P & T SCHEDULED CASTE/TRIBE EMPLOYEES' WELFARE ASSOCIATION (REGD.) & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
- Citation
- 1988 INSC 246
- Decided
- 29 August 1988
- Disposal
- Case Allowed
- Bench
- E S VENKATARAMIAH
Holding
The removal of the reservation‑based promotion advantage for SC/ST employees in the P&T Department is discriminatory and violates Article 16, and the Government must issue an order conferring a comparable extra advantage.
Summary
The petitioners, representing Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe employees of the Posts & Telegraphs (P&T) Department, challenged a 1983 government policy that removed the earlier reservation advantage that allowed them to be promoted after 10‑12 years, replacing it with a uniform 16‑year rule for all employees. They argued that this deprivation violated the equality clause of the Constitution, particularly Article 16(4), as similar advantages continued in other government departments. The Union of India contended that the new scheme was uniformly beneficial and was agreed upon by employee federations. The Supreme Court held that the removal of the specific advantage for SC/ST employees in the P&T Department was discriminatory and that the Court could direct the Government to issue an order conferring a comparable extra advantage. The Court ordered the Government to issue such an order within four months, to operate prospectively, without disturbing promotions already made under the 1983 scheme. The petition was allowed.
Issues considered
- Whether the withdrawal of the reservation‑based promotion advantage for SC/ST employees in the P&T Department violates the equality clause of the Constitution (Article 16).
- Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to compel the Government to make a specific reservation order under Article 16(4).
- Whether the Government must provide a comparable extra advantage to SC/ST employees in the P&T Department consistent with practices in other departments.
Legislation cited
- Constitution of Indias. Art.15(1), s. Art.15(4), s. Art.16(1), s. Art.16(2), s. Art.16(4), s. Art.30, s. Art.33, s. Art.330, s. Art.332, s. Art.334, s. Art.335
Subjects
Judgment
A
P & T SCHEDULED CASTE/TRIBE EMPLOYEES'
WELFARE ASSOCIATION (REGD.) & ORS.
v.
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
B
AUGUST 29, 1988
[E.S. VENKATARAMIAH, S. NATARAJAN AND
N.D. OJHA, JJ.]
Constitution of India, 1950: Articles 16, 330, 332, 334 and 335-
Promotion posts in P & T department-Reservation for Scheduled
c
Caste, Scheduled Tribe employees-Advantage enjoyed lost in the New
Scheme of 1983-Scheduled Casie, Scheduled Tribe employees of other
departments continue to enjoy the advantage-Government directed to
confer ·similar advantage to Scheduled Caste, Scheduled Tribe
employees of Post and Telegraph Department. D
Civil Services-P & T department-Promotion-Re~·ervation of
vacancies for SC, ST employees-New Scheme, 1983-Al/ employees to
get promotion after 16 years-Advantage of SC, ST employees getting
promotion within a shorter period lost-Govt. directed to issue order
conferring the additional advantage on SC, ST employees in P & T E
department, as are enjoyed by SC, ST employees in other departments.
In supersession of its earlier order issued in 1968, the Union
Government communicated in 1972 its policy regarding reservations
for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in posts filled by promo-
tion on the basis of seniority subject to fitness. Whenever such promo- F
tions were to be made in appointments to Class-I, Class-II, Class-III
and Class-IV posts in grades or services in which the element of direct
recruitment, if any, did not exceed SO per cent, lS per cent and 7'h per
cent of the vacancies were to be reserved for SCs and STs respectively.
Detailed instructions were issued to the appointing authorities to make
promotions accordingly so that the SCs and STs could have an G
advantage of getting promotion to a higher grade much earlier than the
others.
In 1974, further instructions were issued with regard to reserva·
tion of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in posts filled by promo·
!Ions/appointments to Selection Grade Posts directing reservation of IS H
623
624 SUPREME COURT REPORTS I!988] Supp. 2 S.C.R.
A per cent/71/i percent of the vacancies for SCs/STs.
