High Court of Gujarat

GANESHBHAI RANCHHODBHAI VEKARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal: 28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE
Bench: SANJEEV THAKER

Holding

The court held that the petition lacks justifiable reasons and therefore parole leave is denied.

Summary

The petitioner, Ganesbhai Ranchhodbhai Vekariya, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The jail records indicated that the petitioner had been released in June 2026 and the petition did not provide any justifiable reasons for granting parole. The court examined the lack of substantive grounds in the application. Finding that no case was made out, the court rejected the petition. The order directs the registry to inform the concerned jail authority of the decision.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioner is entitled to parole leave under the applicable legal provisions

Subjects

parolespecial criminal applicationhigh court of Gujaratjail authorityleave of absence

Judgment

                R/SCR.A/10023/2026                                                 ORDER DATED: 16/07/2026




                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

              R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 10023 of
                                        2026

           ==========================================================
                                GANESHBHAI RANCHHODBHAI VEKARIYA
                                              Versus
                                     STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
           ==========================================================
           Appearance:
           THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1
           MR ROHAN A SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
           ==========================================================

              CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                                   Date : 16/07/2026

                                                     ORAL ORDER


           1.       This petition, through jail, is filed by the petitioner

           seeking parole leave.



           2.       The      jail     remarks          indicate        that      the        petitioner      was

           recently        released        in     the      month        of     June         2026     and        no

           justifiable        reasons        have       been       mentioned           in     the    petition.

           Considering the same, no case is made out.                                       The petition is

           rejected, accordingly.



           3.       Registry to communicate this order to the concerned jail

           authority.


                                                                                (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
           URIL RANA



Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: RANA URIL K(HC01406), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 16/07/2026 16:45:10




                                                         Page 1 of 1

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search