Created by Fuzzy Cloud

CHAWAN PRAKASH

376 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

MONU AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 17997 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants claimed that they had reached an amicable …

MUKUL TYAGI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mukul Tyagi and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 2534 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicants …

ZAHEER @ JAHIR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet and the entire criminal proceeding arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicants and the second opposite party had amicably settled the dispute outside …

AHASHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ahashan and three others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 323, 324, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicants and the second opposite party had amicably …

RAMU AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a criminal case (Criminal Case No. 3259 of 2025) arising from alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicants claimed that they had reached an amicable …

ANCHAL RASTOGIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant Anchal Rastogi filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal case No. 1336 of 2018 (State v. Sachin Rastogi et al.) which involved offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High Court noted that the applicant had …

ASHRAF AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings relating to several IPC offences, the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Right on Marriage) Act, on the ground that they had amicably settled with …

DEEPESH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court settlement, and the opposite …

MOHD. SAJID AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mohd. Sajid and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(2) of the B.N.S., Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Sections 3/4 of …

TARUN VERMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 8166 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants and the second opposite party had reached an out‑of‑court …

BHUPENDRA @ BHUPENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant Bhupendra filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 3691 of 2019) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The matter was listed but the applicant did not appear, while the Attorney General for the State was present. The court observed that …

PRAMOD AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners Pramod and two others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 3706 of 2019) against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The matter was listed but no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, while the State’s counsel was present. The …

CHIRAUNJI LAL AND 5 ORSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR

The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 7027 of 2019) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter remained pending for several years, and when the case was listed, none of the parties appeared, although the learned Additional …

KAILASH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners Kailash and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019, seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another. No counsel appeared for either side, though the Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The court observed that …

SMT. RAKHI @ REKHA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Smt. Rakhi @ Rekha and two others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019 seeking the High Court's inherent jurisdiction to intervene in a criminal proceeding. The matter was listed but no counsel for either side appeared, although the State's …

MOHIT AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mohit and six others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case (Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act) on the ground that they had reached an amicable compromise …

ASIF ALI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Asif Ali and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash pending criminal proceedings arising from cases under IPC sections 498A, 323, 376, 511 and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The parties had amicably settled the dispute through a compromise, which …

MOHD ISHA AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, and requested mediation. The matter was referred to a mediation centre, but the applicants failed to deposit the required Rs. 25,000 as per the mediation report dated 11.05.2025. No counsel appeared …

SACHIN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Sachin and three others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's inherent powers to intervene in their criminal proceedings. The application was listed but no petitioner representative appeared, even after a revised list. The …

ASHISH SONI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking relief, but failed to comply with the Court's earlier order dated 01.05.2025 requiring a deposit of Rs.35,000 with the Mediation Centre. The Mediation Centre report dated 01.08.2025 confirmed non‑payment and the applicants did …

JAGDISH SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

Jagdish Singh Yadav filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019, seeking the High Court's inherent powers. The applicant's counsel did not appear, while counsel for the State and the other respondent were present. The Court observed that the application had been …

FAIZAN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Faizan Khan, filed a Section 482 application seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a Sessions trial for offences under Sections 387, 307 and 506 IPC, alleging false and fabricated allegations and lack of evidence. The trial court had earlier rejected his Section 227 …

ANEES AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached an amicable settlement, which …

HARISH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 10814 of 2022) relating to offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants and the second …

HEMANT KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Hemant Kumar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 1424 of 2025, which involved offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504 and 506. The applicants asserted that they had reached an …

HARISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash charge sheet No. 46 of 2022 and the related criminal proceedings arising under Sections 498A, 323, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The parties had amicably settled their dispute outside court, and …

JITENDRA @ BHURI AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case (Case No. 3152 of 2021) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicants claimed that they had …

SOMIT SHARMA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and related proceedings in a criminal case involving Sections 498A, 323, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that they had reached a settlement with the second opposite party. The …

SAMEER SRIVASTAVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Sameer Srivastava, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case (crime no. 16/2023) involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 498A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …

JITENDRA KUMAR VERMA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet and cognizance order relating to offences under sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the BNSS and sections 3 and 4 of the DP Act. The applicants asserted that they had reached a compromise with the …

