Created by Fuzzy Cloud

DEVENDRA SINGH I

247 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200

GOPAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Gopal and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and two others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that both petitioners had already been arrested and they no …

ASHISH SINGH MINORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Ashish Singh Minor filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and seek permission to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The State’s Additional Government Advocate …

SAGAR SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Sagar Singh filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20501 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge‑sheet against the petitioner had been filed on 13 …

SMT. RIYA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt. Riya and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection. The Court considered the …

MUNEER AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Muneer Ahmad filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested and no longer …

ARVIND SAROJ AND 3 OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF U.P AND 3 OTHERS

Arvind Saroj and three others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20144 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel announced that they do not wish to pursue the …

ALOK AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHER

Petitioners Alok and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During proceedings, the Additional Government Advocate highlighted that additional sections had been added to the petition. The petitioners did not contest this fact but expressed a desire to …

VEER PALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Veer Pal filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 20536 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and two others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that the petitioner had already been arrested by the police and no longer wished to pursue the …

SMT. SIVA BAGAM AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation was already concluded and a final report had been submitted in favor of the petitioners. The petitioners, …

NISHANT TOMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Nishant Tomar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge sheet filed against him. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed on 13 …

INDRA KUMAR JAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Indra Kumar Jain, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against him. The State had already concluded the investigation and filed a charge sheet on 12 September 2026. The petitioner, through counsel, did not contest this fact but expressed a desire …

LAXMANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Laxman filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21457 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and six other respondents. After hearing the parties, the petitioner’s counsel, Shubham Yadav, informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ …

MOHAMMAD FAKHRUDDIN SHAH @ FAKHRUDDINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohammad Fakhruddin Shah, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against him after a charge sheet was filed on 30 June 2026. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that the investigation was complete and the …

SHIVAM KESARWANI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Shivam Kesarwani and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging aspects of the investigation. During the pendency of the petition, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the investigating agency had added more serious …

NAGESH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Nagesh and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against them. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 25-08-2026. Petitioners did not dispute these facts …

RAJESH GOSWAMIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Rajesh Goswami filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging a show‑cause notice dated 05‑05‑2026 issued by the Additional District Magistrate under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970. He contended that the notice was vague, illegal and that he was wholly innocent. The …

ANNIRUDDH SHAKYA @ ANURUDH KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings against them. The State informed the Court that the investigation had been completed and a charge sheet was filed on 30 July 2026. The petitioners' counsel did not contest this …

AMIT KUMAR MISHRA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners Amit Kumar Mishra and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21441 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer wished to …

SHEKHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Shekhar filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21483 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel stated that he no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The respondent's Additional Government Advocate raised no …

ASLAM QURAISHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Aslam Quraishi and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The State's Additional Government …

SUBHASH CHANDRAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Subhash Chandra, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The State's Additional Government Advocate …

RAJJAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rajjan Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Police Commissioner of Prayagraj to take action on an FIR dated 25‑01‑2020 (Case Crime No. 65 of 2020) involving offences under sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 427 of the IPC and sections …

MAHAVEER SINGHversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Mahaveer Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. He informed the court that he had already been arrested and no longer wished to pursue the petition, seeking to withdraw it. The State, represented by its Additional Government Advocate, raised no objection …

NITIN KUMAR SAXENAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Nitin Kumar Saxena filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21458 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of U.P. and three others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner announced that he no longer wished to pursue the petition and …

NASIR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Nasir and another, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21579 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of U.P. After hearing the parties, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer wished to pursue the writ and …

MANOJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

The petitioner, Manoj, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the filing of a charge sheet against him. The State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents indicated that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed on 20 June …

TUSHAR SAINIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Tushar Saini filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Saurabh Basu, announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its …

SMT. LAJJAWATIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Lajjawati filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an investigation that had already concluded with a final report favoring the accused on 02-09-2026. The State's Additional Government Advocate confirmed the final report and noted that …