In the Posts and Telegraphs Department, the aforesaid policy
continned till 1983 when an agreement was arrived at between the
Ministry of Communications and certain associations of Post and Tele-
graphs employees, and a fresh order relating to the policy of promotion
B to he adopted in the P & T Department was issued in supersession of the
scheme of reservation followed till then. Under the policy, all officials
belonging to basic grades in Group C and Group D to which there was
direct recruitment either from outside and/or by means of limited com-
petitive examination from lower cadres and who had completed 16
years of service in that grade would be placed in the next higher grade.
C Whether an employee belonged to general category or to the category
of SCs and STs, he would get his promotion on the completion of 16
years' service. Under the pr.,·ious scheme it was possible for the SC and
ST employees to secure promotion within a period of IO to 12 years,
while the other employees had to wait for nearly 20 to 23 years. Thus,
the comparative advantage enjoyed by employees belonging to SCs and
D STs was take11 away. No specific order was issued by the Government
regarding reservation for SCs and STs, though clause 6 of the new
scheme provided for it. But the earlier orders providing for reservation
for SCs and STs were made inapplicable. Aggrieved by the new policy,
which deprived the SC and ST employees of the advantage which they
were enjoying, the petitioners approached this Court by way of the
E present writ petition.
Petitioners prayed for a direction to the Govt. of India for issuing
an order under clause 6 of the new scheme conferring such additional
advantage to them as are enjoyed by SC and ST employees in other
departments.
F
The Respondent contended that the new scheme was advanta-
geous to all the employees since all of them would get automatic promo-
tion after con1pleting 16 years of service in.a cadre and that it was done
with the consent of the Federations of Employees of the P & T
Department.
G
Allowing the writ petition,
HELD: I. The advantage of promotion within a shorter period is
being enjoyed by persons 'belonging to the Scheduled Castes and t•·ie
Scheduled Tribes in other Departments and only the petitioners have
H been deprived of it. Such deprivation violates the equality clause of the
P & T EMPLOYEES ASSN. v. U.0.1. 625
Constitution. While it may be true that no writ can be issued ordinarily
A
compelling the Government to make reservation under Article 16(4)
which is only an enabling clause, the circumstances in which the mem-
bers belonging to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the
Posts and Telegraphs Department are deprived of indirectly, the
advantage of ·such reservation which they. were enjoying earlier, while
others who are similarly situated in the other departments are allowed B
to enjoy it, make the action of Government discriminatory and invite
intervention by this Court. [629G-H; 630A-B]
2. One of the methods by which the Government can confer some
extra advantage on the employee_s belonging to the Scheduled Castes
and the Scheduled Tribes iu cases of this nature where promotion to
higher cadre is a time-bound one is to direct that the employees belong-
c
ing to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes may be promoted
to the higher cadre on completion of a shorter period of service than
what is ·prescribed for others. In this particular case it is open to the
Government to direct that while all others would be entitled to be
promoted to the higher cadre on completition of 16 years of service, the D
members belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes
may be promoted to the higher cadre on completion of, say 12 or 13
years of service. There may be other methods of achieving the same
result. In what way it should be done is a matter left to the discretion of
the Government. This should be decided by the Government taking into
consideration all aspects of the case. [630B-F] E
3. The Government of India shall within four months issue an
order under clause 6 of the letter dated 23. l 1. I983 confert;jng some
additional advantage on the employees belonging to the Scheduled
Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in the Posis & Telegraphs Department
] commensurate with similar advantages which are being enjoyed by the F
employees belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes
in the other departments. Any order that may be issued by the Govern·
ment shall operate prospectively. All promotions that have been made
so far pursuant to the policy contained in the letter dated 23.12.1983
and that may be made hereafter till the date on which the direction to he
issued by the Government under clause 6 comes into operation, shall G
however, ramain undisturbed. [630F-H; 631A]
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 1003-
1005 of 1984.
(Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India). H
626 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [1988] Supp. 2 S.C.R.
R.K. Garg, Pankaj Katra and P.K. Jain for the Petitioners.
A
V.C. Mahajan, Ms. A. Subhashini, C.V. Subba Rao, Grish
Chander, S.K. Mehta, Dhruv Mehta, Aman Vachher, S.M. Sarin and
Jagannath Goulay (N.P.) for the Respondents.
a The Judgments of the Court was delivered by
VENKATARAMIAH, J. People belonging to the Scheduled
Castes and the Scheduled Tribes and to other weaker sections of
society in India are the zealously protected children of the Indian
Constitution. Article 46 of the Constitution provides that the State
C shall promote with special care the educational and economic interests
of the weaker sections of the people, and, in particular, of the
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, and shall protect them
from social injustice and all forms of exploitation. While clause (1) of
Article 15 of the Constitution provides that the State shall not discri··
minate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex,
D place of birth or any of them, clause (4) of that Article provides that
nothing in the said Article or in clause (2) of Article 29 of the Constitu-
tion shall prevent the State from making any special provision for the
advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of
citizens or for the Schedule Castes and the Scheduled Tribes. Simi-
larly, while clause (1) of Article 16 of the Constitution provides that
E there shall be equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters relating
to employment or appoiniment to any office under the State and
clause (2) of the said Article provides that no citizen shall, on grounds
only of re¥gion, race, caste, sex, descent, place of birth, residence or
any of them, be ineligible for, or discriminated against in respect of
any employment or office untler the State, clause (4) of the said Arti-
f' cle provides that nothing in that Article shall prevent the State from
making any provision for the reservation of appointments or posts in
favour of any backward class of citizens which, in the opinion of the
State, is not adequately represented in the services under the State.
Article 330 and Article 332 of the Constitution provide for reservation
of seats for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in the Lok
G Sabha and in the Legislative Assemblies of the States till such period
as is provided in Article 334 of the Constitution. Article 335 of the
Constitution, which is relevant for purposes of this case, provides that
the claims of the members of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled
Tribes shall be taken into consideration, consistently with the main-
tenance of efficiency of administration, in the making of appointments
H to services and posts in connection with the affairs of the Union or of a
State.
-
P & T EMPLOYEES ASSN. v. U.0.1. [VENKATARAMIAH, J.] 627
The present case is, however, one in which a concession which A
had been extended to the employees belonging to the Scheduled
Castes and the Scheduled Tribes by way of reservation of vacancies at
the stage of promotion has been withdrawn in a rather concealed way.
Petitioners 1 and 2 in this Writ Petition are the P & T Scheduled
Caste/Tribe Employees' Welfare Assocation (Regd.) Delhi and the
Federatioff of all India Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes B
Employees P & T Department, New Delhi and Petitioner 3 is an
employee in the Posts & Telegraphs Department. By the Jetter bearing
No. 27/2/71-Estt. (SCT) dated 27.1L1972 issued by the Department of
Personnel, the Government communicated its policy regarding the
reservations for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in
posts filled by promotion/promotions on the basis of seniority subject C
to fitness. The said policy was.adopted by the Government in superses-
sion of the orders contained in an earlier Government Order dated
11. 7. 1968. Under the said policy a reservation of 15 per cent of vacan-
cies was made for the Scheduled Castes and 7-1/2 per cent for the
Scheduled Tribes wherever promotions were to be made on the basis
of seniority subject to fitness, in appointments to all Class I, Class II, D
Class III and Class IV posts in grades or services in which the element
of direct recruitment, if any, did not exceed 50 per cent. In order to
implement the above reservation the Government directed the
.appointing authorities to maintain a separate 40-point roster to
determine the number of reserved vacancies in a year in which points 1,
8, 14, 22, 28 & 36 had to be reserved for the Scheduled Castes and E
points 4, 17 and 31 had to be reserved for the Scheduled Tribes.
