Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
273 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The accused Angad Yadav and Kripashankar Yadav applied for bail in a case involving alleged assault and a gunshot injury under several IPC sections. They claimed false implication, lack of prior criminal record, and that the injuries to the informant were simple, with the gunshot injury attributed …
The accused Vijay Lal Yadav applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87 and 61(2) of the CrPC concerning an alleged enticement of a 14‑year‑old girl. The victim’s statement under Section 183 indicated that she left home voluntarily, lived in a forest area for ten days, and …
The accused Jano applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 295 of 2026) involving alleged assault with a sharp-edged weapon and a fatal injury to the victim Gulzar. The FIR, lodged on 25.07.2026, does not specify the exact date and time of the incident, and there is inconsistency regarding the …
The accused Junaid @ Kala applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 290 of 2026) involving alleged indiscriminate firing at a family function, resulting in minor injuries to three persons. The prosecution argued that the accused had previously been granted bail with conditions, possessed a pistol …
The applicant Satyam Singh was arrested for alleged assault on a fellow student, resulting in multiple injuries to both parties. The FIR was lodged by the victim's brother, while no FIR was filed against the applicant. The applicant sought bail, arguing the incident was a sudden quarrel, he has no …
Vijay Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 591 of 2026) alleging false implication in an FIR filed by the victim on 2 August 2026 for assault. The applicant argued that the FIR and medico‑legal report were unduly delayed, the injuries were minor, and a civil dispute existed between …
Manish, accused under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, was lodged in jail on 31‑Aug‑2026 while trial is pending. He claimed false implication and highlighted that he has thirteen other cases, all of which are on bail. The State …
The accused, Brijesh Kumar Tripathi, filed a bail application under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, while the trial was pending. He claimed false implication and highlighted his prior criminal history, noting that he had been in …
Gulam Jilani, accused in NDPS case No. 37 of 2018, had previously been granted bail on 19‑04‑2018 but was unable to appear for trial because he was incarcerated in Gwalior jail for another case from 22‑09‑2021 to 22‑02‑2023. After his release he surrendered on 21‑08‑2026 and his earlier bail …
The accused, Ajay Pratap Singh, applied for bail in a case under Sections 109 of the IPC and Sections 3, 25(1‑B)(a) and 27 of the Arms Act, arising from a police encounter on 13‑03‑2026 where a country‑made pistol was recovered. The applicant argued that the recovery was made without any independent …
Prince Singh, accused under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in a case registered at Chopan police station, was detained since 26‑08‑2026 despite being on bail in a separate solitary case. He contended that the police had falsely …
Elias Ahmed applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0140 of 2026) filed under Section 87 BNS after being arrested on 14 April 2026. He contended that the FIR, lodged by the victim’s uncle, was false and that the victim’s statement under Section 180 BNSS showed she voluntarily left her uncle’s …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Amit Kumar Ahirwar, who was arrested under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, and had been in jail since 13 August 2026. The applicant claimed false implication and pointed to …
The accused, Salman, applied for bail in a case under Sections 288 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act for allegedly possessing fire‑cracker material. He claimed false implication, lack of an independent witness to the arrest and recovery, and highlighted his cooperation …
Anoop Pal applied for bail in Crime No. 674 of 2026, charged under several sections of the BNS and the Arms Act, alleging false implication in an FIR dated 21.07.2026 concerning a hotel altercation that resulted in minor injuries. The applicant argued that no weapon was identified, witness …
The accused Kamlesh applied for bail in a criminal case involving sections of the IPC and CrPC, alleging false implication in an FIR filed by the victim alleging assault. He argued that the FIR and medico‑legal report were unduly delayed, the injuries were minor, and a civil dispute existed between …
Azim Ansari applied for bail in a cyber‑crime case (Criminal No. 46 of 2025) alleging he hacked a bank account and siphoned Rs.42.5 lakh, with a recovered car linked to the proceeds. The FIR was lodged on 8‑Dec‑2025 and the accused has been in custody since 13‑Sep‑2026. The prosecution argued the …
Naushad, the accused, was detained on 22 May 2026 under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in a cyber‑crime case pending trial. He filed a bail application seeking enlargement of bail, claiming false implication and noting that he is …
The accused Azam and Smt. Amna applied for bail in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, alleging false implication and that the seized 18 kg of meat was left on their doorstep by co‑accused without any independent witness. The State opposed the bail. The High Court noted that …
Ayush Mahato, a driver, was arrested on 12 September 2026 under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, Section 11 of the Punishment for Cruelty to Animals Act and Section 109(1) of the BNS Act for allegedly transporting three live cattle for slaughter. The applicant contended that the …
The accused Sulekha applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 600 of 2026) alleging false implication in an FIR dated 05.08.2026. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code indicated that she voluntarily went with the accused and no sexual act was …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Neelesh Kumar and two others who were arrested under Section 2/3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicants argued that they were falsely implicated and pointed to their existing …
Haricharan Yadav applied for bail in a case under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, alleging that he and co‑accused were caught with three cattle for slaughter. The police recovered the cattle and arrested the accused on …
The accused Mohd. Gufran and Mohd. Sufian applied for bail in a case filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. They claimed false implication, noting that one has a prior conviction while the other has no criminal record, and …
The accused Bhura applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 104 of 2026) alleging matrimonial atrocities, forced miscarriage, and assault. He claimed false implication, stating that the FIR was lodged by the victim's father and that there is no definitive medical evidence linking him to the …
Harsh Chauhan, accused under several provisions of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, filed a bail application while already in custody since August 30, 2024. He contended that the police had falsely implicated him and highlighted his extensive criminal history. …
