSPECTOR (POSTAL) AND ORS.versusK.K. PAVITHERAN
1996 INSC 112830 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, an extra‑departmental postal agent, was charged under Rule 8 of the Post and Telegraph Extra Departmental Agents (Conduct and Services) Rules, 1964 for temporary absence from duty and was removed from service after departmental enquiry. The Central Administrative Tribunal, after several remittances and …
U.P. STATE ROADWAYS TRANSPORT CORPN., LUCKNOW THROUGH ITS GENERAL MANAGERversusANWAR AHMED AND ORS.
1996 INSC 112930 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Uttar Pradesh State Roadways Transport Corporation (appellant) challenged the Allahabad High Court’s order directing the Regional Transport Authority to grant temporary permits to private operators for a new route carved out by merging two notified routes (Bulandshahr‑Delhi and Shahdara‑Saharanpur) and to lift the …
SECY. (HEALTH) DEPTT. OF HEALTH AND F.W. AND ANR.versusDR. ANITA PURI AND ORS.
1996 INSC 97030 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Punjab Public Service Commission advertised 21 Dental Officer posts requiring a B.D.S. degree and stating a preference for higher dental qualifications. Dr. Anita Puri, holding an M.D.S., filed a writ petition claiming that the preference clause entitled her to be selected, and the Punjab & Haryana High Court allow…
N.R. DONGRE AND ORS.versusWHIRLPOOL CORPORATION AND ANR.
1996 INSC 97130 August 1996Dismissed
The plaintiffs, Whirlpool Corporation and its Indian joint‑venture TVS Whirlpool Ltd., claimed prior use and trans‑border reputation of the word mark "Whirlpool" and alleged that the defendants, trustees of Chinar Trust and related entities, had obtained a registration for the same mark in 1992 on the basis of proposed…
P. SATYANARAYANA AND ANR.versusP. MALLAIAH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 97230 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The wife filed a complaint under Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code alleging bigamy by her husband, who claimed he had married a second time after ten years of desertion. The trial magistrate acquitted the husband, finding no evidence that a second Hindu marriage had been solemnized according to the tests laid down i…
ABDUR RAHMAN & ORSversusATHIFA BEGUM AND ORS .
1996 INSC 97330 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Abdur Rahman & Ors appealed to the Supreme Court against a Karnataka High Court order that dismissed their appeal under Order 41 Rule 17 of the CPC because their counsel was absent. While dismissing the appeal, the High Court also examined the merits of the case and concluded that there was no ground for interfering wi…
M. JAYAKUMAR AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.
1996 INSC 97430 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the interpretation of Tamil Nadu Ministerial Service Rules and special rules under G.O.Ms. No. 3134 regarding promotion of Assistants to Superintendents in the Urban Land Tax Department. The respondents argued that all city‑based units (Board of Revenue, Assistant Commissioner’s office, etc.) formed …
MOHAMMAD RAHMAT ALIversusTHE INSPECTOR OF REGISTRATION AND STAMPS, ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 97530 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Mohammad Rahmat Ali, appointed as a copyist in the Hyderabad Government in 1951, was later allotted to Andhra Pradesh services. After a suspension, conviction and subsequent acquittal, he was dismissed in 1981 and filed petitions for reinstatement and promotion. The Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal dismissed his …
BISHAN SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR.
1996 INSC 97630 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Three police officers, including the petitioners, led a peaceful procession after duty hours to present a grievance about inadequate accommodation to the Superintendent of Police, in violation of a prohibitory order. They were dismissed from service under Rule 16(2) of the Punjab Police Rules for alleged grave miscondu…
MIS STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. ETC.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE
1996 INSC 80130 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Steel Authority of India Ltd. (SAIL) used raw naphtha in its fertilizer plant and claimed the concessional excise duty under Exemption Notification No. 187 of 1961, which required proof that the naphtha was intended for fertilizer manufacture. The Revenue argued that a substantial quantity of the naphtha was not actual…
DANDA RAJESHWARIversusBODAVULA HANUMAYAMMA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 80230 July 1996Dismissed
The petitioners challenged a High Court order directing them to file an election petition within three weeks of the writ petition's disposal and to have the Election Tribunal decide the matter without considering the statutory limitation of 30 days prescribed under Rule 3 of the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Election T…
VIJAY PRATAP AND ORSversusSAMBHU SARAN SINHA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 80330 July 1996Dismissed
The petitioners, sons of a deceased plaintiff, applied to be added as parties to a specific performance suit after their father's name was deleted following his death. They alleged that the relinquishment deed signed by their father was forged and that being excluded would prejudice their rights. The trial court held t…
PIRTHI @ SANS! ETC.versusJATI RAM AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 80430 July 1996Dismissed
Petitioner Pirthi@ Sansi entered into an agreement on 6 May 1988 to sell agricultural land to Respondent No.1 and received part payment. Respondent No.1 filed a suit for specific performance in 1993, which the trial court decreed in his favour. On appeal, the Additional District Judge set aside the decree, holding that…
M.S.R. PRASADversusBOMMISETTI SUBBA RAO AND ORS.
1996 INSC 80530 July 1996Dismissed
The petitioner obtained an injunction from a civil court restraining the respondent from constructing a building that allegedly infringed his easement of air and light. The respondent filed a writ petition under Article 226 against the Municipal Corporation, claiming the construction was authorized, and the High Court …
SMT. BHATORIversusSMT. RAM PIARI
1996 INSC 80630 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Sm. Bhatori, executed a general power of attorney in favour of respondent‑2, granting him authority to manage her agricultural land, including alienation. Respondent‑2 used this authority to file a suit against the appellant and subsequently executed sale deeds transferring the same land to his wife, Ram…
STATE OF HARYANAversusSMT. KAMLA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 58830 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Haryana issued a notification under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the Collector awarded compensation for acquired land. The respondents applied under Section 18 and a District Judge awarded compensation, after which the State executed the decree. The executing District Judge later awarded additional c…
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR 0.I.I.D.C., BHUBANESWARversusSARAT CHANDRA PATNAIK AND ANR.
1996 INSC 58930 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Orissa Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (OIDC) offered a plot to Sarat Chandra Patnaik on a 90‑year lease; the respondent later sought a reduction in the lease consideration. The Orissa High Court directed that the matter be placed before the State Government for a final decision, invoking Sections…
HIS HOLINESS ACHARYA SWAMI GANESH DASSJIversusSH. SITA RAM THAPAR
1996 INSC 59030 April 1996Dismissed
Acharya Swami Ganesh Dassji entered into a contract on 27 February 1975 to purchase a 500‑sq‑yd plot in Delhi from Sita Ram Thapar, with the agreement that the draft sale deed be finalised and registered within seven days, making time of the essence. The seller required cash payment for the purchase, and the buyer sent…
C.V. RAJA RAO AND ANR.versusMIRZA BASHEER BAIG AND ORS
1996 INSC 59130 April 1996Dismissed
The petitioners claimed ownership of 4,922 square yards of land (Survey No. 202) in Lallaguda, Secunderabad and obtained injunction orders under sections 145 and 146 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. They alleged that the police were not providing assistance despite the injunctions. The Andhra Pradesh High Court quash…
ASSAM MADHYAMIK SIKSHAK ARU KARMACHARI SANSTHA, NAGAONversusTHE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS.
1996 INSC 59230 April 1996Dismissed
The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the Assam Madhyamik Sikshak Aru Karmachari Sanstha challenging Section 4(3) of the Assam Secondary Education (Provincialisation) Act, 1977, which mandated retirement of teachers at age 58 unless they opted for a pension or CPF scheme. The appellants argued that, in the absence of ru…
HEIRS OF VRAJLAL J. GANATRAversusHEIRS OF PARSHOTTAM S. SHAH
1996 INSC 59330 April 1996Dismissed
The heirs of Vrajlal J. Ganatra filed a suit seeking a declaration that they were the real owners of a property despite a sale deed showing Parshottam S. Shah as the vendee, alleging the deed was a security for a loan and that the land would be reconveyed upon repayment. The trial court dismissed the suit for lack of p…
AGRICULTURAL AND PROCESSED FOOD PRODUCTS ETCversusOSWAL AGRO FURANE AND ORS.
