Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

MERAIYA GAUTAMBHAI DINESHBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Holding

The court held that, exercising its discretion, the petitioner is entitled to parole for seven days upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000.

Summary

Meraiya Gautambhai Dineshbhai filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service on behalf of the State. The court considered the petitioner's averments and jail remarks, and exercised its discretion in his favour. It ordered the petitioner to be released on parole for seven days, subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000 and complying with usual terms and conditions. The petitioner must surrender to the jail authority at the expiry of the parole period.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to parole leave on the ground of financial assistance to his family?

Subjects

parolecriminal procedurediscretionary relieffinancial hardshippersonal bond

Judgment

      R/SCR.A/9070/2026                                     ORDER DATED: 02/07/2026




           IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
     R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 9070 of
                               2026
================================================================
                          MERAIYA GAUTAMBHAI DINESHBHAI
                                      Versus
                             STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
================================================================
Appearance:
MR AVANIDHAR M THAKORE(10377) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR RONAK RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================
 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                 Date : 02/07/2026
                                  ORAL ORDER

1.      This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking parole

leave      on the ground of providing financial assistance to his

family.



2.      Rule.       Learned      Additional        Public   Prosecutor         waives

service on behalf of the respondent – State.



3.      Heard, the learned advocates for the parties.


4.      Having heard and considering the averments made in

the petition, more particularly, the ground mentioned therein

as well as the jail remarks, this Court is inclined to exercise

discretion in favour of the present petitioner.



5.      The petition, therefore, succeeds and is partly allowed.

The petitioner is ordered to be released on parole for a

period of seven days from the date of his actual release on



                                     Page 1 of 2
       R/SCR.A/9070/2026                                                 ORDER DATED: 02/07/2026




 his furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

 Thousand) to the satisfaction of the concerned jail authority

 on usual terms and conditions, with a direction that the

 petitioner shall surrender to the jail authority on expiry of

 the parole leave period forthwith.                               Rule is made absolute

 accordingly.



 5.1      Direct service is permitted.



                                                                       (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)




 Manoj Kumar Rai




Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: MANOJKUMAR RAI(HC01072), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 02/07/2026 16:19:33




                                               Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.