The accused, Prabhushekhar, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 133 of 2026) involving alleged firing of a licensed gun during a property dispute in Etah, Uttar Pradesh. The FIR alleged that he opened fire after a dispute over a plot of land, but the counsel argued that the matter was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed on 30 September 2026 by Mohd. Naushad, who was in custody for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC arising from a 2009 loan fraud involving a property already mortgaged. The applicant argued that the loan of Rs. 4.5 lakh was …
Ajay Chandra Seth, charged under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC for an offence alleged in a 2012 FIR, had been granted bail by the Sessions Court in 2014. The trial court cancelled his bail and issued a non‑bailable warrant because he failed to appear on three consecutive dates, …
The accused, Anwar, was arrested on 28 January 2025 for alleged possession of 1,200 tablets of alprazolam under Section 20 of the NDPS Act, with the recovery made by police officers on petrol duty and without any independent witness. He has eight pending criminal cases, seven of which he is already …
Vikash Sonkar applied for bail in a police‑encounter case (Crime No. 274 of 2025) under Section 109(1) of the BNS and Section 3/25 of the Arms Act. He alleged that the encounter was fabricated, that no police officer was injured while he sustained gunshot wounds and that the recovery of a pistol and …
The accused, Vipin @ Pille, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 344 of 2025) involving a single gunshot injury, alleging that the main role was played by co‑accused Sohel Yadav. The applicant's counsel highlighted that the only criminal history on record was a police encounter arrest, and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pawan Yadav, who was arrested in connection with FIR No. 236 of 2026 alleging assault on two individuals, resulting in simple injuries to one and a fracture to the other. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that the weapon …
The accused, Prakashi, applied for bail in a 1995 case under IPC sections 147, 148, 149 and 307, claiming false implication. He argued that the trial was stayed under a Section 482 application in 1997, the stay was later vacated in 2010, and no process was ever served on him. He surrendered in May …
Alok Patel applied for bail in a NDPS case (Crime No. 113 of 2026) where the FIR alleged that a car carrying 28.362 kg of ganja was intercepted. While four co‑accused were arrested on the spot and later granted bail, Patel was not arrested at the scene and was identified only through their …
The accused Rakam Singh applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 83 of 2026) involving alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 352, 115(2), 109(1), 126(2) and 3(5) of the BNS. The FIR alleged that the complainant was attacked and fired upon while returning from an exam, but the accused’s …
The accused, Sohit Singh, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 194 of 2026) involving alleged assault under Sections 109, 352 and 351(3) of the IPC. He claimed false implication, stating the FIR was lodged belatedly and that the assault was attributed to him only later, while he has no …
The accused Kala @ Umardaraj applied for enlargement of bail in a case under Sections 109(1), 3(5) of the BNS and Sections 3, 5, 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act arising from an incident at Doghat, Baghpat. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that no weapon was recovered, his name was …
Vishnu Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 126 of 2026) involving charges under several IPC sections for allegedly assaulting the informant Bheem Singh and his son Anil with various weapons, resulting in serious head injuries. The prosecution argued that Singh had a specific role …
Himanshu Singh (alias Chotu Singh) applied for bail in a criminal case filed under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He claimed false implication, noting that he was already on bail in two related cases and had a criminal history but was cooperating with …
Mahabeer, an accused under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, applied for bail while in jail since 20‑08‑2026. He claimed false implication and cited his criminal history, noting that he was cooperating with the investigation. The State opposed the bail. …
Surendra, the accused, was charged under Section 238 of the BNS Act, a bailable offence according to the First Schedule of BNSS, 2023. He applied for bail while in custody since 04‑06‑2026, claiming no prior criminal history, despite the trial court rejecting his earlier bail plea. The State opposed …
Manish Bind applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 71 of 2026) under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. He was arrested on 28 August 2026 for allegedly transporting three cattle for slaughter, with the recovery made in …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by accused Siyaram Chero under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, while the trial was pending. The applicant argued that he had been falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record, and …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ravi Nishad, who was arrested in a cyber‑fraud case (Criminal No. 711 of 2026) under sections 318(4), 351(3), 352, 61(2) of the B.N.S. and sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. The applicant’s counsel argued that he was …
Manish applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 538 of 2026) involving alleged firing under Sections 109(1), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The FIR, lodged on 2 June 2026, alleged that Manish and five others surrounded the victim and his friend over a money dispute, with the victim …
Shamshul @ Shulla applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 102 of 2026) filed under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, has no prior criminal record, and has been cooperating …
Rizwan applied for bail in a 2009 case (Crime No. 1482) involving alleged fraud under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471, where he is accused of taking a loan on a property already mortgaged. He had previously been granted bail but failed to appear, leading to his re‑arrest on 14‑09‑2025 and …
Kanhaiya Bind applied for bail under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, claiming he was falsely implicated and has no prior criminal record. He had been in custody since 29‑08‑2026 while the investigation continued. The State opposed the …
The accused Bunty applied for bail in a criminal case involving sections of the IPC and CrPC, alleging false implication in an FIR filed by the victim. He claimed the FIR and medico‑legal report were unduly delayed and that a civil dispute with the victim's father motivated the complaint. The …
The accused Teetu applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 178 of 2024) involving alleged robbery of a woman, with the FIR lodged on 13.07.2024. The prosecution’s case rests solely on a disclosure statement and recovered articles, with no identification parade conducted. The applicant has a substantial …
