Created byFuzzy Cloud

Supreme Court of India

Judgments of 1994

624 judgments, newest first — showing 1–200.

KUM NARAYANAMMAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA AND ORS .

1994 INSC 34131 August 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The victim, a 14‑year‑old illiterate agricultural labourer, was gang‑raped by three accused. The trial court convicted them under IPC sections 376 and 114, but the Karnataka High Court acquitted them, holding that the victim's testimony was unreliable as it lacked medical corroboration. On appeal, the Supreme Court exa

DR. ARUNDHATI AJIT PARGAONKARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 34331 August 1994

Dr. Arundhati Pargaonkar was appointed on a purely temporary basis in 1978 to the permanent Class‑II post of Lecturer in Dentistry at B.J. Medical College, Pune. She served continuously for nine years and claimed that, under the State Government's 19 September 1975 Temporary Government Services Regularisation Resolutio

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.versusADMANE ANITA MOTI AND ORS.

1994 INSC 34431 August 1994Disposed off

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the Bombay High Court’s interim order directing the Education Officer to admit 112 girls to a Diploma in Education programme at a Christian minority institution, exceeding the sanctioned strength of 80. The Supreme Court examined whether the High Court was justified in granting

S. RAMACHANDRA RAJUversusSTATE OF ORISSA

1994 INSC 34531 August 1994

The appellant, a lecturer appointed in 1965, received a solitary adverse confidential report for the academic year 1987‑88, which he claimed was made in mala‑fide by the principal. He sought to have the remarks expunged, was promoted to Reader in 1991, but was compulsorily retired on 28 May 1991 under Rule 71(a) of the

SMT. SHANTI DEVI AND ORS.versusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS .

1994 INSC 34031 August 1994Dismissed

The appellants challenged the acquisition of land under the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, claiming that a subsequent order dated 4 November 1985 had regularised the conversion of agricultural land to non‑agricultural use and vested title in them. They relied on this order, which was produced for the first time before

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHIversusTHE ASIAN ART PRINTERS (P) LTD. AND ORS. ETC.

1994 INSC 34231 August 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) supplied electricity to Asian Art Printers Ltd. under a "Mixed Load (HT)" tariff. The tariff booklet contained clause (c) stating demand charges plus energy charges and clause (d) prescribing a minimum bill. The consumers argued that the payable amount should be whichever is hig

THE INDIAN TIMBER AND PLYWOOD CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 13531 March 1994Dismissed

The State of Kerala filed a suit to recover possession of 4,200 acres of land, claiming that the lands had escheated to the State under the Kerala Escheats and Forfeitures Act, 1964. The Collector had issued an order on 24‑12‑1968 declaring the lands escheated, and the appellants did not file an appeal under Section 7

GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ETC.versusDELHI AUTO AND GENERAL FINANCE PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

1994 INSC 13731 March 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttar Pradesh master plan of 1986 earmarked certain lands of private colonisers Delhi Auto and Maha Maya for recreational use. Both applied to the Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA) for permission to develop their lands under Section 15 of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Planning and Development Act. After a conditional

SUBHASH DESAIversusSHARAD J. RAO AND ORS.

1994 INSC 13631 March 1994Dismissed

Subhash Desai, elected from Goregaon as a Shiv Sena candidate, was challenged by Sharad J. Rao of Janata Dal for alleged corrupt practices. The election petition alleged that Desai had appealed to voters on religious grounds, published a false newspaper report to vilify Rao, and incited communal hatred, violating Secti

U.P. STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN AND ORS.versusSRI RADHEY MOHAN VERMA

1994 INSC 13931 March 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a suspended employee of Mirzapur Electricity Supply Co., filed a writ petition seeking reinstatement after the company's licence was revoked on 1 September 1975 and the Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Board took over the undertaking. The Board had agreed not to take on any employee against whom discipli

DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENTversusDEEPAK MAHAJAN AND ANR.

1994 INSC 3631 January 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Directorate of Enforcement arrested Deepak Mahajan under Section 35 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) and produced him before a magistrate, who ordered his judicial remand under Section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). Mahajan challenged the magistrate's jurisdiction, relying on the earlier

KARSAN AMBUBHAI SINDHAVversusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

1994 INSC 56330 November 1994Dismissed

The appellant, Karsan Ambubhai Sindha, owned agricultural land exceeding the ceiling of 54 acres prescribed under the Gujarat Agricultural Land Ceiling Act, 1960. The Tribunal, after excluding the ceiling area, identified 18.23 acres as excess and ordered surrender. The appellant argued that his parents and other relat

MATHEVAN PADMANABHAN @ PONNAN (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusPARMESHWARAN THAMPI AND ORS

1994 INSC 56430 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents filed a suit for possession of land alleging that the appellant had surrendered his tenancy and was in illegal possession. The appellant contested, claiming he remained a tenant and sought permission under Section 72‑B of the Kerala Land Reforms Act to purchase the land. The civil court, invoking Sectio

L. V ASANTHA KUMARIversusBALAMMAL AND ORS.

1994 INSC 56530 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, L. V. Vasantha Kumar, occupied a hut on land that had been sold by Subramonian Pillai to Vaikuntam Pillai in 1955, and later claimed ownership based on an agreement to purchase. The respondent, Balammal, obtained a decree for specific performance of that agreement and subsequently sued for possession, al

KULDIP MAHATON AND ORS.versusBHULAN MAHTO (DEAD) BY L.RS. AND ORS.

1994 INSC 56630 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

Munnia, the widow of Bigu, held a life estate in property and died in 1932 before the Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937 came into force. Upon her death, the property reverted to the reversioners – the first respondent (Bhulan) and the appellants – making them co‑owners. Bhulan claimed he had been adopted by Mun

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHIversusDY. COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (LICENCING) AND ANR.

1994 INSC 42630 September 1994Disposed off

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) against the Dy. Commissioner of Police (Licensing) and others concerning the construction of a cinema building. The issue arose after an amendment to the Delhi Cinematograph Rules, 1981, which replaced the MCD with the Delhi Development

K.R. SRINIVASversusR.M. PREMCHAND AND ORS.

1994 INSC 42730 September 1994Appeal(s) allowed

K.R. Srinivas, son of the then Vice‑Chancellor of Andhra University, obtained a higher mark after revaluation of his answer sheets, which had been destroyed as per university regulations. Dr. R.M. Premchand, a research scholar, filed a public‑interest writ petition under Article 226 challenging the result, alleging pro

SULEKH CHAND AND SALEK CHANDversusCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS.

1994 INSC 42830 September 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, police officers promoted from Assistant Sub‑Inspector to Sub‑Inspector, claimed that their promotion should be back‑dated to 1 October 1982. The respondents, the Commissioner of Police, denied the promotion on the ground that the officers had been charged under section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corrupti

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusVISHWANATH VERMA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 42930 September 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Jabalpur Municipal Corporation introduced a Family Benefit Fund Scheme whereby employees made voluntary contributions and, in return, received lump‑sum payments on retirement or on death of the employee to his family. The Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) contended that the scheme amounted to life insurance

MEHTAB SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA

1994 INSC 33930 August 1994

The Supreme Court examined the compensation awarded for the acquisition of 267.91 acres of land in Rohtak district for an industrial area. The original award in 1977 fixed two marginally different rates, which were later replaced by a uniform rate of Rs 7 per square yard by the District Judge. The High Court later revi

GOVERNMENT OF UNION TERRITORY OF PONDICHERRYversusMOHAMMED HUSSAIN (DEAD) BY L.RS.

1994 INSC 22730 June 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Government of Pondicherry challenged the inclusion of shares of two minor sons who attained majority between the appointed day (24‑Jan‑1971) and the notified date in the calculation of the family’s land‑holding ceiling under the Pondicherry Land Reforms Act, 1973. The Land Tribunal had allowed the respondent’s obje

P.K. VIJAYANversusKAMALAKSHI AMMA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 13130 March 1994Dismissed

The landlords filed an eviction petition under Section 11 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, which the Rent Controller accepted, directing them to sue in civil court. The tenant first sought relief under Section 72B of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, claiming assignment of title as a cultivating t

EX. CAPT. HARISH UPPALversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 13230 March 1994Dismissed

Harish Uppal, a former Indian Army officer, was court‑martialed and sentenced to dismissal and two years' rigorous imprisonment for irregularities during the 1971 Bangladesh operations. While incarcerated, his advocate filed a post‑confirmation petition under Section 164(2) of the Army Act, 1950, which was rejected by

SOORAJMULL NAGARMULLversusDALHOUSIE PROPERTIES LTD. AND ANR.

