Created by Fuzzy Cloud

DEVENDRA SINGH I

247 judgments · newest first · showing 201–247

DHARM SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dharm Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ and seeks to withdraw it. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised no …

SARAJVEER AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the State's Additional Government Advocate raised no objection. The court considered the request to withdraw the …

LAL MIYANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 14 OTHERS

The petitioner, Lal Miyan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against him on 11 June 2026. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been submitted. The …

ARUN KUMAR (MINOR)versusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

The minor Arun Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The State’s Additional …

AJAI KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Ajai Kumar Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police to conduct a fair, speedy, and proper investigation of an FIR dated 05.05.2024 under IPC sections 420, 406 and IT Act section 66. The petitioner alleged that the police were not investigating …

HASMAT ALIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Hasmat Ali, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed a desire to withdraw the petition, and the State's counsel raised no objection. The court considered the petitioner's clear statement of …

DHEERAJ KUMAR GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Dheeraj Kumar Gupta, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The State informed the court that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 21-11-2023. The petitioner did not contest these facts but expressed a desire to …

SHIV SINGH AND 13 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Shiv Singh and thirteen others filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 17848 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. The State’s Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation had already been concluded and a final …

NEETISH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Neetish Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another respondent. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Vipin Kumar Singh, announced that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ petition …

DHANRAJ NISHADversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 7 OTHERS

Petitioner Dhanraj Nishad filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an investigation. The investigating agency had already concluded the inquiry and issued a final report in the petitioner’s favour on 28 December 2025. The petitioner, through counsel …

AYUSH MITTALversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ayush Mittal, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the investigation and charge-sheet filed against him. The State of U.P. and other respondents indicated that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 04-09-2026. The petitioner admitted …

SHAHJAHAN BEGAM AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The counsel for the respondent and the Additional Government Advocate for …

KAJAL DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Kajal Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The State's Additional Government Advocate informed the court that the investigation had been completed and a final report favoring the accused was submitted …

SMT REETU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State. During the hearing, the second petitioner disclosed that he had already been arrested and expressed a desire to withdraw the petition. Both the Additional Government …

BHASKAR SAHUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Bhaskar Sahu, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. After the investigation concluded, a charge-sheet was filed against him on 17 July 2026. The petitioner subsequently informed the court that he no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to …

PRAKASH DWIVEDIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Prakash Dwivedi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police officials to conduct a fair and impartial investigation into Crime No. 222 of 2025 under specific provisions of the B.N.S., 2023 and the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner …

KUNAL @ KUNANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kunal @ Kunan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel announced that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the petition and seeks to withdraw it. The State’s Additional Government Advocate raised …

FARMAN RAZA @ BABU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Farman Raza @ Babu and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging aspects of the investigation, during which an additional section was added. The Attorney General highlighted this addition, which the petitioners did not dispute. However, the petitioners …

SURESH CHAUHAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners Suresh Chauhan and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The respondent's counsel and the Additional …

YASH SHARMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Yash Sharma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the investigation and charge sheet filed against them by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The State’s Additional Government Advocate informed the Court that the investigation was complete and …

ILMA AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Ilma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel announced that they did not wish to pursue the present petition and sought to withdraw it, requesting …

VIKASH PRAJAPATI @ CHOTU AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Vikash Prajapati and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court after a charge-sheet was filed against them on 5 July 2026. They later sought to withdraw the petition, stating they would approach the appropriate forum later. The State's …

RAJ BAHADUR ALIAS BAURA AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, counsel for the petitioners informed the court that they no longer wish to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The respondent's counsel, the Additional Government Advocate, raised no …

NEELESH KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Neelesh Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the criminal proceedings against him. The State disclosed that the investigation was complete and a charge-sheet had been filed on 28 May 2026. The petitioner did not contest these …

KRISHNAMOHAN KUSHWAHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Krishnamohan Kushwaha, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Superintendent of Police (respondent No.2) and another official (respondent No.3) to ensure a fair and impartial investigation in a case registered on 04-04-2026. The petitioner …

GOVIND TOMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Govind Tomar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an order of the State of U.P. and others. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel announced that he no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The …

MAYAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Maya, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 20035 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging an ongoing criminal proceeding. The State of Uttar Pradesh had already concluded its investigation and filed a charge-sheet against the petitioner on 24 March 2026. …

SMT. FULMATI DEVIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

The petitioner, Smt. Fulmati Devi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Superintendent of Police and other officials to complete a fair and impartial investigation into FIR No. 91 of 2026 and to refrain from arresting her. She alleged that the police were not …

