Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

SANJAYBHAI NATHABHAI KHISATARIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Holding

The Court exercised its discretion to grant parole leave for seven days on condition of a personal bond.

Summary

The petitioner, Sanjaybhai Nathabhai Khisatariya, filed a parole application seeking temporary release to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the petitioner's ground and jail remarks and exercised its discretion in his favor. It ordered the petitioner to be released on parole for seven days upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000 to the jail authority, with the condition of surrendering at the end of the period. The order was communicated to the concerned jail authority.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate exercise of judicial discretion in granting parole leave on the ground of financial assistance to the family?

Subjects

paroletemporary releasecriminal procedurefinancial assistancejudicial discretion

Judgment

      R/SCR.A/9746/2026                                    ORDER DATED: 10/07/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 9746 of
                               2026

==========================================================
                      SANJAYBHAI NATHABHAI KHISATARIYA
                                   Versus
                          STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR NIRAJ SHARMA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                Date : 10/07/2026

                                 ORAL ORDER


1.      This petition, through jail, is filed by the petitioner

seeking parole leave on the ground of extending financial

assistance to the family.



2.      Rule.         Learned   Additional        Public    Prosecutor        waives

service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent – State.



3.      Considering       the   application,       more      particularly,           the

ground mentioned therein as well as the jail remarks, this

Court is inclined to exercise discretion in favour of the

present petitioner.



4.      The petition, therefore, succeeds and is partly allowed.

The petitioner is ordered to be released on parole for a



                                    Page 1 of 2
        R/SCR.A/9746/2026                                                               ORDER DATED: 10/07/2026




period of seven days from the date of his/her actual release

on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

Thousand) to the satisfaction of the concerned jail authority

on usual terms and conditions, with a direction that the

petitioner shall surrender to the jail authority on expiry of

the parole leave period forthwith.                                            Rule is made absolute

accordingly.



4.1        Registry to communicate this order to the concerned jail

authority, forthwith.


                                                                                     (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
M.H. DAVE/27

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: MAHESHKUMAR HASMUKHLAL DAVE(HC00193), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 10/07/2026 14:07:37




                                                        Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.