Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
376 judgments · newest first · showing 201–376
The applicant, Deepak Mukherjee, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bihar Negotiable Settlement Scheme seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 4157 of 2013) relating to offences under IPC sections 467, 468, 471 and 420. The parties had reached a compromise on 18 September 2025, …
The applicants Ramlal and two others, charged under IPC sections 323, 324, 328 and 308, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of the charge sheet, summons and the entire session proceedings. During hearing, the applicants' counsel indicated that they would surrender within …
The applicants, Pradeep Kumar Agarwal and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal case No 2052/2019, which involved offences under Sections 307, 406, 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC. They claimed they were falsely implicated and that the underlying …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal case No.13 of 2018 (Crime No.309 of 2017) involving offences under Sections 147, 307, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicants claimed that they had reached an amicable compromise with the opposite party and …
The applicants, Savita and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case filed under various IPC and CLA provisions. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel withdrew all prayers except the request to …
The applicants, Sonu alias Mohd Irfan and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 885 of 2014) arising from alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 324, 504 and 307. They claimed innocence and asserted that the dispute with …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case arising from offences under Sections 191(2), 190, 109(1), 352 and 118(1) of the B.N.S. on the ground that the dispute had been settled by compromise between …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and related criminal proceedings, alleging that the dispute with the State had been settled by compromise. The State did not object to the filing of a compromise deed before the trial court. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case involving alleged offences under sections 109(1), 115(2), 352 and 117(2) of the B.N.S. They asserted that they and the victims had reached an amicable …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 42942 of 2025) on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the opposite party. The court noted that the trial court is the proper forum to determine the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 42076 of 2025) on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the opposite party. The State and the opposite party did not contest the existence of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Charge Sheet No. 01 of 2018) in Session Case No. 954 of 2022, alleging that they had reached an amicable compromise with the State. The State’s learned A.G.A. expressed no objection to …
The applicants sought to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings filed under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 191(2), 110, 117(2) and 324(4) of the B.N.S. on the ground that they were falsely implicated in a civil dispute and that the investigation was defective. The State argued that the FIR, …
The case arose from a violent incident on 14‑02‑1985 in Mainpuri where a group of accused, led by Havaldar Singh, attacked Kunji Lal, his companions and killed Mulaim Singh by firing guns. Kunji Lal, an injured eyewitness and brother of the deceased, gave oral information that led to an FIR and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants on the scheduled date, nor had they appeared on the previous date of 17 May 2024. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State was the only …
The High Court of Allahabad listed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, No. 25084 of 2021, filed by Ram Avtar Agarwal and another against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. No counsel appeared on behalf of either party, although the learned Additional …
The applicants, Thaneshwar Prasad Dubey and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed for hearing, but no counsel or party appeared on behalf of the applicants on the scheduled dates, including the revised …
The applicant, Ashish Dubey, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant at the revised call, while counsel for the opposite party and the Additional Government Advocate were present. The court dismissed the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. No counsel or party appeared on the revised call. The opposite party's counsel and the Additional Government Advocate were present. The Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution and vacated any …
The Regional Manager of the U.P. State Road Transport Corporation and others filed a first appeal against order No. 102 of 2010 before the Allahabad High Court, with the respondents being Smt. Usha Rani and others. The appellant was represented by counsel Rahul Anand Gaur, while the respondents were …
The appellant, Sheo Nath Kushwaha, filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, official reports dated 30‑03‑2026 and 13‑03‑2026 confirmed that the appellant had died. The court examined whether the death of the sole appellant would affect the …
The applicants, Ramkunwar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 1430 of 2022) arising from FIR No. 95 of 2021 alleging assault and related offences. They alleged that the FIR was lodged six days after the …
The applicant, Fahad Mustafa, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant’s counsel, Mohd. Naushad Ahmad Khan, was not present on the scheduled date of 20‑04‑2026, nor on the subsequent date. The State’s counsel, G.A., appeared before the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Charge Sheet No.324 of 2017 and the related proceedings arising from offences under Sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had entered into a compromise on 6 June 2025, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 4 July 2024 and the entire proceeding in a case filed under Sections 323 and 504 IPC. They alleged false implication, claiming that the charge sheet was filed for non‑cognizable offences …
