U.P. JAL NIGAM AND ORS.versusDURGA PRASAD SINGH AND ORS.

                     U.P.JAL NIGAM AND ORS.                               A
                                  '\'·
                 DURGA PRASAD SINGH AND ORS.

                         DECEMBER 2, 1994

         [ K. RAMASWAMY AND N. VENKATACHALA, JJ.]                         B

    Service Law:-UP.Loca/ Self Government Engineering Department
Seniority-Assistant Engineers appointed on ad-hoc basis-Inter
seniority-Determination of-Record not traceable-F.LR filed-
Directions to newly constituted Selection Committee and Police Issued
                                                                          c
    The respondents were temporarily appointed on ad-hoc basis as
Assistant Engineers in U.P Local Self Government Engineering
Department. As regards their inter-se seniority, the matter reached the
High Court, which directed the preparation of fresh seniority on the
basis of merit list of the candidates.
                                                                          D
     However, the record could not be traced out and in its absence, as
suggested by the High Court, a fresh Selection Committee was
constituted, the legality of which was challenged before the High Court.
The appellant was directed by the High Court to re-do the merit list of
only of such Assistant Engineers whose services were regularised by the
Selection Committee constituted in March, 1986 on the basis of their E
performance as per records available upto December 26, 1977. Hence
this appeal by U.P. Jal Nigam.

    Allowing the appeals, this Court

    HELD: 1.1. It is clear that the merit list filed, had obviously been F
made by some of the parties and produced before the Tribunal and
when it was circulated, the adversely affected persons had objected to
that merit list as well as its genuineness. In consequence, the list was
ignored and a committee came to be appointed. The appellants have
also specifically stated in the counter affidavit filed in the High Omrt G
that after investigation to dig out the record, they could not trace out
the record and so they lodged an F. I. R. for investigation as to the
persons responsible for destruction of the record and the matter is
under investigation. Under these circumstances, the appellants
obviously had chosen the last option given by the High Court in the
earlier order and constituted a fresh selection committee to consider H
                                  277
    278                     SUPREME COURT REPORTS                 [1994] SUPP. 6 S.C.R

A   the claims of the candidates for preparation of the inter-se seniority in
    the order of merit. Under these circumstances, the High Court was not
    right in issuing the writ of mandamus. (281 E to G)

         1.2 The committee would go into the question of inter-se seniority
    and prepare the list according to merit and give the report within a
B   period of two months from the date of the receipt of this order. The
    police would make a thorough investigation to find out the persons
    responsible for destruction of the record and take appropriate action
    according to law. (281 H, 282 A]

           CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal No.9214of1994
C   Etc.

       From the Judgment and order dated 18.3.94 of the Allahabad High
    Court in W.P. No 72 (SB) of 1994.

           Rajeev Dhawan, I. M. Quddusi, R.B. Misra and P. K. Chakrabarty for
D the Appellants.
        Dr. N. M. Ghatate, A. S. Pundhir, Ms. Sandhya Goswamy and N. A.
    Siddiqui for the Respondents.

           The following Order of the Court was delivered:
E          Leave Granted in SLPs No. 8106 and 8264of1994.

         These appeals by special leave arise from the judgments of the
    Division Bench of the High Court of Allahabad in W.P.No 72 (SB)/94 and·
    114 (SB)/94 dated 18-3-93. The facts are that the respondents were
    temporarily appointed on ad-hoc basis as Assistant Engineers in U.P. Local
F   Self Govt. Engineering Department. On an earlier occasion, when writ
    petition was filed, the High Court adjudicated the dispute and had observed
    in its order dated January 14, 1993, in W.P.No. 8504/87 at paragraphs 17
    and 18 thereof thus :

                    "It follows from the conclusion arrived at above that the Jal
G                   Nigam must publish the merit list prepared by the Selection
                    Committee and take necessary action for determining
                    seniority according to that list. The merit list could not be
                    produced by the Jal Nigam before the Tribunal. There are
                    three alternatives. First that the original merit list is traced out
                    by the Jal Nigam and is acted upon after considering
H
         U.P.JAL NIGAM v. D. P. SINGH                     279

objections, if any, which may be made against the same by A
the concerned Assistant Engineers. The second alternative is
that if the original merit list is not traceable, an attempt is
made to reconstruct and publish the same and after inviting
objections thereto from the concerned Assistants Engineers
and disposing of the objections action is taken according to
law. The third alternative is that the copy of the merit list B
reduced by the claimants before the Tribunal is taken into
account for determining seniority provided the genuineness
of the merit list is accepted by all the persons affected by it
after opportunity for the same is given to them by the Jal
Nigam in this behalf. In case none of these alternatives is
fesasible, there can no other court left open for the Jal Nigam C
except to constitute a fresh selection committee under the
relevant rules for the purposes of drawing a fresh merit list of
the parties concerned on the basis of their performance as
indicated by the available records upto December 26, 1977.
The whole exercise must be completed within a period of two
months.                                                          D
After hearing the learned counsel for the parties at great
length, I have come to the conclusion that the writ petition
deserves to be allowed. The writ petition is accordingly
allowed and the impugned judgment and order of the U .P.
Public Services Tribunal dated 1. 7.87 is hereby quashed. The E
impugned seniority list dated 26.12.1977 is also quashed. It is
directed that the U.P. Jal Nigam shall draw a fresh seniority
list in accordance with the relevant service rules which were
in force on 26.12.1977. The fresh seniority list shall be drawn
within a period of two months from the date on which a copy
of this order/ judgement is produced before the competent F
authority. In drawing the seniority list, the U.P. Jal Nigam
shall take into account the merit list alleged to have been
prepared by the claimant before the aforesaid Tribunal
provided the genuineness of the merit list is accepted by all
the persons affected by it after opportunity for the same is G
given to them by the Jal Nigam in this behalf. In case the
genuineness of the merit list is not accepted by the parties
                                                                /
then it will be open to the Jal Nigam to constitute a fresh
Selection Committee as required under the relevant rules for
the purposes. Of determining the merit of the parties
concerned, the fresh seniority list shall be finally prepared H
    280                  SUPREME COURT REPORTS               [1994) SUPP. 6 S.C.R