1996 INSC 59430 April 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Oswal Agro Furane Ltd., a 100% export‑oriented unit licensed to manufacture furfural and edible rice bran oil, sought to export non‑basmati rice and to sell the rice bran oil in the domestic market, invoking Clause 15(j) of the Export (Control) Order, 1988 as a blanket exemption. The Delhi High Court allowed these expo…
HINDUSTAN SHIPYARD LTD. AND ORS.versusDR. P. SAMASIVA RAO ETC.
1996 INSC 15230 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Three medical officers were appointed on an ad‑hoc basis by Hindustan Shipyard Ltd. and later sought regularisation and parity pay. The Andhra Pradesh High Court directed that they be regularised with effect from 1 April 1986 and that they receive regular pay scales. On appeal, the Supreme Court held that regularisatio…
MS. SAVITA SAMVEDI AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 15330 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved a retiring railway employee (appellant No.2) who sought to have his married daughter, also a railway employee (appellant No.1), regularised in the railway quarter allotted to him. The Railway Board circular dated 11 August 1992 allowed regularisation only for a son or an unmarried daughter, permitting…
VINEET NARAIN AND ORSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
1996 INSC 14730 January 1996Disposed off
The petitioners alleged that the CBI and other government agencies had failed to investigate thoroughly the hawala transactions uncovered during raids, which implicated politicians, bureaucrats and criminals. They sought the Supreme Court’s intervention under Article 32 to compel the agencies to conduct a full, imparti…
RAM CHANDRA VERMAversusSHRI JAGAT SINGH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 14830 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents filed eviction suits against tenant Harkesh Rai Agarwal in 1975, both of which were dismissed, after which a compromise decree was entered on 26 Nov 1981 whereby Harkesh Rai agreed to surrender a room now occupied by the appellant, Ram Chandra Verma. When execution of the decree was sought, the appellan…
SESHAN AND ORS.versusTHE SPECIAL TEHSILDAR AND LAND ACOUISITION OFFICER, SIPCOT, PUDUKKOTTAJ
1996 INSC 14930 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The dispute arose from land acquired under a notification dated 17 October 1981, with possession taken in January 1982. The Land Acquisition Officer awarded compensation of Rs 2,000 per acre on 31 July 1982, which was later enhanced by the civil court to Rs 4,000 per acre (7 November 1983) and by the Madras High Court …
STATE OF HARYANAversusCHANDRA MANI AND ORS.
1996 INSC 15030 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Haryana filed a Letters Patent Appeal against a judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, but delayed filing the appeal by 109 days. The High Court refused to condone the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Supreme Court examined the meaning of "sufficient cause" and held that the pro…
C. MASILAMANI MUDALIAR AND ORS.versusTHE IDOL OF SRI SWAMINATHASWAMI SWAMINATHASWAMI THIRUKOIL AND ORS.
1996 INSC 15130 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned property bequeathed by Somasundram Pillai in 1950 to his wife Sellathachi and his cousin's widow Janakathachi as maintenance. After the testator's death the widows possessed the land, but a power of attorney later alienated it, prompting a suit to declare the alienations illegal. The question before …
SHREE MAHAVIR OIL MILLS AND ANR.versusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS.
1996 INSC 141229 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Jammu & Kashmir exempted all local edible‑oil manufacturers from sales tax for ten years, while out‑of‑state manufacturers were required to pay an 8% tax. Shree Mahavir Oil Mills and other out‑of‑state producers challenged the exemption as a violation of Articles 301 and 304(a) of the Constitution, which g…
G. DEENDAYALAN AMBEDKARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 141329 November 1996Dismissed
The appellant, selected as an Assistant Station Master, argued that his seniority over two respondents should be based on his earlier completion of training, invoking Rule 303(1)(a) of the Railway Establishment Code which he said mandates seniority from the date of training completion. The respondents, however, were ra…
DISTRICT TRANSPORT MANAGER (ADMN.) O.S.R.T.C., ORISSAversusDILIP KUMAR NAYAK AND ANR.
1996 INSC 141429 November 1996Disposed off
The respondent, a conductor employed in the Baripada zone of the Orissa State Road Transport Corporation, was dismissed for misconduct while an industrial dispute involving an employee in the Bhadrak zone was pending before the Industrial Tribunal. The respondent sought relief under Section 33(1)(a) of the Industrial D…
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusSMT. V.P. PARUKUTTY
1996 INSC 141529 November 1996Disposed off
The case concerned the termination of Smt. V.P. Parukutty's appointment as an agent under the Mahila Pradhan Kshetriya Bachat Yojana because she was the brother of a post‑office employee, contrary to a 1981 government circular prohibiting near relatives from being appointed by the post‑master. She challenged the termin…
NELLIKKOTU KOLLERIYIL MADHAVIversusKAVAKKALATHIL KALIKUTTY AND ORS.
1996 INSC 141629 November 1996Dismissed
The respondents purchased a schedule property in execution of a decree and were issued a sale certificate and possession. They later assigned the property to the plaintiff and sought a perpetual injunction to prevent the appellant from interfering with possession. The trial and appellate courts had accepted the appella…
VALLIKAT THEKKEDATH VALAPPIL LAKSHMIKUTTY AMMA AND ORS.versusVALLIKAT THEKKEDATH VALAPPIL DEMODARA MENON AND ORS.
1996 INSC 141729 November 1996Dismissed
The appellant redeemed a possessory mortgage on item 6 of the schedule property and, by operation of subrogation, stepped into the shoes of the mortgagee. The respondents, who were co‑mortgagors, did not redeem the mortgage within the statutory 30‑year period, leading the trial and district courts to hold that the appe…
STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS. ETC.versusS. THANGAVEL AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 141829 November 1996Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined whether the Tamil Nadu Government could prepare a supplementary promotion list after an annual list had been prepared, despite no vacancies existing on the prescribed date, when new posts were later created due to administrative reorganisation. It held that the Rules do not strip the Governme…
THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.versusKAILASH CHANDRA KAPUR AND ORS.
1996 INSC 141929 November 1996Dismissed
The State of West Bengal granted a 999‑year lease of a plot in Salt Lake to Tapan Kumar Mullick, who later bequeathed the leasehold interest to a stranger, K.C. Kapur, by will. After Mullick's death, Kapur obtained probate and applied to have his name entered as lessee, which the High Court ordered despite the Governme…
C.P. AGRAWAL ETC. ETC.versusP.O. LABOUR COURT AND ANR.
1996 INSC 124229 October 1996Dismissed
The appellants, employees of the Steel Authority of India, claimed they were illegally denied promotion to the post of E‑1 despite their juniors being promoted, alleging a violation of Article 16 of the Constitution and that the promotion rules altered their conditions of service under Section 33‑A of the Industrial Di…
KISHORE CHANDRA PANIGRAHIversusSTATE OF ORISSA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 124329 October 1996Dismissed
The appellant, a Class IV peon appointed in 1976, was temporarily promoted to the Class III post of Junior Clerk in 1982 and later reverted to his original post in 1986. He challenged the reversion before the Orissa Administrative Tribunal, which held that the promotion was contrary to the 1963 Orissa Ministerial Servi…
KARTAR KAUR AND ANR.versusMILKHO AND ORS.