The Allahabad High Court heard an application under Section 528 of the BNSS filed by Nagender @ Narendra Kumar and 12 others seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 66019 of 2025) arising from offences under various IPC sections. During the hearing the applicants’ counsel …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the charge sheet and related proceedings in a criminal case. During the hearing, the applicants indicated they would withdraw all other prayers, surrender before the lower court …
The applicant, Ajaruddin @ Salman Audi, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings arising from a 2024 altercation in Meerut, alleging false implication and lack of any victim statement. The charge‑sheet, filed by the police, named eight …
The applicants, Digvijay Singh and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 25‑12‑2023 and the cognizance order dated 10‑10‑2024 in a case arising from FIR No. 74 of 2023 alleging offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 501, 294 and 120B …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 1335 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 351(3) and 324(4) of the BNSS. The parties had reached a compromise on 12 November 2025, and the co‑accused (opposite …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 18‑01‑2025 and the summons issued in Crime No. 189 of 2024, alleging that the FIR was filed with an unexplained three‑day delay and that there was no medical evidence of injury. The State …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings arising from Charge Sheet No. 34 of 2016 (Sections 452, 323, 504, 506, 325 IPC) on the ground that they had reached an out‑of‑court settlement with the opposite party. The trial court …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking quash of criminal proceedings arising from a charge sheet dated 10 June 2022 for offences under Sections 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court compromise on 1 December 2025, and the …
The applicants, Satya Priya Gautam @ Anshu and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 2635 of 2018) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. They claimed that the dispute had been amicably settled by a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and the entire criminal proceeding (Criminal Case No. 143411 of 2022) on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the second opposite party. Both the State and the second opposite party …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a criminal trial (Sessions Trial No. 256 of 2022) on the ground that the parties had reached an amicable compromise. The applicants claimed innocence and alleged that the dispute had been settled, …
The applicants Tejpal and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summons and the entire criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 378 of 2024) arising from Crime No. 175 of 2022, which involved offences under IPC sections 308, 325, 323, 504 and 506. The applicants …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 26787 of 2022) on the ground that they had reached an amicable compromise with the State. The State did not object to the filing of a compromise deed before the trial court. The …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash an order dated 11 September 2025 that dismissed his request to recall witness PW‑4 for cross‑examination. The trial court had allowed the examination‑in‑chief of PW‑4 on 25 July 2024, deferred cross‑examination, …
The applicant, Sonu Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case alleging assault on the mother of the complainant. The applicant claimed innocence and argued that the medical report showed no injury, …
The applicants, Mataru and another, were charged under sections 308(4), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act in a criminal case filed by the State of U.P. They filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order, claiming they were falsely …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal case (State Vs. Irshad and others) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharanpur, on the basis of a compromise that had not been verified. The High Court directed that the parties appear …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 1574 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 323, 324, 325, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicants and the second opposite party had reached a compromise, which was verified by the trial …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 356 of 2025) on the ground that they had reached an amicable compromise with the State. The State, through the A.G.A., raised no objection to the filing of a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 9749 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahr, on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the State, which was verified by the trial court. The …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 52 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The applicant claimed that he and the second opposite party had reached an amicable compromise and therefore …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 1575 of 2024) arising from an alleged offence under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506. The applicants and the second opposite party had entered into a compromise, which was verified by the trial …
The applicants, Udaiveer alias Bhola and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 1647 of 2021, which arose from offences under Sections 323, 325, 308, 504 and 506 IPC. They claimed that the dispute with the second opposite party had been …
The applicants, Akash Nishad and others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and summons issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, in a case arising from alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352, 351 and 333 of the B.N.S. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and the entire criminal proceeding, claiming that they had reached an amicable compromise with the second opposite party. The State did not oppose the filing of a compromise deed before the trial …