1994 INSC 13330 March 1994Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard a civil appeal (No. 2846 of 1979) arising from a 40‑year landlord‑tenant dispute between Soorajmull Nagarmull (tenant) and Dalhouise Properties Ltd. (landlord). While the appeal was pending, the parties reached a compromise covering rent, compensation for past occupation, tax liabilities, and ot

RAM PRASAD (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.versusTHE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION AND ORS.

1994 INSC 13430 March 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The widow Jivani, after the death of her husband Bahadur Singh (the last male holder of tenancy rights), claimed to have created a joint tenancy with Jwala Singh under Section 59 of the U.P. Tenancy Act, 1939. The appellants, heirs of the original tenant, challenged the decree, alleging it was collusive and fraudulent

SHIVAPPAversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

1994 INSC 56229 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

Shivappa was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC solely on the basis of a confession recorded under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The High Court upheld the conviction, holding that the confession, though later retracted, was voluntary and truthful. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the m

TMT. T.P.K. THILAGAVATHYversusTHE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY AND OTHERS

1994 INSC 55829 November 1994Dismissed

The petitioners, private stage‑carriage operators, challenged the Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles (Special Provisions) Act, 1992 which bars the grant of any new permit overlapping a notified route after 30 June 1990. They argued that the cut‑off date created an arbitrary classification violating Article 14 and that Section 1

SRI SHYAM SUNDER PRASAD AND ORS.versusSRI RAJPAL SINGH AND ANR.

1994 INSC 55929 November 1994Dismissed

The plaintiffs filed a title suit seeking declaration of ownership and possession of certain plots. The trial court decreed in their favour, but the High Court dismissed the suit on the ground that the plaintiffs failed to prove possession within the 12‑year period prescribed by Article 142 of the Limitation Act, 1908,

BAKHTAWAR SINGH AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1994 INSC 56029 November 1994Dismissed

The case concerned acquisition of about 527 acres of land in Bhagualong and surrounding villages for a cantonment. The Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded Rs 22,000 per acre for nehrri and chahi land, which was later enhanced by the Additional District Judge to Rs 36,000 and by the High Court to Rs 37,000 per ac

TARLOCHAN SINGH AND ANR; ETC. ETC.versusTHE STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1994 INSC 56129 November 1994Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined appeals by landowners whose 881 acres were acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for municipal development. After a series of assessments by the acquisition officer, district judge, single judge and a division bench, the claimants sought further enhancement of compensation, arguing th

STATE OF RAJASTHANversusSHRI UMRAO SINGH

1994 INSC 42329 September 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent’s father died while serving as a Sub‑Inspector, and the respondent was appointed as a Lower Division Clerk on compassionate grounds. After accepting that appointment, he sought a promotion to Sub‑Inspector, which was denied, leading him to file a writ petition. The Rajasthan High Court Single Judge direc

UDAY PRATAP SINGH AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

1994 INSC 42229 September 1994Dismissed

The appellants, originally members of the Junior Branch of the Bihar Finance Service, were merged into the Senior Branch by a government resolution dated 2 November 1975, purportedly with retrospective effect from 1 April 1974. The respondents, who were direct recruits to the Senior Branch on 12 May and 25 May 1974, ch

M/S MOORCO (INDIA) LTD. MADRASversusTHE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, MADRAS

1994 INSC 42429 September 1994Appeal(s) allowed

Mis Moorco (India) Ltd., a manufacturer of volumetric displacement type flow meters, imported components and accessories for use in its meters. The Assistant Collector classified the accessories under tariff heading 90.26, a general heading, relying on clause (c) of Rule 3 of the General Rules for Interpretation of the

SHRI T. SHAM BHATversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1994 INSC 29329 July 1994

Shri T. Sham Bhat, a Class‑I officer of Karnataka's non‑State Civil Service, was barred from selection to the Indian Administrative Service (IAS) after the IAS (Appointment by Selection) Second Amendment Regulations, 1989 increased the required continuous service from eight to twelve years and allowed Class‑II officers

THE NATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITYversusSHRI M.A. WAHAB

1994 INSC 18029 April 1994Appeal(s) allowed

Shri M.A. Wahab joined the National Airport Authority in 1957 with his date of birth recorded as 1 January 1934. After passing his matriculation in 1962, a certificate indicated his birth as 1 March 1939, and in 1990 he applied to have his service record corrected. The Authority refused and the Central Administrative T

STATE OF GUJARATversusMEGHJI PETHRAJ SHAH CHARITABLE TRUST

1994 INSC 13029 March 1994Appeal(s) allowed

In 1954, Shri M.P. Shah donated Rs.15 lakh to the Government of Saurashtra for establishing a medical college, with the condition that he or his nominee could nominate 10% of the seats for admission. The Government of Gujarat later decided to discontinue the donor's 12-seat quota, invoking the Supreme Court's decision

RAM NARAIN PRASAD AND ANR.versusATUL CHANDER MITRA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 12829 March 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants filed an eviction suit against the first respondent, claiming they were landlords and the respondent was a tenant in arrears of rent, and valued the suit on the basis of twelve months' rent. The respondent denied any landlord‑tenant relationship and argued that the suit required adjudication of title, th

KAZI LHENDUP DORJIversusTHE CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND ORS.

1994 INSC 12929 March 1994Case Allowed

The former Chief Minister of Sikkim challenged a 1987 notification that withdrew the State's consent, given under section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946, for CBI investigations into alleged corruption. The petition raised whether a State could revoke such consent, whether section 21 of the Genera

JUGRAJ SINGH AND ANR.versusLABH SINGH AND ORS.

1994 INSC 55728 November 1994Dismissed

The plaintiffs, Labh Singh and his brother, sued for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 30‑8‑1984 against the original vendor, Jasbir Singh. The petitioners, who had purchased the property later on 4‑1‑1985, were impleaded as necessary parties. All lower courts held that the petitioners were not bona‑fide p

MAHABIR BISWAS AND ANR.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL

1994 INSC 49728 October 1994Disposed off

Mahabir Biswas and Shiba (Bijoy Krishna Dutta) were convicted of murder under IPC 302/34 for the killing of two rickshaw passengers. The prosecution's case rested on retracted judicial confessions of the accused and physical discoveries (a sword, a watch, and a ring) linked to the confessions. The Supreme Court held th

SMT. JUTHIKA MULICK AND ANR.versusDR. MAHENDRA YASHWANT BAL AND ORS.

1994 INSC 49828 October 1994Dismissed

The appellant owned premises leased in 1966 to Lall Behari Mullick for his natural life, with a covenant that his heirs must vacate within three months of his death and have no right to hold over. Mullick died within three years, but his heirs remained in possession. The appellant sought eviction, arguing that the leas

COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENTversusSHAMBU SARAN PANDEY AND ORS.

1994 INSC 49928 October 1994Disposed off

The Principal of a university institution was charged with misappropriating funds and served with a charge‑sheet. He requested inspection of the documents referred to in the charge‑sheet, but the enquiry officer postponed inspection until the final hearing, which the Court held to be a procedural error. The enquiry pro

ALI MUSTAFFA ABDUL RAHMAN MOOSAversusSTATE OF KERALA

1994 INSC 41928 September 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a Kuwaiti national, was caught at Quilon railway station with 780 grams of charas and was convicted under Section 20(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, receiving 11 years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.1 lakh. The High Court reduced the term to 10 years but uphe

UNION OF INDIAversusGHAMANDIRAM KEWALJI GOWANI

1994 INSC 42028 September 1994Dismissed

The Union of India appealed against the quashing of a detention order passed under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 against Ghamandiram Kewalji Gowani, who died during the pendency of the appeal. The appellant sought substitution of the deceased’s heirs, arguing that

M/S. TAMIL NADU HOUSING BOARDversusTHE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, MADRAS AND ANR.

1994 INSC 42128 September 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Tamil Nadu Housing Board, a statutory body registered under the Factories Act, operated a concrete unit (licensed) and a wood‑working unit (unlicensed) whose products were used only in its own buildings. The Central Excise Department issued a show‑cause notice alleging duty evasion on the wood unit. The Excise Trib

KERALA STATE HOUSING BOARD AND ORS. ETC.versusM/S. RAMAPRIYA HOTELS (P) LTD. AND ORS.

1994 INSC 29128 July 1994Dismissed

The Kerala State Housing Board entered into a Section 16(1) agreement with M/s. Ramapriya Hotels to accept compensation of Rs.1100 per cent for land to be acquired, after which a notification under Section 3(1) was issued and a later declaration under Section 6 was published. The High Court held the award void because

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusM/S. GRAPHIC INDUSTRIES CO. AND ORS.