ARCHANA KUMARI MEDHAVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner filed an FIR on 20 May 2016 (Case Crime No. 277 of 2016) alleging offences under Sections 406, 420, 471, 467, 468, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The trial court, after a protest petition, ordered a …

SAHIL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Sahil and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge sheet filed against them. The State had already concluded the investigation and forwarded a charge sheet on 31 July 2026. Petitioners did not dispute this fact but expressed a …

PRAVIN RANJAN ALIAS PRAVIN KUMAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

Petitioners Pravin Ranjan and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. A supplementary affidavit was filed, and the matter was heard by the court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they no longer wished to pursue the petition …

SAGARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

A criminal miscellaneous writ petition was filed by Sagar against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, challenging the continuation of criminal proceedings. The investigating agency had already concluded its investigation and filed a charge sheet on 20 June 2026. The petitioner's counsel did not …

GHANSHAYAM SINGH AND 4 OTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

Petitioners Ghanshayam Singh and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation against them. The State had already concluded the investigation and filed a charge sheet on 29 July 2026. The petitioners, through counsel, did not …

JEETUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

Petitioner Jeetu filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against him. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed on 20‑06‑2026. The petitioner did not contest this fact but expressed his desire to withdraw the …

GABBARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHER

Gabbar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings against him. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed on 20 June 2026. The petitioner’s counsel did not contest this but expressed …

SUMAYILA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State. The investigation in the matter had already concluded, and a final report favoring the petitioners was submitted. The petitioners, through counsel, expressed a desire to …

PUTTU LAL GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Puttu Lal Gupta filed a writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 17‑12‑2025 that arose from a monetary dispute. The Court referred the matter to its Mediation and Conciliation Centre, where the parties reached a settlement agreement on 07‑08‑2026, which they both affirmed as fully …

SUSHIL AWANA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners, Sushil Awana and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging aspects of an investigation. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the investigation had been completed and a final report …

AVDESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner Avdesh Kumar filed a writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 17 June 2026 under Sections 117(2) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that the dispute was trivial and the parties had amicably resolved it through a compromise affidavit. The court examined the compromise …

KAVITA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Kavita and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 22129 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer wished to pursue the present …

RAM SINGH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ram Singh and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 22760 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. After hearing the parties, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer …

RAMBABU AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Rambabu and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. The State’s Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation in the matter had …

ANJORA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Anjora Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police officers (respondents 2 & 3) to conduct a prompt, proper and fair investigation into FIR No. 191 of 2026 under various sections of the B.N.S. and to arrest the accused. The petitioner …

NITESH PAL AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Nitesh Pal and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The State of U.P. informed the court that the investigation was already concluded and a final report favoring the petitioners had been submitted on 14‑08‑2026. The petitioners, while …

SHASHWAT PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shashwat Pandey, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 22123 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The respondent counsel and the …

AJEET SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 15 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ajeet Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Senior Superintendent of Police, Mathura, to transfer the investigation of FIR dated 14-06-2026 and ensure a fair, impartial inquiry. The petitioner alleged that the police were not conducting …

KRISHNACHAND PANDEY @ KC AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Krishnachand Pandey and others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against them. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 31 July 2026. The petitioners' …

RADHA DEVI SAHUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Radha Devi Sahu, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the continuation of criminal proceedings. The State had already concluded its investigation and forwarded a charge sheet against the accused. The petitioner’s counsel …

RAKESH SHUKLAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rakesk Shukla, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 22805 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and two others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that he no longer wished to pursue the writ and wanted to withdraw …

MAUSAM @ TUNDAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mausam @ Tunda, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested and expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State’s Additional …

SHIV KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Shiv Kumar filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 22811 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The …

GULMOHAMMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gulmohammad, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The investigation had already concluded with a final report favoring the petitioner dated 21‑08‑2026. The petitioner later expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, which the …

PRIYA GUPTA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioners, Priya Gupta and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against them. The State of U.P. informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 5 …

RAM ASHISH AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ram Ashish and four others, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 22800 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel informed the Court that they no longer …

SHIV KUMAR GUPTA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Shiv Kumar Gupta and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging aspects of the investigation, wherein additional sections were added during the probe. The State's Additional Government Advocate (AGA) highlighted the addition …

