Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

AMRAT BRAHMANAND GUPTA THRO GUPTA JIGNASHA AMRATBHAIversusSATATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Holding

The Court exercised its discretion and granted parole for seven days upon a personal bond of Rs.10,000.

Summary

The petitioner, Amrat Brahmanand Gupta, filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave to arrange funds for his son's admission to Standard 11. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The Court examined the petition, the grounds raised, and the jail remarks, and exercised its discretion in favour of the petitioner. It ordered that the petitioner be released on parole for seven days upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000 to the jail authority, with the condition of surrendering at the end of the period. The order was made absolute and direct service was permitted.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to parole leave on the ground of arranging funds for his son's education
  • Whether the waiver of service by the Additional Public Prosecutor affects the Court's discretion to grant parole

Subjects

parolespecial criminal applicationdiscretionpersonal bondjail authorityeducation funding

Judgment

      R/SCR.A/7466/2026                                       ORDER DATED: 30/06/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 7466 of
                               2026

==========================================================
 AMRAT BRAHMANAND GUPTA THRO GUPTA JIGNASHA AMRATBHAI
                        Versus
               SATATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR DINESHKUMAR J PRAJAPATI(9979) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR TIRTHRAJ PANDYA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                Date : 30/06/2026

                                 ORAL ORDER


1.      This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking parole

leave on the ground of arranging for funds for the admission
                                  th
of his son in Standard 11 .



2.      Rule.         Learned   Additional           Public    Prosecutor        waives

service on behalf of the respondent – State.



3.      Heard, the learned advocates for the parties.



4.      Having heard and considering the averments made in

the petition, more particularly, the ground mentioned therein

as well as the jail remarks, this Court is inclined to exercise

discretion in favour of the present petitioner.




                                       Page 1 of 2
          R/SCR.A/7466/2026                                                                  ORDER DATED: 30/06/2026




   5.         The petition, therefore, succeeds and is partly allowed.

   The petitioner is ordered to be released on parole for a

   period of seven days from the date of his/her actual release

   on his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

   Thousand) to the satisfaction of the concerned jail authority

   on usual terms and conditions, with a direction that the

   petitioner shall surrender to the jail authority on expiry of

   the parole leave period forthwith.                                              Rule is made absolute

   accordingly.



   5.1        Direct service is permitted.



                                                                                          (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
   SRILATHA


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: SRILATHA VENKATARAO UPADHYAYULA(HC00185), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 30/06/2026 14:30:04




                                                             Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.