ATUL SHARMA AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code (BNSS No. 40156 of 2026) seeking relief. They had previously filed an application under Section 482 CrPC (No. 22081 of 2011), which was disposed of on 12 July 2011. Counsel for the applicants informed the court that …

DANISH AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Danish and nine others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and related proceedings in a criminal case pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑III, Rampur. The applicants and the second opposite party had settled their …

RAJEEVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rajeev, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 21.01.2026 and the related criminal proceedings. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel withdrew all prayers except the request to surrender before the trial court within …

KUNJ GUPTA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Kunj Gupta and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings arising from a case filed under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had reached an amicable compromise. The …

SHIV KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Shiv Kumar and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 21‑12‑2022 and the proceedings of Criminal Case No. 1238 of 2023, which involved offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. …

SHAHNEWAZ AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 21‑06‑2022 that had summoned them under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. They claimed they were falsely implicated and that the underlying personal …

SONU SINGH @ PARAM JEET SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 10472 of 2026, which arose from a complaint under sections 498A, 323 IPC and sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicants claimed that they had reached a full and amicable compromise with the …

SANJAY SWAMI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The High Court had earlier ordered the applicants to deposit Rs.25,000 with its Mediation Centre, which they failed to do. No representative of the applicants appeared before the Court to pursue the …

SUMAN AWASTHIversusUNION OF INDIA

The applicant, Suman Awasthi, sought a No‑Objection Certificate (NOC) and renewal of her passport to travel abroad, but the trial court rejected her application on the basis that a criminal case against her was stayed by this High Court. The criminal case involved offences under Sections 323, 498A, …

LAL BAHADUR @ BANTU AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Lal Bahadur @ Bantu and two others against the State of U.P. and another. The applicants sought relief, but no counsel appeared on their behalf to press the application. The counsel for the opposite party, Hem Pratap Singh, …

ANURAG SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Anurag Sharma and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 22‑12‑2021 and the related warrant trial (No. 1670 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the …

AMIT NIRANJAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 112/2024) arising from offences under IPC sections 498‑A, 354‑A, 323, 504, 506, 427 and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that they had reached a …

YOGENDRA KUMAR SINGH @ YOGESH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Yogendra Kumar Singh and two others filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a Civil Judge’s order that dismissed their discharge application in a dowry‑related criminal case. During hearing, the applicants’ counsel withdrew the challenge to the order …

ABHISHEK BHASKAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Abhishek Bhaskar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No.125243 of 2023, which involved charges under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 403 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …

NIRMALA DEVIversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Nirmala Devi, mother‑in‑law of the deceased, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the criminal proceedings arising from a dowry‑related FIR. The deceased, married to the …

RAVISHARAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief from a non‑bailable warrant issued in a case involving offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The counsel for the applicants indicated that they did not wish to …

PUNEET TANEJA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Puneet Taneja and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (BNSS No. 41095 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. They later approached the Court seeking to withdraw the application, stating that certain documents could not be annexed and …

RAJ AHIRWAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of a charge sheet and related proceedings, claiming they were falsely implicated and that the parties had amicably resolved their dispute. The State did not object to a compromise being filed in the trial court. The …

SMT. MRIDULATAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt. Mridulata, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings pending against parties 2 to 5 in a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 504, 354 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant asserted that a …

SUSHIL SINGHAL AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Sushil Singhal and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 518/9 of 2018) arising from a 2015 offence under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 316 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They asserted that …

ASHU SINGHALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ashu Singlar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 5278/9 of 2016) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 316, 377 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant …

TARUN @ GOPAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 03 of 2019) involving allegations under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed they were falsely implicated and that the dispute had been amicably settled, …

CHANDRA SHEKHAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a criminal case (Case Crime No.215 of 2007) involving charges under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed innocence and alleged that the parties had amicably resolved their …

ANUJ BHATT AND 3 ORSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 3753 of 2018) filed by the complainant under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506. They asserted that they were falsely implicated and that the dispute between applicant No.4 and the complainant …

ANURAG KAUSHIK AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 2314 of 2019) instituted by the complainant under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They asserted that the dispute arose from …

NEELAM GIRI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from a case under Section 115(2) of the B.N.S and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. The matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, where the parties …

SUMIT SAINI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Sumit Saini and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal case No. 2803/2022 pending before the CJ(JD) FTC (CAW), Saharanpur, which alleged offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 313, 354(b), 504, 506 and the DP Act. …