YOGENDRA PRASADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Yogendra Prasad, filed a writ petition seeking mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair investigation and arrest the accused under Sections 498-A, 304-B, 315 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, after a magistrate had ordered further investigation. The police had …

HARIPAL SINGHversusSTATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Haripal Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel stated that he no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it, requesting liberty to approach the competent magistrate instead. The …

SANTOSH KUMAR UPADHYAYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair, impartial, and expeditious investigation into FIR No. 0217/2026. He alleged that the police were not investigating the case properly despite being the first informant. The court …

BEERESH KUMAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Beeresh Kumar and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Nikhil Pratap Singh, announced that the petitioners no longer …

ADITYA RAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Aditya Raj filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that he no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The State's …

FASIH AKHTAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Fasih Akhtar and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that they did not wish to pursue the present petition and sought to withdraw it, reserving the right to file a …

MEENA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS

Meena Devi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18568 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Surya Prakash Yadav, informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ …

VINAY KUMAR SACHAN AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Vinay Kumar Sachan and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the filing of a charge sheet against them. The State had already completed the investigation and forwarded the charge sheet on 7 June 2026. The petitioners' …

DR. IBNE HASANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dr. Ibne Hasan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The State had already concluded the investigation and filed a charge-sheet against him on 19 May 2026. The petitioner did not contest these facts but expressed a desire to withdraw the writ …

SMT. VIMLA AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt. Vimla and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and seek liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The State, represented by …

HARSHITA VASHISTHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Harshita Vashistha, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18573 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, stating that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the relief sought. The …

BABU RAM PRAJAPATI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Babu Ram Prajapati and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh. The investigation in the matter had already concluded and a charge sheet was filed against the petitioners on 26 July 2026. …

MUTTUR PRAJAPATI AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Muttur Prajapati and six others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18560 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer wished to …

SANTGIRIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Santgiri, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner informed the court that he had already been arrested and expressed his desire to withdraw the writ petition. The State, represented by an Additional Government …

SURAJ VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Suraj Verma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings against him. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Vijay Kumar, informed the court that the investigation had been completed and a charge sheet had been filed, …

GAURAV SAXENA AND 6 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Gaurav Saxena and six others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an ongoing investigation. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the investigation had already concluded and a police report was filed on 24 …

RUBINA @ RUBYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Rubina @ Ruby filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Tariq Naiyer, informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested and that she no longer wished to pursue the writ, seeking to withdraw it. The …

MUNAVVAR HASANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Munavvar Hasan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge sheet filed against him. The State of U.P. and two others were respondents. The learned Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the …

SHRIMATI POOJA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Shrimati Pooja Devi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 19247 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and others. The investigation in the underlying matter had already been concluded and a charge sheet was filed on 17 May 2026. The petitioner later informed …

WASIF ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Wasif Ali, the owner of a truck, filed a writ petition seeking quash of an FIR dated 23 June 2026 under Section 316(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, alleging misappropriation of 574 crates of foreign liquor during transport. The FIR alleged that 785 crates were entrusted to the petitioner’s …

RAMFAL AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that they did not wish to pursue the present petition and sought to withdraw it, requesting liberty to file a fresh petition with better …

MADAN SINGH AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Madan Singh and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the continuation of criminal proceedings. The State disclosed that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed against the petitioners on 27 July 2026. The petitioners, through …

PREM PAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Prem Pal and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an ongoing investigation. The State had already concluded the investigation and forwarded a police report against the petitioners on 06-07-2026. The petitioners, …

RAM BABU AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ram Babu and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against them by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on …

VINOD CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vinod Chauhan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging aspects of the investigation. During the proceedings, the State counsel informed the Court that additional, more serious charges had been added to the case. The petitioner …

SMT GULISTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 9 OTHERS

Smt. Gulista filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 21983 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and nine others. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge‑sheet …

ASHIF AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ashif and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against them. The State of U.P. informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been submitted on 17 March 2026. The petitioners' …