Mushtaque Alam, an additional director of Shine City, was arrested in connection with alleged fraud and conspiracy offences (IPC sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B) and has been in custody since October 2021. He filed a bail application during the early stage of trial, contending that he was …
The accused Baldev applied for bail in a NDNDPS case (Crime No. 649 of 2025) where he was arrested with 1.2 kg of charas. He argued that the arrest lacked an independent witness and that the mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act had not been complied with, while the trial was at a nascent stage with …
The High Court considered the bail application of Prahalad Singh, who had been granted interim bail on 30 July 2025. The Court noted that despite a specific direction to appear before the Chief Judicial Magistrate by 28 August 2025, the applicant failed to surrender and his whereabouts became …
Emmanual Ebuka, a foreign national, applied for bail in a case under Sections 8, 21, 27, 27A, 29 and 37 of the NDPS Act and Section 14 of the Foreigners Act, alleging that the arrest and seizure of 26.67 kg of crystal and MDMA were conducted without an independent witness, violating mandatory …
The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by foreign national Ifeanyi Johnbosco, who was arrested in connection with a seizure of 26.67 kg of crystal methamphetamine and MDMA under Sections 8, 21, 27, 27A, 29 and 37 of the NDPS Act and Section 14 of the Foreigners Act. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vishwadeepak Bharti (alias Govind) in a criminal case (Crime No. 313 of 2024) involving alleged financial fraud under Sections 319(2), 318(4) and 316(2) of the BNS. The applicant contended that he was merely a cousin of the alleged mastermind, …
Vikram Prasad was arrested in a fraud case (Criminal No. 315 of 2024) alleging duping of an informant of Rs 4.42 crore through D.D. Finance, owned by his cousin Upendra Nath. He is charged under IPC sections 419, 420, 406, 504, 506 and 120‑B and has been in custody since 13‑Oct‑2024 while the trial …
Vishwadeepak Bharti alias Govind applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 315 of 2024) involving alleged cheating, fraud, criminal breach of trust and intimidation under Sections 419, 420, 406, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The FIR alleged that he and co‑accused duped the informant of about Rs 4.42 …
The accused Vishwadeepak Bharti (Govind) and Vikram Prasad applied for bail in a fraud case (Criminal No. 312 of 2024) alleging that they merely received a small credit in their accounts and had no direct involvement in the D.D. Finance scheme run by their cousin Upendra Nath. The FIR alleged duping …
Sugriv Yadav, accused of offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 406 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code, applied for interim bail while the trial was pending. He had been in custody since 4 July 2025 and offered to return Rs.7.5 lakh to the informant as a condition of his release. Both the …
Naveen alias Golu alias Shivraj filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 26908 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The court, on 15 July 2026, granted the applicant a last opportunity to press the bail application and scheduled a further hearing for 6 August 2026. The applicant …
The accused Noor Mohammad applied for bail in a fraud case (Criminal No. 845 of 2024) alleging that he received Rs.12 lakh from the informant for a contract to erect an Airtel tower, of which part was repaid and a cheque later dishonoured. He has 14 criminal cases pending, is on bail in nine, and is …
The applicant, Talib Urf Kamil, filed a bail application in the Allahabad High Court after being acquitted of the charges. The applicant's counsel argued that the bail application had become infructuous because the acquittal rendered it moot. The court examined whether a bail application could …
The accused Sushil Maurya applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 170 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 406, 506 and 120‑B of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that he took money to secure a government job for the informant's son. He has three other criminal cases, …
The accused, Irshad, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 145 of 2026) alleging he was falsely implicated in a delayed FIR for assaulting a woman with bricks, causing multiple injuries including one fatal. He claimed no motive, no prior criminal record, and that the FIR was lodged by his …
The accused, Sushil Maurya, was arrested in Crime No. 03 of 2025 under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 168, 471 and 406 for allegedly taking money to secure a government job for the informant's son, a job that was never provided and the money was not returned. He has three other criminal cases, one of …
The accused, Sajan Singh, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No. 240 of 2026, which arose from an FIR lodged on 1 June 2026 for theft of cash and jewellery. He was later identified through a police disclosure statement after being arrested in an unrelated case. The applicant has a history of …
The accused, Sajjan Singh, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 161 of 2026) involving alleged theft and offences under Sections 331(4), 305(A), 317(2) and 317(4) of the IPC. The FIR was initially lodged against anonymous persons, and the accused was later identified through a …
Ram Ji applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 145 of 2026) under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the BNS, claiming he was falsely implicated. The victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS indicated that she left her parental home voluntarily and that no sexual intercourse or enticement occurred. …
The accused Hazarilal applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 347 of 2025) alleging that he was falsely implicated in an assault on 23 November 2025. He argued that the FIR was lodged more than 20 hours after the incident and the medical report was also delayed, raising doubts about the …
The accused Prem Chandra alias Chhotu and Gulsan Kumar alias Bulbul applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 89 of 2026) under Sections 109(1), 351(3) and 352 of the BNS. They argued that the FIR dated 14 June 2026 was lodged belatedly for an incident that occurred on 13 June 2026 and that …
The accused, Deepi, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 257 of 2026) alleging false implication by the victim's father. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS indicated a consensual relationship with the accused and denied any enticement or sexual intercourse. The State …
The accused Sunil Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 492 of 2026) involving alleged assault on an informant and her husband, with injuries reported. The applicant argued that the FIR was filed due to a family property dispute, that he himself suffered an injury, and that he had …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Abhishek Yadav, who was charged under Sections 109(1), 61(2) and 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code in connection with a shooting incident in Deoria. The prosecution alleged that Yadav had called the victim, Prakash Yadav, to a park where co‑accused …