ARASAD @ RAJA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Arasad @ Raja and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of a charge sheet dated 29‑07‑2001 and the related criminal proceedings (Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act) on the ground that they had reached a …

KAMIL ABBAS AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order and the criminal case (Criminal Case No. 10503 of 2026) filed under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354C, as well as sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Marriage Act. They …

KHUSHWANT SINGH HADA AND 2 OTHERSversusState of UPAND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal case (Criminal Case No. 8637 of 2024) filed against them under sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and sections 3/4 of the Delhi Police Act. They claimed innocence and alleged that the dispute with the …

KHALIL AHMAD AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 393 of 2020) relating to offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 IPC, sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act and sections 3/4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Right on …

GULFAM AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from a case under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, the D.P. Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, on the ground that the parties had …

JUNAID AHMAD AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The counsel for the applicants indicated that they no longer wish to pursue the application and requested its dismissal. The court accepted this position and dismissed the application as not pressed, …

SATYAVEER AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Satyaveer and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 07‑09‑2012 and all proceedings in Sessions Case No. 149 of 2024, alleging that they had reached a compromise with the State, which was verified by the trial court. The …

BHAGWAN DAS SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a chargesheet and the criminal case (Criminal Case No. 1977 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. They claimed they were falsely …

SAKIB AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Sakib and six others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 03‑11‑2025 and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 09 of 2026) arising from Crime No. 276 of 2025. They asserted that they had amicably settled the dispute with …

RAMENDRA SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise. The applicants claimed innocence and that the dispute was amicably resolved, while the State did not object to a …

ARJUN THAKUR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Arjun Thakur and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash charge‑sheets filed against them under sections 85, 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed they were falsely implicated and …

KUNWAR VIKASH SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Kunwar Vikash Singh and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 19‑04‑2019 and the criminal proceedings in Case No. 419 of 2019, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 377 of the IPC and Sections …

BAIJNATH PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019. The matter was listed but the applicant failed to appear, even after a revised listing. Counsel for the opposite parties appeared, and the court noted the prolonged pendency and lack of prosecution. …

RIZWAN AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance order and charge‑sheet in a criminal case (Criminal Case No.2477/2024) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the …

MOHD. DANISH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mohd. Danish and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicants informed the court that the application had become infructuous. The court, upon receiving this statement, dismissed the …

JITENDRA KASHYAPversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Jitendra Kashyap, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge sheet filed under Sections 323, 498A, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that he was falsely implicated in a dowry harassment case. The marriage …

AKHIL KUMAR YADAV AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 04‑08‑2023 and the criminal proceedings (Case No. 10013 of 2023) arising from a dowry dispute under sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 420, 494 IPC and sections 3/4 of the Dowry …

RAJNISH KUMAR SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Rajnish Kumar Sharma, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 45143 of 2019) against the State of U.P. and another party. The application remained pending for several years without any appearance by the parties, and the applicant appeared to have …

RAMESH VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Ramesh Verma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019 seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The application remained pending for several years, and no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant when the matter was called. The State, …

KISHOR KUMAR @ RINKU AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter had been pending since 2019. On the hearing date, no representative appeared for the applicants, while the State was represented by its Additional …

MOHAMMAD WASIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohammad Wasi, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge-sheet and non‑bailable warrant in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 and 313 of the IPC and the D.P. Act. The applicant claimed innocence and alleged that …

MUKHBIR SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 2059 of 2013) filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh under IPC sections 498-A, 323 and 504. The parties had entered into a compromise on 10 July 2024, which was …

ABHISHEK PATHAK AND 7 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 34 of 2024, which involved charges under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354‑A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the Mediation and …

CHHOTU @ ARUNversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Chhotu @ Arun, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a notice and a Cr.P.C. order dated 19 January 2026 and 14 July 2026, as well as the pending criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the …

NARAYAN DATT TRIPATHI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 115174 of 2023) arising from offences under IPC sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The parties had entered into a compromise on 11‑08‑2026, which was …

LAVKUSH GUPTA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from alleged offences under the IPC and D.P. Act, claiming they had reached an amicable compromise with the complainant. The State's Additional Government Advocate …

MOHAMMAD IMRAN @ HAZI SAIKHUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Mohammad Imran, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case filed under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. The applicant …

