Created by Fuzzy Cloud

AVNISH SAXENA

273 judgments · newest first · showing 201–273

GOPAL PODDERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Gopal Podder, filed an anticipatory bail application in a case registered in 2013 under IPC sections 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 120‑B and 471 relating to alleged misappropriation of funds of Ramela Industries. The FIR alleged that the applicant was running the business and had diverted …

RAHULversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Rahul under Section 482 of the BNSS in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109, 191(2) and 191(3). Rahul claimed he was falsely implicated in a cross‑fight incident and had no prior …

SUFIYA BANOversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Sufiya Bano, a teacher at a madarsa, was implicated in an FIR filed on 12‑02‑2025 alleging misappropriation of grant funds and related offences under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. She applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, asserting no prior criminal record, no …

ARUN KUMAR SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants, Arun Kumar Singh and Tej Bahadur Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in connection with FIR No. 584 of 2025 alleging they took Rs. 15.95 lakh from an informant for a railway contract that was not delivered. They claimed false implication, no …

DINESH JAINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Dinesh Jain under Section 482 of the BNSS in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 7 of 2025) involving alleged fraud under Section 318(4) BNS and Section 66D of the IT Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, was …

RAJ DHAKRE @ HARI OM SINGH DHAKREversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Raj Dhakre, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a criminal case involving multiple IPC offences. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead file a regular bail application before the …

ANIL KUMAR VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Anil Kumar Verma, who was implicated in a FIR alleging fraud in Army recruitment under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 406. The applicant claimed false implication, had no criminal …

LAXMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant Laxman, named in an FIR filed on 26‑02‑2026 for alleged stone‑pelting and firing in a village clash, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code and related provisions, fearing arrest while the investigation continued. The State opposed the bail, arguing …

DAUJI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The accused filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in Crime No. 180 of 2026, invoking Sections 115(2), 351(2) and 76 of the BNS. After hearing, the applicants sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition and instead file a regular bail application before the trial …

SURAJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Suraj, who alleged false implication in a motorcycle theft case. The applicant, a mechanic, claimed that co‑accused statements were the sole basis for his involvement and highlighted his low flight risk …

SANTOSH KUMAR SAROJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Santosh Kumar Saroj, who was implicated in a case alleging attempts to convert Hindus to Christianity under the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021. The FIR, lodged …

MOHAMMAD AMEENversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Mohammad Ameen, who was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 563 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 419, 420 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant argued that the FIR was false and …

ABHISHEK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Abhishek Kumar, who was implicated in a FIR alleging he paid money to secure a government job and was charged with offences under Sections 419, 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, …

SITARAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Sitaram and another in connection with a criminal complaint arising from a property dispute. The FIR alleged offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B, …

ISRAWATI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Israwati and two others in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 110, 115(2), 352, 351(3) and 117(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants argued that there …

BHUDEVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Bhudev filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a case (Crime No. 103 of 2020) involving alleged offences under Sections 323, 504 and 308 IPC. He argued that he had not been arrested, the FIR was a counter‑blast, there was no fatal injury, and he had no …

LAIKRAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Laikram, who was implicated in a case (Crime No. 103 of 2020) involving offences under Sections 323, 504 and 308 of the IPC. The applicant argued that he had not been arrested, had no criminal …

MANOJ NIGAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

Manoj Nigam applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS in a criminal case (Crime No. 13 of 2026) alleging offences under IPC sections 420, 504 and 506. He claimed he was falsely implicated because the FIR stemmed from a disputed sale agreement involving his deceased mother, Manorma …

SANTOSH KUMAR GAUDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Santosh Kumar Gaud, who was implicated in a case under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 for alleged cow slaughter. The applicant argued …

PRADEEP ARORAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Pradeep Arora, was implicated in an FIR dated 13‑09‑2021 under Sections 63 and 65 of the Copyright Act, 1957 for allegedly possessing 53 pairs of counterfeit footwear. No arrest was made during the investigation and a charge‑sheet has already been filed. Fearing arrest, the applicant …

DEVENDR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Devendr and Naresh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 307, 324, 504 and 506 IPC. The FIR originally implicated a co‑accused, Satyapal, but the injured witness later altered his statement to allege …

SANGEETA DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Sangeeta Devi and two others in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 109, 333, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code arising from a …

SHAVEJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Shavej, was implicated in an NDPS case (sections 8, 21 and 29) based solely on the statement of a co‑accused who was caught with 50 g of cannabis. Shavej, who has a criminal record of 13 cases (mostly robbery) but no prior NDPS offence, contended that he was falsely implicated and …

SUBHAN ALIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Subhan Ali under Section 438 of the CrPC in a case arising from alleged violations of Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, where a supply inspector seized 15 empty gas cylinders from his shop. The …

