Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

GOVIND @ PEKLO JIGNESH JAYANTIBHAI PATANIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The application for parole leave was rejected as no case was made out for its grant.

Summary

The petitioner, Govind @ Peklo Jignesh Jayantibhai Patani, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The applicant had already been released on parole by the same court for a period of 21 days from 13 January 2026 to 20 February 2026. The court examined whether there was any justification for granting additional parole leave so soon after the earlier release. Finding that the applicant had just completed a parole term and that no new circumstances warranted further leave, the court concluded that the application lacked merit. Consequently, the application for parole leave was rejected.

Issues considered

  • Whether the applicant is entitled to further parole leave immediately after a recent parole release

Subjects

parolecriminal procedurehigh courtapplication rejection

Judgment

            R/SCR.A/4817/2026                                                                     ORDER DATED: 09/04/2026




                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

         R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 4817 of
                                   2026

    ==========================================================
                         GOVIND @ PEKLO JIGNESH JAYANTIBHAI PATANI
                                           Versus
                                 STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
    ==========================================================
    Appearance:
    THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1
    MONALI BHATT APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
    ==========================================================

        CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

                                                        Date : 09/04/2026

                                                           ORAL ORDER


    1.          The present Application has been preferred by the
    Applicant through jail for parole leave.


    2.          Considering the fact that the Applicant was released
    recently on parole from 13.01.2026 to 02.20.2026 for 21 days
    by this Court, no case is made out for the grant of parole leave
    as prayed for by the Applicant through jail. The application
    stands rejected accordingly.




                                                                                                             (P. M. RAVAL, J)
    MMP


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: MAHENDRA MOHANBHAI PUROHIT(HCD0074), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE TWO CLASS TWO, at High Court of Gujarat on 09/04/2026
16:42:11




                                                                 Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.