1996 INSC 124429 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants, the widow and daughter of the deceased Atma Singh, challenged a registered will that left all of his property to his sister (the first respondent) and subsequent sale deeds that transferred land to the sister's son. The trial court found numerous suspicious circumstances—such as questionable thumb impre…
NAHAR SINGHversusHARNAK SINGH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 124529 October 1996Dismissed
The appellant entered into an agreement of sale for immovable land that was described only in vague terms, lacking exact area, boundaries, and khasra numbers. The trial court granted specific performance without examining the identifiability of the property. On appeal, the lower appellate court held that the agreement …
M/S. C.S. COMPANY AND ORS.versusKERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
1996 INSC 124629 October 1996Dismissed
The petitioners filed a suit for settlement of accounts and a declaration that they were entitled to recover damages under a contract dated May 12, 1983. They later applied, under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC, to amend the plaint to convert the suit into a damages suit by quantifying the claimed amount. The trial court …
ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES EMPLOYEES UNION (REGD.) THROUGH ITS PRESIDENTversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 124729 October 1996Dismissed
The All India Institute of Medical Sciences Employees Union filed a complaint against Dr. S.K. Kacker alleging an offence under Section 409 of the IPC. The police took no action, and the Union approached the Delhi High Court under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the CBI to investigate. The High Court refused t…
M/S. MOTORS AND INVESTMENTS LTD.versusTHE NEW BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 124829 October 1996Disposed off
Mis Motors and Investments Ltd. had purchased 44 acres of land at a court auction for Rs 77,500 after no other bids were received. The land belonged to insolvent respondents whose interest vested in the official assignee, who was directed to sell the property. On appeal, other respondents offered substantially higher s…
STATE OF RAJASTHANversusSRIRAM VERMA AND ANR
1996 INSC 124929 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Rajasthan promoted thirteen officers under Rule 28‑B of the Rajasthan Administrative Service Rules, 1954, nine on seniority‑cum‑merit and four on merit. Sriram Verma, a senior officer, claimed his junior Ashok Kumar Sanvaria was promoted over him and appealed to the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribu…
PRABHU SHANKAR JAISWALversusSRI SHEO NARAIN JAISWAL
1996 INSC 125029 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant and several respondents were partners in an unregistered partnership firm and a suit for dissolution and accounts was filed by one partner. The partnership deed contained an arbitration clause, leading the appellant to obtain a stay of the suit under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and to file a petitio…
STATE OF U.P.versusBAL KISHAN DAS AND ANR.
1996 INSC 125129 October 1996Disposed off
The case concerned the murder of Rama, a young woman who disappeared from her matrimonial home and whose body was later found in a hold‑all at New Delhi railway station. The prosecution relied on identification of the victim by her sister through the red saree and glass bangles, forensic evidence of strangulation, and …
H.M.T. LTD.versusH.M.T. HEAD OFFICE EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION AND ORS.
1996 INSC 125229 October 1996Disposed off
The case concerned five public‑sector undertakings whose workmen had gone on an illegal but justified strike demanding wage parity with BHEL, followed by a lock‑out declared by management. The National Industrial Tribunal awarded the workers 35% of their wages for the strike and lock‑out periods, disallowed set‑off of …
MANAGEMENT OF HEAVY ENGINEERING CORPORATION LTD.versusPRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT AND ORS.
1996 INSC 125329 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Management of Heavy Engineering Corporation appointed a doctor on an ad‑hoc six‑month contract to run a first‑aid post in shifts, supervising a male nurse, attendant, sweeper and ambulance driver. Upon completion of the contract the corporation terminated his services without giving the one‑month notice or compensa…
C.T. LTD. AND ANR.versusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND ORS.
1996 INSC 124129 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
C.T. Ltd. and another, engaged in the tea trade, entered into a contract with the State Trading Corporation (STC) to supply unblended Assam tea to an Iranian buyer. To fulfil this contract they purchased tea from auction brokers. The sales tax authorities demanded payment of sales tax on these purchases. The appellants…
KASMIRI LAL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB
1996 INSC 96629 August 1996Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined an appeal by four men convicted for the murder of Gurbachan Singh and assault on his family. The appellants claimed they acted in private defence, alleging the incident occurred on the ground floor of their house where they were the victims. Evidence showed the assault took place on the first…
M/S. SHREE BAIDYANATH AYURVED BHAWAN PVT. LTD.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.
1996 INSC 96729 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court considered an appeal by Shree Baidyanath Ayurved Bhandan Pvt. Ltd. against the State of Bihar, which had refused to refund taxes collected on certain ayurvedic preparations that the Court had earlier held to be illegal under the Excise Acts. The appellant had applied for refund in 1962, but the State …
KRISHI UTPADAN MANDI SAMITIversusASHOK KUMAR DINESH CHANDRA AND ANR. ETC. ETC.
1996 INSC 96829 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The writ petitioners, traders in a market, claimed that the Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti was not providing any services and therefore could not charge a market fee. The Mandi Samiti counter‑claimed that it rendered several services such as electricity, water, sanitation, tents, and was planning further infrastructure, j…
FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIAversusF.C.I. DEPUTATIONIST ASSOCIATION AND ORS.
1996 INSC 96529 August 1996Dismissed
The Food Corporation of India (FCI) had taken several Sub‑Inspectors of the West Bengal Government on deputation and assigned them to the duties of Assistant Grade‑II for more than eighteen years. When the deputationists were to be absorbed into FCI's regular service, the corporation’s circular proposed their fitment i…
STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusSH. MARUTI SHRIPATI DUBAL
1996 INSC 96929 August 1996Dismissed
Shri Maruti Shripati Dubal, a police constable, suffered a head injury in a 1981 road accident and was subsequently diagnosed with schizophrenia. He attempted self‑immolation on 27 April 1985 and was charged under Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code. While the case was pending, he challenged the constitutional validit…
GIRISH YADAV AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
1996 INSC 46029 March 1996Dismissed
The accused were convicted of murder under Sections 302, 148 and 149 of the IPC for chasing and assaulting the deceased, an act witnessed by three eye‑witnesses. The appellants challenged the conviction on several grounds, chiefly that the First Information Report (FIR) was not promptly lodged, that the copy of the FIR…
T. VENKATA NARAYANA AND ORS,versusSMT. VENKATA SUBBAMMA (DEAD) AND ORS.
1996 INSC 46129 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed
In a suit for perpetual injunction, the appellants sought to restrain Smt. Venkata Subbamma (deceased) from alienating property granted to her under a 1969 compromise decree in a partition suit. After her death, the respondents, as legal representatives, claimed that Subbamma had executed a will in their favour, but th…
D. S. THIMMAPPAversusSIDDARAMAKKA
1996 INSC 46229 March 1996Dismissed
Thimmappa (appellant) had executed two sale deeds transferring a property to Siddaramakka (respondent) and a reconveyance agreement dated July 20, 1968, stipulating that if the respondent repaid Rs.5,000 within eight years, she could have the sale deed executed in her favour. The respondent offered payment in June 1976…
MOHSIN UNISSAversusTAMIL NADU PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
1996 INSC 46329 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a temporary employee of the Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission in 1975‑76, was later regularised as a Junior Assistant in the Finance Department in August 1990, subject to passing a Tamil language test. She had passed the test in 1977 while serving temporarily, but was required to retake it after regul…
M.P. CHANDORIAversusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 46429 March 1996Dismissed
The appellant, a direct recruit Deputy Collector in Madhya Pradesh, joined service on 15‑02‑1967 and was placed on probation. He passed the prescribed departmental test on 27‑06‑1972 and was confirmed on 13‑03‑1973. He claimed that his seniority should be backdated to his date of joining, but the State Administrative T…
SATYA NARAIN PAREEKversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.
1996 INSC 46529 March 1996Dismissed
The appellant, a permanent Lower Division Clerk in the Technical Education Department of Rajasthan, was deputed to a tenure post in the Transport Department and later repatriated to his parent department. He challenged the repatriation, alleging that his lien in the parent department had been suspended and that he shou…
UNION OF LNDIA AND ORS.versusDHARMA PAL AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 46629 March 1996Disposed off
The case concerned the regularisation and remuneration of approximately 3,647 daily‑wage/casual workers employed by the Chandigarh Administration. The Central Administrative Tribunal had directed that these workers be paid full Dearness Allowance (DA), House Rent Allowance (HRA) and City Compensatory Allowance (CCA), w…
DELHI WATER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL UNDER TAKING AND ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 33529 February 1996Disposed off
The Delhi Water Supply and Sewage Disposal Undertaking and Commodore S. D. Sinha filed a public‑interest petition under Article 32 seeking a direction that the upstream states release sufficient water in the Jamuna River for Delhi's drinking needs. The Supreme Court, after hearing the parties, issued an interim order d…
ATTIQ-UR-REHMANversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ANR.