1994 INSC 29228 July 1994Appeal(s) allowed

Graphic Industries Co. supplied stores worth about Rs. 50 lakh to Eastern Railways, but payment was delayed. The company filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus for payment, relying on correspondence between the Railway Minister and officials. The Calcutta High Court Division Benc

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusHYDERABAD ASBESTOS CEMENT PRODUCTION LTD. ETC. ETC.

1994 INSC 17928 April 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether a sales‑tax appellate authority could entertain a Form‑C declaration when it had not been filed before the first assessing authority under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1957. The revenue argued that Rule 12(7) limited the filing of Form‑C to the time of assessment by the first assessing

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusMRS. ASHA RAMCHANDRA AMBEDKAR AND ANR.

1994 INSC 9328 February 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The widowed wife of a deceased LIC employee and her son applied for employment on compassionate grounds after the employee's death. The corporation rejected the wife's claim due to her exceeding the age limit and rejected the son's claim citing a circular that barred compassionate appointments when any family member wa

STATE OF U.P.versusU.P. UNIVERSITY COLLEGES PENSIONERS ASSOCIATION

1994 INSC 9428 February 1994Disposed off

The State of Uttar Pradesh issued a Government Order in 1980 offering two pension schemes to teachers of aided degree colleges, one of which provided pension without gratuity for those retiring at 60. Most teachers chose this scheme, but the Association challenged the computation of pension on the basis of the last pay

BILLA JAGAN MOHAN REDDY AND ANR.versusBILLA SANJEEVA REDDY AND ORS.

1994 INSC 3428 January 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, who were the first parties in a reference proceeding under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act concerning compensation for acquired land, sought to prove their pre‑existing title by producing revenue records and other public documents. Because the documents were not in their immediate possession, the

SARAT KUMAR DASH AND ORS.versusBISWAJIT PATNAIK AND ORS.

1994 INSC 49527 October 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the promotion of Drug Inspectors to Assistant Drugs Controller posts. The Government, lacking statutory rules, adopted the principle of "merit‑cum‑suitability with due regard to seniority" and asked the Public Service Commission (PSC) to evaluate candidates using an objective grading system based on

LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, ELURU ETC.versusSMT. JASTI ROHINI AND ANR. ETC.

1994 INSC 49627 October 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The State acquired 9.47 acres in 1983 and 14.10 acres in 1985 near Eluru for house sites for the poor. The Land Acquisition Officer fixed compensation at Rs 40,000 per acre, but the reference court and the Andhra Pradesh High Court enhanced the market value to Rs 150 per square yard based on the Basic Valuation Registe

CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION ETC. ETC.versusK.K. JERATH

1994 INSC 41827 September 1994Dismissed

The respondent, an Electrical Engineering graduate, rose through the Chandigarh Administration's engineering service to Superintending Engineer and claimed eligibility for promotion to Chief Engineer when the post became vacant. The Chandigarh Administration sought to fill the vacancy by deputation from Punjab, arguing

MADRAS CITY WINE MERCHANTS' ASSON. AND ANR.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.

1994 INSC 28927 July 1994Dismissed

The appellants, licence holders for retail vending of Indian Made Foreign Spirits, were allowed to obtain bar licences under the Tamil Nadu Liquor (Retail Vending in Bar) Rules, 1992. After law‑and‑order problems, the State of Tamil Nadu rescinded those Bar Rules by a government order, effectively terminating the bar l

H.S. ATWAL AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 29027 July 1994Dismissed

The appellants, former army personnel who demobilised in 1968, joined the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Service in 1975 and claimed that their five years of military service should be counted towards seniority under Rule 4(1) of the Himachal Pradesh Administrative Rules, 1974. The rule provides such credit only if th

PRITPAL SINGH ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 28827 July 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Haryana Subordinate Services Selection Board conducted a recruitment for Assistant Sub‑Inspectors of Police, but destroyed the answer books before results were declared and failed to produce proper mark tabulations. Unsuccessful candidates alleged that the Board gave extra interview marks to favoured candidates and

COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HYDERABADversusFENOPLAST (P) LTD. {II)

1994 INSC 22627 June 1994

The respondent, Fenoplast (P) Ltd., manufactures rexine cloth by coating 100% cotton fabric with PVC resin, plasticizers and fillers. It argued that because cotton constituted only 8% of the finished product, the cloth could not be classified as a "cotton fabric" under Tariff Item 19(III) of the Central Excise and Salt

GRAHAK SANSTHA MANCH AND ETC.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

1994 INSC 17527 April 1994

The petitioners, a coalition of cooperative societies running fair‑price ration shops and occupants of residential premises, challenged a State Government notice to vacate premises that had been requisitioned under the Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948 more than four decades earlier. They argued that requisition could

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIAversusELMOT ENGINEERING COMPANY AND ORS.

1994 INSC 17627 April 1994

The Central Bank of India (appellant) had two suits in the Subordinate Court of Rangareddy, Andhra Pradesh, to enforce an equitable mortgage and recover expenses against Elmot Engineering Company (a limited company) and its directors. While the winding‑up petition against the company was pending, the Bombay High Court,

MANGILAL AND ORS.versusSTATE OF M.P.

1994 INSC 17727 April 1994

The appellants, Mangilal and others, were convicted under IPC sections 147 and 307 and appealed to the Madhya Pradesh High Court. While the appeal was listed, the counsel were absent because lawyers were on strike, leading the High Court to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and to comment on the reasons for th

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.versusSARDAR PUSHPENDRA SINGH AND ORS.

1994 INSC 17827 April 1994

The State of Rajasthan acquired about 1800 acres of land for defence purposes under the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953. The Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) could not determine the compensation because portions of the land were in excess of limits prescribed by the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 and the Rajasthan Impo

KRANTI SWAROOP MACHINE TOOLS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.versusSMT. KANTA BAI ASAWA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 3127 January 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The tenants, Kranti Swaroop Machine Tools Pvt. Ltd. and another, challenged eviction orders issued by the landladies, Smt. Kanta Bai Asawa and others, on the ground that they had not committed wilful default in rent or municipal taxes. The High Court had held that non‑payment of a small municipal tax amount constituted

ESHWARAIAH AND ANR.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

1994 INSC 3227 January 1994Dismissed

The deceased Ramesh was found dead in his house on the night of 14-15 December 1982 with injuries indicating asphyxia. Two accused, Eshwaraiah (a constable) and Mayamma (the deceased's mistress), entered the house after a cinema show and were later discovered hiding under a cot when the door was broken open. The prosec

M.V. KRISHNA RAO AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1994 INSC 3027 January 1994Dismissed

The case concerned direct recruits to the Indian Police Service (IPS) who appealed against a Central Administrative Tribunal order that allowed promotee officers from the State Police Service to count their continuous officiating service from the date they were included in the IPS select list for determining their year

SATYABRATA BISWAS AND ORSversusKALYAN KUMAR KISKU AND ORS.

1994 INSC 3327 January 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Calcutta High Court, while hearing a contempt petition concerning alleged violations of a 15 September 1988 status‑quo order, allowed an oral application by Somani Builders—a party not impleaded—to remove a padlock and later directed that the builders be permitted to occupy the disputed church premises. The appella

M/S GRAVER AND WEIL (INDIA) LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BARODA

1994 INSC 49026 October 1994Dismissed

Mis. Graver and Weil (India) Ltd. manufactured sodium bichromate and transferred it to an adjoining Chromic Acid section where chromic‑acid flakes were produced using power. The flakes were removed without payment of excise duty and were seized. The Collector imposed a penalty and ordered confiscation; the Tribunal uph

PT. CHET RAM VASHIST (DEAD) BY LRS.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI

1994 INSC 49126 October 1994Order modified

The appellant, the heir of Pt. Chet Ram Vashist, had obtained approval for a lay‑out plan of his private colony, which reserved certain plots for parks and schools. After municipal water supply became available, he applied to the Delhi Municipal Corporation for removal of building restrictions, and the Standing Committ

CALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR.versusSRI ANIL RATAN BANERJEE AND ORS.

1994 INSC 49226 October 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents obtained an eight‑storey building sanction on 27 April 1985 under the Bengal Municipal Act, 1932, but failed to commence construction within two years, causing the sanction to lapse. They later applied for a revised eight‑storey plan and a twelve‑storey plan in 1987, claiming a deemed sanction under Sec

M/S PUNJAB FOOTWEAR LIMITED, JALANDHARversusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHANDIGARH

1994 INSC 49326 October 1994Dismissed

Mis Punjab Footwear Ltd. (appellant) manufactured footwear partly in its own factory and partly through Mis Stepwell Industries Ltd. under a licence agreement that allowed Stepwell's workers to operate machines and use electricity within the appellant's premises. The appellant claimed exemption from excise duty under N

SUBHASH MULJIMAL GANDHIversusL. HIMINGLIANA AND ANR .

