High Court of Gujarat

RAMESHBHAI MEVABHAI GAMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal: 28-REJECTED @ ADM.STAGE
Bench: SANJEEV THAKER

Holding

The court held that there was no case to grant parole leave and therefore rejected the petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Rameshbhai Mevabhai Gamar, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave. The jail records indicated that he had been arrested after 3,901 days following his release on parole in 2014 and that his conduct in jail was unsatisfactory. The court examined these remarks and found no sufficient basis to grant parole. Consequently, the application was rejected. The order was directed to be communicated to the concerned jail authority.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioner is eligible for parole leave in view of his prior release on parole, subsequent arrest after 3,901 days, and poor jail conduct

Subjects

parolespecial criminal applicationjail conducthigh courtpetition dismissal

Judgment

          R/SCR.A/8062/2026                                                                  ORDER DATED: 15/06/2026




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

       R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 8062 of
                                 2026

  ==========================================================
                                     RAMESHBHAI MEVABHAI GAMAR
                                                Versus
                                       STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
  ==========================================================
  Appearance:
  THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1
  MR KM ANTANI, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
  ==========================================================

      CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                                    Date : 15/06/2026

                                                       ORAL ORDER


  1.          This petition, through jail, is filed by the petitioner

  seeking parole leave.



  2.          The         jail       remarks             indicate             that        the        petitioner              was

  arrested by the police after 3901 days when he was released

  on parole leave in the year 2014. Further, the jail remarks

  also state that his jail conduct is not good. Considering the

  same,           no       case        is      made          out.            The         petition           is      rejected,

  accordingly.



  3.          Registry to communicate this order to the concerned jail

  authority.


                                                                                         (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
  SRILATHA

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: SRILATHA VENKATARAO UPADHYAYULA(HC00185), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 15/06/2026 14:43:33




                                                            Page 1 of 1

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search