Surjeet Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 150 of 2026) filed under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the BNS. He contended that the FIR, lodged by the victim's father, falsely implicated him for enticement, and the victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS affirmed that she voluntarily …
The accused Shekhar applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 370 of 2026) involving offences under several IPC sections, including assault and grievous hurt. He argued that he was not named in the FIR and that the investigation only implicated him through a vague statement, with no specific role …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Tushar Kumar, accused in a case involving alleged assault over a property dispute, where the FIR listed several violent offences under the IPC. The applicant argued that the injuries to the victims were simple, he had no prior criminal record, …
The accused, Adesh, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 167 of 2026) involving charges under Sections 190, 191(2), 115(2), 109(1), 352 and 351(3) of the BNS. The dispute arose from a village quarrel over garbage dumping, leading to a cross‑fight on 14 August 2026 in which both parties …
The accused Shadab was arrested for alleged assault with a knife under several IPC sections, including 109, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 191(2) and 118(1). He claimed that the informant and he belong to the same family and that a compromise had been reached, with the informant expressing no desire to …
Savitri applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 101 of 2026) under Sections 87, 137(2), 142 and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that she was implicated only because photographs from her mobile phone linked her brother Shivanshu to an alleged enticement of a minor. She claimed no …
The accused, Anil Kumar Singh Yadav, sought bail in a criminal case involving sections of the Indian Penal Code relating to fraud and forgery, alleging that the FIR lodged by Shashank Bajpai was false and stemmed from a commercial dispute over a sub‑tender. The applicant contended that no sub‑tender …
Yogesh Rana applied for bail in a case under Section 137(2) of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4(2) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, alleging sexual assault of a 14‑year‑old. The FIR was lodged by the victim’s brother, but during trial the informant and the victim turned …
Ajay was arrested in connection with an FIR alleging that he, along with two others, abducted Rohit over a money dispute. He has been in custody since 04‑06‑2026 and filed a bail application under CrPC provisions. The State opposed bail but did not dispute the factual background. The Court examined …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Deepak Kumar Urf Nati, who was arrested in connection with an assault case (Crime No. 429 of 2025) involving alleged injuries to Bhagwati Prasad. The FIR, dated 08‑12‑2025, named four accused including the applicant, but did not assign any …
Shivam Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 137 of 2026) involving charges under several IPC sections for an alleged assault on 10 April 2026. He claimed he was falsely implicated by the informant, Shivam Gupta, and that the incident was a simple altercation without intent to murder, …
Monu @ Mohan applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 217 of 2026) arising from an FIR dated 4 July 2026 alleging assault on 3 July 2026. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that affidavits of the injured and informant denied any role by him, and that no specific allegation …
The accused, Saidan Ansari, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 378 of 2026) under Sections 318(4), 317(4) of the IPC and Section 66D of the IT Act, alleging that his bank account was misused by a villager named Shahid who paid a nominal fee for its use. He contended that he is a victim …
The accused, Sameer Ansari, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 378 of 2026) involving alleged cyber fraud under Sections 318(4), 317(4) of the IPC and Section 66D of the IT Act. He contended that his bank account was misused by a villager named Shahid, who paid him Rs.500 and used the …
Suraj Tiwari applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 185 of 2026) involving alleged assault with a knife under several sections of the BNS. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated due to village politics and argued that the medico‑legal report did not corroborate the injuries alleged …
The accused Vikas Thakur applied for bail in an abduction case (CrPC Sec. 140(1) & 61(2)(a)) alleging false implication. The FIR alleged that he, along with two others, assaulted and abducted the complainant, but the victim later released him with villagers' indulgence and only simple injuries were …
The accused, Pulkit Chaudhary, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 370 of 2026) involving alleged assault with an iron rod, for which the FIR named four other persons but not him. He argued that he was implicated only due to a family relationship and that no specific act was attributed to …
The accused Deepak applied for bail in a case under Sections 109(1), 118(1) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code relating to an alleged assault on two injured persons. The FIR, lodged by the mother of one injured, alleged that Deepak and another person assaulted the victims, but the defence argued …
The accused, Khurshed, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 196 of 2025) alleging assault with a sharp-edged weapon. He argued that the FIR filed on 21‑07‑2025 was false, that the injuries were caused by a blunt object, and that he has no prior criminal record. The State and the informant …
The applicant, Vinod Bharti, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 4210 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for a status of trial on 9 July 2026, and a report dated 25 July 2026 indicated that the applicant had already been convicted in the case. Because …
The applicant, Afsaar, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 20686 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court seeking release from custody. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, opposed the bail. The Court had earlier, on 09 July 2026, ordered a status …
Vikas alias Maddy applied for bail in a criminal matter before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on his behalf. The Court had earlier ordered a status report of the trial, which revealed that the trial court had recorded a conviction based on the accused's confession. Since a conviction …
Shahrukh alias Tutu filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant's counsel, Sri Shashwat Srivastava, sought to withdraw the bail application. The State's counsel, G.A., was present. The court entertained the request to withdraw and dismissed the bail …
The applicant, Pankaj, filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 18506 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. The court issued notices and listed the matter, seeking the trial status, but the applicant failed to appear on the scheduled dates. The State’s Additional Government Advocate …