1996 INSC 33629 February 1996Dismissed
Attiq‑ur‑Rehman filed a civil suit to restrain the Municipal Corporation of Delhi from demolishing alleged unauthorised construction on his property. The corporation later lodged a criminal complaint under sections 332 and 461 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act in the Court of a Metropolitan Magistrate, even though…
SMT. SARLA DIXIT AND ANR.versusBALWANT YADAV AND ORS.
1996 INSC 33729 February 1996
The widowed wife and daughter of Captain Rama Kant Dixit, who died in a road accident when his scooter was struck by a truck, filed a claim under Section 110A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 seeking compensation. The Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal reduced the award by 75% on the ground of alleged contributory negligenc…
CALCUTTA STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL
1996 INSC 33829 February 1996Dismissed
The Calcutta State Transport Corporation (CSTC), a statutory body created under the Road Transport Corporations Act to provide road transport services, claimed that its income was exempt from tax under Section 10(20) of the Income‑Tax Act, 1961, on the ground that it was a "local authority" as defined in Section 3(31) …
THE BIHAR STATE BOARD OF RELIGIOUS TRUSTversusRAMSUBARAN DAS
1996 INSC 33929 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned two ancient Hindu temples in Muzaffarpur district whose status as public religious trusts was disputed. The respondent, Ramsubaran Das, claimed that the predecessor Raghubardas had filed returns treating the temples as public trusts under a mistake of law and fact, and therefore the properties should…
ISMAIL ABDUL LATIF SHAIKHversusSTATE OF MAHARASHRA AND ANR.
1996 INSC 34029 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a constable in the Maharashtra Prohibition and Excise Department, was rejected for promotion to Sub‑Inspector in 1966 because his chest measurement fell short of the standard prescribed in the Bombay Prohibition and Excise Department Rules, 1958. He was later promoted in 1970 and contended that his promo…
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BOMBAYversusBOMBAY DYEING AND MANUFACTURING CO. LTD.
1996 INSC 34129 February 1996Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered two questions raised by Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Co. Ltd.: (1) whether professional fees paid to solicitors for the amalgamation of Nawrosjee Wadia Ginning & Pressing Co. could be treated as revenue expenditure under the Income Tax Act, and (2) whether a contribution of Rs. 2,25,000 to…
SURJIT SINGH AND ORS.versusBALBIR SINGH
1996 INSC 33329 February 1996Dismissed
The respondents filed a private criminal complaint alleging that the appellants forged an agreement and signatures to claim possession of property, invoking offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. The magistrate took cognizance of the complaint on 27 September 1983. The appellants later filed a civil s…
RAJ KUMAR BINDLISHversusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 33429 February 1996Dismissed
The petition under Article 32 challenged the selection of three advocates—Mohinder Singh Suller, S.K. Sardana and Nawab Singh—as Additional District and Sessions Judges in Haryana, alleging that the High Court had no definite selection procedure and that one appointee was the son‑in‑law of a sitting judge, raising conc…
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL-I, BOMBAYversusMESSRS EMPIRE ESTATE, BOMBAY
1996 INSC 13729 January 1996Dismissed
The assessee, a partnership firm of three partners, lost one partner on 12 January 1974. The partnership deed did not contain a clause allowing the firm to continue after a partner's death, so under Section 42 of the Partnership Act the firm dissolved on that date. The surviving partners formed a new partnership deed t…
RAGHBIR SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA
1996 INSC 13829 January 1996Dismissed
Raghbir Singh was caught with opium during a police raid and was offered the choice of being searched by the police officer or before a Gazetted Officer; he chose the latter and the search yielded the contraband. He was convicted under Section 18 of the NDPS Act and sentenced to ten years' rigorous imprisonment. On app…
KESAR SINGH AND ORS.versusSADHU
1996 INSC 13929 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents filed a suit in 1978 to recover possession of land based on a 1924 declaratory decree that arose from a customary right to contest alienation under the Punjab Custom (Power to Contest) Act, 1921. The appellants, who had purchased the land, challenged the decree, arguing that the 1973 Amendment Act had a…
SATISH KUMARversusTHE JALANDHAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST, JALANDHAR AND ANR.
1996 INSC 14029 January 1996Dismissed
The petitioner, Satish Kumar, challenged his appointment as Pumpset Operator by the Jalandhar Improvement Trust, claiming entitlement to equal pay under Article 39(d) and Article 14 of the Constitution. He argued that despite lacking the minimum qualification prescribed for the post, he performed the same duties as qua…
STATE OF HARYANAversusPALA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 14129 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
In December 1989, the deceased Rati Ram was attacked by two accused who struck him with musals on the head and body, causing multiple injuries. He died five days later from septicaemia that the autopsy report linked to the head injury, which was deemed sufficient to cause death in the ordinary course of nature. The tri…
MALKIAT SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
1996 INSC 14229 January 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Malkiat Singh, a police constable appointed on 20 April 1990, was discharged on 22 July 1992 on the grounds of prolonged absence and alleged irregular attendance, which the authorities claimed demonstrated his inefficiency. The record showed three instances of absence: a six‑hour tardiness on 10 September 1990, a night…
DR. P.N. PURI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 14329 January 1996Dismissed
The petitioners, who were employees of urban local bodies, filed a writ petition seeking equal pay on par with Medical Officers at a scale of Rs. 2200‑4000 and arrears dating back to 1986. The Anomaly Committee had recommended that such employees be placed on the said pay scale, effective from 7 November 1994, and the …
KARAM SINGHversusSTATE OF PUNJAB & ANR.
1996 INSC 14429 January 1996Dismissed
Karam Singh, a Punjab police constable, was convicted under IPC Section 323 and released on probation, while being acquitted of murder (Sec. 302) and grievous hurt (Sec. 324). He applied for reinstatement, but the police authorities rejected his request under Rule 16.2(2) of the Punjab Police Rules. The Punjab & Haryan…
S.C. MANDAKKI ETC.versusTHE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SERVICE ETC.
1996 INSC 14529 January 1996Dismissed
The appellant, appointed as a Junior Laboratory Technician on 3 May 1979, voluntarily transferred to the post of First Divisional Assistant on 28 October 1986 within the same department. He sought an advance increment under Karnataka Civil Services (Time Bound Advancement) Rules, 1983, which is granted after ten years …
SRI NARAYAN BAL AND OTHERSversusSRI SRIDHAR SUTAR AND OTHERS
1996 INSC 14629 January 1996Dismissed
The eldest male member of a joint Hindu family, acting as Karta, together with two widows who were also guardians of their minor sons, executed a sale deed of family lands. The plaintiffs, members of the same family, challenged the sale alleging fraud and contended that the Karta lacked authority because Section 8 of t…
ANUJ KUMAR DEY AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 140028 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Anuj Kumar Dey enlisted in the Indian Navy as an Artificer Apprentice on 12 August 1971, took the oath of allegiance, and underwent four years of training before being promoted to Electrical Artificer in August 1975. After his release on 31 January 1988, the Navy denied him pension benefits on the ground that the train…
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.versusSHRI KUSUMANCHI KAMESHWARA RAO AND ANR.
1996 INSC 140128 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The plaintiff, Shri Kusumanchi Kameshwara Rao, sued New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (the appellant) and a partner (defendant No.2) for Rs 1,25,000, alleging that a surety bond executed by the insurer on 26 April 1971 guaranteed payment of that amount if the partner failed to meet obligations arising from a dissolution dee…
"COMMON CAUSE", A REGISTERED SOCIETY THROUGH ITS DIRECTORversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 140228 November 1996Disposed off
The Supreme Court issued a clarificatory order modifying its earlier judgment (1 May 1996) in Writ Petition (C) No. 1128 of 1986, which had provided for discharge or acquittal of accused whose criminal trials were pending for a prescribed period. The Court held that the relief does not apply where the pendency is cause…
STATE OF KERALA AND ANR.versusBUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF IND!A AND ORS.