MUNNU LAL @ MONUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Munnu Lal @ Monu, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 15400 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. Counsel for the petitioner, Dinesh Mishra, informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The Additional Government …

AZAM HUSSAINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Azam Hussain filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17449 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an unspecified action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petitioner was represented by counsel Pramod Kumar Pandey. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel …

NARENDRA SINGHAL @ NARENDRA KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Narendra Singhal filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17447 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State and the other respondents, represented by their counsel, raised no objection …

DHARMJEET CHAUHAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Dharmjeet Chauhan and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Kuber Singh Yadav, announced that the petitioners no …

REENA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Reena Yadav filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17434 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and …

AKANKSHA DEVI @ AKANKSHA SHIVHAREversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Akanksha Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation in which the charge under Section 103 of the B.N.S., 2023 was later substituted by Section 108 of the same Act. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel admitted the factual correctness of …

NEERAJ YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Neeraj Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Piyush Patel, expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The learned Additional Government Advocate and the counsel for the third respondent, Ravi …

SHARIKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sharik, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17490 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue …

VIJAY SHARMA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Vijay Sharma and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the continuation of criminal proceedings after a charge sheet was filed on 15 July 2026. The State of U.P. submitted that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed. Petitioners did not …

AMANversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

Aman filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18148 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. No counsel appeared for the third respondent. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wished to …

ANKUR KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ankur Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an investigation that had concluded with a final report favoring the accused on 12 April 2026. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the investigation …

FARIYAD HUSAIN AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Fariyad Husain and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation, but the investigating agency had already submitted a final report in their favour on 2 July 2026. The petitioners later informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue …

SUDHIRAMversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sudhiram, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18158 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Om Prakash, informed the court that the petitioner no longer …

KRISHAN KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Krishan Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and six others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the investigation had been completed and the final report was …

JYOTI TYAGIversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

Jyoti Tyagi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18144 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. No counsel appeared for the fourth respondent. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Gyanendra Prasad …

ALAM @ SAHRE ALAMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Alam @ Sahre Alam, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18152 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging the State of U.P. and three others. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ …

RAM KISHUN AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the State's counsel raised no objection. The court considered the parties' statements and allowed the …

PRADUMAN JOSHI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Praduman Joshi and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that they wished to withdraw the petition. The State and the other respondents raised no objection to the withdrawal. The …

KULDEEP @ KULDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Kuldeep Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against them. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 10 July 2026. …

URMILA BHARTIYA AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Urmila Bhartiya and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three respondents. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they wished to withdraw the present …

RAMSHANKAR YADAV AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the investigation had been completed and the final report was favorable to them, and …

SHRI RAHUL GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shri Rahul Gupta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the filing of a charge sheet against him dated 20 July 2026. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the court that the investigation was complete …

SADAB @ MOHD SHADAB KURESHI AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Sadab @ Mohd Shadab Kureshi and another filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18204 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that they no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The learned …

GULSHAN KHAN AND 8 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Gulshan Khan and others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the investigation had been completed and a final report favorable …

AVNISHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Avnish, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18192 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and two others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Nirbhay Singh, announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the …

GAURAV SAXENAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Gaurav Saxena, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 18216 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings against him. The State had already concluded its investigation and filed a charge sheet on 23 July 2026. During the hearing, the petitioner’s …

KAMRAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 18203 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced at the Bar that they wished to withdraw the petition and would file a fresh one with better particulars. The respondent’s counsel and …

ANKITversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ankit, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The investigation in the matter had already concluded, and a final report favoring the petitioner was submitted on 23 August …

BABULALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Babulal filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The investigation had already concluded, and a final report favoring the accused was submitted on 15 May 2026. The petitioner, through counsel, did …

UMESH SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Umesh Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel announced that the investigation had been concluded with a final report favorable to the petitioner and expressed a desire to withdraw the …

SRI DHANIRAM @ DHANIYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Sri Dhaniram filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The investigation had already concluded, and a final report favoring the accused was submitted on 27 July 2026. The petitioner, through counsel, did not contest this fact and expressed …