NITISH HITAISHI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. Act seeking to quash the cognizance, charge sheet and all proceedings in State v. Nitish Hitaishi (Case No. 25014/2024) on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the opposite party, which was verified by the trial court. …

MOHD. AZAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 1678 of 2021, Crime No. 544 of 2021) that alleged offences under Sections 498‑A, 504, 377 IPC, Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Sections 3/4 of the Muslim Women (Protection …

OMVEER AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 34072 of 2024) arising from allegations under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They asserted that the dispute had been amicably settled …

ASHISH PANDEY AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a dowry‑related case (Cr. No. 27610 of 2024) filed under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The marriage between the first …

SUNNY KUMAR AND 2 ORSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR

The High Court considered an application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code by Sunny Kumar and others against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The application had been pending since 2019, and no counsel appeared for the applicants, indicating a loss of interest in pursuing the matter. …

AMAN AND OTHERSversusState of UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506, 354, 354‑B of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Both the applicants and the second …

SMT. SHANTI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The applicant, Smt. Shanti Devi, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019. The matter was listed but the applicant failed to appear, and no counsel represented her at the hearing. The opposite party and the State's counsel were present. The court observed that …

TASABBARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 46372 of 2019) was filed by Tasbbar against the State of U.P. and ten others. The matter was listed but the applicant's counsel did not appear, while the Attorney General for the State was present. The court observed that the …

ASHOK KUMAR JAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR

The applicant, Ashok Kumar Jain, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Subsequently, counsel for the applicant moved that the application had become infructuous and should be dismissed as withdrawn. The court …

KHALID SULTAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 1341 of 2008) arising under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 and sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that a compromise dated 04‑07‑2013 …

SUBHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and related criminal proceedings arising from a case in which they were charged under various IPC sections and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached a compromise on 5 January 2026, which …

ANSHUL MALIK AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and subsequent proceedings in a criminal case filed under IPC sections 498A, 323 and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise …

HASEEN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants and the second opposite party had reached …

ANURAG SAINI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal case No. 53567 of 2023 filed by the State of U.P. for offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants and the second opposite party had entered into a compromise …

UDAL SINGH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, Ms. Priti Pandey, counsel for the applicants, expressed that the applicants no longer wished to pursue the application and requested its withdrawal. The court …

RAJU GUPTA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Counsel for the applicants, Ajeet Kumar Madhesia, informed the Court that they no longer wished to pursue the application and sought its withdrawal. The Court considered the counsel's request and, finding no …

RAVI SAMAURIA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ravi Samauria and two others, were charged under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act in a case pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra. They settled the dispute out of court and filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking …

AKHILESH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings arising from a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had …

SMT. GUDIYA @ KAMAR SHAHEEN AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 07‑01‑2025 and related orders in a criminal case (Crime No. 375 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Women …

RIZWAN ALI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.30 of 2014) arising from an FIR under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court settlement, and the opposite …

MUNNA LAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Munna Lal and others were charged under IPC sections 498‑A, 354Ka, 323, 504 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act for a dowry‑related offence. They later settled the dispute out of court and filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking quash of the …

AMAN AZIM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants Aman Azim and others filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case filed under sections 85, 115(2) of the B.N.S Act, the Dowry Prohibition Act and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights …

KAPIL KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Kapil Kumar and another, were charged under Sections 498A, 452, 323, 504 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act in a case pending before the Civil Judge (J.D.)/FTC1, Ghaziabad. The parties reached an out‑of‑court settlement, which was verified by the trial court on …

ASHOK PUNJABIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant, Ashok Punjabi, filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the appellant died in 2021, as evidenced by a police report, statements of his wife and others, and a death certificate. The court considered whether the appeal could continue …

KESH PAL AND OTHERSversusSTATE

The appeal was filed by Kesh Pal and others against the State. During the proceedings, it was reported that appellant No.1, Kishan Pal, had died as per a report from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad. Consequently, the court held that the proceedings against the deceased stand abated. Since …

RAM ASARE SETHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ram Asare Seth, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 2266 of 2019) seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another. The matter was listed before the High Court, but the applicant failed to appear, even after being listed on the revised list. …

