Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

STATE OF PUNJABversusRAJ SINGH AND ANR.

Citation
1998 INSC 28
Decided
16 January 1998
Disposal
Appeal(s) allowed

Holding

Section 195 CrPC does not curtail the police’s statutory power to investigate cognizable offences alleged in civil proceedings, and a court may proceed under Section 340 CrPC on the basis of the FIR and investigation.

Summary

The State of Punjab appealed against the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s order quashing an FIR that alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 467 and 468 IPC committed during civil proceedings. The High Court had held that Section 195(1)(b)(ii) of the Criminal Procedure Code barred police investigation into such offences. The Supreme Court examined the scope of Section 195 and held that it only comes into play when a court intends to take cognizance of an offence under Section 190 CrPC and does not restrict the statutory power of police to investigate a cognizable offence disclosed in an FIR, even if the alleged offence arose out of court proceedings. Consequently, the court may file a complaint based on the FIR and the material gathered during investigation, following the procedure of Section 340 CrPC. The Court distinguished the earlier decision in Gopal Krishna Menon v. D. Raja Reddy as inapplicable. The appeal was allowed and the High Court’s order set aside.

Issues considered

  • Whether Section 195(1)(b)(ii) of the Criminal Procedure Code prohibits police investigation into offences alleged to have been committed in the course of civil proceedings.
  • Whether a court can entertain a complaint based on an FIR and the investigation report under Section 340 CrPC despite the provisions of Section 195.

Legislation cited

Subjects

Section 195 CrPCSection 340 CrPCpolice investigationFIRcivil suitcognizable offencecriminal procedureappellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                                 STATE OF PUNJAB                                          A
                                         v
                                RAJ SINGH AND ANR.

                                  JANUARY 16, 1998

                   [M.K. MUKHERJEE AND K.T. THOMAS, JJ.]                                  B


            Code of Civil Procedure, 1973 :

            Sections 195(1) and 340 - F.1.R. alleging commission of offences ulss.
      419, 420, 467 and 468 lPC in course of proceedings of Civil Court- C
      Quashed by High Court on the ground that s.195(l)(b) (ii) of Code prohibited
      entertainment and investigation into the same by the police-Held, statutory
      power of the police to investigate under the Code is not in any way controlled
      or circumscribed by s. 195-Procedure u/s 340 to be followed-Order of
      High Court set aside.                                                          D
            Gopal Krishna Menon and Anr. v. D. Raja Reddy, AIR (1983) SC 1053;
      held inapplicable.

            CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION : Civil Appeal No. 82 of 1998.

           From the Judgment and Order dated 31.1.97 of the Punjab and Haryana
                                                                                          E
      High Court in Crl. Misc. No. 15996/96.

           G.S. Dhillon, Addi. General, Darshan and Mr. R.S. Sodhi for the
      Appellants.
                                                                                          F
            Mr. N.D. Garg for the Respondent.

            The following Order of the Court was delivered :

            Leave granted. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
                                                                                          G
            We are unable to sustain the impugned order of the High Court quashing
      the F.l.R. Lodged against the respondents alleging commission of offences
"r-   under Sections 419, 420, 467 and 468 1.P.C. by them in course of the proceeding
      of a civil suit, on the ground that Section 195 (!) (b) (ii) Cr. P.C. prohibited
      entertainment of and investigation into the same by the police. From a plain
      reading of Section 195 Cr.P.C. it is manifest that it comes into operation at the   H
                                            223
    224                    SUPREME COURT REPORTS                     [1998) 1 S.C.R.

A stage when the Court intends to take cognizance of an offence under Section
  190( I) Cr.'.P.C.; and it has 'nothing to do with the statutory power of the police
  to investigate into an F.l.R. which discloses a cognisable offence, in accordance
  with Chapter XII of the Code even if the offence is alleged to have been
  committed in, or in relation to, any proceeding in Court. In other words, the
  statutory power of the Police to investigate under the Code is not in any way
B controlled or circumscribed by Section 195 Cr.P.C. It is of course true that
  upon the charge-sheet (challan), if any, filed on completion of the investigation
  into such an offence the Court would not be competent to take cognizance
  thereof in view of the embargo of Section 195(1) (b) Cr. P.C., but nothing
  therein deters the Court from filing a complaint for the offence on the basis
C of the F.J.R. (filed by the aggrieved private party) and the materials collected
  during investigation, provided it forms the requisite opinion and follows the
  procedure laid down tin section 340 Cr. P.C. The judgment of this Court in
  Gopal Krishna Menon and Anr. v. D. Raja Reddy, AIR (1983) SC 1053, on
  which the High Court relied, has no manner of application to the facts of the
   instant case for there cognizance was taken on a private complaint even
D though the offence of forgery was committed in respect of a money receipt
   produced in the Civil Court and hence it was held that the Court could not
  take cognizance on such a complaint in view of Section 195 Cr. P.C.

          For the foregoing reasons, we allow this appeal and set aside the
E impugned order.
    RP.                                                            Appeal allowed.


Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Try "Section 195 CrPC"Sign in to search

For a digitally signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's own website. Only the court can issue one.