The appellants were convicted in 1986 for offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 324/149 and 436/149 and sentenced to up to three years' rigorous imprisonment. They appealed, not on the merits, but seeking the benefit of probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, with the State's …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the cognizance, summons and charge sheet in a criminal case alleging offences under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 406, 504 and 506 of the IPC. They claimed that a compromise had been reached with the State and that …
The applicants sought to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 3005 of 2022) filed under several IPC offences arising from a land‑related dispute, invoking Section 528 of the CrPC. They claimed they were falsely implicated and that no offence was made out against them. The State opposed, contending …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and related proceedings arising from offences under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 504 and 506 of the IPC. During hearing, the applicants’ counsel withdrew all prayers except to surrender before the …
The applicants, Prem Pal alias Jaypal and six others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 20‑02‑2023 in a case registered as Crime No. 386 of 2022 under IPC sections 147, 336 and 323. They alleged that they were falsely implicated, that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal case, charge sheet dated 20.08.2022 and summons order dated 13.02.2024 in State vs. Aman Fauji and others, alleging false implication. The State opposed, contending that the FIR, …
Trinetra Filling Station and another filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of either the applicant or the opposite party to press the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for want …
The applicant, Deepak Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 4 July 2025 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 573 of 2026) arising from offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 351(2) and 352 of the BNSS. The applicant and the second …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief in a criminal matter. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The Court also vacated any …
The petitioners, Smt. Prerna Arora and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. The matter was listed, but the petitioners failed to appear on the scheduled dates, including the previous hearing on 16‑April‑2026 and the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief in the High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The interim order previously …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief in a criminal matter. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants to press the application. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution. The interim order …
The applicant, Saddam, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 11 September 2016 and the related cognizance order in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 323, 324, 308 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant and the second …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quash of Criminal Case No. 196 of 2016 (State v. Ramesh & Ors.) relating to offences under Sections 420, 406, 467 and 468 IPC. The High Court had earlier referred the matter to its Mediation and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and cognizance order in Criminal Case No. 5976 of 2025, alleging that they had reached an amicable compromise with the second opposite party. Both the State’s Additional Government Advocate and the …
The applicants, Shahzad and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 7464 of 2024) alleging offences under various IPC sections. They claimed that they had reached an amicable compromise with the …
The applicants, Jahid and eight others, were charged in Criminal Case No.25855 of 2022 for offences including rioting, assault and criminal intimidation. They filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quash of the charge sheet dated 28‑08‑2022 and the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (S.T. No.280 of 2024 & 08/2025) arising from a case registered under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and 307. They asserted that the dispute had been amicably settled through a compromise and that …
The applicants, Smt. Krishna and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a criminal charge sheet and proceedings arising from alleged offences under Sections 420, 120B, 342, 504 and 506 IPC. They claimed that the dispute had been amicably settled by …
The applicant, Rakesh Verma, sought to quash Criminal Case No. 3727 of 2008 (State vs. Rakesh Verma) arising from offences under Sections 363 and 366 IPC, on the ground that the dispute had been amicably settled with the second opposite party. Both parties, through their counsel, submitted that a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal case No.118 of 2018 (State vs. Nasir et al.) on the ground that they had reached an amicable compromise. The State and the second opposite party did not contest the existence of the compromise and were …
The applicant, Mohd. Abu Obaida Mansoori, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet dated 12‑07‑2022 and the cognizance order dated 09‑05‑2023 in a criminal case pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 4, Allahabad, alleging …
The appellants, Shanker Lal and Har Govind, were convicted under IPC sections 147, 148, 149 and 325 and sentenced to up to two years' rigorous imprisonment. They sought relief on the ground that, given the non‑serious nature of the offences, lack of prior convictions and the considerable delay since …
The appellant, Bharat Singh, was convicted by a Sessions Court in 1987 for offences under Sections 148, 149 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to a total of two years' rigorous imprisonment. He appealed, not contesting the conviction, but seeking the benefit of probation under Section 4 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance taken by the Judicial Magistrate in a case alleging offences under several IPC sections arising from a village election dispute. The State argued that the FIR, …
The applicant, Srikant Pandey, filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the order of the Judicial Magistrate‑I, Jaunpur dated 02‑11‑2020, which had rejected his discharge application in a criminal case under Sections 419 and 420 IPC. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Charge Sheet No. 751 of 2018) arising from offences under Sections 308, 323, 504 and 506 IPC, on the ground that the matter had been compromised between the parties. The State’s A.G. did not …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 20‑07‑2018 issued by Judicial Magistrate‑I, Gorakhpur, and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 1050 of 2017) for offences under Sections 323, 452, 504 and 506 IPC. The dispute arose from …