JAGDISH ALIAS SETHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under CrPC Section 482 filed by Jagdish alias Sethi, who alleged false implication in an FIR dated 17‑08‑2001 involving offences under IPC Sections 147, 324, 353, 504, 224, 225 and 307. The applicant had not been served with any summons, …

RAJU CHAUHAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Raju Chauhan and two others, who alleged false implication in an FIR alleging assault over a land dispute. The applicants argued they had no criminal record, were not arrested, and feared …

CHATRAPALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Chatrapal in a case involving alleged robbery and murder offences (Sections 303(2), 317(2), 3(5) IPC). The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated due to enmity with …

MOHAMMAD NAZIMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Mohammad Nazim, who was implicated in a case under the Cow Slaughter and Prevention Act, 1955 (sections 3, 5Ka, 5Kha, 8) and IPC sections 427 and 307. The FIR dated …

CHANDAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC by Chandan Singh, who was implicated in a case (Crime No. 931 of 2018) involving alleged offences under Sections 409, 417, 120‑B IPC and 66‑C of the IT Act, arising from a complaint under the …

PRINCE KUMAR @ CHHOTUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Prince Kumar @ Chhotu in connection with FIR No. 266 of 2025 alleging illegal mining and offences under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 109(1), 132, 3(5) of the BNS and the Prevention of Damages to …

SANJAY BOBBY DESHWALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sanjay Bobby Deshwal under Section 482 of the CrPC in a cyber‑fraud case (Crime No. 19 of 2024). The FIR alleged that the applicant, a landlord, was linked to a fraudulent transaction involving Rs. 57,89,776 transferred to …

NEETESH JATAV @ NITESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Neetesh Jatav, who alleged false implication in a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Gangster Act. The applicant argued that he was on bail in related gang‑chart cases, that the gang leader …

JITENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Jitendra, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a criminal case involving alleged offences under Sections 117(1), 126(2), 110, 191(3), 191(2) and 190 of the IPC. While the application was pending, the applicant’s counsel sought to withdraw the …

KRISHNversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in connection with multiple charges including Sections 191, 190, 61, 109, 130, 115, 352, 351, 324, 110 of the BNSS and Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel sought to …

HIMANSHUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Himanshu, who claimed false implication in an FIR alleging assault with lathi‑danda and iron rod. The applicant, who has three prior criminal cases (two pending, one resulting in conviction), sought …

OMPALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bihar Narcotic and Smuggling Act (BNSS) by the accused Ompal in a case involving alleged assault with lathi-danda resulting in injuries. The applicant claimed false implication and sought bail to …

ANIL GAUR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Anil Gaur and two others who were named in an FIR for a stone‑pelting clash in Hathras. The applicants disclosed modest criminal histories but asserted they had no role in the incident and were …

RANJEET CHAURASIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Ranjeet Chaurasiya, who was alleged to be involved in liquor smuggling and charged under Sections 317(2), 341(2) of the BNSS and the Arms Act. The applicant claimed false implication, no prior criminal …

SABIR HUSAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sabir Husain, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in a complaint case involving alleged offences under Sections 323, 506 and 406 of the IPC. After hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and …

VIPIN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Vipin Singh under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, along with provisions of the BNS Act and the U.P. Social Examination Ordinance, 2024. The applicant alleged that he was falsely implicated for allegedly giving …

SANJAY YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants, Sanjay Yadav and Yadraam Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act concerning alleged adulteration of biodiesel. They claimed false implication by the …

PRAVEEN KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Praveen Kumar Gupta, who was implicated in a FIR for alleged trade tax evasion and charged under IPC sections 420, 467 and 468. The applicant argued that the FIR was false, that the case had …

ANKIT DUBEYversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ankit Dubey under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case alleging fraud in medical college admissions. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had no prior criminal record, and was …

SANDEEPversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving alleged fraud and a dishonoured cheque. The applicant, Sandeep, claimed he was falsely implicated as the brother of the main accused and had no prior …

TARIFversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The accused filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangster Act. During the hearing, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead move a regular bail application …

MAHAVEERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Mahaveer, who was implicated in a case (Crime No. 103 of 2020) involving alleged offences under Sections 323, 504 and 308 of the IPC. The applicant argued that he had not been arrested, had …

GULAM SABERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Gulam Saber under Section 482 CrPC in connection with a case under Sections 8, 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated based on statements of co‑accused who had been arrested with …

MADAN SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Madan Singh, who faced charges under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 131, 109(1), 352 and 351(3) in a case arising from alleged indiscriminate firing during a harvest. The applicant argued …

DEVESH @ MONUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Devesh @ Monu, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in BNSS No. 4280 of 2026 against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The victim's statement was recorded under Section 183, after which the applicant's counsel sought to withdraw the bail …