1994 INSC 33826 August 1994Dismissed

The respondent, acting as Secretary (Preventive Detention), issued a detention order under section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 against the appellant for alleged gold smuggling. The appellant challenged the order at the pre‑execution stage, arguing that i

TATA CELLULARversusUNION OF INDIA

1994 INSC 28326 July 1994Disposed off

The Department of Telecommunications invited tenders for cellular licences in four Indian cities, leading to a two‑stage evaluation and the selection of eight operators. Several rejected bidders challenged the final list before the Delhi High Court, alleging bias (due to a member’s son working for a bidder), arbitrarin

HINDUSTAN LEVER LTD.versusB.N. DONGRE AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1994 INSC 28426 July 1994Disposed off

Hindustan Lever Ltd. sought to impose a ceiling on dearness allowance for workers earning above Rs 500 per month, arguing that the existing slab system caused over‑neutralisation of the cost‑of‑living index and distorted wage differentials, especially vis‑à‑vis junior executives. The Industrial Tribunal placed such a c

IQBAL SINGHversusAVTAR SINGH AND ORS.

1994 INSC 28526 July 1994Dismissed

The appellant, Iqbal Singh, contested the 1992 Faridkot Assembly election and filed an election petition under Section 80 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, alleging that the returned candidate and a party president conspired to induce another candidate to withdraw in exchange for his appointment as General

CARMEL BOOK STALLversusDY. COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX

1994 INSC 28726 July 1994Appeal(s) allowed

Carmel Book Stall, a charitable trust, sold books whose profits were claimed to be exempt from Kerala sales tax under Section 10 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963, provided the profits were solely used for charitable purposes. The Sales Tax Officer taxed the profits for the assessment years 1981-82 and 1982-83,

P. RATHINAM/NABHUSAN PATNAIKversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1994 INSC 17126 April 1994

The Supreme Court considered two writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code, which criminalises attempted suicide. The petitioners argued that the provision violated Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution. After reviewing earlier High Court decisions, comparative law,

SARDAR SINGHversusSMT. KRISHNA DEVI AND ANR.

1994 INSC 17226 April 1994

Sardar Singh claimed a half‑share in a house purchased by his brother Kartar Lal, which was later sold by Kartar Lal to Joginder Nath (respondent). A private arbitration award declared that both brothers were co‑owners, each holding an equal share, but the award was not registered. The respondent sued for specific perf

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, ETC.versusMODERN PROTEINS LTD.

1994 INSC 17326 April 1994

Modern Proteins Ltd., a dealer under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, dealt in groundnut products including deoiled cake and groundnut protein flour. For the 1977-78 assessment year, the Central Tax Officer taxed the flour at 4% under the Central Sales Tax Act, but the Assistant Commissioner re‑classified it a

K.A.A. RAJA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND ANR.

1994 INSC 17426 April 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Kerala acquired 52.88 acres of cardamom plantation for the Periyar Tiger Reserve under a notification issued under s.3(1) of the Kerala Land Acquisition Act, 1962. The Land Acquisition Officer initially valued the land at Rs.14.75 lakh, which was enhanced by the Subordinate Judge to Rs.197.77 lakh; the Hig

D. K. JAIN AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 55525 November 1994Dismissed

The State of Haryana relaxed the minimum qualification for ex‑military personnel, appointing diploma‑holding engineers as Assistant Engineers under Rule 3(iii) of the Punjab Government National Emergency (Concession) Rules, 1965, and counted their military service for seniority. The respondents, after promotion to Exec

GOODRICKE GROUP LTD. ETC.versusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

1994 INSC 55225 November 1994Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined writ petitions challenging the West Bengal Taxation Laws (Second Amendment) Act, 1989, which imposed a cess on tea estates calculated per kilogram of green tea leaves produced. The petitioners argued that the levy was a tax on tea production, falling under Union competence (Entry 84/List I) a

NARENDER PAL SHARMA AND ANR.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

1994 INSC 55625 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the nomination procedure for nine vacancies in the Punjab Civil Services (Executive Branch) under the 1976 Rules, where the Chief Secretary assigned marks for ACRs, experience, and an ability test, and excluded candidates scoring 33% or less in the ability test. The appellants argued that thi

M/S. BHAGATRAM RAJIV KUMARversusCOMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.

1994 INSC 55325 November 1994Dismissed

The appellants, dealers registered under the Madhya Pradesh Sales Tax Act, imported sugar and other goods listed in Schedule II of the Madhya Pradesh Entry Tax Act into the state for consumption, use or sale. They challenged the entry tax levied under Section 3(1)(a) of the Act, contending that because sugar attracts a

M/S SHAKTIKUMAR M. SANCHETI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 55425 November 1994Dismissed

The petitioners, contractors and dealers of motor vehicles, purchased vehicles outside Maharashtra and brought them into the state, where they were levied an entry tax under the Maharashtra Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act, 1987. They challenged the tax as unconstitutional, arguing that it exceeded t

AKHIL BHARAT GOSEVA SANGH ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.

1994 INSC 48925 October 1994Directions issued

The Supreme Court examined the controversy surrounding the establishment of a mechanised slaughter house (Alkabeer Abattoir) at Rudraram, Medak district, Andhra Pradesh. The petitioner organisations challenged the various permissions granted to the company, arguing that the slaughter house would deplete cattle wealth a

N.K. SINGHversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 33725 August 1994Dismissed

N.K. Singh, an IPS officer, was transferred from the post of Joint Director, CBI to an equivalent post of IG in the BSF while handling a sensitive investigation. He challenged the transfer before the Central Administrative Tribunal alleging malafides by the Prime Minister, prejudice to public interest, and violation of

JOGINDER KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

1994 INSC 17025 April 1994Disposed off

The petitioner, Joginder Kumar, a 28‑year‑old advocate, was taken into police custody in Ghaziabad on the pretext of assisting with investigations and was not produced before a magistrate for five days. His brother’s inquiries revealed that the petitioner was being held in an undisclosed location, prompting a writ peti

RAM CHANDRA TRIPATHIversusU.P. PUBLIC SERVICES TRIBUNAL IV AND ORS.

1994 INSC 9125 February 1994Dismissed

R.C. Tripathi, appointed as Overseer (later Junior Engineer) in the Local Self‑Government Engineering Department in 1964, was confirmed in 1975 despite a High Court injunction prohibiting such confirmations. The confirmation was later rectified by a de‑confirmation order in 1978 without giving Tripathi a hearing. In 19

KRISHANLALversusSTATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

1994 INSC 9225 February 1994Case Allowed

Krishanlal, a clerk in the Jammu & Kashmir Home Guards, was investigated by the Anti‑Corruption Commission under the J&K (Government Servants) Prevention of Corruption Act, 1962. The Commission recommended his dismissal, but the authorities failed to furnish him a copy of the inquiry proceedings as required by Section

RAM JANAM SINGH AND ANR. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

1994 INSC 2425 January 1994

The Supreme Court examined whether the Uttar Pradesh rules granting special seniority to demobilised officers commissioned during national emergencies (Nov 1962‑Jan 1968 and after Dec 1971) while excluding those commissioned between Jan 1968 and Dec 1971 violated Article 14. The respondent, a former short‑service army

BHOLA NATH VARSHNEY (SINCE DEAD) THROUGH HIS LRS.versusMULK RAJ MADAN

1994 INSC 2525 January 1994

The landlord, Bhola Nath Varshney, served a notice under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and filed an eviction suit in 1981 against his tenant, Mulk Raj Madan, for a building constructed in 1974. The issue was whether the Uttar Pradesh Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 wou

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusGURAPPA HIROJIRAO AND ORS. AND VICE VERSA

1994 INSC 2625 January 1994

The State of Maharashtra acquired about 108 acres of agricultural land within a municipal corporation for an agricultural produce market and made an award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Several claimants, dissatisfied with the award, invoked Section 18 of the Act and obtained an enhanced compensation of Rs.0.80

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusLEUKOPLAST PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS.

1994 INSC 2725 January 1994Dismissed

The Union of India appealed against a Bombay High Court decision that a strip of surgical dressing (trade‑name Handyplast) medicated with 0.125% nitrofurozone was not a "patent or proprietary medicine" under Tariff Item 14‑E of the Central Excise and Salt Act. The product consisted of a sterile elastic adhesive pad to

STATE OF U.P. AND ORS. ETCversusU.P. STATE LAW OFFICERS ASSOCIATION AND ORS. ETC.