1996 INSC 140328 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 introduced optional alternate taxation provisions (Section 7(7), 7A, 7B, 11, 12) allowing contractors to pay a fixed percentage of the contract value instead of tax under Section 5(1)(iv). Several contractors who had not opted for this scheme challenged the validity of those sub‑s…
J.S. CHHABRA ETC.versusSTATE OF M.P. AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 140428 November 1996
The Madhya Pradesh Government, unable to fill lecturer posts through the Public Service Commission, upgraded 21 casualty medical officer (CMO) posts to the lecturer grade and appointed doctors on an ad‑hoc basis in 1971. Their services were later regularised under the M.P. Regularisation of Ad‑hoc Appointment Rules, 19…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORSversusM/S. M.V. VYAVSAYA AND CO.
1996 INSC 140528 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against a series of interim orders passed by the High Court in a writ petition filed by M.V. Vyavsayand Co., the highest bidder for liquor licences, which had allegedly defaulted on contractual and statutory obligations. The High Court, despite being informed that the case involved …
BHOOMIREDDY CHENNA REDDY AND ANR.versusBHOOSPALLI PEDDA VERRAPPA (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ANR.
1996 INSC 140628 November 1996Dismissed
Pedda Chennaiah executed a will in 1947 bequeathing all his properties to his wife Laxmamma with a life‑interest and reserving the remainder to the sons of his wife's sister. After the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 came into force, the Court held that Laxmamma's limited right matured into an absolute ownership under Secti…
THACKER PRAGJI ANANDJIversusMANSUKH AMBALAL (DEAD) THROUGH HIS HEIRS AND LRS. AND ANR.
1996 INSC 140728 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Thacker Pragji Anandji, sought a declaration that a second mortgage dated September 30, 1958 on two houses (Nos. 247 & 248) did not bind him, and requested partition and possession of his share. The houses were joint family properties originally mortgaged in 1956 and subsequently redeemed, but the second…
ANIL KUMAR MITRA AND ORS.versusGANENDRA NATH MITRA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 140828 November 1996Dismissed
The dispute concerned a property in Calcutta originally owned jointly by brothers Haridas and Gunendra. Haridas mortgaged his share to Rabindra Nath Bose, who eventually purchased it after a foreclosure suit. A preliminary decree dated 17 December 1931 in a partition suit against Bose severed the joint family status of…
VEMULA SIVIAH NAIDUversusSTATE OF AP. AND ANR.
1996 INSC 140928 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether a member of a joint family who, by partition, undertook to discharge a government loan taken by another family member, qualifies as a "defaulter" under Section 5 of the Andhra Pradesh Revenue Recovery Act, 1894. The joint family property had been hypothecated to secure the loan, and t…
SOVRIN KNIT WORKS ETC.versusEMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPN. AND ANR. ETC.
1996 INSC 141028 November 1996Dismissed
Sovrin Knit Works and other establishments, covered under the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948, failed to pay the statutory contribution for the year 1980-81. The Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) issued a notice on 31 December 1982 demanding damages and interest for the delayed payment, which the appel…
SMT. ZUBEDA BEGUM ETC.versusSYED SHAH KHURSHEED AHMAD HASHMI AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 141128 November 1996Dismissed
Nawab Sir Mohammad Yusuf executed a wakfnama on 5 April 1956, dedicating his properties as a waqf and appointing himself as Mutawalli, with his nephew Syed Shah Hashmi as successor. After his death, his widow Smt. Zubeda Begum sued for cancellation of the wakfnama and possession of the properties, claiming a one‑fourth…
RANCHHODJI CHATURJI THAKOREversusTHE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, GUJARAT ELECTRICITY BOARD, HIMMATNAGAR (GUJARAT) AND ANR.
1996 INSC 123428 October 1996Dismissed
Ranchhodji Chaturji Thakore, a junior clerk with the Gujarat Electricity Board, was convicted under Section 302 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code for murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, leading to his dismissal from service. While his dismissal was being challenged, the Gujarat High Court acquitted him and o…
S. VASUNDARAversusCANARA BANK AND ORS.
1996 INSC 123528 October 1996Dismissed
The petitioner, a manager of Canara Bank, was convicted by a criminal court for offences under Sections 420, 477A of the IPC and Sections 5(2) read with 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, and sentenced to one year imprisonment with fines. The High Court later suspended the sentence pending appeal. The bank is…
KUNWAR ARUN KUMARversusU.P. HILL ELECTRONICS CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 123628 October 1996Dismissed
The petitioner was appointed on probation on 15 January 1990 with a clause allowing termination without assigning any reason during the probation period. He was terminated on 16 January 1991 on the ground that his work performance was unsatisfactory and he was regularly absent. The petitioner challenged the termination…
SH. RAMESH KUMARversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 123728 October 1996Dismissed
Sh. Ramesh Kumar, a casual labourer (chowkidar) engaged in 1986 and granted temporary status in 1987, challenged his non‑absorption after the winding up of the Central Organisation for Operations and Information System (COOIS). The appellant alleged that his seniority over a junior employee, Rohtas Kumar, who was regul…
THE DIRECTOR, MINISTRY OF COAL AND ORS.versusBIMLENDU KUMAR
1996 INSC 123828 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Bimlendu Kumar was appointed on probation to a temporary post under the Coal Mines Provident Fund (Employees Recruitment) Rules, 1982. His appointment was terminated on May 14, 1989, and he claimed the termination was illegal because his probation had not been extended beyond three years, arguing that he should be deem…
THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERversusS.D. COLLEGE, HOSHIARPUR AND ORS.
1996 INSC 123928 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner against S.D. College, Hoshiarpur and other educational institutions for failing to deposit statutory EPF contributions after a 1988 Supreme Court order directing compliance. Despite the order, the respondents continued to keep the contri…
NINGE GOWDAversusLINGE GOWDA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 124028 October 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Ninge Gowda filed a suit for declaration of title and injunction, claiming that the land in dispute was ancestral property that had been partitioned among his father and his father's brothers before 1936, and subsequently partitioned again in 1936 between Ninge Gowda and his brothers, with a mutation in the revenue rec…
BAKHTAWAR SINGH AND ANR.versusSADA KAUR AND ANR.