SMT. MAYA SRIVASTAVA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Smt. Maya Srivastava and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge sheet filed against them. The Attorney General informed the Court that the investigation had already concluded and a charge sheet was …

DEVENDRA SINGH @ JAGGU YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Devendra Singh @ Jaggu Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel stated that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the petition and seeks to withdraw it, requesting liberty to approach the …

DEV @ DARA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Dev @ Dara and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State raised no objection. The court …

VIPIN @ VIPIN SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vipin Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The respondent’s Additional Government Advocate raised …

VIKAS AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Vikas and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioners no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The learned …

SACHIN KUMAR @ SUNNY DEOL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Sachin Kumar @ Sunny Deol and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. They informed the Court that they had already been arrested by the police and expressed their desire to withdraw the petition. The State and the fourth respondent raised no …

SAILU AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that the investigation had been completed and a final report favorable to them had been submitted, and they wished to withdraw the petition. …

SHAHKAB AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Shahkab and five family members filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR lodged on 9 May 2026 under Sections 64(1), 85, 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the B.N.S., 2023, arising from matrimonial discord with respondent No.4, the wife of petitioner No.1. The High Court …

LAXMI NARAYAN TIWARI AND 7 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings of the State, after a charge sheet had been filed against them on 19 July 2026. The State submitted an affidavit confirming that the investigation was complete and the charge sheet was already forwarded. The …

UVAISH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Uvaish and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging aspects of the investigation. The State filed a charge-sheet against the petitioners on 27 June 2026, concluding the investigation. The petitioners' counsel, without disputing …

SARWAR AZIZversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Sarwar Aziz filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The …

NAFEESversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Nafees, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the filing of a charge sheet against him. The State had already completed the investigation and forwarded the charge sheet on 23 July 2026. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel …

SRI SANJAY RAJBHARversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sri Sanjay Rajbhar, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18651 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The investigation in the matter had already been concluded, and a final report dated 25.05.2026 was issued in favor of the petitioner. The petitioner later expressed a …

DHARMESH NISHADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dharmesh Nishad, filed a reply under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970 to a notice dated 10 April 2026. The authority (respondent 3) subsequently ordered his externment from the boundaries of District Basti for six months on 15 June 2026. Aggrieved, the petitioner …

SMT SUBIA YUNUSversusSTATE OF UP AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt Subia Yunus, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 18511 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a final report favored the petitioner. The …

MOHD. HASAN @ HASSAN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Mohd. Hasan @ Hassan Khan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings of a criminal investigation that had already culminated in a charge-sheet dated 18 May 2026. The State, represented by the Additional Government …

BUNTY @ BALLUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Bunty @ Ballu filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18399 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Rajesh Kumar Pal, informed the court that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue …

SHRI KRISHAN @ KISHAN CHANDversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shri Krishan @ Kishan Chand, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed against the petitioner on 18 May 2026. The petitioner’s counsel acknowledged …

ADITYA JAISWAL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Aditya Jaiswal and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The Attorney General for the State of Uttar …

TUKTUK @ YUVRAJ MINORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Tuktuk @ Yuvraj Minor filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The State's Additional …

SUNNY AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Sunny and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others. The petition sought relief (the specific relief is not detailed in the record). During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel announced …

MUKESH GUPTA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Mukesh Gupta and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against them. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed on 29 July 2026. The petitioners did not dispute this but expressed …

SHARMILA DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Sharmila Devi filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18422 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three others. The investigating agency had already concluded its inquiry and on 13 July 2026 forwarded a final report in favour of the petitioner. …

CHHOTELAL GUPTA AND 11 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Chhotelal Gupta and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against them. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet …

AVIKAL SHARMA @ AVIKAL KUMAR SHARMA MINORversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Avikal Sharma, a minor, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested and that he no longer wished to …

DINESH SINGH CHAUHAN @ DINESH SINGHversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dinesh Singh Chauhan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 11 March 2026. The petitioner did not contest these facts but expressed a desire to …

