Created byFuzzy Cloud

High Court of Gujarat

CHETANBHAI DHIRUBHAI MAKAWANAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

Disposal
38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Holding

The Court exercised its discretion to grant parole leave to the petitioner.

Summary

Chetanbhai Dhirubhai Makawana, who is incarcerated, filed a special criminal application seeking parole leave to provide financial assistance to his family. The Additional Public Prosecutor waived service of notice on behalf of the State. The Court examined the petitioner’s ground and the jail’s remarks and decided to exercise its discretion in his favour. Consequently, the petition was partly allowed, granting the petitioner a seven‑day parole on the condition of furnishing a personal bond of Rs 10,000 and surrendering after the leave period. The order was directed to be communicated to the concerned jail authority.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to parole leave on the ground of financial assistance to his family?

Subjects

parolecriminal procedurefinancial assistancejudicial discretionbond

Judgment

      R/SCR.A/9982/2026                                        ORDER DATED: 16/07/2026




             IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

     R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (PAROLE LEAVE) NO. 9982 of
                               2026

==========================================================
                          CHETANBHAI DHIRUBHAI MAKAWANA
                                       Versus
                              STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR ROHAN A SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================

 CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SANJEEV J.THAKER

                                    Date : 16/07/2026

                                     ORAL ORDER


1.      This petition, through jail, is filed by the petitioner

seeking parole leave               on the ground of financial assistance to

his family.



2.      Rule.         Learned       Additional        Public    Prosecutor        waives

service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent – State.



3.      Considering          the     application,      more      particularly,           the

ground mentioned therein as well as the jail remarks, this

Court is inclined to exercise discretion in favour of the

present petitioner.



4.      The petition, therefore, succeeds and is partly allowed.

The petitioner is ordered to be released on parole for a



                                        Page 1 of 2
           R/SCR.A/9982/2026                                                ORDER DATED: 16/07/2026




     period of seven days from the date of his/her actual release

     on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

     Thousand) to the satisfaction of the concerned jail authority

     on usual terms and conditions, with a direction that the

     petitioner shall surrender to the jail authority on expiry of

     the parole leave period forthwith.                              Rule is made absolute

     accordingly.



     4.1      Registry to communicate this order to the concerned jail

     authority, forthwith.


                                                                          (SANJEEV J.THAKER,J)
     URIL RANA




Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge.
Digitally signed by: RANA URIL K(HC01406), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 16/07/2026 16:48:22




                                                   Page 2 of 2


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "parole"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.