Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

RAJESHversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.

Citation
2009 INSC 63
Decided
23 January 2009
Disposal
Disposed off

Holding

The Supreme Court disposed of the transfer petition in terms of the settlement, allowing the withdrawal and settlement of all pending criminal and matrimonial cases.

Summary

The petitioner, Rajesh, sought transfer of a criminal case (FIR No.352 dated 7‑12‑2005) under Sections 406, 498A read with Section 34 IPC, pending in the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chittorgarh, to a court in Hissar. The matter was posted before the Supreme Court Lok Adalat on 6‑12‑2008, where both parties appeared and filed a joint petition stating that their matrimonial and related disputes had been settled through mediation. The settlement provided for a payment of Rs.8 lakhs, return of certain articles, custody of the minor child with the mother, and the withdrawal/settlement of four pending matters: the criminal case under Section 498A, the criminal case under Section 125 Cr.P.C., the divorce petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, and the present transfer petition. The Court, noting the amicable settlement, disposed of the transfer petition in accordance with the parties’ agreement, ordering that the petition and the related cases be withdrawn/settled. The settlement terms were incorporated into the record.

Issues considered

  • Whether a transfer petition can be disposed of on the basis of a settlement reached between the parties and filed before the Supreme Court Lok Adalat.
  • Whether the withdrawal of pending criminal and matrimonial proceedings, as agreed by the parties, is permissible under the applicable statutes.

Legislation cited

Subjects

transfer petitionLok Adalatsettlementmediationcriminal casedivorcechild custodywithdrawal of proceedingsmatrimonial dispute

Judgment

                          [2009] 1 S.C.R. 530


A                               RAJ ESH
                                    v.
                 STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.
                (Transfer Petition (Crl.) No.71 of 2007)
                          JANUARY 23, 2009
B
            [DR. ARIJIT_PASAYAT AND ASOK KUMAR
                         GANGULY, JJ.] •

         Matrimonial dispute - Transfer Petition - Transfer of
c criminal case from Chittorgarh to Hissar- Held: In Lok Ada/at
    matter settled - Joint petition containing ter'lfis of settlement
    filed - Accordingly Divorce case, Cr/. Cases under s. 125
    Cr.P. C. and 498A to be withdrawn/settled - Transfer petition
    disposed of in terms of the settlement.
D
    ..    CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Transfer Petition
    (Crl.) No. 71 of 2007.

       Dr. J.N. Dubey, Anurag Dubey, Anu Sawhney, Meenesh
  Dubey, S.K. Diwakar, D.P. Pandey and S.R. Setia for the
E Petitioner.

        Praveen Kumar, Manish Kumar, Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary,
    Satya Prakash and Promila Matta for the Respondents.

         The Judgment of the Court was delivered by
F
       DR. .ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.1. The petitioner has sought for
  transfer of Criminal Case FIR No.352 dated 7.12.2005 under
  Sections 406, 498A read with Section 34 IPC titled Sangeeta
  v. Rajesh pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First
G Class, Chittorgarh, to a court of competent jurisdiction in Hissar.

      2. This transfer petition was posted before Supreme Court          -fl'
  Lok Adalat on 6.12.2008. The parties and their lawyers
  appeared and filed a joint petition stating that their disputes have
H                                  530
             RAJESH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.                   531
                      [DR. ARIJtT PASAYAT, J.]
    ~   been settled under the guidelines of the mediators who acted        A

-       as Amicus Curiae.

            3. The following were the terms of settlement:

            A. It is agreed between the parties that Shri Rajesh will pay
            a sum of Rs.8 lakhs by way of a demand draft to Smt.            B
            Sangeeta on or before 30th June, 2009.

            8. It is further agreed that the articles, as agreed upon by
            the parties in a separate list, shall be sent by Shri Rajesh
            to the house of Smt. Sangeeta at Chitorgarh.                    c
            C. It is further agreed that the custody of the minor child
            named Lucky who is now been with Smt. Sangeeta shall
            remain with her and Shri Rajesh will not claim anything with
            regard to child's custody from Smt. Sangeeta or her family
            hereinafter.                                                    0

            D. It has been agreed that the cases filed by both the
            parties:-

                   (i) Criminal Case filed by Smt. Sangeeta under           E
                   Section 498(A) of Code of Criminal Procedure,
                   1973 (in short the 'Code') against' Rajesh at
                   Chittorgarh;

                   (ii) Criminal case filed against Shri Rajesh under
                   Section 125 of the Code at Chittorgarh;                  F

                   (iii) Petition under Section 13 of Hindu Marriage Act
                   for grant of divorce filed by Shri Rajesh against Smt.
                   Sangeeta pending before the Family Court at
                   Chittorgarh;                                             G

                   (iv) Present Transfer Petition No. 71/2007 filed by
                   Shri Rajesh pending before this Court
                   shall be withdrawn/settled.
                                                                            H
    532        SUPREME COURT REPORTS                   [2009) 1 S.C.R.


A        It is further agreed that in terms of this settlement arrived
    at hereinabove a decree for divorce may be passed. No further
    claim of any kind shall be raised against each other or with
    regard to the minor child Lucky hereinafter.
                                                                            -
          4. It is heartening to note that the parties have settled their
8
    disputes amicably and have agreed to the aforesaid terms. The
    transfer petition is disposed of in terms of the settlement. The
    petition incorporating the terms of settlement shall form a part
    of the record.
C G.N.                                           Appeal disposed of.


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "transfer petition"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.