ANKITA GAUTAMversusSTATE OF UP AND 8 OTHERS

Ankita Gautam filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair investigation into an FIR dated 28‑04‑2026 under several sections of the BNS, 2023. The petitioner alleged that the police were not investigating impartially. The Court observed that …

ABHISHEKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Abhishek, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 21736 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel, Raju Singh, informed the court that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the …

AJIT PANDEY AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ajit Pandey and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging aspects of an investigation in which certain statutory sections had been amended. The State’s Additional Government Advocate acknowledged the amendment of sections but …

AAJAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Aajam and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 21734 of 2026) challenging actions of the State of U.P. and three others. During the investigation, the authorities added more serious charges. The petitioners acknowledged this fact but chose not to pursue the present …

NISHA DEVI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Nisha Devi and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against them. The State of U.P. informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been submitted on 19-06-2026. The petitioners did …

RENU RAI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Renu Rai and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings against them. During the hearing, the petitioners’ counsel informed the court that the investigation was already completed, a charge‑sheet had been filed, …

MANISHA TOMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Manisha Tomar and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against them. The State and one respondent informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 30.05.2026. The …

ABHAYA NARAYAN UPADHYAYAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Abhaya Narayan Upadhyaya, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17381 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging a matter against the State of U.P. and two others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced at the Bar that the petitioner no longer wished …

TEJVEER @ VISHNUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Tejveer @ Vishnu was externed from the boundaries of Mathura district for six months under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970. He filed an appeal and a stay application before the Divisional Commissioner, Agra Division, challenging the externment order. The appeal was …

DR RK BHADWAJ @ RAMKEWAL RAJBHARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dr. Rk Bhadwaj, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet against him. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed on 28 June 2026. The petitioner did not contest this fact but …

AKSHAY TYAGIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Akshay Tyagi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the Commissioner of Police, Gautam Budh Nagar, to monitor and ensure a fair, impartial, and expeditious investigation of FIR No. 417/2025 involving multiple IPC offences. He alleged that …

VISHAL SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Vishal Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they do not wish to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The respondent's counsel and the Attorney General for …

SHAKIL AHMADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shakil Ahmad, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 15534 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging his detention. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested. The petitioner expressed his …

VINAYSHEELversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested and no longer wished to pursue the writ, seeking to withdraw it. The State’s Additional …

SHOEB ANSARI ABDULLAPURIYA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Shoeb Ansari Abdullapuriya and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against them. The State of U.P. informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been …

TAHIRversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Tahir filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After filing, he informed the court that he had already been arrested and no longer wished to pursue the writ, seeking to withdraw it. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the …

SHIV BHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Shiv Bhan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against the accused. The State counsel informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been submitted on 21 June …

MITHILESH KUMAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Mithilesh Kumar Pandey filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the State and the other respondent did not oppose the withdrawal. The court considered the parties’ …

AKHILESH YADAV ALIAS BAUVAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Akhilesh Yadav alias Bauva, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested and expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State’s …

DESHRAJ KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Deshraj Kushwaha, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested and no longer wished to pursue the writ, seeking to withdraw it. The State’s …

ANKIT AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Ankit and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State and the third respondent, represented by their counsel, raised no objection to the …

ASHISH CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner Ashish Chauhan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State's Additional Government Advocate and the counsel for the fourth respondent raised no objection …

WAHEED AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Waheed and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against them. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 09.02.2026. Petitioners did not contest these facts …

RAM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

Ram Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conclude the investigation of an FIR dated 12-06-2025 under several sections of the B.N.S., 2023. The petitioner alleged that the investigation was not being conducted in a fair and impartial manner. …

SURENDER AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Surender and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation was already completed and a charge-sheet …

BANVARI LAL AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Banvari Lal and others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State's Additional Government Advocate and the counsel for respondent No.3 raised no …

KUNVAR PAL @ KUMAR PAL AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Kunvar Pal and others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The respondents, the State of UP and others, indicated that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 17-08-2026. The petitioners did not contest this fact …

ANKIT KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Ankit Kumar filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 16109 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Shri Vageesh Pandey, announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The learned Additional Government …