The accused, Dasrath Nandan, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 109 and 352 of the BNS, alleging that the FIR was lodged belatedly and that the incident description was inconsistent. He claimed the assault allegation was false, highlighted a change in the reported location of the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Upkar alias Jhalak in Criminal Case No. 772 of 2026, where the FIR dated 15‑07‑2026 described an assault on four persons but did not name the applicant. The applicant argued that he was not mentioned in the FIR, that his identification was made …
The accused Ajab Singh and Ramji Lal applied for bail in a case under Sections 109(1), 115(2) and 352 of the BNS, alleging they were implicated in an assault involving knives on two injured persons. The informant’s brother filed the FIR, claiming the accused surrounded and assaulted the victims with …
The accused Karan Saini applied for bail in a case involving alleged assault under several IPC sections, claiming false implication and that the injuries were minor except one grievous fracture. The informant alleged that the accused and others assaulted them with an iron rod and a sharp-edged …
The accused Ratan Gupta applied for bail in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 31931 of 2026, relating to Case Crime No. 410 of 2024 under Sections 115(2), 109, 228 and 3(5) of the BNS. He argued that the FIR dated 26‑11‑2024 was filed late, that his name was derived only from the sister’s …
The accused, Ashok Yadav, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 385 of 2026) alleging assault with an iron rod that allegedly caused injuries, including eye damage, to the victim Amrendra. The applicant claimed false implication and argued that the injuries were not of a magnitude to …
Harphool applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 25 of 2026) under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the BNS, alleging false implication for an enticement charge. The victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS indicated that she voluntarily left her home, married the accused, and that no sexual …
The applicant, Ajay Kashyap, was arrested in connection with an assault case (Crime No. 148 of 2026) after a CCTV footage and victim's statement identified him, although his name was absent from the original FIR filed on 4‑April‑2026. He has a modest criminal record and has been in custody since …
The accused, Raghunandan, sought enlargement of bail in a criminal complaint (Case No. 211 of 2023) alleging offences under Sections 493, 504 and 506 of the IPC, arising from a dispute with the complainant over a cohabitation‑marriage relationship. The complainant had initially filed an application …
The accused, Jayabul, was arrested in connection with an FIR dated 08.08.2025 alleging enticement of a minor. He contended that the victim’s statement under Section 183 indicated he merely called her and she voluntarily went to Delhi, and that he had no prior criminal record. The State opposed bail, …
The accused, Kamal, filed a bail application in Criminal Case No. 89 of 2026, alleging that he was not named in the FIR dated 17‑04‑2026 filed by the victim's father for alleged enticement. He further submitted that the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS showed she voluntarily went …
The applicant Sunaina Vishwakarma sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 278 of 2026) alleging assault on the mother of an informant, resulting in a fracture of the temporal and parietal bones. The FIR, lodged on 2 August 2026, named six accused, but two were later exonerated; the applicant …
The accused Shailesh Singh applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 185 of 2026) involving alleged assault with a kulhari, iron rod and a country‑made pistol, resulting in six injuries, one of which was grievous. The FIR was lodged two years after the incident, and the applicant claimed political …
The accused, Anoop Katiyar, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 56 of 2025) under Section 229(2) of the CrPC, alleging false implication in an abduction‑ransom investigation involving his relative Harish Katiyar. He contended that three FIRs were filed on the same incident, and he had …
The accused Iliyas applied for bail in Criminal Case No. 103 of 2026, charged under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 191(2), 191(3), 351(3) and 352 of the BNS. He alleged that the FIR dated 11‑07‑2026 was false, arising from a cross‑fight over cleaning a drain outside a mosque, with injuries on both …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sunil Singh, accused in a case under Sections 118(2), 109(1), 351(3) and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly assaulting two brothers with a kulhari and exhorting co‑accused to kill them. The State opposed bail, emphasizing the serious …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu Yadav, who was arrested in connection with an assault case (Crime No. 110 of 2026) involving multiple IPC offences. The applicant claimed false implication, noting that the FIR listed seven accused without assigning a specific role to him …
The accused Vinod applied for bail in a case involving offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 131, 118(1), 351(3) and 109(1) IPC arising from a family dispute that led to a cross‑fight on 1 August 2026, injuring both parties. The FIR was lodged by the informant, who is the wife of the accused’s …
The accused, Roshan Yadav, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 219 of 2026) alleging assault with an iron rod that resulted in serious injuries, including a claimed linear fracture of the left temporal bone. He contended that the FIR was filed belatedly, that the medical evidence was …
The accused Ajay applied for bail in criminal case No. 229 of 2026, charged under Section 137(2) for alleged enticement of a 17‑year‑old girl. The FIR was lodged by the victim’s father on the same day the girl left home, but the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the Evidence Act indicated that …
The accused Anurage applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 135 of 2026) under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the CrPC, alleging that the FIR for enticement was filed by the victim's father and that the victim’s statement under Section 183 indicated no enticement or sexual intercourse. The …
Vineet applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 191 of 2025) arising from an FIR dated 07.05.2025 filed by the victim's mother alleging enticement. The victim, in a statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS, testified that she visited a friend's house of her own volition and does not know the …
The applicant Kala @ Rihan sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 148 of 2026) involving alleged assault on the informant's son Amit on 3 April 2026. The FIR, lodged on 4 April 2026, initially named four persons and an anonymous individual, but did not name the applicant; identification was later …
The applicant Vishal was arrested in connection with FIR No. 316 of 2026 alleging enticement, filed by the victim's mother. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the Evidence Act indicated a consensual relationship with the applicant, denying any enticement or sexual intercourse. The …