DALIP KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant, Dalip Kumar, filed a criminal appeal against the State of U.P. However, the court was informed through an office report dated 15 September 2026 that the appellant had died, as per a report from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra dated 8 July 2026. Consequently, the court held that …

AJAY KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019 seeking relief in a criminal matter. The matter was listed before the High Court but no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, even after a revised list. The learned Additional Government Advocate …

AJAY KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Ajay Kumar Gupta filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019, seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant when the matter was called, and the application had remained pending for several years. The High …

PRADEEP KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summons and the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 28190 of 2017) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The State, …

SMT. JYOTI JAISWAL AND 2 ORSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019 seeking relief. The matter was listed before the High Court but the petitioners failed to appear, even after a revised list. The State, represented by the learned Additional Government Advocate, was …

ANAND KUMAR AGRAWALversusUNION OF INDIA AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Anand Kumar Agrawal, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the application had become infructuous. The court accepted this submission and dismissed the application on …

ABHISHEK SHUKLA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order and the entire criminal proceeding (Complaint Case No. 445 of 2014) arising under Sections 386 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants claimed that they had reached an …

MOHD. ASIF AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 8 May 2019 and the cognizance order dated 17 September 2019 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry …

RAJENDRA PRASAD BHASKAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in Criminal Case No. 2307 of 2025, which arose from a complaint under Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants and the …

VISHAL SAHNI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 62816 of 2022) arising from alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that they had …

AVNEESH KUMAR YADAV AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Avneesh Kumar Yadav and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 909 of 2025, which involved charges under IPC sections 498‑A, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The parties had amicably settled the …

VINEET AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and related proceedings on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the State. The State’s counsel did not oppose the filing of a compromise deed before the trial court. The Court held …

RASHID AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Rashid and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 1361 of 2024) pending under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 324, 504 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that they had reached an amicable …

RAVENDRA SINGH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ravendra Singh Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and related proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. During the hearing, …

RAVIversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a criminal case (Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act) on the ground that a compromise had been reached with the second opposite party. The State opposed no objection to filing a compromise …

KAPIL GILL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Kapil Gill and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No.11657 of 2022, which involved offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that they had …

MOHD. ASAD AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mohd Asad and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.857 of 2025) arising from alleged offences under sections 85, 75, 76, 115(2), 352 and 305 of the B.N.S. and sections 3 and 4 …

DEEPAK RANA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and related proceedings in a criminal case involving sections of the Dowry Prohibition Act and other offences, on the ground that they had reached an out‑of‑court compromise with the State. Both …

JARIF KHAN AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and summons in Criminal Case No.10295 of 2026, arising from offences under sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 85 of the BNSS and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants and the second …

SHADAB AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Shadad and six others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the applicants, Ms. Akanksha Mishra, later informed the court that she no longer wished to pursue the application and requested its dismissal. The …

SAMEER AHMAD AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Sameer Ahmad and five others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No.30327/2026, which involved charges under various sections of the BNSS, the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. …

DILASHANA @ CHONIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicant, Dilashana @ Choni, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case (Criminal Case No.8026/9 of 2022) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 313 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicant …

MUDASSIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Mudassir filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 12‑12‑2023 and the ensuing criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.378/9 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 313 of the IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and the Muslim …

SHIV PRATAP SHUKLA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants (Shiv Pratap Shukla and four others) filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 66 of 2021, which involved charges under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had …

SMT LALTI DEVIversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019 seeking relief against the State. The matter remained pending for several years and, on the date of hearing, no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant despite being listed. The learned Additional …

SUDARSHAN GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P.AND ANOTHER

An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 19170 of 2019) was filed by Sudarshan Goswami against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The matter remained pending for several years and, when called on, no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant. The High Court …

LAXMAN PRASAD AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Laxman Prasad and others. The applicants' counsel did not appear before the High Court, and the same absence was noted on a prior occasion. The Court observed that no representation was made on behalf of the applicants. …

HRIDAY NARAYAN MISHRA @ HRIDAYANAND MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2019 seeking the High Court's intervention. The matter remained pending for several years. On the date of hearing, no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while the State was represented by its Additional …

ALI PASHA @ MOHAMMAD ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ali Pasha, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The court had earlier directed the applicant to deposit Rs. 30,000 with the Mediation Centre, but the applicant failed to do so as per the mediation report dated 28.08.2024. No counsel …