AMAAN HUSSAINversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Amaan Hussain, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Subsequently, the applicant’s counsel sought to withdraw the application. The court considered whether a pending anticipatory bail application could …

ANKIT @ GULLUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Ankit @ Gullu, who was named in an FIR for robbery, assault and related offences after a six‑day delay. The applicant claimed false implication and asserted no prior criminal record, while …

VINODversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Vinod sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS in a case arising from a 2015 incident where he was initially not charge‑sheeted but later summoned after a witness altered his statement to implicate Vinod. The prosecution argued that the applicant was the principal …

KARAMVEER SINGH @ TINKU SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Karamveer Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a criminal case pending trial. He later sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application and instead move a regular bail application before the trial court, requesting protection of his …

REKHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Rekha, who was implicated in a case under the Cow Slaughter Act (sections 3, 5A, 5B, 8) and the Animal Cruelty Act (section 11) for allegedly transporting ten cattle. The FIR was lodged on 5 April 2026 …

VIVEK KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Vivek Kumar, who was implicated in an FIR alleging he allowed another person to sit for his D.L.Ed. examination. The applicant claimed false implication, had no prior criminal record, and had …

SUNAHERI LAL (SUB INSPECTOR) AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad heard an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS filed by Sub‑Inspector Sunaheri Lal and five others, who were charged under Section 395 IPC for an alleged offence in Sahavar, Kasganj. The applicants, through counsel, sought to withdraw the …

SARVESH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Sarvesh Yadav, who is charged under Sections 2(b)(i) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant argued that he has several pending cases in which he is already on bail and fears …

RAHUL SAXENAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rahul Saxena, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS in a criminal case (Crime No. 328 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 191(2), 109(1), 308(5), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. While the application was pending, the applicant’s counsel …

DEVESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Devesh Kumar, who was implicated in a narcotics case (Crime No. 185 of 2025) under Sections 8, 15(C), 25 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely …

TEJMANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Tejman in a case involving alleged gold‑loan fraud, with charges under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated by a …

LAVKUSHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Lavkush in a case involving alleged participation in a mob that assaulted a Nagar Palika team during an encroachment removal operation. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and had no prior criminal …

MADHUKAR SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Madhukar Srivastava under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case involving alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B relating to a land fraud. The applicant argued that the FIR was lodged against …

DEVENDRA MISHRA @ DABBUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Devendra Mishra (alias Dabbu) under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, in FIR dated 13-11-2021. The applicant argued that the gang chart linking him to the case had been quashed …

SRI OMPRAKASH SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicant, Sri Omprakash Sharma, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking the High Court’s interpretation of a Judicial Magistrate’s letter dated 23 May 2024 and direction to the trial court to comply with an anticipatory bail order dated 29 April 2024. The letter highlighted …

RAJAN SINGH ALIAS JITENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rajan Singh alias Jitendra Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking a discharge. The applicant's counsel, Prateek Srivastava, later moved the court to withdraw the application while reserving the right to file a fresh discharge …

M/S GAGAN ENT UDYOGversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

M/s Gagan Ent Udyog filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17142 of 2012 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, informed the Court that it does not wish to contest the proceedings. The learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the petition is not being …

M/S GAGAN ENT UDYOGversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

M/s Gagan Ent Udyog filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17206 of 2012 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, later informed the court that it did not wish to contest the case. The court examined the petitioner's request to withdraw the proceedings. Since the …

KHELA SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE

The appeal, filed by Khela Singh and Gatuwa (Butuwa) against the State, was taken up in the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared for the appellants, and the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banda, submitted a report indicating that …

ROHIT UPADHYAYversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Rohit Upadhyay filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal trial (Case No. 68572 of 2024) arising from an FIR alleging repeated rape, blackmail with indecent videos, and exploitation under the guise of exorcism. The victim, a married woman, reported …

SUMIT KUMAR SINGHversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sumit Kumar Singh, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 15542 of 2024 challenging a chargesheet filed against him. He had already contested the chargesheet under Section 528 of the BNSS and subsequently expressed that he did not wish to pursue the writ petition. The …

SONU JAISWAL AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sonu Jaiswal and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking leave to assail a chargesheet that had been filed against them. They argued that the writ petition was the appropriate vehicle to challenge the chargesheet before a …

FAIJIL @ FAISAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to challenge a chargesheet that had been filed against them. They requested leave to assail the chargesheet under Section 528 of the BNSS and expressed a desire not to pursue the writ further. The court noted that the petitioners …

ABHINAVversusState of UP AND 4 OTHERS

Petitioner Abhinav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging a chargesheet, having already contested the same chargesheet before the appropriate court under the relevant statutory provision. The petitioner later expressed that he no longer wished to pursue the writ petition. The …