1996 INSC 95328 August 1996Dismissed
The plaintiffs, sons of Gulab Singh, claimed a two‑thirds share in ancestral land and filed a suit in 1962 which was later allowed on appeal. They filed another suit in 1964 for possession, which they withdrew in 1971 with liberty to file a fresh suit. In 1990 they instituted a fresh suit, but the trial court held it b…
VELLORE CITIZENS WELFARE FORUMversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 95228 August 1996Disposed off
The Supreme Court entertained a public‑interest writ under Article 32 filed by the Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum alleging that tanneries in five districts of Tamil Nadu were discharging untreated effluents, contaminating surface and groundwater, rendering 35,000 hectares of agricultural land unfit for cultivation and …
GENTELA VIJAYAVARDHAN RAO AND ANR.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
1996 INSC 95428 August 1996Dismissed
The appellants, G. Vijayavardhan Rao and another, were convicted of setting fire to a passenger bus, killing 23 people and injuring many, with the motive of robbery. They poured petrol into the bus, ignited it, and robbed passengers of cash, a wristwatch and clothing, as evidenced by recovered items and witness testimo…
M/S. J.K. SYNTHETICS LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE
1996 INSC 95528 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
J.K. Synthetics Ltd filed a refund claim that was rejected, appealed and the appeal was allowed by the Collector (Customs). The Collector of Central Excise then appealed before the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT). At the hearing on 31 August 1987 the appellant was absent, and CEGAT heard t…
MAHESHversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
1996 INSC 95628 August 1996Disposed off
Mahesh was charged with the murder of Krishna Kumar after a dispute over grazing cattle in a field. The deceased and two other labourers asked Mahesh to remove his cattle, leading to an altercation in which Mahesh struck Krishna Kumar once on the head with a pharsa, causing instant death. The trial court, after evaluat…
SHERA SINGHversusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB
1996 INSC 95728 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Three persons were tried for the murder of Sucha Singh. The trial court convicted all under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. On appeal, the High Court acquitted two co‑accused but upheld the conviction of Shera Singh, relying on the testimony of an approver (PW‑13) and treating the statement of a witness (P…
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusANAND SINGH BISHT
1996 INSC 95828 August 1996Disposed off
Anand Singh Bisht, a Naik in the Border Security Force, was convicted under the BSF Act and IPC section 307 for injuring a cadet and sentenced to one year of rigorous imprisonment. He had already spent about a year in pre‑trial detention and sought release by invoking Section 428 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, whic…
SRI SAUNUversusCOLLECTOR, LAND ACQUISITION
1996 INSC 95928 August 1996Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered an appeal by Sri Saunu against the Collector’s award of compensation for 221 bighas of land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the Beas‑Sutlej Link Project. The Land Acquisition Officer had fixed compensation between Rs 2,000 and Rs 5,000 per bigha, which was confirmed by the…
SMT. SANTOSH KUMAR! ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA
1996 INSC 96028 August 1996Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined an appeal by Santosh Kumar and others against the Punjab & Haryana High Court’s enhancement of compensation for land acquired under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for housing development in Panipat. The Land Acquisition Officer had fixed compensation per acre, which was later …
SHARANAPPA BASAPPA DINDAWARversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 96128 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Sharanappa Basappa Dindawar owned 15 acres 6 gunthas in Survey No. 102 and 28 acres 10 gunthas in Survey No. 28/2. By a registered exchange deed dated 18 August 1971 he swapped the 28 acres 10 gunthas for 30 acres 24 gunthas of land in Survey No. 175, increasing his total holding to 45 acres 30 gunthas, still within th…
P.G. ESHWARAPPAversusM. RUDRAPPA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 96228 August 1996Dismissed
Mohammed Khan sold a two‑acre parcel of land in Shimoga to P.G. Eshwarappa after the tenant, Channabasappa (father of the respondents), refused to purchase it. Channabasappa sued for declaration of title and possession, obtaining a decree in 1959 that forfeited his tenancy. The appellant took possession in 1967, and th…
POSHETTY AND ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
1996 INSC 96328 August 1996Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered an appeal by Poshetty and others against the State of Andhra Pradesh concerning the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The issue was whether serving a notice of award under Section 11, together with its enclosure, is a pre‑condition under Section 12(2) for the limitation period prescribed in the p…
VENKATASWAMAPPAversusTHE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (REVENUE)
1996 INSC 96428 August 1996Dismissed
The appellants challenged the validity of a notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, which sought to acquire 80 acres of land for a house‑building cooperative society. They argued that the notification was mala fide because some of their lands had previously been acquired for public pur…
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusRAM PHAL
1996 INSC 33028 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a constable in the Border Security Force, was repeatedly absent without leave from December 1983 and, after several notices, was deemed a deserter. A show‑cause notice dated 20 April 1984 warned that his further retention was undesirable and proposed dismissal under Section 11(2) of the Border Security …
UMASHANKAR PANDAversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
1996 INSC 33128 February 1996
Umashankar Panda was convicted under IPC sections 302 and 307 for murdering his wife and two daughters with a sword and attempting to murder his three other children, who survived with grievous injuries. The trial court sentenced him to death, a judgment affirmed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court. In a Special Leave Pet…
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXversusM/S. NARANG DAIRY PRODUCTS
1996 INSC 33228 February 1996
The assessee, Narang Dairy Products, was granted a development rebate under Section 33(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act for its entire machinery in AY 1965-66. Subsequently, part of the machinery was sold and the remaining plant was leased to Hindustan Lever Ltd for three years, within the eight‑year period prescribed by Se…
EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO THE MANAGEMENT OF RESERVE BANK OF INDIAversusTHEIR WORKMEN
1996 INSC 32728 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) provided canteen facilities for its Class III and IV employees through three arrangements – an Implementation Committee, co‑operative societies and contractors – but had no statutory duty to run these canteens. The Central Government Industrial Tribunal held that 166 canteen workers were…
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HYDERABAD ETC. ETC.versusM/S. VAZIR SULTAN TOBACCO CO. LTD., HYDERABAD ETC. ETC.
1996 INSC 32828 February 1996Case Partly allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether cigarettes manufactured before 1 March 1978 but removed from the factory after that date were liable to the special excise duty introduced by Section 37 of the Finance Act, 1978. The respondent, a tobacco manufacturer, argued that excise duties are levied at the time of manufacture, n…
PHIROZE DINSHAW LAM ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS.
1996 INSC 32928 February 1996Disposed off
Godrej & Boyce manufactured refrigerators packed in corrugated fibre containers (CFCs) and contested the inclusion of CFC value in excise valuation. The Revenue served demand notices including CFC value, leading Godrej to file writ petitions. Godrej attempted to support its case with fabricated dealer letters, which we…
MARSHALL SONS AND CO. (INDIA) LTD.versusINCOME TAX OFFICER
1996 INSC 139127 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Marshall Sons and Co. (India) Ltd. (the holding company) and Marshall Sons and Manufacturing Ltd. (the subsidiary) entered into a scheme of amalgamation that specified a transfer date of 1 January 1982, but the scheme was only sanctioned by the Madras and Calcutta High Courts in late 1983 and early 1984. The Income Tax…
PHOOLAN DEVI ETC.versusSTATE. OF M.P. AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 139227 November 1996Disposed off
Phoolan Devi surrendered in Madhya Pradesh in 1983 and was released on parole after serving eleven years of custody. She filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking her release and the quashing of about 55 criminal prosecutions pending in Uttar Pradesh, alleging violation of her Article 21 right to a speedy trial an…
STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIRversusROMESH CHANDER AND ORS.
1996 INSC 139327 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Jammu & Kashmir sued Romesh Chander and others for allegedly extracting timber from a demarcated forest in violation of the Jammu & Kashmir State Nationalisation of Forest Working Act, 1985 and the subsequent Ordinance/Act of 1986‑87. A charge‑sheet was filed against the lessees and forest officials, but t…
CHARAN SINGH ETCversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 139427 November 1996Disposed off
Charan Singh, a Scheduled Caste member, was granted a ten‑year lease of uncultivable waste land under the Nazool Land Rules, 1956, which he reclaimed, cultivated and equipped with a tube‑well. After the lease expired in 1972 he remained in possession, but the Government initiated eviction proceedings which were upheld …
SITA RAM BANSAL AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. ETC. ETC.
1996 INSC 139527 November 1996Dismissed
The petitioners, non‑provincialised employees of municipal committees, challenged a government pension scheme that was introduced on 1 April 1990 for All India Gazetted and Punjab Civil Services officers and later extended to non‑provincialised staff on 28 July 1994. They argued that the cut‑off date excluded retirees …
JAGTAR SINGHversusPARGAT SINGH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 139627 November 1996Dismissed
The elder brother of the petitioner filed a declaratory suit seeking to declare a 1990 decree null and void, which had been upheld by the Subordinate Judge, Hoshiarpur. The petitioner appealed the decree to the Additional District Judge, but his counsel, on 15 September 1995, announced that the petitioner did not wish …
M/S GOODYEAR INDIA LTD.versusTHE REGIONAL DIRECTOR, EMPLOYEES STATE INSURANCE CORPN. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 139727 November 1996Dismissed
Goodyear India Ltd, an employer covered by the Employees' State Insurance Act, was served a demand on 1 December 1982 to pay contributions for the periods 28 January 1968 to 31 October 1979 (Bangalore) and 28 January 1968 to 31 August 1979 (Indore). The company contended that the establishments were not covered by the …
M/S MOHAN MEAKIN LTD.versusEXCISE AND TAXATION COMMISSIONER, HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 139827 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Mohan Meakin Ltd. appealed against the Himachal Pradesh Excise and Taxation Commissioner challenging the High Court’s view that excise duty on beer became payable at the wort (fermentation) stage under Rule 10(3.4) of the Punjab Breweries Rules. The Supreme Court examined the definitions of “excisable article”, “intoxi…
WALTER LOUIS FRANKLIN (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusGEORGE SINGH (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.
