Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

JITESH RAMESHBHAI GAJERAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Holding

The court exercised its discretion and granted parole leave for one week upon a personal bond of Rs.10,000.

Summary

The petitioner, Jitesh Rameshbhai Gajera, filed special criminal applications seeking parole leave to enable him to file an appeal. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The court considered the petitioner's averments, the jail remarks, and its earlier orders in similar applications dated 15-16 June 2026. Exercising its discretion, the court found merit in the petitioner's request. Consequently, the petitions were partly allowed, granting the petitioner parole for one week upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000, with the condition to surrender to the jail authority at the end of the period.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to parole leave for the purpose of filing an appeal

Subjects

parolespecial criminal applicationcriminal procedureappealdiscretionbond

Judgment

      R/SCR.A/8385/2026                                   ORDER DATED: 19/06/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 8385 of
                               2026
                               With
          R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 8417 of 2026
==========================================================
                          JITESH RAMESHBHAI GAJERA
                                    Versus
                           STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS.AKSHITABA SOLANKI(6782) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                               Date : 19/06/2026

                                ORAL ORDER


1.      These petitions are filed by the very petitioner seeking

parole leave on the ground to file an appeal.



2.      Rule.       Learned   Additional         Public   Prosecutor         waives

service on behalf of the respondent – State.



3.      Heard, the learned advocates for the parties.



4.      Having heard and considering the averments made in

the petitions, more particularly, the ground mentioned therein

as well as the jail remarks, and the orders passed by this

Court in Special Criminal Applications No.8130 & 8061 of

2026, dated 16.06.2026 & 15.06.2026, respectively, this Court

is inclined to exercise discretion in favour of the present



                                   Page 1 of 2
        R/SCR.A/8385/2026                                                               ORDER DATED: 19/06/2026




 petitioner.



 5.         The petitions, therefore, succeed and are partly allowed.

 The petitioner is ordered to be released on parole for a total

 period of one week from the date of his/her actual release on

 his furnishing a personal bond of total Rs.10,000/- (Rupees

 Ten        Thousand)               to      the       satisfaction              of      the       concerned              jail

 authority on usual terms and conditions, with a direction

 that the petitioner shall surrender to the jail authority on

 expiry of the parole leave period forthwith.                                                      Rule is made

 absolute accordingly in both the petitions.



            Direct service is permitted.


                                                                                     (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
 M.H. DAVE/16 & 21


Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: MAHESHKUMAR HASMUKHLAL DAVE(HC00193), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 19/06/2026 15:31:09




                                                         Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.