Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

M.V. LAILA PROSPERA (IMO NO. 9149897)versusUNITED ASIA BUNKERING AND TRADING PTE. LTD.

Disposal
53-ALLOWED / GRANTED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The Court held that the application for restoration should be allowed, subject to the condition that office objections be removed within four weeks.

Summary

The case involved an application for restoration of OJ Civil Application No.2 of 2025 filed by M.V. Laila Prospera against United Asia Bunkering and Trading Pte. Ltd. The applicant sought to have the matter reinstated in the court’s register after it had been struck out or closed. The respondent opposed the restoration, raising procedural objections. The learned counsel for the applicant argued that the removal of office objections would cure the defect and that the applicant was entitled to a fair opportunity to be heard. After considering the submissions, the Court held that the restoration should be granted subject to the condition that any outstanding office objections be removed within four weeks. Accordingly, the Registry was directed to restore the file to its original position.

Issues considered

  • Whether OJ Civil Application No.2 of 2025 should be restored to the court’s register
  • Whether imposing a condition to remove office objections within four weeks is appropriate

Subjects

restorationcivil procedureHigh CourtOJ applicationoffice objections

Judgment

         C/MCA/1231/2026                                                              ORDER DATED: 08/05/2026




                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

    R/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR RESTORATION) NO. 1231 of 2026
                                 In
                          OJ CA No.2 of 2025

                                     In R/ADMIRALTY SUIT/66/2025

 ==========================================================
                       M.V. LAILA PROSPERA (IMO NO. 9149897)
                                       Versus
                   UNITED ASIA BUNKERING AND TRADING PTE. LTD.
 ==========================================================
 Appearance:
 MR HARSH N PAREKH(6951) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
 MS PAURAMI B. SHETH(841) for the Opponent(s) No. 1
 ==========================================================

     CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRAL R. MEHTA

                                                 Date : 08/05/2026

                                                   ORAL ORDER


            Considering the submissions canvassed by learned
 advocate for the applicant and the averments made, the
 present application for restoration of OJ Civil                                                       Application
 No.2 of 2025 is allowed, by directing the Registry to restore
 the matter to its original file, however, on condition that
 whatever office objections are left out to be removed, shall
 now be removed within a period of four weeks from today.



                                                                                           (NIRAL R. MEHTA,J)
 V.J. SATWARA



Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: VIPUL JASWANTBHAI SATWARA(HC00170), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 08/05/2026 16:05:00




                                                        Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "restoration"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.