1994 INSC 2825 January 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttar Pradesh State Government appointed law officers and brief holders on contracts that allowed termination at any time without cause. The government later abolished the brief‑holder system and removed 26 law officers, prompting the officers to file a writ alleging violation of Article 14 and natural justice. The

JAWAJEE NAGNATHAMversusTHE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ADILABAD, AP., ETC.

1994 INSC 2925 January 1994Dismissed

The appellant owned 18 guntas of land in Adilabad municipality that were acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Compensation was initially based on letting value and later enhanced to Rs. 75 per square yard by the reference court. The appellant claimed a market value of Rs. 300 per square yard, relying on the B

STTE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR.versusMOHAMMAD KHALID AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1994 INSC 54524 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The State of West Bengal appealed against the Calcutta High Court’s order quashing the sanction and the taking of cognizance in a TADA case involving a 1993 bomb explosion that killed 69 people. The High Court had held that the sanction order was invalid, that the Designated Court’s cognizance was not reasoned, and tha

SANJAY AHLAWATversusM.D. UNIVERSITY AND ORS.

1994 INSC 54624 November 1994Dismissed

The appellant, Sanjay Ahlawat, challenged clause 3(i) of the prospectus of Maharishi Dayanand University, which awarded a ten‑mark weightage to graduates of the sole medical college in Haryana for postgraduate medical admissions. He argued that the rule was arbitrary, discriminatory and violated Article 14 of the Const

ISHVARBHAI FULJIBHAI PATNIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1994 INSC 54724 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

Ishvarbhai Fuljibhai Patni was convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appealed to the Gujarat High Court, which dismissed his appeal in a brief, cryptic judgment that merely affirmed the conviction without discussing the evidence or the arguments raised. The Supreme Court held that a Hig

DOLAT RAM AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF HARYANA

1994 INSC 54824 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from FIR No. 735 (8 November 1993) alleging dowry death of Sunita, wife of Anil Kumar. The Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak, granted anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC to the parents and brother of the husband, noting that they lived separately from the deceased as evidenced by the FIR and ration

SMT. RATNA @ RATNAVATIversusSYNDICATE BANK AND ORS.

1994 INSC 54924 November 1994Dismissed

The petitioner’s father was the second defendant in a suit for recovery of money under a mortgage. A preliminary decree was passed, after which the second defendant (surety) died. The plaintiff sought a final decree and asked that the petitioner be brought in as the legal representative of the deceased defendant. The d

VIRENDRA GAUR AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 55024 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether the Haryana Government could lease municipal land, earmarked as open space for sanitation and recreation, to the Punjab Samaj Sabha for a Dharamshala. The land had been vested in the municipality under the Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 and was reserved under a town planning scheme for p

R. R. KULASEKHARANversusA.P.P.S. COMMISSION AND ORS

1994 INSC 55124 November 1994Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the appointment of candidates to posts reserved for Backward Class (BC‑A) in Andhra Pradesh, arguing that when no local BC‑A candidates were available, the government should have allowed BC‑A candidates from other zones to be considered as non‑local and appointed on merit. The respondents con

P.A. CHANDRAN AND ORS.versusBOARD OF REVENUE (EXCISE) AND ORS.

1994 INSC 48124 October 1994Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether a rule prescribing a 1:1 ratio for promotion of Excise Guards to Excise Preventive Officer, based on possession of the Secondary School Leaving Certificate (SSLC), violated Article 16 of the Constitution. The Court reiterated that higher educational qualifications can be a permissible

GOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ANR.versusA. RAJAPANDIAN

1994 INSC 48724 October 1994Appeal(s) allowed

A. Rajapandian, a Sub‑Inspector of Police, was dismissed after a departmental inquiry found three charges of misconduct proved against him. He challenged the dismissal before the Madras High Court, which transferred the matter to the Tamil Nadu Administrative Tribunal. The Tribunal set aside the dismissal by re‑appreci

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusS.B.P.V. CHALAPATHI RAO ETC.

1994 INSC 48224 October 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents sold 220.25 acres of agricultural land in December 1971 through fourteen sale deeds. The State of Andhra Pradesh contended that the transfers were made to evade the ceiling provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling) on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1973, and should be disregarded for ceiling c

HINDUSTAN LEVER EMPLOYEES' UNIONversusHINDUSTAN LEVER LIMITED AND ORS

1994 INSC 48324 October 1994Dismissed

The Supreme Court considered the sanction of a scheme of amalgamation between Tata Oil Mills Company Ltd. (TOMCO) and Hindustan Lever Ltd. (HLL), a subsidiary of the foreign multinational Unilever. The petitioners – nominal TOMCO shareholders, employee unions and consumer groups – challenged the scheme on six grounds,

MOHD. ASLAM OBHURE, ACCHAN RIZVIversusUNION OF INDIA STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS.

1994 INSC 48424 October 1994Disposed off

The Supreme Court entertained contempt proceedings against the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, Kalyan Singh, and the State Government for wilfully disobeying its orders that prohibited any construction on a 2.77‑acre land in Ayodhya acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court found that massive permanent

ANIL KUMAR SINGHversusSHIVNA TH MISHRA @ GADASU GURU

1994 INSC 48524 October 1994Dismissed

Daulat Singh filed a suit for specific performance of a land sale; he died and his son continued as legal representative. The plaintiff sought to amend the plaint to implead Shivnath Mishra, alleging Mishra had become a co‑owner of the land by a decree under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act and therefo

BAHADUR SINGH AND ORS.versusSHANGARA SINGH AND ORS.

1994 INSC 48624 October 1994Dismissed

The case concerned lands occupied by respondents Nos.5‑15 since 1931. The Punjab Occupancy Tenants’ Vesting of Property Rights Act, 1952 became effective on 15 June 1951, vesting ownership in occupancy tenants. Although the tenants’ names were not entered in revenue records and they continued to pay rent until 1974, th

DR. M. ISMAIL FARUQUI ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 47924 October 1994Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya Act, 1993 and the Presidential reference under Article 143(1) concerning whether a Hindu temple existed before the Babri Masjid was built. The Court held that the Act was within Parliament’s legislative competence (Entry 42,

STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND ORS.versusMANGAT RAM AND ORS.

1994 INSC 48824 October 1994Disposed off

The respondents bought 132 bighas of land in Theog, Shimla, surrounded by forest, to establish an apple orchard, which required felling of trees. They applied for demarcation; an Assistant Collector Grade II demarcated the land on 7 December 1987 and submitted a report stating that verification by a Senior Land Revenue

SVENSKA HANDELSBM'KEN AND OTHERS ETC.versusINDIAN CHARGE CHROME LTD. AND OTHERS

1994 INSC 2224 January 1994

The plaintiff (borrower) sued the suppliers, lenders and guarantor over a power‑plant project, invoking credit agreements that contained arbitration clauses. The lenders, particularly Svenska Handelsbanken (defendant No. 4), instructed their counsel not to appear or take any step in the main suit, limiting a power of a

MAHARASHTRA STATE COOPERATIVE COTTAN GROWERS' MARKETING FEDERATION LTD. AND ANR.versusMAHARASHTRA STATE COOPERATIVE COTTON GROWERS' MARKETING FEDERATION EMPLOYEES UNION AND ANR.

1994 INSC 2324 January 1994

The case concerned whether the 1984 Patankar Award of the Industrial Tribunal, which made permanent those workers who had completed 240 days of continuous service, applied to seasonal employees of the Maharashtra State Cooperative Cotton Growers' Marketing Federation. The Union of seasonal employees claimed that the aw

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusVEDANAYAGAM

1994 INSC 62423 December 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Karnataka appealed a High Court judgment that reduced the charge against Vedanayagam from murder to culpable homicide. The accused had stabbed the deceased, Sugumaran, on the left side of the chest with a dagger, causing instant death. The trial court convicted him under Section 302 IPC, but the High Court

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.versusBALA MUSALAIAH AND ORS.

1994 INSC 54223 November 1994Dismissed

The Government of Andhra Pradesh issued a 1967 Government Order (G.O.) that prescribed an ad‑hoc rule for retrenching temporary employees, giving preference to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (SC/ST) candidates over general‑category probationers and approved probationers. The High Court struck down the G.O. as viol

RAM AVTAR SHUKLAversusARVIND SHUKLA

1994 INSC 54323 November 1994Disposed off

The case arose from a dispute over the management of a society‑run school where Ram Autar Shukla (petitioner) claimed to be the duly elected manager and Arvind Shukla (respondent) contested the same. After a series of orders by the Assistant Registrar and the High Court, the Supreme Court stayed the High Court's judgme

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusM/S. THE BRITANNIA BISCUITS CO. LTD.

