Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

AEJAZ URFE SAMIR SUPADU SHAHversusSTATE OF GUJARATR

Disposal
28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE

Holding

The petition was rejected as no case was made out for granting furlough leave to a recently released prisoner.

Summary

The petitioner, Aeja… Shah, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking a 30‑day parole (furlough leave) to provide financial assistance to his family. The jail records showed that the petitioner had been released from custody on 10 March 2026 and remained out of jail until 24 March 2026. The court noted that because the petitioner had only recently been released, there was no sufficient ground to grant further leave. Consequently, the application was rejected. The order was directed to be communicated to the jail authority.

Issues considered

  • Whether a prisoner who has been released recently is eligible for furlough leave for financial reasons

Subjects

parolefurlough leavecriminal procedurereleaseGujarat

Judgment

         R/SCR.A/5292/2026                                                                  ORDER DATED: 20/04/2026




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

   R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (FURLOUGH LEAVE) NO. 5292 of
                              2026

  ==========================================================
                                   AEJAZ URFE SAMIR SUPADU SHAH
                                               Versus
                                     STATE OF GUJARATR & ORS.
  ==========================================================
  Appearance:
  THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1
  MS SHRUTI PATHAK, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
  ==========================================================

       CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                                    Date : 20/04/2026

                                                      ORAL ORDER


  1.         This petition, through jail, is filed by the petitioner seeking
  parole leave for 30 days on the ground of financial assistance to his
  family.


  2.         The jail remarks indicate that the petitioner was recently
  released from 10.3.2026 to 24.3.2026. Considering the same, no
  case is made out. The petition is rejected, accordingly.


  3.         Registry to communicate this order to the concerned jail
  authority.


                                                                                         (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
  SRILATHA



Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: SRILATHA VENKATARAO UPADHYAYULA(HC00185), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 20/04/2026 15:36:11




                                                            Page 1 of 1


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.