SHAHRUKH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 730 of 2016) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that they had reached an …

RIZWAN HABIB AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 1079 of 2020, which involved charges under Sections 498-A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court compromise dated 25 …

KAPIL UPADHYAY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 07‑02‑2018 issued in a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A and 323 of the IPC. During the hearing, the applicants withdrew their challenge to the charge sheet and only …

MOHD HANIF AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mohd Hanif and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants, Mr. Rizwan Ahmad, expressed that he did not wish to pursue the application and requested its dismissal …

SUYASH BARANWAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 17066 of 2025, which involved offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 406, 427 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached a compromise on 10 June …

RAHUL SAXENA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 24110 of 2024, which involved charges under Sections 498A, 323, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The case arose from Crime No. 663 of 2023 and was pending before …

MUKESH YADAVversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

Mukesh Yadav filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No.13805 of 2019) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The application remained pending for several years without any appearance or submission from the applicant’s counsel, although the State’s …

ARUN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Arun Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside the order dated 24‑02‑2026 that framed an alternative charge of Section 302 IPC in a case originally involving Sections 498A, 304B IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The original FIR …

UMMIDALAM URF BALLE AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash charge sheets and criminal proceedings arising from allegations under Sections 498A, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The dispute had been settled by a compromise deed dated …

GAURAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352 of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant claimed that he and the second opposite party had …

SHYAM LAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellants, Shyam Lal and Vijai Singh, filed a criminal appeal against the State of U.P. While the appeal was pending, Vijai Singh died, as reported in an office memo dated 08‑09‑2026. Subsequently, the court learned that Shyam Lal had also died, leading to the conclusion that both appellants …

BAL KRISHNA DUBEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UP AND ANR

The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief, but failed to appear before the court. No counsel represented the applicants on the revised list, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate and the second opposite party were present. The …

LALCHANDRA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 6087 of 2019, which involved offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC. The applicant did not press the merits of the quash petition and instead requested the …

SMT. KAILASHI DEVI AND 2 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Smt. Kailashi Devi and two others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Their counsel, Mool Chandra Maurya, later informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the application. The court accepted this request and dismissed the application …

DURVIJAY AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants Durvijay and seven others filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from offences under Sections 498‑A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that they had reached an amicable …

ANAS AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants (Anas and six others) filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings pending against them for offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 354 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants claimed …

ALI KURESHI AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 2207 of 2016, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants and the second opposite party …

ROHIT DHUPUR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and related proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants and the second opposite party had …

MUSTAK AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Mustak and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal case No.3494 of 2017, which involved charges under IPC sections 498A, 323, 324, 506 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. They claimed that the dispute had been amicably …

BHOLA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The applicants, Bhola and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 1251 of 2018) relating to offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that a compromise had …

SAURABH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 110 of 2024 (State vs. Saurabh Kumar et al.) which involved offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants and the second opposite …

TAJEEM AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 25394/9 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(3), 351(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached an …

JITENDRA KUMAR MISHRA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 275 of 2025) arising from offences under sections 85, 115(2) and 351(2) of the B.N.S.S. They claimed that the dispute with Opposite Party No.2 had been amicably settled and that the …

NIKHIL JAIN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Nikhil Jain and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 6772 of 2023) that alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants …

KRISHNA CHAURASIYAversusSTATE OF UP AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 73 of 2026) on the ground that the parties had reached an amicable compromise. The State opposed no objection to filing a compromise deed before the …

GUDDU AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the cognizance order and all proceedings in a criminal case (Sections 498‑A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 D.P. Act) on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the second opposite party. The State opposed …

SMT RENU @ REENA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 04‑07‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 19‑09‑2024 in Criminal Case No. 490 of 2024, which arose from offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 354 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry …

KOMALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant Komal filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a chargesheet and criminal proceedings (Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mathura, on the ground that a compromise had been …

SARAS KUMAR @ SETHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that they had reached an amicable compromise …

TAHIR ABBASI AND 10 ORSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 8189 of 2019) by Tahir Abbasi and ten others against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The application had been pending since 2019, and no counsel appeared for either party, although the Attorney General …

RAM SAHAYversusSTATE OF UP AND 6 OTHERS

The High Court considered an application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 9633 of 2019) by Ram Sahay against the State of Uttar Pradesh and six others. The application had been pending since 2019, and no counsel for either party appeared before the court, although the …

