Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

FIROJ KASHIRAM TUMDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The Court held that no case was made out to grant parole leave and therefore dismissed the petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Firoj Kashiram Tumda, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave for 30 days, citing the need to provide financial assistance to his family and to arrange legal fees. The application was presented through the jail authorities, and the respondent State of Gujarat was represented by Mr. Chintan Dave. The High Court examined the averments and reasons provided in the application to determine whether sufficient grounds existed for granting parole. The Court found that the petitioner had not demonstrated a compelling case that warranted parole leave. Consequently, the Court rejected the application and ordered that the petition be dismissed. The order was communicated to the concerned jail authority for implementation.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to parole leave on the grounds of financial assistance to his family and need for legal fees

Subjects

parolecriminal procedureleave of absencefinancial hardshipjudicial discretion

Judgment

                          R/SCR.A/4880/2026                                                ORDER DATED: 10/04/2026




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

                         R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 4880 of
                                                   2026

                    ==========================================================
                                                    FIROJ KASHIRAM TUMDA
                                                            Versus
                                                   STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
                    ==========================================================
                    Appearance:
                    THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1
                    MR CHINTAN DAVE, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
                    ==========================================================

                         CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                                           Date : 10/04/2026

                                                             ORAL ORDER


                    1.      This petition, through jail, is filed by the petitioner seeking
                    parole leave for 30 days on the ground of financial assistance to his
                    family and to arrange fees for advocate.


                    2.      Considering the averments made in the application and
                    reasons stated in the application, no case is made out to grant the
                    present parole leave. The petition is rejected, accordingly.


                    3.      Registry to communicate this order to the concerned jail
                    authority.



                                                                                         (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
                    URIL RANA




Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: RANA URIL K(HC01406), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 10/04/2026 16:36:53




                                                                  Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.