1996 INSC 139927 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Walter Louis Franklin, purchased plot No. 15/45 from a church in 1937 and had been in possession, using it for poultry farming and occasional sleeping. He filed a suit for perpetual injunction under Section 38 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, to restrain the respondent, George Singh, from interfering wi…
RITA MARKANDEYversusSURJIT SINGH ARORA
1996 INSC 112227 September 1996Disposed off
In a rent‑control dispute, the Supreme Court dismissed the respondent's appeal and granted him time until 31 March 1995 to vacate the suit premises, subject to filing an undertaking. The respondent neither filed the undertaking nor vacated the premises, and filed false affidavits claiming he had handed over possession …
STATE OF RAJASTHANversusSH. B.K. MEENA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 112327 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Rajasthan initiated disciplinary proceedings against IAS officer B.K. Meena for alleged misappropriation of Rs 1.05 crore, while a criminal case under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was also filed. The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) stayed the disciplinary enquiry pending the criminal trial,…
R. LAKSHMIversusK. SARASWATHI AMMAL
1996 INSC 112427 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The husband obtained an ex‑parte decree of divorce and subsequently died. The wife (appellant) filed an application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the decree, asserting that it affected her marital status and property rights. The trial court dismissed the application, holding that di…
RAMESHWAR DASS GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.
1996 INSC 94927 August 1996Dismissed
The Uttar Pradesh Public Services Tribunal set aside the removal of Rameshwar Dass Gupta and ordered his confirmation, promotion and payment of salary, gratuity and pension. Gupta filed an execution petition under Order 21 Rule 1 of the CPC to recover the awarded amounts. The executing court, however, added interest at…
RAMESHWARLALversusMUNICIPAL COUNCIL, TONK AND ORS.
1996 INSC 95027 August 1996Disposed off
Rameshwarlal, a former employee of the Municipal Council, Tonk, claimed arrears of salary for the period September 10, 1987 to August 18, 1988. He filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution in the Rajasthan High Court in February 1990, which was dismissed on the ground that the claim was civil in natur…
MAHABIR SUGAR MILLS LTD. AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF U.P. AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 95127 August 1996Dismissed
The Supreme Court considered a series of appeals and writ petitions filed by Mahavir Sugar Mills Ltd. and related parties against the State of Uttar Pradesh concerning the U.P. Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1971. The Court noted that the validity of the Act had already been upheld in Ishwari Khetan Sugar Mills …
BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS.versusPARMESHWAR KUMAR AGARWALA ETC. ETC.
1996 INSC 69227 May 1996Dismissed
The Bihar State Electricity Board, facing losses from electricity theft and defective meters, issued a notification under Sections 46 and 49 of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 to bill industrial consumers at prescribed load factors. Consumers challenged the notification, arguing it conflicted with the terms of their…
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MADRASversusGEMINI PICTURES CIRCUIT PVT. LTD.
1996 INSC 45627 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined whether a parcel of land situated on Mount Road, Madras, which had been used for raising bananas and vegetables, qualified as "agricultural land" under the Income Tax Act, 1961 and thus could be exempt from capital gains tax. The assessee argued that the land was agricultural and therefore no…
PATTU LALversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
1996 INSC 45727 March 1996Dismissed
Pattu Lal was convicted of murdering his wife Chameli Devi under Section 302 IPC. The prosecution’s case rested on the deposition of the investigating officer that the son, Bishan Dial, lodged the FIR and produced his father with blood‑stained clothes and the weapon (toka) at the police station. Bishan later turned hos…
THE REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER ETC.versusSHILLONG CITY BUS SYNDICATE AND ANR. ETC.
1996 INSC 45827 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner issued a notice under Section 7B of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 to Shillong City Bus Syndicate for failure to pay EPF contributions for Jan‑Sept 1972. The syndicate contended that the Act did not apply to the Khasi Hills Autonomous Distr…
SH. O.K. UDAYASANKARAN AND ORS. ETCversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 45427 March 1996Dismissed
The case concerned ex‑servicemen re‑employed by the Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) of India who were appointed after 1 January 1988. LIC had issued instructions on 2 June 1989 prescribing how their salaries should be fixed, including a notional fitment provision in paragraph 3.8 that was intended only for ex‑servicem…
RAMANAND PRASAD SINGH AND ANR ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC.
1996 INSC 45527 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed
A Selection Committee was constituted to select officers of the Bihar Administrative Service for promotion to the Indian Administrative Service. The Committee considered 264 officers, including those above the age of 54 under the provisos of Regulation 5(3), and prepared a list of 51 suitable candidates. The Central Ad…
STATE BANK OF PATIALA AND ORS.versusS.K. SHARMA
1996 INSC 45927 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, S.K. Sharma, a bank manager, was charged with temporary misappropriation of a loan amount and was removed from service after a departmental enquiry. The enquiry officer relied on statements of witnesses, but the respondent was not supplied copies of those statements nor of certain documents as required …
GOPALJI KHANNAversusALLAHABAD BANK AND OTHERS
1996 INSC 32227 February 1996Dismissed
The appellant, an employee of Allahabad Bank, was disciplined and his pay scale was reduced. The Executive Director, who was temporarily holding charge of the Chairman and Managing Director posts, reviewed the penalty under Regulation 18 and enhanced it, reducing the appellant further. The appellant challenged the orde…
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusK.V. VIJEESH
1996 INSC 31727 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, K.V. Vijeesh, was placed at rank 172 in the select list for Diesel Assistant vacancies of the Southern Railways but was not appointed while lower‑ranked candidates were. He approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, which directed the Railways to consider him for any existing or future vacancy. The…
V. SUBBA RAO AND OTHERSversusTHE SECRETARY TO GOVT. PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF AP. AND OTHERS
1996 INSC 31827 February 1996Dismissed
The petitioners, children of deceased employees, were initially appointed on compassionate grounds and later regularized, after which they were promoted to Junior Assistant. A show‑cause notice was issued ordering their reversion because they had only about three years of service in the last grade, whereas promotion to…
PRATAP & ANR.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.
1996 INSC 31927 February 1996Dismissed
The appellants' land was acquired by the State of Rajasthan under Section 52 of the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959, and vested in the State upon publication of a notification in 1984. After this vesting, the Central Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was extended to Rajasthan and the State amended its own Act in 1987 an…
STATE OF RAJASTHANversusKISHORE
1996 INSC 32027 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The deceased Guddi, wife of the accused Kishore, suffered 80 % burns after kerosene was poured on her and she later died. Three dying declarations were recorded – one in the FIR, one under Section 161 of the Cr.P.C., and a judicial‑magistrate’s statement (Ex P‑8). The Sessions Court convicted Kishore under Section 302 …
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusSHILPA CO-OPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. ETC.
1996 INSC 32327 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) allotted land to several cooperative housing societies, but after the premium was escalated the societies refused to accept the allotment, leading to its cancellation. The societies had deposited earnest money, and the question before the Supreme Court was the extent to which this …
SHAHEEN WELFARE ASSOCIATIONversusUNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
1996 INSC 32427 February 1996Disposed off
The Supreme Court entertained a public‑interest writ under Article 32 filed by Shaheen Welfare Association seeking the release of under‑trial detainees under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) where evidence was lacking or procedural safeguards were not observed. The Court observed th…
VARELI WEAVES PVT. LTD. AND ANRversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
1996 INSC 32527 February 1996Case Partly allowed
Vareliweaves Pvt. Ltd. imported partially oriented yarn (POY) and claimed exemption from countervailing duty (CVD) under a 1982 notification, arguing that the yarn fell in the 100‑750 denier category. The customs authorities, relying on a 1980 circular, treated the POY as belonging to the 75‑100 denier range and levied…
GOVT. OF TAMIL NADUversusP.A. MANICKAM ETC.
1996 INSC 32627 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents, employees of the Tamil Nadu government, were compulsorily retired after attaining the age of 50 years under Fundamental Rule 56(d). The State Government had issued G.O. No. 761 (1973) directing that cases be sent to a review committee six months before the retirement point. The Madras High Court held t…
WEST BENGAL STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDversusM/S FAKIR CHAND RICE MILLS AND ORS.