Meena Kumari applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 0249 of 2026) involving sections 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3), 352 and 61(2) of the Indian Penal Code. She claimed she was falsely implicated based on a co‑accused’s statement and that the FIR was lodged by the injured’s daughter against …
Priyanshu, accused in FIR dated 17.03.2026 under Sections 137(2) and 87 BNS for alleged enticement, applied for bail while the trial is pending. He contended that the FIR was false and that the victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the CrPC shows a consensual relationship with no sexual …
Prashant Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. His counsel, Surendra Singh, sought to withdraw the application, stating that the provisions of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act had been initiated and a fresh bail application …
The accused Nandkishor applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 156 of 2026) alleging assault on the informant's family members, resulting in injuries including a fatal fracture to Kailash. The prosecution argued that the injuries were severe and that a co-accused had used an iron rod, seeking denial …
The accused, Satish Jayswal, applied for bail in a case arising from a road‑traffic accident alleged to have caused grievous injuries under Sections 115(2), 351(2), 352 and 109 of the IPC. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was lodged by a relative with whom he has a dispute, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay alias Himanshu, who was arrested in a criminal case (Crime No. 172 of 2026) under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated by the victim’s mother and relied on a victim’s statement recorded under …
The accused Gautam applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 674 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352 of the IPC and Sections 4, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. He contended that he was falsely implicated after the informant, Sabir Ali, added his name eight days …
Anis Saqlaini applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 492 of 2025) involving multiple serious offences under the BNS. The FIR, lodged on 27 September 2025, named 15 persons and 450 anonymous individuals, but did not specifically name Saqlaini. He was alleged to have attended a meeting on 19 …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Lucky Saini, accused under Sections 109(1) and 3(5) BNS for a firearm assault on Navin Khanna. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the actual firing was done by co‑accused Dhruv Dhawan and that a monetary dispute …
Bhoop Narayan was arrested in connection with FIR dated 23.06.2026 lodged by the victim's father alleging enticement. The victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS indicated she went with the accused voluntarily and no wrongdoing occurred. The accused, having no prior criminal record, had been in …
Surendra Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 98 of 2026) involving alleged assault under Sections 109, 115(2), 117(2) and 352 of the BNS. The FIR, lodged two days after the incident, alleged that the accused assaulted the informant's wife with weapons, causing multiple grievous …
The accused Goldee Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 772 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 115, 351, 109, 191 and 352 of the Indian Penal Code, arising from an alleged assault and firing incident on 14 July 2026. The FIR named four persons, including Kumar, as …
The accused, Radhey Shyam, applied for bail in a criminal case under IPC Sections 109(1), 3(5) and 117(2) arising from a delayed FIR dated 01‑06‑2026. He claimed false implication, stating the FIR was lodged by the victim's brother against two other persons and that his name was added only after a …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gaurav Singh, who was in custody for offences under Sections 305(a), 317(2) and 331(3) of the Indian Penal Code arising from an alleged theft. The applicant argued that his name was identified only through a co‑accused’s statement and that he has …
The accused, Imran @ Romiyo, applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 565 of 2025) involving alleged assault with a knife and a blunt object under several IPC sections. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that the assault resulted from sudden provocation, and that the injuries to the two …
The accused Tanveer applied for enlargement of bail in a pending trial under Section 307 IPC (case No. 383 of 2019) alleging false police implication in an encounter with no injury to police. He had previously been granted bail in 2019 but could not appear due to the Covid‑19 pandemic and …
The accused, Angira Devi, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 187 of 2026) alleging false implication in an FIR filed by a victim's brother. She contended that the alleged victims were friends who voluntarily accompanied her and that there was no injury, as shown by the medical report, …
The accused Rijwan applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 94 of 2026) involving an alleged robbery of a cash‑laden van during an ATM cash‑loading operation. He claimed he was falsely implicated and that the only evidence against him was a confessional statement of a co‑accused, with no other material …
The accused Tinku applied for bail in a Section 307 IPC case (Crime No. 881 of 2015) alleging false implication in an FIR dated 06-11-2015. He surrendered on 27-07-2026 after learning of the trial and has been in custody since then, while the other co‑accused have already been released on bail. The …
The accused, Virendra (also known as Chhote), applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 363 and 366 IPC, with the bail petition filed under Sections 137(2) and 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He claimed he was falsely implicated, asserting that the victim’s mother’s statement under …
The accused Bhanu Pratap Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 82 of 2026) alleging that his name was only mentioned in the statement of a co‑accused and that there is no other material linking him to the alleged siphoning of funds. The FIR, lodged by a bank manager, did not name him, …
The accused Shyam @ Atendra applied for bail in a case under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109 and 131 of the BNS, alleging false implication in a FIR dated 27‑07‑2026. The FIR alleged an assault involving his brother and father, resulting in minor injuries without any bony fracture. The applicant …
The accused Ravi applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 112 of 2026) involving alleged assault and grievous injuries under IPC sections 109, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 3(5) BNS. The FIR was lodged by Chandini Pal a day after the incident, accusing four persons of breaking into her house and …
The accused Mukesh Kumar, Edal Singh (alias Yashveer Singh) and Arvind Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 214 of 2025) involving alleged assault with an axe and resulting injuries. They contended that the FIR dated 19 July 2025 was false, arising from a family dispute over garbage …