The applicants, including Shabab, were charged in a criminal case under Sections 498A, 323, 506, 313 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, arising from a complaint by the wife of Shabab. After investigation and framing of charges, the parties reached an out‑of‑court settlement on …
The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 4887 of 2019) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 307, 328 and 354 IPC. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court compromise dated 16 October 2021, which was verified by the trial …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance order and the entire criminal proceeding (Criminal Case No. 13781 of 2025) arising from a charge sheet under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 and 120B of the IPC. The parties had reached a compromise on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 4999 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 147, 148, 325, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached a compromise on 28 January 2026, and the trial court …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Rajveer and seven others seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 4280 of 2025) relating to offences under IPC sections 147, 323, 325, 352, 504 and 506. The applicants asserted …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge sheet and related orders dated January‑February 2007 in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 195, 211, 218, 220, 323, 343 and 120B of the IPC. They asserted that the dispute with the State and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (S.T. No.1253 of 2025) arising from a case involving offences under Sections 109(1), 333, 352, 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The applicants and the opposing parties (Nos.2 and 3) had reached …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 511 of 2021) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court compromise on 21 August 2025, which was verified by …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 10641 of 2022) arising from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties claimed they had settled the dispute out of court and the opposite party was ready to …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal case (Criminal Case No. 4735 of 2018) pending before the Additional Civil Judge, Azamgarh, which arose from FIR 0054 of 2018 alleging offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 and 354B of the IPC. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 4352 of 2025) arising from Crime No. 589 of 2024, which involved several non‑compoundable offences. The parties had reached an out‑of‑court compromise, which was verified by the …
The applicant, Bhola Shukla, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summoning order dated 24.01.2020 and the charge sheet dated 27.12.2018 in a criminal case (Case No. 1585 of 2020) arising from FIR No. 503 of 2018 under Section 506 IPC. He alleged that the FIR was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and summoning order issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate in a case arising from alleged trespass and theft. They contended that the investigation was improper, the charge sheet was filed …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and the magistrate's cognizance order in a criminal case arising from a land‑dispute‑related assault alleged in FIR No. 583 of 2024. They contended that the allegations were false, the injuries …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a criminal case alleging offences under IPC Sections 352, 351(2) and 333. They contended that the investigation was flawed, the statements of the complainant and witnesses were …
The applicant Jaypal filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 20‑12‑2024 and the cognizance/summoning order dated 23‑12‑2024 in a criminal case pending before the Additional District Judge, Bareilly. The applicant and opposite party No.2 (Zulekha Begum) had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 6357 of 2022) arising from a 2021 crime complaint. They claimed that they had reached an amicable compromise with the State and wished to avoid adjudication of the alleged offences. …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 3143 of 2024, alleging that they had amicably settled the dispute with Opposite Party No.2. The trial court verified the compromise, and Opposite Party No.2 expressed no desire …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 11‑April‑2013 and related proceedings in a case involving offences under IPC sections 323, 324, 325 and 504. The applicants and the second opposite party had amicably settled the dispute and the latter …
The applicants, Tipu and others, filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash the criminal proceeding S.T. No.1915 of 2024 (State vs. Tipu et al.) arising from a 2018 case under IPC sections 307, 504 and 506. The parties had amicably settled the dispute out of court, and the opposite …
The applicants, Rihan and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge sheet and subsequent criminal proceedings arising from offences under Sections 323, 352, 504, 5506 and 308 IPC. The parties claimed they had amicably settled the dispute, and the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 22‑01‑2023 and the cognizance order dated 23‑04‑2024 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Fatehpur, in a case arising from FIR No. 17 of 2023 alleging assault and threats under IPC …
The applicant Sonia filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 7416 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rampur, on the ground that she and the second opposite party had reached a compromise. Both parties …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and cognizance order in a criminal case (State vs. Mohd Tasleem et al.) on the ground that they had entered into a compromise deed with the co‑defendants. Both the co‑defendants …