1996 INSC 32127 February 1996Disposed off
The West Bengal State Electricity Board claimed Rs 28,68,264.06 from Fakir Chand Rice Mills for alleged pilferage in electricity consumption. The trial court ordered the mill to pay Rs 2,60,000, which the High Court later modified to a direction to deposit Rs 5,60,000 without adjudicating the liability. The mill appeal…
TUSHAR ARUN GANDHIversusSTATE OF ORISSA AND OTHER
1996 INSC 138426 November 1996Disposed off
The petitioner, great‑grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, learned that an urn allegedly containing Gandhi's ashes was kept in a safe‑deposit locker of the State Bank of India, Cuttack, deposited in 1950 by the then Secretary to the Chief Minister of Orissa. After repeated requests to the Orissa government and the bank for rele…
U.D. LAMA AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF SIKKIM AND OTHERS
1996 INSC 138226 November 1996Dismissed
The Sikkim State Civil Service Rules, 1977 required recruitment either by competitive examination or selection of existing gazetted officers, with the Public Service Commission (PSC) as the appointing authority. Because the PSC was not constituted until 1982, the State Government, invoking Rule 4(3), held a written‑exa…
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, JAIPURversusBANSWARA SYNTEX LTD.
1996 INSC 138326 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Collector of Central Excise issued a demand that Banswara Syntex Ltd. pay excise duty on single‑ply yarn used for doubling or multifolding, alleging short payment. The company argued that duty should be payable only after the yarn was doubled, contending that the process did not create a new product and that waste …
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, BOMBAY AND ANR.versusBHAGWAN V. LAHANE
1996 INSC 138526 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Bhagwan V. Lahane was appointed Sub‑Inspector in 1976 with his date of birth recorded as 12 Nov 1948 based on the school‑leaving certificate he submitted at entry. In 1982 he claimed his correct birth date was 6 June 1951 and applied for correction under Rule 36 of the Maharashtra Civil Services (General Conditions of …
SATYA PAL AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND ORS.
1996 INSC 138626 November 1996
The appeal concerned the acquisition of land under the Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965. The central question was whether the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 68 of 1984, and its Section 11‑A, applied to such acquisitions. Earlier Supreme Court decisions were split, but later judgments (Lata Awas…
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR.versusRAVI BALA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 138726 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents, appointed as Junior Basic Teachers, later obtained B.T./E.Ed. qualifications and claimed entitlement to higher pay scales based on a 1957 Punjab circular. The High Court allowed their claim, but the State appealed, citing the Government of Haryana's policy instruction dated 9 March 1990, which stated t…
ADAVALA SATHAIAH AND ORS.versusTHE SPECIAL DY. COLLECTOR, LAND ACQUISITION UNIT I AND ORS.
1996 INSC 138826 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court heard an appeal by special leave against the Andhra Pradesh High Court’s order remanding a compensation dispute for 71 acres of agricultural land acquired for the National Thermal Power Corporation. The Land Acquisition Officer had initially awarded Rs 4,000 and Rs 4,500 per acre for two groups of lan…
TEHRI HYDRO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONversusSH. S.P. SINGH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 138926 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Tehri Hydro Development Corporation against a decree of the Allahabad High Court that reduced compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and awarded separate compensation for buildings, factories and machinery. The issue was whether the claimants were entitl…
SIR SHADILAL DISTILLERY AND CHEMICALS WORKSversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS.
1996 INSC 139026 November 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Commissioner invited tenders for supply of country‑made liquor in Uttar Pradesh for 1996‑97 and on 27 Feb 1996 allotted the districts of Saharanpur and Haridwar to Co‑operative Distillery Co. Ltd. (the third respondent). On 27 Mar 1996 the Commissioner revoked that allotment and re‑allotted Haridwar to Sir Shadial …
PARAMJIT AND ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA
1996 INSC 111726 September 1996Dismissed
Paramjit and Inderjit assaulted Rambhaj after he reprimanded Paramjit for indecent remarks, inflicting fatal knife wounds. The victim gave a dying declaration describing the assault, which was corroborated by an eyewitness (PW5) and medical evidence showing the injuries were sufficient to cause death. The trial court c…
M/S ESCORTS FARMS (RAMGARH) LTD.versusTHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI
1996 INSC 111826 September 1996Dismissed
Escorts Farms (Ramgarh) Ltd., a private limited company, sold shares it had purchased after 1954 and claimed capital gains by treating the actual purchase price of the original shares as the cost of acquisition, ignoring the effect of subsequently issued bonus shares. The Income‑Tax Officer, the Appellate Assistant Com…
BANDLAMUDDI ATCHUTA RAMAIAH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
1996 INSC 111926 September 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The case arose from a brawl on 1‑2 July 1988 between Sambasiva Rao (second accused) and Suryanarayana Rao (PW‑1) over a dog. The next night Sambasiva Rao, his father (first accused) and a relative (third accused) went to PW‑1’s house, assaulted PW‑1, his wife and others. The deceased, Srinivasa Rao, intervened; while t…
RAM AVTAR AND ORS.versusRAM DHANI AND ORS
1996 INSC 112026 September 1996Dismissed
The widow Smt. Phoola was allotted land in 1932 as part of a family compromise for her maintenance and her name was entered in revenue records. She later sold the land in 1956 to the respondents, but other members of the Hindu Undivided Family challenged the sale, claiming she only held a limited interest under Section…
BALBIR SINGHversusSTATE
1996 INSC 112126 September 1996Case Partly allowed
Balbir Singh was arrested in a notified area while in possession of an unauthorised rifle (bearing No. 516275) and 161 live cartridges. He was convicted under section 5 of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 and sentenced to eight years’ rigorous imprisonment. On appeal he argued that the wea…
SUSHIL KUMARversusMOTI RAM AND ANR.
1996 INSC 94426 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant's grandfather bought a house in the appellant's name but later sold it to the appellant's step‑mother. The appellant sued for a permanent injunction to prevent his father and step‑mother from interfering with his possession, but the suit and subsequent appeals were dismissed. On appeal, the appellant offe…
I.T.C. LIMITEDversusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOMBAY
1996 INSC 94526 August 1996Dismissed
The appeal filed by I.T.C. Limited challenged the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal's decision to uphold a notification issued by the Central Excise authorities. The appellant contended that the notification was not operable because it was not published in the Official Gazette, despite being announc…
KUTTIYAPPANversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 94626 August 1996Dismissed
The petitioners, selected for promotion under a 25% internal quota, joined their posts in October 1990, while direct recruits under the same quota joined earlier in August 1990. The petitioners claimed that, because their selection process began earlier, they were entitled to seniority over the direct recruits. The Cen…
THE UNION OF INDIAversusSHRI SUBE RAM AND ORS.
1996 INSC 94726 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The Union of India acquired land in Delhi under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and awarded compensation, which was subsequently enhanced by the Land Acquisition Officer and the Additional District Judge. The High Court, relying on the 1984 Amendment Act, further enhanced the compensation by granting a 30% solatium and …
STATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS.versusD.C. NANJUDAIAH AND ORS.
1996 INSC 94826 August 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Karnataka issued a notification under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on 26 August 1982 and later conducted an enquiry under Section 5‑A, after which a declaration under Section 6 was published on 24 June 1985. Two writ petitions challenged both the notification and the declaration; the Karn…
PRALHAD LALCHAND CHA VANversusIQBAL HUSSAIN INAYAT HUSSAIN BADRI
1996 INSC 79426 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
The landlord, Pralhad Lalchand Chavan, obtained permission from the Rent Controller under clause 13(3)(vi) of the Central Provinces and Berar Rent Control Order to terminate his tenant's lease on the ground of bona‑fide residence. After the permission became final, he served a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer o…
SOLAPUR MIDC INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION ETC.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
1996 INSC 79526 July 1996Dismissed
The Solapur MIDC Industries Association filed Special Leave Petitions challenging a notification under Section 3(3) of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation Act, 1949 that brought their industrial estate within the limits of Solapur Municipal Corporation. The petitioners argued that the same industrial area was s…
M/S. KASHMIR ELECTRIC AND HARDWARE CORPORATIONversusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
1996 INSC 79626 July 1996Appeal(s) allowed
Mis. Kashmir Electric and Hardware Corporation appealed against a decision of the Letters Patent Bench that held an arbitrator had misbehaved by conducting hearings in premises owned by the appellant and accepting tea and refreshments from them. The appellant argued that such courtesies were extended equally to both pa…