1994 INSC 54423 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra appealed against The Britannia Biscuits Co. Ltd., which sold biscuits in tins and collected a refundable deposit for the tins, refunding it only if the tins were returned within three months. The Assessing Authority treated the amount written off from unreturned tin deposits (Rs 84,013) as part

M/S. DURGA RAM PRASADversusGOVT. OF ANDHRA PRADESH

1994 INSC 53923 November 1994Dismissed

The appellant, a contractor, entered into a contract to construct a food‑grains godown for the Government of Andhra Pradesh. The engineer withheld part of the payment alleging that the work was not executed as per the contract. The dispute was referred to an arbitrator who awarded the contractor the withheld sum togeth

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAversusAMRIK SINGH

1994 INSC 54123 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a Selection Grade Superintendent of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, had his superannuation extended by two years (re‑employment). During this period he was charged with embezzlement, suspended and a charge‑sheet was issued. After the re‑employment period he was allowed to retire, but a disciplinary e

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusPUSHPENDRA KUMAR JAIN

1994 INSC 41623 September 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Delhi Development Authority (DDA) allotted a flat to the respondent after a draw of lots on 12 October 1990, but the allotment‑cum‑demand letter was sent only on 9‑13 January 1991. In the interim, DDA revised land rates by a circular dated 6 December 1990, and the respondent was asked to pay the higher price. The r

M/S. SAHAKARI KHANO UDYOG MANDALI LTD.versusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

1994 INSC 41723 September 1994Dismissed

The appellant, a cooperative society engaged in sugar manufacturing, obtained sugarcane from its farmer members, gave them advances, and processed the cane into sugar. The Sales Tax Officer assessed purchase tax under Section 14B of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, holding the supply to be a purchase, a view affirmed by

INDIAN TOOL MANUFACTURERSversusASSTT. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NASIK AND ORS.

1994 INSC 41323 September 1994Dismissed

Indian Tool Manufacturers produced carbide "throw‑away" inserts that were initially classified under Tariff Item 68, later under Item 51A(iii) after an amendment, and subsequently re‑classified by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise as Item 62 (Tool Tips). The manufacturer appealed the re‑classification, arguing

H.M.M. LIMITEDversusTHE COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE

1994 INSC 41523 September 1994Appeal(s) allowed

H.M.M. Ltd. claimed that the metal screw caps used to seal bottles of Horlicks are component parts of the finished product and therefore eligible for a duty exemption under Notification No. 201/79‑CE. The Collector (Appeals) allowed the claim, but the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal reversed the dec

INDIAN EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS (P) LTD. ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1994 INSC 41423 September 1994Case Partly allowed

The Indian Express Newspapers and other newspaper establishments challenged two 1989 government orders that gave effect to the Bachawat Wage Board's recommendations fixing wage scales, grades, house rent and city compensatory allowances under the Working Journalists and Other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service)

DR. RASH LAL YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

1994 INSC 22523 June 1994Dismissed

Dr. Rash Lal Yadav, appointed Chairman of the Bihar School Service Board for a three‑year term, was removed by the State Government under Section 10(7) of the Bihar Non‑Government Secondary Schools (Taking over of Management and Control) Act, 1981 on grounds of alleged mismanagement and detrimental conduct. He challeng

OIL AND NATURAL GAS COMMISSIONversusUTPAL KUMAR BASU AND ORS.

1994 INSC 22323 June 1994

Engineers India Limited, acting as consultant for the Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC), advertised a tender for a Kerosene Recovery Processing Unit in newspapers across India, including West Bengal. NICCO, a company with its registered office in Calcutta, learned of the tender, submitted its bid and subsequent rev

KRISHAN CHANDER DUTIA (SPICE) PVT. LTDversusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AND ORS.

1994 INSC 8923 February 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, K.C.D. Pvt. Ltd., bought whole black pepper and whole turmeric in West Bengal, ground them into powder, and sold the powder. It argued that under the West Bengal Sales Tax Act, 1954, the powdered forms are the same goods as the whole forms, already taxed at the first point of sale, and therefore not liab

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.versusSHRI PURKHA RAM AND ANR.

1994 INSC 9023 February 1994Dismissed

The case involved displaced persons from the Bhakra Nangal Dam who were rehabilitated in the Rajasthan Canal Colony and allotted land under the Rajasthan Colonisation Act, 1954 and the 1967 Rules, with payment required as per Rule 23, which they duly made. In 1984 the government issued notices under the 1975 Rules, spe

MAC LABORATORIES (P) LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BOMBAY

1994 INSC 53322 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

Mac Laboratories, a manufacturer of Kemicetine Vaginal Suppositories containing chloramphenicol, claimed exemption from excise duty under Notification No. 116/69‑CE (as amended) which exempts "chloramphenicol and its esters for oral and parenteral use". The department issued notices denying exemption, arguing that the

CONSOLIDATED COFFEE LIMITED AND ANR.versusCOFFEE BOARD AND ANR.

1994 INSC 53122 November 1994Disposed off

The appellants, coffee growers, filed writ petitions seeking to restrain the Coffee Board from using the Pool Fund, created under Section 30 of the Coffee Act, 1942, to pay the purchase tax imposed by the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957. The High Court held that the growers were not liable to pay the tax and that the Boa

REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERversusM/S K.T ROLLING MILLS PVT. LTD.

1994 INSC 53422 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

MIS K. TROLLING MILLS Pvt. Ltd. failed to deposit Employees' Provident Fund contributions for the period July 1968 to October 1977. The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner initiated proceedings in 1985 and, under Section 14‑B of the EPF Act, levied damages of Rs. 52,034.80. The Bombay High Court set aside the order, h

CHAIRMAN AND M.D. SINGARENI COLLIERIES AND ANR.versusM. RAMESH CHANDER AND ORS.

1994 INSC 53522 November 1994

The dispute concerned recruitment to the statutory posts of Welfare Officers under Rule 72 of the Mines Rules. Coal India Ltd. adopted a policy that one‑third of the posts be filled by internal candidates and the remaining two‑thirds by external candidates, with a common written test for all applicants. The company fir

U.P. FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND ORS.versusM/S NAINI OXYGEN AND ACETYLENE GAS LTD. AND ANR.

1994 INSC 53622 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Uttar Pradesh State Financial Corporation (SFC) had sanctioned a Rs 30 lakh term loan to Naini Oxygen and Acetylene Gas Ltd. (the Company). The Company repeatedly defaulted, leading to a recovery certificate under the U.P. Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act and a notice under Section 29 of the U.P. State Financia

STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.versusANANTHI AMMAL AND ORS.

1994 INSC 53222 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Tamil Nadu enacted the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Harijan Welfare Schemes Act, 1978 to acquire land for Harijan welfare projects. The Act was challenged as unconstitutional, alleging violations of Articles 14, 19 and 300A of the Constitution and lack of protection under Articles 31A and 31C. The Ma

SMT. SITA DEVI (DEAD) BY LRS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

1994 INSC 53722 November 1994Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the Bihar Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1960's provision allowing the Market Committee to levy a market fee on buffaloes, bullocks and cows sold in a notified market, arguing that cattle are not agricultural produce. The High Court held that Section 2(1)(a) of the Act, together with Item

SMT. SOORAJ AND ORS.versusS.D.O. AND ORS.

1994 INSC 53822 November 1994Dismissed

Ratan Singh, a Bhoomidar, died leaving 41.49 acres of agricultural land. Under the Madhya Pradesh Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1960, the Sub‑Divisional Officer limited the widow's share to 10.38 acres and declared the remainder surplus. The major daughters (appellants) filed a civil suit claiming inheritance u

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAXversusM/S. SHRAVAN KUMAR SWARUP AND SONS, ETC. ETC.

1994 INSC 41122 September 1994Dismissed

The assessee, a Hindu Undivided Family, challenged the valuation of its residential properties for the assessment years 1977-78 and 1978-79, contending that Rule 1BB of the Wealth Tax Rules, 1957 (effective 1 April 1979) should be applied even though the assessments were made after the rule’s introduction. The Revenue

SHIVAPPA TAMMANNAPPA KARABANversusPARASAPPA HANAMMAPPA KURABAN AND ORS.

