MADHUBEN PARTHIBHAI VEDU (CHAUHAN)versusSTATE OF GUJARAT
- Disposal
- 38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH
- Bench
- SANJEEV THAKER
Holding
The Court granted parole leave for seven days upon the petitioner furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000.
Summary
The petitioner, Madhuben Parthibhai Vedu (Chauhan), filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave on the grounds of having filed an appeal and needing financial assistance for his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State, and both parties were heard. The Court examined the petitioner's averments and the jail remarks, and exercised its discretion in favor of the petitioner. It ordered the petitioner to be released on parole for seven days, subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000 to the jail authority and complying with usual terms and conditions. The petitioner must surrender to the jail authority at the expiry of the parole period.
Issues considered
- What is the eligibility of the petitioner for parole leave on the basis of a pending appeal and financial hardship?
- Whether the Court may exercise its discretion to grant parole in the present case?
Subjects
Judgment
R/SCR.A/8128/2026 ORDER DATED: 16/06/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 8128 of
2026
==========================================================
MADHUBEN PARTHIBHAI VEDU (CHAUHAN)
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR DINESHKUMAR J PRAJAPATI(9979) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR VINAY VISHEN for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER
Date : 16/06/2026
ORAL ORDER
1. This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking parole
leave on the ground of filing an appeal and financial
assistance to his family.
2. Rule. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives
service on behalf of the respondent – State.
3. Heard, the learned advocates for the parties.
4. Having heard and considering the averments made in
the petition, more particularly, the ground mentioned therein
as well as the jail remarks, this Court is inclined to exercise
discretion in favour of the present petitioner.
Page 1 of 2
R/SCR.A/8128/2026 ORDER DATED: 16/06/2026
5. The petition, therefore, succeeds and is partly allowed.
The petitioner is ordered to be released on parole for a
period of 7 days from the date of his/her actual release on
his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten
Thousand) to the satisfaction of the concerned jail authority
on usual terms and conditions, with a direction that the
petitioner shall surrender to the jail authority on expiry of
the parole leave period forthwith. Rule is made absolute
accordingly.
5.1 Direct service is permitted.
(SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
URIL RANA
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: RANA URIL K(HC01406), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 16/06/2026 16:08:08
Page 2 of 2
Search Indian case law
Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.