Lucky Singh, the accused in Crime No. 267 of 2026, filed a bail application claiming he was falsely implicated in an assault case involving injuries to several persons. The FIR alleged that a group, including the accused, assaulted the informant and his relatives, but the medical report indicated …
Arif applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 823 of 2015) involving alleged cheating with forged gold bars under IPC sections 419, 420, 392, 342, 504 and 506. The FIR, lodged on 26‑11‑2015, alleged that Arif transported the informant to the co‑accused but claimed he had no knowledge of the …
The accused Shahabaj applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 417 of 2026) alleging false implication. He argued that the victim’s statement under Section 183 of the CrPC showed she voluntarily visited his house and no wrongdoing occurred, and that he has no prior criminal record. The State …
Dinesh Yadav was arrested in connection with an FIR alleging that he took Rs 17 lakhs from a relative for a land‑sale transaction. He contended that the allegation was false, that there was no evidence of any money being deposited in his bank account, and that he had no prior criminal record. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by accused Asraf and Israfil Ali in a case under several IPC sections for alleged assault on the husband of an informant and his relatives. The applicants argued they were falsely implicated, had no specific role in the assault, and possessed no …
The accused Rajesh @ Raju was arrested in connection with FIR No. dated 10.08.2026 alleging assault on the informant's mother, resulting in seven injuries. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, had no specific role, no prior criminal record, and was cooperating with the …
Jafar @ Raman Kaliya applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 389 of 2026) alleging he opened fire on police, though no police were injured. He claimed false implication and highlighted his extensive criminal history with 33 pending cases, 30 of which he was already on bail. The State opposed the bail, …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Devendra, accused in a case involving offences under Sections 191, 118, 117, 115, 352 and 109 of the BNS, relating to alleged assault and grievous injury to the informant's son. The applicant contended that the FIR was lodged belatedly and that …
The applicant, Sandeep, was implicated in an FIR dated 4 May 2026 for an assault that resulted in six injuries, two of which were grievous, to the injured Dheeraj. The FIR alleges that co‑accused Ravi called Sandeep’s son, leading to a sudden fight in which Dheeraj used a lathi, danda and sariya; no …
Shakeel alias Hazi Bona applied for bail in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, alleging false police implication. His first bail plea was dismissed, but he relied on a recent Supreme Court judgment (Shiv Pratap Singh Alias Chinu …
The accused Neelam applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 114 of 2026) involving alleged abduction and injury under Sections 126(2), 140(1), 115(2) and 351(3) of the BNS. The FIR, filed a day after the alleged incident, was claimed to be false and motivated by a land dispute, and the accused …
The accused, Saharuddin, applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 188 of 2026) involving alleged assault with a sharp-edged weapon under Sections 115(2), 118(2), 109(1), 352 and 351(3) of the BNS. The FIR alleges a land‑dispute‑related attack on the informant and his family, resulting in …
Smt. Mausam filed an application to cancel the bail of the accused (opposite party no.2) in a criminal case alleging that the accused was pressurising her to compromise and thereby threatening the trial. The application relied on sections of the BNS Act, the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act, but no …
Yogesh applied for bail in a kidnapping case (Criminal No. 278 of 2026) where a child was recovered after his alleged involvement. The prosecution alleged that Yogesh and a co‑accused were apprehended in a police encounter and that police personnel sustained injuries. Yogesh contended that the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vinod Kumar, who was arrested in connection with an alleged assault over a Rs.400 dispute during a marriage ceremony. The FIR alleged that the accused, along with others, used lathi, danda, kulhari and baluwa, causing grievous injuries to one …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Himanshu, accused in a case (Crime No. 498 of 2026) involving alleged assault on a traffic police constable. The FIR alleged that the accused, while riding a motorcycle, hurled abuses and assaulted the constable, causing a head …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Ritik, accused in a case under several IPC sections including assault and attempted murder. The FIR alleged that Ritik, as a pillion rider, assaulted a traffic police constable who was pursuing him, causing minor head injury. The …
Chandra Prakash Gupta was arrested in connection with an FIR dated 18‑06‑2026 alleging dowry demands, matrimonial atrocities and assault leading to a miscarriage, filed by his wife. The applicant contended that the FIR was false, filed after a three‑month delay, and that a doctor’s report showed no …
The accused Guruvachan was arrested on 13‑12‑2024 in connection with FIR No. filed on 06‑12‑2024 alleging offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 117(3) of the Indian Penal Code, including assault with a knife that resulted in the victim losing part of his ear. The victim and his wife initially …
The accused Keshav Ram @ Manjesh applied for bail in a kidnapping case (Crime No. 278 of 2026) while the trial is pending. He was implicated based solely on a co-accused Uttam Bajpai’s statement linking him to other child‑trafficking cases, which are not part of the present charge. The State argued …
The accused Praveen Kumar Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 58 of 2012) pending trial for offences under Sections 363 and 366 IPC. He alleged false implication, that no arrest had been made earlier, and that the complainant withdrew the complaint after the victim married. He …
The accused, Rajdeep Kumar, owner of a cricket ground, was arrested in connection with an assault on Rahul Singh that allegedly occurred when the ground was not vacated after the booked time. The FIR, filed on 27‑02‑2026, named four persons and an anonymous individual, and the accused faced multiple …
The accused Mahaveer applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 356 of 2026) involving alleged assault with lathi and danda, filed under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 61(2) and 109(1) of the BNS. He claimed false implication, citing a belated FIR and an old enmity with the victims, and highlighted his …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Indal Singh and Shailendra (Sheru) in a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences such as assault, grievous hurt and criminal conspiracy. The applicants alleged that they were falsely implicated in an FIR dated 19 July 2026, which arose from …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Anuj Nath Paswan, accused in a case of alleged assault on a minor (Sonu) under multiple sections of the BNS. The applicant claimed false implication, citing inconsistencies in the FIR, lack of a medical examination on the primary victim, and the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Fareed @ Kala, who was alleged to be falsely implicated in a FIR dated 04‑04‑2026 relating to an injury incident on 03‑04‑2026. The applicant argued that he was not named in the original FIR, that the informant’s statement had …