SMT. ANISA KHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The petitioners, Smt. Anisa Khan and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 11402 of 2019) before the Allahabad High Court. The application remained pending for several years without any appearance by the petitioners, even after a revised call. The court …

NARESH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash charge sheet No. 29/2025 and related proceedings in a dowry‑related case. They claimed that the dispute with the second opposite party had been amicably settled and that the latter wished to withdraw the …

RAKESH KUMAR AND AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet and related criminal proceedings involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 307, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had amicably settled the dispute …

SHAN AHMAD AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 18‑02‑2026 issued in State v. Shan et al., which arose from charges under IPC sections 498A, 323, 506 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. During the …

RAHUL ALIAS PAPPU AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the BNSS filed by Rahul alias Pappu and five others seeking to quash the charge sheet, summons and non‑bailable warrant in a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 354, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry …

HAJI ABDUL RASHEED ANSARI AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet and related proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 504, 506, 354 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court …

VINAY PRAKASH MADHESHIYA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the order dated 23‑09‑2022 that framed charges against them in a criminal case (Case No. 5404 of 2017) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. …

DILEEP KUMAR AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Dileep Kumar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 22‑12‑2025, the cognizance order dated 15‑04‑2026, and the entire proceedings in a criminal case pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, …

DIVYANSHU PANDEY @ HAPPY AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 159479 of 2025, alleging false implication and claiming that the underlying personal dispute has been amicably resolved. They requested that the case be dismissed on the basis of a compromise between …

RAM KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Ram Kumar and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 540 of 2026) relating to offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the BNSS and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …

RAVI MISHRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ravi Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 2183 of 2026, which arose from a chargesheet filed under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicant claimed innocence and asserted that the …

SACHIN KUMAR AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Sachin Kumar and six others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 5359 of 2024) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑3, Moradabad, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 34 of the IPC …

VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 45358 of 2022) arising from alleged offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that the dispute had been …

SHAMU LAL CHAKRAWAL AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Shamu Lal Chakrawal and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 19‑12‑2025 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 59715 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3 & 4 of …

DEVESH KUMAR AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants, Devesh Kumar and five others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. Act seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 16‑09‑2020 and the ensuing criminal proceedings (Case No. 9990 of 2021) relating to offences under IPC sections 498‑A, 323 and Dowry Prohibition Act …

AJAY KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 26455 of 2022) arising from alleged offences under IPC sections 498A, 323, 506 and sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that they had reached an amicable …

GOURAV AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants (Gourav and six others) filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings in Case No. 34119 of 2026, alleging that they had reached a compromise with opposite party No.2 and settled the dispute …

DIVYANSHU GAUTAM AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet and the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 32543 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 85, 115(2) and 352 IPC. The applicants claimed that they had reached an amicable compromise with the …

EHASAN @ SABUR ALI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceeding (Criminal Case No.23112 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 115(2), 85, 351(3) of the B.N.S.S. and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry …

TARIQUE JAMALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Tarique Jamam, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 16480 of 2026) arising from alleged offences under IPC sections 498‑A and 308. The applicant claimed that he and the second opposite party had reached an amicable …

RAKESH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.3027/9 of 2005) arising from offences under Sections 498‑A, 504, 506, 342 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants and the second opposite party …

SHIV NARAIN AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant had stood as surety for an accused in Sessions Trial No. 153 of 1981, furnishing a bond of Rs. 3,000. When the accused failed to appear, a criminal miscellaneous case was instituted under Section 446 of the Criminal Procedure Code and recovery warrants were issued against the …

MOHIT AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 37979 of 2025) arising from charges under sections 85, 115(2), 351(2), 352 of the B.N.S.S. and sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The applicants and the second opposite party had reached …

SARMOD AND ANOTHERversusState of U.P. AND ANOTHER

Dismiss other than merit(DD/Non Prosec./Abated)

The applicants Sarmod and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 11905 of 2021) before the Allahabad High Court, seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application, although the …

SHOAIB AKHTAR @ BADSHAHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 140001 of 2023) that were based on a compromise in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 406 and 379 IPC. The High Court noted that the parties had been directed to appear …

CHANDRA SHEKHAR YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Chandra Shekhar Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the application. The court considered the …