The appeal was filed by Jai Singh and others against the State. During the pendency of the appeal, the Chief Judicial Magistrate reported that appellant No.1 Jai Singh and appellant No.2 Ram Swarup had died. The court considered whether the death of the appellants extinguished the proceedings. It …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 44289 of 2024) on the ground that they had reached an amicable compromise with the State. The State did not oppose the compromise and agreed that the parties could approach the trial …
The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 337 of 2022 and the charge‑sheet dated 19‑Jan‑2019, which arose from offences under Sections 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicants and the second opposite party asserted that they had amicably settled the …
The applicants filed a Section 528 B.N.S.S. application seeking to quash the charge sheet and criminal proceedings (Case No. 10337 of 2025) arising from offences under Sections 221, 121(1), 132, 352 and 351(3). The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the trial court verified the …
The applicant, Nayamuddin, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in a case pending under Sections 363 and 366 IPC. The applicant and the second opposite party had reached a compromise, which was acknowledged by both …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash criminal case No. 35366 of 2024, which involved offences under Sections 147, 323, 504 and 506 IPC, on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the opposite party. Both parties admitted …
The applicant Amit Kumar Chaudhary filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal case No.3089 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC relating to alleged short‑supply of paddy. He contended that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a charge‑sheet and the pending criminal case (Case No. 266 of 2016) arising from offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The applicants and the second opposite party had reached a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of criminal proceedings (Case No. 4047/2024) arising from alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 504 and 506. The applicants claimed that they had reached a full compromise with the opposite party, which was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the charge sheet and related criminal proceedings (Case No. 7869 of 2025) on the ground that they had reached a compromise with the opposite party, which was verified by the trial court. The opposite party …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet (No.145/2018) and related proceedings in a criminal case arising from offences under Sections 147, 323, 324, 352 and 506 of the IPC. Both the applicants and the second opposite …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 19‑12‑2024 and the entire criminal proceedings arising from FIR No. 159 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 120B, 506, 420, 419 and 386 IPC. The applicants argued that they …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application to quash criminal case ST No.491/2008 (State v. Paramhansh Singh) involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506 and 308 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute and the trial court verified the compromise. Both the applicant …
The applicants, Ekta Lunia and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash an order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of Ghaziabad who refused to renew their passports on the ground of a pending criminal case. The High Court had earlier allowed their …
The applicant, Baliram, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a theft case (Sections 457, 380, 411 IPC) filed against him. He alleged that the investigation was flawed, there were no eyewitnesses, and the magistrate had taken …
The applicant, Snehansh Upadhyay, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the criminal proceedings arising from FIR No.126 of 2024 and the charge‑sheet dated 30‑08‑2024 under Section 305 BNSS, as well as a summoning order dated 17‑02‑2025. The applicant and the second …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No.14180 of 2021, which involved alleged offences under Sections 504 and 506 of the IPC. They asserted that they had reached a compromise with the opposite party and wished to avoid …
The appellants were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Mainpuri, for voluntarily causing hurt under Section 324 IPC and sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment. They appealed, seeking the benefit of probation under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, with the State's …
The applicants filed a Section 528 CrPC application seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 716 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 352, 323, 354, 452, 504 and 506 IPC. They claimed that the dispute with the second opposite party had been amicably settled and a compromise was …
The applicants, Shanti Devi and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Crimes No. 20 of 2013) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Budaun, involving offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The parties had …
The applicant, Krishna Verma, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 354, 354(Gha), 294, 504 and 506 IPC. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel withdrew all other prayers and …
The applicant, Tushar Pandey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and the cognizance order in a criminal case (Cr. No. 655 of 2023) filed under Sections 323 and 506 IPC for alleged assault and criminal intimidation. The applicant …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 23128 of 2025) arising from an FIR alleging assault under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(3) BNS. They argued that the FIR was …
The applicant, Suneel Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the order of the Additional Sessions Judge dated 04‑09‑2025, which had dismissed his discharge application under Section 250 BNSS. He alleged that the FIR was lodged after an unexplained delay, that the …
The applicant, Shivam Vishnoi, filed an application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a Sessions Court order that had proceeded with his trial for offences under Sections 363, 302 and 201 IPC. He claimed he was falsely implicated due to a property dispute and asked the court to recall two …
