High Court of Gujarat
JAGDISH URFE RAJU KHIMJIBHAI SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 56-DISPOSED AT ADMISSION STAGE
- Bench
- ILESH VORA
Holding
Parole leave was not granted.
Summary
The convict filed a Special Criminal Application seeking parole leave. The application was presented through the jail, and the State was represented by Mr. Ronak Raval. Justice Ilesh J. Vora examined the grounds raised by the convict and found no sufficient cause to grant parole. The court concluded that the applicant had not made a case for parole leave. Consequently, the application was rejected.
Issues considered
- Whether the convict is entitled to parole leave under the applicable law
Subjects
parolespecial criminal applicationleave of courtcriminal proceduregrant of parole
Judgment
R/SCR.A/7599/2026 ORDER DATED: 03/06/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 7599 of
2026
==========================================================
JAGDISH URFE RAJU KHIMJIBHAI SOLANKI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR RONAK RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
Date : 03/06/2026
ORAL ORDER
No case is made out for the grant of parole leave as prayed for by
the convict through jail, more particularly having regard to the ground as
urged in the application forwarded by the convict to this Court. The
application stands rejected accordingly.
(ILESH J. VORA,J)
Rakesh
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: RAKESH MAHESHKUMAR KOSHTI(HC00950), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 03/06/2026 11:47:53
Page 1 of 1
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.
Try "parole"Sign in to search