The accused Gautam applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 155 of 2024) involving charges under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 325 and 308, arising from an alleged assault on his uncle/nephew that resulted in two injuries, one a skull fracture, and the subsequent death of the injured party. The applicant …
The accused, Devashish Nigam, applied for bail in a case under sections 115(2), 352, 109(1) and 117(2) of the BNS, alleging he assaulted a 38‑year‑old woman with a brick. The FIR was lodged by the victim's brother, but the medical report showed only minor injuries and the victim’s statement was …
The accused Rinku @ Rahul was arrested in connection with an FIR dated 21.07.2026 alleging enticement of a 17‑year‑old girl, a charge filed by the victim's father. The victim’s statements recorded under Sections 180 and 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code were found to be inconsistent, and the …
The applicant Jitendra Singh filed a bail cancellation application (No. 330 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court, seeking to cancel his interim bail. Counsel for the applicant argued that the application had become infructuous because the bail had already been granted finally. The court examined …
The accused, Satyajeet Yadav @ Virat Singh, applied for bail in a counterfeiting case (Cr. No. 182 of 2026) alleging false implication by police. He claimed the seized printers were not examined by a forensic lab, the arrest occurred without independent witnesses, and he has no prior criminal …
The appellants Hetram, Shanker and Bhudat were convicted by the Sessions Court for rape under Section 376 IPC based on testimonies of three eyewitnesses and a medical report that showed no injuries. They appealed under Section 374 CrPC, arguing that the FIR was delayed, witness statements were …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ravindra Kumar Nirmal under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR No. 0087 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 186, 323, 332, 353, 447, 504 and 506. The applicant argued that …
Shajiya Parveen, a housewife, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case (Crime No. 358 of 2024) involving alleged fraud and multiple IPC offences (420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506). She claimed she was falsely implicated as the wife of the co‑accused whose husband …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 CrPC by Bidura Digal, who was implicated in an NDPS case involving 42 kg of ganja. The applicant argued false implication, lack of independent witness during arrest, and asserted no criminal history, …
The accused, Mukesh Kumar, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in connection with a criminal complaint (No. 13108 of 2024) involving sections 74, 75, 115(2) and 351(2) of the BNS. The applicant later sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition and instead file …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Asif in a case registered as Crime No. 131 of 2026, alleging offences under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 317(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant claimed he was …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Istakhar @ Taro and his son in a case alleging assault with lathi and danda under Sections 115(2), 352, 333 and 351(3) of the BNSS. The applicants argued that they had no prior criminal …
The accused, Mohd Kadir, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2) of the BNS and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act. The applicant had not approached the …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Ikram @ Kale, who was named in an FIR under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act as a supplier of cattle meat. The applicant claimed false …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Sandeep Kumar, who was alleged to have participated in indiscriminate firing during a panchayat election rivalry. The applicant claimed false implication, no injury, and lack of criminal …
The applicant, Mo Zakariya, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 110 of the IPC arising from a property dispute and alleged assault. The applicant argued that he had not been arrested, had no …
The appellant Bhola was convicted under Section 394 IPC for robbery and sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment. He appealed, contending that he was falsely implicated, that the FIR was delayed, and that the witnesses were unreliable. The trial court had relied on the testimonies of the …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by Shamshad Ahamad, who was implicated in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged against …
Arshad Alias Adwani filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant was represented by counsel Rizwan Ullah Siddiqui, while the State was represented by G.A. The counsel for the applicant submitted that the …
The applicants, Mukesh Chauhan and three others, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a criminal case involving multiple offences. The High Court noted that the applicants had not approached the Sessions Court for anticipatory bail and sought to withdraw the …
Gayatri Devi filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving offences under Sections 384, 506 and 420 of the IPC. While seeking anticipatory bail, she later requested to withdraw the application and instead move a regular bail application …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Bhagawani Devi, who was implicated in an FIR alleging a cross‑fight that resulted in injuries under Sections 325 and 307 IPC. The applicant claimed false implication, low flight risk, and …
The applicant, Mithilesh Kumar Das, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B of the IPC. He claimed false implication in an FIR filed by the Mahant of an Ashram, …
The applicant, Rakesh Kumar Katiyar, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS in a case stemming from a 2010 FIR alleging fraud in the issuance of licences for petrol, diesel and gas agencies. The FIR named 21 persons, with the primary alleged perpetrators being two directors, Dinesh …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Vijaypal in Crime No. 624 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 351(3), 352, 131, 340(2), 336(3), 338 and 318(4) of the BNS relating to a disputed agricultural land transaction. The …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Rakesh Kumar and Jaiprakash, who were accused in a 2018 FIR for alleged forgery of income certificates to claim a government scheme. The applicants argued they were falsely implicated, had no …
The applicant Mahendra Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a case (Crime No. 1012 of 2018) involving alleged offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471. He claimed false implication, stating that the FIR was based on a forged will and that he was …
