Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

CHIMANBHAI MANABHAI SOLANKIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Holding

The court exercised its discretion to grant parole leave to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Chimanbhai Manabhai Solanki, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to enable him to file an appeal against his conviction. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, waived service of notice. The court considered the petition, the grounds raised, and the jail remarks, and exercised its discretion under the relevant provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. Finding no impediment, the bench granted parole for a period of one week subject to a personal bond of Rs.10,000 and standard conditions. The order directed the petitioner to surrender to the jail authority at the expiry of the parole period. Accordingly, the petition was partly allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to parole leave for the purpose of filing an appeal

Subjects

parolecriminal procedurediscretionappealbondHigh Court of Gujarat

Judgment

      R/SCR.A/8220/2026                                    ORDER DATED: 18/06/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 8220 of
                               2026

==========================================================
                          CHIMANBHAI MANABHAI SOLANKI
                                     Versus
                            STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR DINESHKUMAR J PRAJAPATI(9979) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                Date : 18/06/2026

                                 ORAL ORDER


1.      This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking parole

leave      on the ground to file an appeal.



2.      Rule.         Learned    Additional       Public    Prosecutor        waives

service on behalf of the respondent – State.



3.      Heard, the learned advocates for the parties.



4.      Having heard and considering the averments made in

the petition, more particularly, the ground mentioned therein

as well as the jail remarks, this Court is inclined to exercise

discretion in favour of the present petitioner.



5.      The petition, therefore, succeeds and is partly allowed.



                                    Page 1 of 2
        R/SCR.A/8220/2026                                                               ORDER DATED: 18/06/2026




 The petitioner is ordered to be released on parole for a

 period of one week from the date of his/her actual release on

 his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

 Thousand) to the satisfaction of the concerned jail authority

 on usual terms and conditions, with a direction that the

 petitioner shall surrender to the jail authority on expiry of

 the parole leave period forthwith.                                            Rule is made absolute

 accordingly.



            Direct service is permitted.


                                                                                     (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
 M.H. DAVE/25

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: MAHESHKUMAR HASMUKHLAL DAVE(HC00193), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 18/06/2026 15:26:43




                                                         Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.