1994 INSC 41222 September 1994Dismissed

The appellant, a holder of a village office (Walikarki) under the Karnataka Village Offices Abolition Act, 1961, claimed exclusive ownership of land regranted to him after the abolition of the office. Upon partition, he received only one‑fifth of the property while the respondents, other members of the Hindu joint fami

RAGHBIR SINGHversusSURJIT SINGH AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1994 INSC 33622 August 1994Dismissed

Raghbir Singh, convicted under IPC sections 326 and 149 and sentenced to three years' rigorous imprisonment, was released in November 1988 and subsequently contested the Punjab Vidhan Sabha election in February 1992. The respondent filed an election petition alleging that Singh was disqualified under sub‑section 3 of S

PREMJI RATANSEY SHAH AND ORSversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 27922 July 1994Dismissed

The petitioners claimed to be successors in title to land that had been acquired by the government for the railways under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and sought a declaration and an injunction to protect their possession. The trial court found them in possession, but the High Court held that the land was in the pos

P.CHANDRAMOULYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR.

1994 INSC 28022 July 1994Dismissed

Four members of the General Reserve Engineers Force (GREF) were tried by a Court‑Martial convened under a warrant of the Chief of the Army Staff authorising the Chief Engineer and were convicted of offences under Sections 63, 39(a) and 41 of the Army Act. They challenged the jurisdiction of the Court‑Martial, the effec

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusSURENDRA MOHAN ARORA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 27822 July 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the promotion of diploma holders and science graduates employed in Indian Ordnance Factories. The Central Administrative Tribunal had treated all initial appointments as if they were to the post of Supervisor Grade‑A and directed that, on two years of service as Supervisor‑A, the employees be promote

SH. DEWAN CHAND BHALLAversusDR. ASHOK KUMAR BHOIL

1994 INSC 28122 July 1994Dismissed

The appellant, a government servant, was allotted a government residential accommodation and was a tenant of a residential building owned by the respondent landlord. The landlord invoked Section 14(3)(a)(iv) of the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 to obtain possession, arguing that the tenant was liable fo

BIHAR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ANR. ETC.versusDR. SHIV JATAN THAKUR AND ORS. ETC.

1994 INSC 28222 July 1994Disposed off

Dr. Shiv Jatan Thakur, a member of the Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC), claimed that, as a member, he was entitled to the same facilities and amenities as the Chairman, invoking the Constitution and the BPSC (Conditions of Service) Regulations. He also sought punitive action against the Chairman for allegedly re

HICO PRODUCTS LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE

1994 INSC 16722 April 1994

HICO Products Ltd., a manufacturer of medicinal silicone products such as dimethicone and simethicone, claimed that these goods should be classified under the residuary Tariff Item 68 and therefore be exempt from excise duty under government notifications of 1982. The Central Excise authorities directed classification

ANSHAD AND ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

1994 INSC 16822 April 1994

The Supreme Court examined the convictions of five accused (Al, A2, A3, A4, A5) for the murders of Savitri Devi and her grandson Sunil and related robbery. The Sessions Court had sentenced them to life imprisonment, but the Karnataka High Court enhanced the sentences of Al, A2 and A3 to death. The Court held that the H

VISHWAS ANNA SAWANT AND ORS.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAY AND ORS.

1994 INSC 16922 April 1994

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay resolved in 1975 to reserve promotion posts for backward classes, including Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and denotified and nomadic tribes. Although a seniority‑wise list of eligible backward‑class employees was prepared, the corporation denied promotions to several ap

RAJA RAM AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

1994 INSC 8622 February 1994

Ten persons, including eight appellants, were tried for murder (Sec. 302 read with Sec. 149 IPC) and other offences arising from an assault on the deceased Halke. The High Court convicted them of murder and sentenced them to life imprisonment, along with convictions under Sec. 323 and Sec. 325 IPC for causing hurt. On

ADDL. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICERversusYAMANAPPA BASALINGAPPA CHALWADI

1994 INSC 8722 February 1994

The respondents' agricultural lands were acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for the Upper Krishna Project. The District Judge, based on evidence that two dry‑season crops yielded Rs 720 per acre, applied a 15‑year multiplier to compute a market value of Rs 800 per acre, which the Karnataka High Court upheld.

ASSISTANT EXCISE COMMISSIONER AND ORS.versusISSAC PETER AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1994 INSC 8522 February 1994

The Supreme Court examined disputes arising from the Kerala Abkari Shops (Disposal in Auction) Rules, 1974, where licensees of arrack shops claimed the State was contractually obliged to supply additional quantities of liquor beyond the statutorily mandated monthly quota. The Court held that the monthly quota is obliga

LAXMAN NAIKversusSTATE OF ORISSA

1994 INSC 8822 February 1994Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the appeal of Laxman Naik, who was convicted of raping and murdering his 7‑year‑old niece. The prosecution case was built entirely on circumstantial evidence, including eyewitnesses who saw the accused and victim together, the accused’s false statements about the victim’s whereabouts, medical

SALES TAX OFFICER KANPUR AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ANR

1994 INSC 52721 November 1994

Twenty-six packages of utensils were seized by a Uttar Pradesh sales tax officer because they were being transported without the required documents. The railway argued that the goods were moving from a railway godown to a city booking agency, which it claimed was part of the "Railway" under the Railways Act and therefo

R.C.SOODversusHIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN

1994 INSC 52821 November 1994Case Allowed

R.C. Sood, then Registrar of the Rajasthan High Court, was suspended by the High Court under Rule 13 of the Rajasthan Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958, on the allegation that he altered a draft recruitment advertisement, changing the age eligibility date from 1 January 1994 to 1 January 1

STATE OF GUJARATversusC.G. RAIYANI

1994 INSC 52921 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent was initially appointed as a Junior Engineer on an adhoc basis in May 1969 and later selected for regular appointment by the Panchayat Services Selection Board, with regularisation intended to be effective from July 15, 1972. After a provisional promotion in 1978, a common seniority list placed him at a

DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION AND ORS.versusGAJADHAR PRASAD VERMA

1994 INSC 53021 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, G.P. Verma, was appointed as a clerk in a private aided school during a leave vacancy and the Managing Committee resolved to retain him even after the vacancy ended. The school sought reimbursement of his salary from the Government under the U.P. High Schools and Intermediate Colleges (Payment of Salari

PAVAI AMMAL VAIYAPURI EDUCATION TRUSTversusGOVERNMENT OF TAMIL NADU AND ORS.

1994 INSC 40821 September 1994Hearing Adjourned

The Supreme Court entertained a Special Leave Petition filed by P. Av. Education Trust, a private law college, challenging the admission procedures imposed by the Government of Tamil Nadu. The petition raised the question whether the scheme laid down in Unnikrishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1993) applied to the coll

SHYAM SUNDER DUTTAversusBAIKUNTHA NATH BANERJEE (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

1994 INSC 40921 September 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed successive partition suits over property where a court‑appointed receiver (1933‑1941) had inducted the respondents as occupants. After the receiver’s discharge, the respondents claimed tenancy rights by adverse possession. The trial court and the appellate court found that the respondents were not i

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ORS.versusM/S. KRISHNADAS TIKARAM

1994 INSC 41021 September 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent was granted a mining lease in 1966 to extract limestone from a forest area, which expired in 1986. After the Forest Conservation Act, 1980 came into force, any grant or renewal of such a lease required prior approval of the Central Government under Section 2. The State Government issued an order renewing

KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATIONversusB.K. DORESWAMY AND ORS.

1994 INSC 27321 July 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation conducted a 1972 selection for Assistant Stores/Purchase Officers, appointing four candidates in order of merit. Under the Government Instructions dated 6 September 1969, the first vacancy was reserved for a Scheduled Tribe (ST) candidate, followed by Scheduled Caste (SC),

CALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS.versusEAST INDIA HOTELS LTD. AND ORS.

1994 INSC 27421 July 1994Appeal(s) allowed

East India Hotels Ltd operates three restaurants in its Oberoi Grand hotel in Calcutta, each equipped with dancing floors, music and occasional cabaret shows. The Calcutta Municipal Corporation levied a licence fee under Section 443 of the Calcutta Municipal Act, 1951, treating the restaurants as places of public amuse

UNION OF INDIA AND ORSversusSH. RAJIV YADAV, IAS AND ORS.

1994 INSC 27521 July 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned an IAS officer, Rajiv Yadav, who was allocated to the Manipur‑Tripura cadre despite his preference for the Union Territories cadre, his home state. He challenged the allocation before the Central Administrative Tribunal, arguing that the reservation of SC/ST candidates for their home states in the ca

ANAND SWAROOP VOHRAversusBHIM SEN BHARI AND ANR.