The applicant, Subhash Rajbhar, filed a Section 528 BNSS application seeking to set aside a Special Judge's order dated 29‑03‑2025 in a case involving offences under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act sections 3 and 4. The applicant and the second opposite party (the victim) had reached an …
The applicant, Sumit Kumar Singh, the registered owner of a Swift Desire car seized during the investigation of a murder case, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking the release of the vehicle. The trial court rejected his request, citing the pending recording of a witness …
The applicant, a juvenile, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the cognizance and charge sheet issued by the Juvenile Justice Board in a POCSO case. The FIR was lodged against unknown persons, and the prosecutrix initially gave a statement under Section 180 that …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 1341 of 2006) filed under Sections 395 and 397 IPC. They alleged that the dispute with the opposite party had been settled by compromise, a copy of which was annexed to the …
The applicant, Mohd Aslam, sought to quash a summoning order dated 20‑11‑2025 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 4th, Bareilly, which had summoned the opposite parties under Sections 324, 325/34 IPC in a complaint arising from an alleged assault. The applicant contended that a prior …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate in Complaint Case No.2698 of 2024, which charged them with offences under Sections 323, 376D and 120(B) of the IPC. The opposite party had …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 21‑09‑2012 and the entire criminal proceeding (Complaint No. 4511 of 2011) under Section 307 IPC. Both parties claimed they had reached a free and voluntary compromise, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to club two criminal proceedings arising from the same incident on 15 April 2022 – a Sessions trial (Case No. 365 of 2023) and a complaint case (Case No. 143 of 2022) pending before a Chief Judicial Magistrate. The petition …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 13 June 2024 issued by a Judicial Magistrate in a complaint case under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code. They alleged that the complaint was filed to exert pressure in a …
The applicant, Vivek Kaushal, filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash an interim maintenance order dated 12‑08‑2024 passed by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Kanpur Dehat in a Section 125 Cr.P.C. proceeding. The applicant argued that the respondent’s prior marriage had …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summons issued by a Judicial Magistrate in a complaint alleging assault and criminal intimidation. The applicant claimed the complaint was false, baseless, and that no prima facie case existed against …
The applicant filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash a criminal complaint (Case No.127368 of 2022) and a summoning order dated 12‑09‑2023, which alleged that he had assaulted and threatened his wife under Sections 323 and 506 IPC. The wife had earlier approached the mediation …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 27 September 2024 and the pending criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 294 of 2024) against them for offences under Sections 354, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. They alleged that the complaint was a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summoning order dated 18‑05‑2022 and the related criminal proceedings (Case No. 681 of 2025) for offences under Sections 323 and 504 IPC. They argued that the matter is a civil dispute, that the magistrate failed to …
The appellant Jitendra was convicted by a Sessions Court for voluntarily causing hurt under Section 324 IPC and sentenced to two years' rigorous imprisonment. He appealed, not contesting the conviction, but seeking relief under the Probation of Offenders Act. The High Court examined Sections 4 of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Complaint No. 4640 of 2020 (Subhash v. Tarachand) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bijnor, on the ground that the parties had reached a compromise. Both the applicants and the …
An appeal (Criminal Appeal No. 2221 of 1985) was filed by Dal Chand and co‑appellants against the State of U.P. The court noted that, according to an office report dated 18 March 2026 and a report of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Etah, the appellant Dal Chand and two co‑appellants had died. In view …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 12‑10‑2023 and the entire criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 491 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376D, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. They contended that the …
The applicant, Sonu, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. Counsel for the applicant requested that the application be dismissed as withdrawn, citing the inability to annex certain documents and to plead essential facts. The court considered the prayer …
The petitioners, a married couple, filed a writ seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their marital life and to provide protection against alleged harassment. They asserted that their marriage was consensual, no FIR had been lodged, and they faced threats from respondents. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order of the Additional Civil Judge that summoned them under Sections 323, 427, 504 and 506 of the IPC in a complaint filed by the opposite party. The applicants alleged that the complaint was …
The applicant, Santosh Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash a summons dated 05‑02‑2024 issued in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 IPC for failure to repay money obtained through cheques. The applicant argued that the dispute was a …
The applicant Mahir Husain filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the summoning order dated 7 May 2019 and the entire criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 5597 of 2018) relating to offences under Sections 323, 324, 354, 354‑B and 452 IPC. Both parties submitted a …