HASAM ALI AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Hasam Ali and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The State of Uttar Pradesh submitted that the police investigation was completed and a report filed on 28 June 2026. The petitioners did not contest this fact but expressed a …

ISHTEQARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner, Ishteqar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. After filing, the petitioner informed the court that he had already been arrested and no longer wished to pursue the writ, seeking to withdraw it. The State's Additional Government Advocate raised …

KUNWAR ASIF ALI KHANversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

The petitioner, Kunwar Asif Ali Khan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Superintendent of Police (respondent No.2) and another respondent to conduct a free, fair, and expeditious investigation into an FIR dated 11‑12‑2025 under Sections 333, 308(4), 351(3) …

VIPIN KUMAR AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed Criminal Miscellaneous Writ Petition No. 19971 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners announced that they no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The learned Additional Government Advocate for the State of …

ALOKversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHER

The petitioner Alok filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging an action of the State of U.P. and two others. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel expressed that the petitioner no longer wished to pursue the writ and sought to withdraw it. The …

MOHD AFZALversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Mohd Afzal challenged the attachment of his property by orders dated 17.02.2026 and 17.06.2023 issued by the District Magistrate under Section 14 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, contending that the property was purchased from his own income and …

TITUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The appellant, Titu, appealed under Section 413 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the acquittal of accused Nos. 2‑4 in a case involving alleged abusive language and an altercation with the victim. The trial court had acquitted these accused, while the deceased accused Vikas @ Ulla was alleged …

SUJEET VERMAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The appellant challenged the acquittal of the husband and in‑laws of Sanju Verma in a dowry‑death case. The prosecution alleged that the accused harassed the deceased for dowry and caused her death by poisoning, invoking Sections 302/34, 304B, 498A IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …

STATE OF UPversusMANOJ SINGH AND OTHERS

The State of Uttar Pradesh filed Government Appeal Defective No. 122 of 2026 against Manoj Singh and others before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The appeal was listed before Court No. 43 and heard by Hon’ble Justices Salil Kumar Rai and Devendra Singh‑I. After a delay of 151 days, the …

SARVENDRAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant, Sarvendra, filed a criminal appeal (No. 5050 of 2015) against the State of U.P. While the appeal was pending, an office report dated 02-02-2018, based on a report from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Firozabad, confirmed that the appellant had died. The High Court, after taking note of …

HARCHARANversusSTATE

The appellant Harcharan was convicted by the trial court for murder and attempt to murder under Sections 302/34 and 307 IPC based on the testimony of the complainant and other witnesses who claimed the accused entered the victim's house at night and fired. On appeal, the High Court examined the …

SHIVCHARANversusSTATE

The appellants, Shivcharan and Hazari Lal, were subjected to a non‑bailable warrant after an order dated 13‑02‑2026 directed their production before the Allahabad High Court. They contended that a coordinate bench had already acquitted them in Criminal Appeal No. 1833 of 1987, but the acquittal …

BRIJENDRA SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant Brijendra Singh filed a criminal appeal before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. The matter was heard by a bench of two judges, with counsel Kamal Singh and V.P. Pathak representing the appellant and A.G.A. representing the State. No facts or legal issues were detailed …

LAKHMI AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellants Lakhmi, Languri and Yogesh were convicted for the brutal murder, beheading and assault of Chameli Devi and the injury of her grandson Krishna Kumar, under Sections 302/34, 307/34, 509/34 and 506 IPC. The appellants appealed, arguing that the child witness’s testimony contained …

MAHESH ALIAS MUNNA YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The appellant Mahesh alias Munna Yadav was convicted for murder and offences under the Arms Act arising from a land‑dispute‑related shooting that killed Bhola Yadav and Vinod Yadav. The prosecution relied on the informant’s statement, medical post‑mortem reports, forensic ballistics linking the …

IRFAN AND 2 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court examined an appeal against a Sessions Court conviction of Irfan, Faeem and Saleem for murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and abetment (Sec. 120B IPC) based on a FIR lodged 49 hours after the incident. The prosecution alleged the accused deliberately ran over the deceased with a tractor, supported …

SANJU @ SANJAY DIXIT AND 3 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash charge‑sheet No. 382 of 2022 filed in a case of offences under Sections 452, 323 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code. The charge‑sheet was filed despite the applicants not having been arrested during investigation, and …