1994 INSC 27621 July 1994Appeal(s) allowed

Anand Swaroop Vohra, a retired Central Government employee, applied under Section 25‑B(1) read with Section 14‑C of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 for eviction of his tenant on the ground that the premises were needed for his own residence because the accommodation he occupied was insufficient. The Rent Controller re

L/NK. MEHARAJ SINGH/KALUversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

1994 INSC 16321 April 1994

The case concerned the murder of Laxman Singh on 3 November 1977, for which Kalu, Meharaj Singh and others were charged under Section 302 IPC. The trial court acquitted all accused, finding the First Information Report (FIR) to be ante‑timed and the eyewitness testimony unreliable, especially in view of contradictory m

SMT. INDRANI BAIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 16421 April 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The widow of a turner who was dismissed from service challenged the disciplinary enquiry that led to his dismissal. The employee had alleged bias against the appointed enquiry officer and requested a change of officer, which the authorities ignored and proceeded with an ex parte enquiry. After the enquiry officer exami

STATE OF U.P. AND ANR.versusPREM LATA MISRA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 16521 April 1994

The respondent was appointed as a temporary Assistant Project Officer under the National Adult Education Scheme, with her appointment stating that service could be terminated at any time by giving one month's notice or pay. In June 1982 she was terminated under the Uttar Pradesh Temporary Government Servants (Terminati

SATISH CHANDRAversusREGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, DELHI.

1994 INSC 16621 April 1994

The petitioners, members of a Delhi cooperative housing society, were expelled by a resolution of the society's general body on 22 February 1990, which was later approved by the Registrar. They filed several writ petitions in the Delhi High Court challenging the expulsion and other matters, but did not contest the expu

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusABDUL HAMID HAJI MOHAMMED

1994 INSC 8221 February 1994

In 1993 a series of bomb blasts in Bombay led to the arrest of Abdul Hamid Haji Mohammed, during which six Chinese AK‑56 rifles and twelve magazines were recovered. The Designated Court under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) refused his bail, holding that the allegations attracted TADA pr

STATE OF ORISSA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPTT.versusBIMAL KUMAR MOHANTY

1994 INSC 8321 February 1994

The respondent, a manager in the Orissa State Guest House, was found to have committed serious financial irregularities and was later discovered to possess disproportionate assets. The appointing authority suspended him pending disciplinary proceedings and a criminal investigation under Rule 12 of the Orissa Civil Serv

PRABHUversusSTATE OF RAJASTHAN

1994 INSC 8421 February 1994Dismissed

The appellant, a milk vendor, had a sample of his milk taken by a food inspector on 19 March 1983, which was sent for analysis and reported as adulterated. He was convicted under Section 7 read with Section 16 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, sentenced to six months imprisonment and a fine, later reduc

SMT. CHARANJIT KAURversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 2121 January 1994

The petitioner, a widow of a Major in the Indian Army, sought Special Family Pension, Children Allowance and monetary compensation after her husband died in mysterious circumstances involving extensive burns. The authorities denied her claim, stating the death was not attributable to military service and refused to dis

QUAMARUL ISLAMversusS.K. KANTA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 2021 January 1994

The returned candidate Quamarul Islam contested the 1989 Karnataka Assembly election and was challenged by his rival S.K. Kanta on alleged corrupt practices under Sections 123(2), (3), (3A) and (4) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, including religious appeals and false statements. The High Court set aside

RAJIV K. GARG AND ORS.versusSHANTI BHUSHAN AND OTHERS

1994 INSC 52620 November 1994Dismissed

The petitioners, members of the legal profession, sought suo motu initiation of criminal contempt proceedings against respondents, who were also lawyers and members of a Sub‑Committee on Judicial Accountability, alleging that they made statements disparaging judges and the judicial system. The petition relied on Sectio

UNION OF INDIAversusPRINCE MUFFAKAM JAH AND ORS.

1994 INSC 47120 October 1994Dismissed

The dispute concerned jewellery belonging to two trusts created by the Nizam of Hyderabad. An arbitration award directed the Union of India to pay Rs 180 crore to purchase the items, which was challenged by the Union and the trustees under Sections 15 and 16 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. Public‑spirited intervenors fil

UNION OF INDIAversusPRINCE MUFFAKAM JAH AND ORS.

1994 INSC 47220 October 1994

The case concerned 173 items of jewellery belonging to the Nizam of Hyderabad, held in two trusts, which the Union of India sought to purchase under the Antiquities and Art Treasures Act. The parties entered a compromise agreement to resolve all disputes by arbitration, and the umpire fixed a just price of Rs 225,37,33

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHIversusGANESH RAZAK AND ANR.

1994 INSC 47320 October 1994

The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (appellant) challenged awards granted by the Labour Court to daily‑rated/casual workers (respondents) who claimed equal pay with regular employees under the principle of equal pay for equal work. The workers sought computation of arrears of wages at the regular workers' rate, invoking

UNION OF INDIAversusN.P. DHAMANIA,

1994 INSC 47420 October 1994

N.P. Dhamania, an officer of the Indian Telecommunication Service, was recommended for promotion to Senior Administrative Grade Level‑II by the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC). The Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC) returned the panel for a "rigorous review" and subsequently excluded Dhamania and four o

SUB-COMMITIEE ON JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITYversusJUSTICE V. RAMASWAMY

1994 INSC 47520 October 1994Dismissed

The Sub‑Committee on Judicial Accountability filed a suo motu criminal contempt petition against Justice V. Ramaswamy, alleging that a letter he wrote to the Enquiry Committee under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968 contained sweeping allegations against judges and the judiciary. The petition invoked Section 15 of the Con

AWAS EVAM VIKAS PARISHADversusGYAN DEVI (DEAD) BY L.RS. AND ORS.

1994 INSC 47620 October 1994

The Uttar Pradesh Awas Evam Vikas Parishad (the Board), a statutory body acquiring land for a housing scheme, was not impleaded in the compensation proceedings before the tribunal and the High Court. The land owners challenged the compensation awarded, leading to enhanced awards by the High Court, which did not include

SMT. RAMTI DEVIversusUNION OF INDIA

1994 INSC 47720 October 1994Dismissed

Ramti Devi filed a suit on 30 July 1966 seeking a declaration that she was the absolute owner of a house and that the sale deed dated 29 January 1947, by which the defendant had allegedly alienated the property, should be avoided or cancelled. The trial court dismissed the suit and the Delhi High Court affirmed the dis

K.S. PARIPOORNANversusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 47820 October 1994Case Partly allowed

The case concerned a land acquisition where the Collector’s award was made on 30 December 1980 and possession taken in early 1981. The civil court, on reference, enhanced the compensation on 28 February 1985 and the enhanced amount was deposited in 1986. The High Court confirmed the enhanced compensation but denied int

NEDURIMILLI JANARDHANA REDDYversusPROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATIC STUDENTS UNION AND ORS.

1994 INSC 40120 September 1994Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the Andhra Pradesh Government's grant of permission to twenty societies to establish unaided private medical and dental colleges. The Court found that the State had framed the 1992 Rules and invited applications before constituting the "competent authority" mandated by the Andhra Pradesh Educ

KANTA DEVIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 40320 September 1994

The Supreme Court heard two writ petitions on 20 September 1994. In Kanta Devi v. Union of India, a widow of an ex‑serviceman was denied family pension because the Army Instructions No. 51 of 1980 excluded marriages contracted after retirement; the Court held the exclusion to be harsh, heartless and unconstitutional, s

UNION OF INDIAversusS. VIJAYKUMAR AND ORS

1994 INSC 40520 September 1994Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether civil servants who are residents of the North‑Eastern Region, but appointed to posts with "All India Transfer Liability", are entitled to a special duty allowance. The Central Administrative Tribunal had held they were entitled, relying on an Office Memorandum of 14 December 1983 that

NIAZ MOHAMMAD AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 40220 September 1994Dismissed

The petitioners, instructors under Haryana's Adult and Non‑formal Education Scheme, sought contempt proceedings against the State of Haryana and the Union of India for allegedly failing to pay arrears as directed by the Supreme Court on 2 June 1988, which required them to receive pay on par with squad teachers. The Cou

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusSAYED MUZAFFAR MIR

1994 INSC 40620 September 1994Dismissed

The respondent, a railway employee, gave three months' notice on 22 July 1985 to retire voluntarily under Article 1802(b) of the Indian Railway Establishment Code, with the notice period ending on 21 October 1985. While the notice period was pending, he was suspended in a disciplinary proceeding and an order of removal

SH. JILUBHAI NANBHAI KHACHAR ETC ETC.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ANR. ETC. ETC.

[1994] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 80720 July 1994Dismissed

The appellants, successors of Girasdars and Barkhalidars, challenged the constitutional validity of the Gujarat Amendment to the Bombay Land Revenue Code, which vested all mines, minerals and quarries in the State and provided compensation based on the average of three years' net income. They argued that the amendment

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search