Detailed instructions were issued to the appointing authorities to make
promotions in accordance with the directions contained therein so that
members belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled
Tribes could have an advantage of getting promotion to a higher
cadre much earlier than the employees who did not belong to the F
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes. By the letter of the
Department of Personnel & Administrative Reforms bearing O.M.
No. 8/11/73-Estt. (SCT) dated 12.9.1974 addressed to all the Ministries
further instructions were issued with regard to the reservation of the
, Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in posts filled by pro-
motions/appointments to Selection Grade posts directing reservation G
of 15 per cent of vacancies for Scheduled Castes and 7-1/2 per cent for
Scheduled Tribes. As regards the Posts & Telegraphs employees work-
ing under the P & T Board, the Ministry of ~ommunications by its
letter No. 31-19/74-PE-l dated 15.6.1974 gave.certain further direc-
tions with regard to the filling-up of. posts by promotion conferring
certain other advantages on persons' belonging to the Scheduled Castes H
...
628 SUPREME COURT REPORTS I 1988] Supp. 2 S.C.R.
and the Scheduled Tribes. The policy of reservation contained in the
A
above three Government letters was continued till the year 1983 in the
Post & Telegraphs Department. It would appear that in the year 1983
an agreement was arrived at between the Ministry of Communications
and certain associations of employees .working in the Posts & Tele-
graphs Department and as a con·seq uence of the 'said agreement a fresh
B order relating to the policy of promotion to be adopted· in the Posts &
Telegraphs Department was issued in supersession of the scheme of
reservation, which was being followed till then. The said New policy,
the validity of which is challenged before us, is contained in the letter
bearing No. 31-26/83-PE-I dated 17.12.1983 addressed to all heads of
circles. Under this new policy it was decided that with effect from
C 30.11.1983 all officials belonging to basic grades in Group C and
Group D to which there was direct recruitment either from outside
and/or by means of limited competitive examination from lower
cadres, and who had completed 16 years of service in that grade would
be placed in the next higher grade. This policy, it is alleged, was
introduced in order to remove the effects of stagnation of employees in
D a particular grade for nearly 20 to 23 years without being promoted to
higher grade. It would appear that under the scheme which was pre-
vailing prior to 30.11.1983 it was possible for members belonging to
the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes to secure promotion to
the higher cadre within a period of 10 to 12 years while the other
employees had to wait for nearly 20 to 23 years. Thus an advantage
E had been conferred on the employees belonging to the Scheduled
Castes and the Scheduled Tribes since they could secure promotion
within a shorter period. Under the new policy irrespective of the fact
whether an employee belonged to the general category or to the cate-
gory of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes he would be
able to get promotion tci the higher cadre on the completion of 16
F years. Thereby the comparative advantage which the members belong-
ing to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes were enjoying
was taken away and all the employees, namley, the employees belong-
ing to the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Tribes and to the other
categories were placed at par. However, clause 6 of the said letter
dated 17.12.1983 which contained the new policy reads thus:
G
"6. For promotions under the time-bound one promotion
scheme the normal orders relating to reservation for SC/ST
communities will not apply unless any specific order in this
regard is subsequently issued."
H
P & T EMPLOYEES ASSN. v. U.0.1. lVENKATARAMIAH, J.] 629
It is admitted that no specific order has been issued by the A
Government pursuant to clause 6 so far. But the earlier orders provid-
ing for reservation in favour of the Scheduled Castes and the
·Scheduled Tribes were made inapplicable. Aggrieved by the action
taken by the Government in implementing the policy contained in
letter dated 23.12.1983, which had the effect of depriving the members
belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes of the B
advantage which they were enjoying, the petitioners have filed this
petition questioning the said action. The petition is resisted by the
·respondents. It is urged on behalf of the Government that the 'time-
bound one promotion scheme' contained in the letter dated 23. 12.83
was advantageous to all the employees since all of them would get
automatically promoted to a higher cadre on completing 16 years of
service in a cadre and that it had been issued with the consent of the C
Federations of Employees of the Posts & Telegraphs Department.
