Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

UMANGBHAI LALITBHAI THAKKARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Holding

The court exercised its discretion to grant the petitioner parole for seven days upon payment of a Rs.10,000 bond.

Summary

Umang Lalitbhai Thakkar filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the ground of financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The court examined the petition, the grounds raised, and the jail remarks. Exercising its discretion, the court found merit in the petition and decided to grant parole. The petitioner was ordered to be released on parole for seven days upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000, with a direction to surrender at the end of the period.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate exercise of judicial discretion in granting parole leave on the ground of financial hardship?
  • Does the petitioner satisfy the conditions for parole under the applicable procedural rules?

Subjects

parolecriminal procedurefinancial hardshipjudicial discretionbond

Judgment

     R/SCR.A/10017/2026                                    ORDER DATED: 16/07/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

 R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 10017 of
                           2026

==========================================================
                          UMANG LALITBHAI THAKKAR
                                   Versus
                             STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR BH SOLANKI(5353) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR CHIRAG M PANCHAL(5349) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR ROHAN A SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                Date : 16/07/2026

                                 ORAL ORDER


1.      This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking parole

leave     on the ground of financial assistance to his family.



2.      Rule.         Learned   Additional        Public   Prosecutor        waives

service on behalf of the respondent – State.



3.      Heard, the learned advocates for the parties.



4.      Having heard and considering the averments made in

the petition, more particularly, the ground mentioned therein

as well as the jail remarks, this Court is inclined to exercise

discretion in favour of the present petitioner.




                                    Page 1 of 2
               R/SCR.A/10017/2026                                                ORDER DATED: 16/07/2026




         5.       The petition, therefore, succeeds and is partly allowed.

         The petitioner is ordered to be released on parole for a

         period of seven days from the date of his/her actual release

         on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

         Thousand) to the satisfaction of the concerned jail authority

         on usual terms and conditions, with a direction that the

         petitioner shall surrender to the jail authority on expiry of

         the parole leave period forthwith.                              Rule is made absolute

         accordingly.



         5.1      Direct service is permitted.


                                                                              (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
         URIL RANA


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: RANA URIL K(HC01406), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 16/07/2026 16:46:06




                                                       Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.