M/S. PRATAP INDUSTRIES THROUGH VITTHALDAS KALYANJI DATTANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH
- Bench
- HEMANT M PRACHCHHAK
Holding
The Court held that it may direct the respondent authority to decide the pending conciliation proceedings under Section 18(2) of the MSMED Act within a period of three months.
Summary
Pratap Industries filed a special civil application under Articles 14, 19 and 226 of the Constitution invoking the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise Development Act, 2006, seeking a writ of mandamus directing the State of Gujarat to commence conciliation proceedings under Section 18(2) of the MSMED Act for its pending case DP No.4996 and to comply with Gujarat MSME Council Rule 9(C). The petitioner argued that the conciliation process was pending and required judicial direction, while the respondent AGP contended that the proceedings, if pending, should be decided within a reasonable time. The Court examined the submissions and the statutory framework, noting that the MSMED Act empowers the authority to conduct conciliation and that the Gujarat MSME Council Rule mandates timely uploading of records. Accordingly, the Court directed the respondent authority to decide the conciliation proceedings within three months of receipt of the order. The petition was thereafter disposed and the rule made absolute.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court can issue a writ of mandamus directing the State to initiate and decide conciliation proceedings under Section 18(2) of the MSMED Act, 2006.
- Whether the respondent must comply with Rule 9(C) of the Gujarat MSME Council Rule, 2017 by uploading the case records on the designated portal.
Legislation cited
- Constitution of Indias. Article 14, s. Article 19, s. Article 226
- Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise Development Act, 2006s. Section 18(2)
Subjects
Judgment
C/SCA/6336/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/05/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6336 of 2026
FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK Sd/-
==========================================================
Approved for Reporting Yes No
No
==========================================================
M/S. PRATAP INDUSTRIES THROUGH VITTHALDAS KALYANJI DATTANI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
JURIS LEGAL PRACTITIONERS(17818) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR HARSHAD O JOSHI(11428) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MS DIXA PANDYA AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
Date : 01/05/2026
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. Draft amendment is allowed. Amendment to be
carried out forthwith.
2. Rule returnable forthwith. Ms. Dixa Pandya, learned
AGP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of
the respondent. With the consent of the learned counsel
appearing for the respective parties, the present petition
is taken up for final hearing today.
3. Present petition is filed by the petitioner under Articles
14, 19 and 226 of the Constitution of India r/w the
Page 1 of 3
C/SCA/6336/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/05/2026
provision under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise
Development Act, 2006 seeking below mentioned relief/s
“8(A) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to admit and
allow this petition;
(B) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a writ of
Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, оr
direction by directing Respondents herein to initiate
conciliation proceedings (initiated under Section 18(2) of
the MSMED Act, 2006) in the Reference Case of the
Petitioner, being DP No.4996 (Annexed at Annexure E)
within a period of 30 days, and further be pleased to
direct the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 herein to comply
with the provisions of the MSMED Act, 2006.
(C) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to direct
respondent No.3 to forthwith comply with Rule 9(C) of
the Gujarat MSME Council Rule, 2017 by uploading the
complete proceedings and records of the petitioner's
matter bearing DP No.4996 (annexed at Annexure E) on
the designated web portal.
(D) Be pleased to grant any other relief/s as may be
deemed fit and proper, in the interest of justice."
4. Heard learned counsels appearing for both the sides
and perused the record of the petition.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner requests that the
conciliation proceedings (initiated under Section 18(2) of
the MSMED Act, 2006) in Reference Case of the
petitioner being DP No.4996 is pending before the
concerned respondent. He further requests that this
Court may give appropriate direction to the concerned
respondent authority to decide the said application.
Page 2 of 3
C/SCA/6336/2026 JUDGMENT DATED: 01/05/2026
6. On the other hand, learned AGP submits that if the
conciliation proceedings (initiated under Section 18(2) of
the MSMED Act, 2006) in Reference Case of the
petitioner being DP No.4996 is pending before the
concerned respondent authority, then the same shall be
decided within some reasonable time.
7. In view of the above submissions and considering the
peculiar facts of the case, the concerned respondent
authority is hereby directed to decide the conciliation
proceedings (initiated under Section 18(2) of the MSMED
Act, 2006) in Reference Case of the petitioner being DP
No.4996, in accordance with law within period of three
months from the date of receipt of copy of present order.
8. With above directions, the petition stands disposed of.
Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent.
Sd/-
(HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J)
SURESH SOLANKI
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: SURESHKUMAR MOTIBHAI SOLANKI(HC00208), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 05/05/2026 10:54:29
Page 3 of 3
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.