A                 after giving an opportunity to the parties concerned to show
                  cause against the same. In any case the whole exercise must
                  be completed within a period of two months as already
                  indicated. Parties to bear their own cost. Reasons will
                  follow."

B        Since the record has not be traced out and the officers who dealt with
    the matter at the relevant point of time though were contracted, could not
    assist the U.P. Jal Nigam in tracing the record, they lodged the F. I. R. with
    the police to investigate into the persons responsible for the destruction of
    the record. Consequently, the last option given by the High Court in the
    said order viz. constitution of the fresh Seiection Committee was resorted to
c   and a Committee was accordingly constituted. The legality of the
    constitution of the committee, when came to be challenged in the writ
    petitions, by the impugned order of the Division Bench made in them, it is
    observed:

                   "We do not intend to go into detail as to whether the three
D                  alternatives as provided in the directions contained in
                   paragraph 17 of the judgement were strictly followed and if
                   not followed then for valid reasons or not; we proceed to
                   examine the scope of the present selection committee which
                   has been ultimately constituted by the U.P. Jal Nigam. We
                   are doing so specially for the reason that the matter relating
E
                   to determination of seniority of the Assistant Engineers has
                   been hanging fire for about two decade now and the
                   promotion of certain Assistant Engineers on the basis of the
                   impugned seniority list of December, 1977 are also in
                  jeopardy. Therefore, assuming that the authorities could
F                • neither trace the previous merit list nor was consensus on the
                   genuineness of the seniority list produced by some of the
                   Assistant Engineers before the Public Service Tribunal, the
                   only way out left for the authorities was to constitute a fresh
                   selection committee under the relevant rules which they have
                   done but then it appears that the authorities have ignored the
G                  rider that this merit ·list has only to be reconstituted on the
                   basis of their performance as indicated by the available
                   record upto December 1977 and no new material could be
                   added. It has nowhere been stated by the Jal Nigam either in
                   the counter affidavit or during the course of the arguments
H                  that since records of the concerned Assistant Engineers who
                        U.P.JAL NIGAM v. D. P. SINGH                     281

              had participated in the selection committee of March 1976 as A
                                                                                    ..
              produced before the selection committee are not available
              today. In these circumstances, the authorities have clearly
              acted contrary to the directions issued by this court by
              attempting to hold fresh interview and assess the Assistant
              Engineers on the basis of their present performance."
                                                                                B
     Accordingly , a mandamus has been issued directing the appellant to
re-do the merit list of only of such Assistant Engineers whose services were
regularised by the selection committee constituted in March, 1986, on the
basis of their performance as indicated by the available records upto
December 26, 1977. This order is now under challenge.
                                                                                c
     The facts stated, would clearly indicate that the record relating to the
relevant period has been destroyed and the admission in the affidavit filed
by the respondent in an interim application itself clearly indicates that the
fresh selection list was only a tentative list not made even by the
Department but by some others. In the interim application, the actual D
averment has been made at page 37 thus:-

              "That only by a notice dated 23.8.1993, the U.P. Jal Nigam
              had circulated the partial merit list filed by the claimants in
              the U.P. Public Service Tribunal and invited objections."
                                                                                E
     It is clear that a merit list filed, had obviously been made by some of
the parties and produced before the Tribunal and when it was circulated the
adversely affected persons had objected to that a merit lists as well as its
genuineness. In consequence, the list was ignored and a committee came to
be appointed. The appellants have also specifically stated in the counter
affidavit filed in the High Court that· after investigation to dig out the F
record, they could not trace out the record and so they lodged an F. I. R. for
investigation as to the persons responsible for destruction of the record and
the matter is under investigation. Under 'these circumstances, the appellants
obviously had chosen the last option given by High Court in the earlier
order and constituted a fresh selection committee to consider the claims of
the candidates for preparation of the inter-se seniority in the order of merit. G
Under these circumstances, the High Court was not right in issuing the writ
of mandamus pointed above.

   The appeal is accordingly allowed. It is needless to mention that the
committee would go into the question of inter-se seniority and prepare the      H
    282                   SUPREME COURT REPORTS               [1994) SUPP. 6 S.C.R

A   list according to merit and give the report within a period of two months
    from the date of the receipt of this order. It is again needless to mention that



                                                                                       -
    the police would make a thorough investigation into the persons responsible
    for destruction of the record and take appropriate action according to law,
    The writ petitions stand dismissed.                         .

B         S. L. P. N0.9364/94 : The petition is dismissed as withdrawn,

    G.N.                                                         Appeals allowed.