It is not disputed that in many of the other departments of the
Union Government the scheme of reservation of posts for the
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes is in vogue in cases of D
promotions from the lower grades to the higher grades when they are
done on the basis of seniority subject to fitness and under the said
policy the persons belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the
Scheduled Tribes working in the other departments have been con-
ferred an extra advantage which was not available to the candidates
belonging to other categories and that .in the Posts & Telegraphs E
Department also the employees belonging to the Scheduled Castes and
the Scheduled Tribes were enjoying a similar advantage before
30.11.1983 on which date the policy contained in the letter dated
23.12.1983 came into force. Even the letter dated 23.12.1983 while it
sets at naught the normal orders relating to reservation for the
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in the Posts and Tele- F
graphs Department in force in the other departments provides for the
issue of specific orders by the Government under which the members
belonging to the Scheduled Castes & the Scheduled Tribes could gain
some extra advantage. Admittedly no such order has been issued till
today. The petitioners have prayed that a direction should be issued to
the Government to issue specific orders conferring on them such an G
extra advantage. We feel that the claim made by the petitioners is fully
justified in view of the fact that similar advantage is being enjoyed by
persons belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in
other Departments and only they have been deprived of it. Such depri-
vation violates the equality clause of the Constitution. While it may be
true that no writ can be issued ordinarily compelling the Government H
630 SUPREME COURT REPORTS I 1988] Supp. 2 S.C.R.
A to make reservation under Article 16(4) which is only an enabling
clause, the circumstances in which the members belonging to the
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in the Posts and Telegraphs
Department are deprived of indirectly the advantage of such reserva-
tion which they were enjoying earlier while others who are similarly
situated in the other departments are allowed to enjoy it make the
B action of Government discriminatory and invite intervention by this
Court.
One of the methods by which the Government can confer some
extra advantage on the employees belonging to the Scheduled Castes
and the Scheduled Tribes in cases of this nature where promotion to
C higher cadre is a time-bound one is to direct that the employees be-
longing to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes may be
promoted to the higher cadre on completion of a shorter period of
service than what is prescribed for others. In this particular case it is
open to the Government to direct that while all others would be
entitled to be promoted to the higher cadre on completion of 16 years
D of service, the members belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the
Scheduled Tribes may he promoted to the higher cadre on completion
of, say, 12 or 13 years of service. There may be other methods of
achieving the same result. The claim for conferment of some extra
advantage on the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes
employees working in the Posts & Telegraphs Department which may
E be commensurate with the extra advantage which members belonging
to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes are enjoying in the
other departments of the Government of India without detriment to
the maintenance of efficiency in the service appears to be a reason-
able one. In what way it should be done is a matter left to the discre-
tion of the Government. This should be decided by the Government
F taking into consideration all aspects of the case.
We therefore, issue a direction to the Government of India to
issue an order under clause 6 of the letter dated 23.11.1983 conferring
some additional advantage on the employees belonging to the
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in the Posts & Telegraphs
G Department commensurate with similar advantages which are being
en joyed by the employees belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the
Scheduled Tribes in the other departments of the Government of
India. The Government shall issue such an order accordingly within
four months from today. Any order that may be issued by the Govern-
ment shall operate prospectively. All promotions that have been made
H so far pursuant to the policy contained in the letter dated 23.12.1983
P & T EMPLOYEES ASSN. v. U.0.1. [VENKATARAMIAH, J.] 631
and that may be made hereafter till the date on which the direction to A
be issued by the Government under clause 6 comes into operation,
shall however remain undisturbed.
This petition is accordingly allowed. No costs.
G.N. Petition allowed.
B
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.