RAHUL SHARMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rahul Sharma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against him. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 07-06-2026. The petitioner did not contest these facts …

RAHAT ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rahat Ali, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against him. The State indicated that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 08-07-2026. The petitioner did not contest these facts but expressed …

JAYKESH NISHADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jaykesh Nishad, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging certain aspects of the investigation, wherein additional serious sections were added. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel acknowledged the facts but expressed a desire to …

NEETU SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Neetu Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The State's Additional Government Advocate and the counsel for the fourth respondent raised no …

EBADUR REHMAN KHAN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Ebadur Rehman Khan and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging aspects of the investigation by the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the hearing, the Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that additional sections had …

JAGANNATHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 7 OTHERS

The petitioner, Jagannath, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The State of Uttar Pradesh informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge‑sheet had been filed against the accused. The petitioner did not contest this fact but expressed a …

BHAIRAM YADAV AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the proceedings against them. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that the investigation had been completed, a charge‑sheet had been filed, and the magistrate had taken cognizance of the offence. …

MASOOD HASAN @ MASUDUL HASSAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Masood Hasan and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge sheet filed against them by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge …

HARI PRAKASH MITTAL AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 16707 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and seek liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The Additional Government …

SUBHAWATI DEVIversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Subhawati Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation in a case where a final report had already been submitted in favor of the accused. The State, represented by the Additional Government Advocate, informed the …

TANUJ VERMA @TANUSH @ SHAKTIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Tanuj Verma and Shakti, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the petitioner had already been arrested and therefore no …

AKASH SINGHversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Akash Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the respondents, including the State, raised no objection. The court considered the petitioner's request and the …

MALKEET SINGH AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Malkeet Singh and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings against them. The State informed the Court that the investigation had been completed and a charge‑sheet was filed on 06‑07‑2026. The petitioners did …

JAYKISHAN RANAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Jaykishan Rana filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 18189 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The Additional Government Advocate for the …

ASHIM KUMAR SAMANTOversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ashim Kumar Samanto, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The respondent's counsel raised no objection to …

ABHAY CHAUHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Abhay Chauhan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings against him. The State informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 25-04-2026. The petitioner did not contest these …

DUDHNATH RAJBHAR AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. The learned Additional Government Advocate raised no objection to the withdrawal. The court, after noting the …

SURAJ PATEL AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners Suraj Patel and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition and seek liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars. The State’s Additional …

SMT. GEETAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Smt. Geeta filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that she had already been arrested and no longer wished to pursue the writ, seeking to withdraw it. The Additional Government Advocate for …

RUMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Ruma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The second petitioner was subsequently arrested and the petitioners expressed their intention to withdraw the writ. The State and the fourth respondent did not object to the withdrawal. The …

HARGOVIND AND 9 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Hargovind and nine others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against them. The State of Uttar Pradesh submitted that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 14-08-2026. The petitioners' …

AMIT YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Amit Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against him. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been …

DAYANAND YADAVversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dayanand Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. While the petition was pending, the petitioner was arrested and subsequently informed the Court that he no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The State’s Additional …

SANNA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 07.07.2026. The petitioners did not …

AKASHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner informed the court that he had already been arrested and no longer wished to pursue the writ, seeking to withdraw it. The State and the other respondents raised no …

ABHISHEK HARYANA AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Abhishek Haryana and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the proceedings against them. The State had already concluded the investigation, filed a charge-sheet, and the magistrate had taken cognizance on 21-08-2026, leading …

SALMAN ODI @ AJARUDDINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Salman Odi @ Ajaruddin, filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17327 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging a matter against the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that he no longer wished to pursue the …

SEEMA BARGAH AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Seema Bargah and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The State and the fourth respondent, …

MAYA DEVI AND 4 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Maya Devi and four others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17369 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of U.P. The petition was being heard by Hon'ble Justices Rajiv Gupta and Devendra Singh-I. During the hearing, counsel for the …

RAMESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ramesh Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The State’s Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the investigation was complete and a …