The applicants, Smt Gulshan and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking relief. They later informed the court that certain documents could not be annexed and essential facts could not be pleaded, and prayed that the application be dismissed as …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 07.05.2019 and the entire criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 5597 of 2018) relating to offences under Sections 323, 324, 354, 354B and 452 of the IPC. Both parties …
The applicant, Sanjay Chhawara, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. The applicant's counsel was Bed Kant Mishra, while the respondents were represented by G.A., Surendra Kumar, and Virendra Singh Yadav. The …
The applicant, Sher Khan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking relief. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Ram Kumar Dubey, indicated that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the matter, stating that the application had become infructuous. …
The applicants, including an advocate and his family members (two minors), filed a Section 482 application to quash Complaint No. 2731/2022 alleging that the neighbour‑complainant fabricated allegations of assault and molestation. The Judicial Magistrate had summoned the applicants under IPC 354, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 25‑07‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 21‑10‑2024 in a Special Session Trial under the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The High Court examined …
Deepak Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 44583, alleging that he was falsely implicated for allegedly uploading a video on Facebook. The State argued that an FIR under Section 318(4) of the BNSS and Section 66‑D of the …
The applicant, Vinod Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 13‑01‑2026 and a cognizance/summoning order dated 18‑07‑2026 in a special trial under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. He argued that …
The applicants, Istekar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 31‑07‑2019 and the entire proceeding under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. Their contention was that the gangster case …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 20372 of 2018) arising from FIR No. 278 of 2017, which alleged offences under numerous sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act and …
The applicant, Varun Kumar Mishra, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and eight other respondents. The matter was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, but the applicant's counsel failed to appear …
The petitioner, Smt. Manju Upadhyay, filed a Section 482 CrPC application to set aside an order dated 04‑07‑2024 of the Additional Sessions Judge (Special Judge under the POCSO Act) which had treated her Section 156(3) CrPC application for FIR registration as a complaint. She alleged that her three …
The applicant, Jameel Khan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 07.05.2024 and the related criminal complaint (Case No. 1108 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 406, 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The matter was referred …
The applicant, Shyam Sunder, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to set aside the Family Court’s order dated 23 September 2024 that dismissed his request to pay arrears of maintenance in monthly installments of Rs 30,000. The maintenance orders under Section 125 CrPC required him …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court's intervention. On the scheduled date, no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, while counsel for the opposite party was present. The court noted the absence of the applicants' …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 07.04.2023 and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 2564 of 2023, Sheshdhar Dubey v. Raivshankar) pending before the Judicial Magistrate‑II, Bhadohi, which were based …
Abhishek Sharma filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. challenging an interim maintenance order passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which required him to pay Rs.5,000 per month to his wife and Rs.3,000 each to …
The applicant, Smt Aruna, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate who had treated her Section 173(4) application as a complaint rather than directing registration of a First Information Report (FIR) for an alleged assault and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 18‑01‑2025 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Budaun, which alleged their involvement in offences under Sections 120‑B, 420, 467 and 468 of the IPC. The dispute arose from a complex …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 29‑09‑2022 and the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 533 of 2021, in which they were charged under Sections 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged assault, …
The revisionists, who were married to the daughter of the opposite party, alleged interference by the opposite party and police, leading to an FIR under multiple IPC sections and the D.P. Act. The investigating officer initially exonerated most of them but later, after a re‑investigation ordered by …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a summons dated 04‑04‑2023 and the entire criminal proceedings (Complaint No. 4642 of 2022) initiated by the opposite party under Section 506 IPC. The dispute stems from a marriage in 2019 after which the opposite party …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 31‑05‑2023 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Etah, in a complaint alleging offences under Sections 352, 448, 504, 427 and 506 IPC. The applicants contended that the …
The applicants, a wife and her two daughters, obtained a maintenance order in 2022 directing the husband to pay monthly amounts and arrears. The husband paid the monthly sum but failed to pay the full arrears, leading to execution proceedings. The Family Court subsequently calculated the arrears at …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Complaint Case No. 661 of 2022 (Gauri Shankar v. Kamlesh Verma and others), which alleged an offence under Section 392 of the IPC. The parties had entered into a compromise deed, which was submitted …
The applicant, Raju Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 25‑08‑2025 and a recovery warrant dated 05‑10‑2024 issued by the Family Court, Mainpuri, for enforcement of a maintenance order under Section 125 CrPC. The applicant …
