HARI OMversusSTATE OF HARYANA & ANOTHER
2014 INSC 75731 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed
Hari Om was convicted under Sections 304-B and 498-A of the IPC for the dowry death of his wife, Poonam, who committed suicide within a month of marriage after persistent dowry demands. The High Court upheld his conviction and sentenced him to life imprisonment, while acquitting co‑accused. Hari Om appealed only agains…
NAND KUMARversusSTATE OF CHHATIISGARH
2014 INSC 75631 October 2014Dismissed
The case concerns the murder of three members of the Singh family in Bhaismudi village, Chhattisgarh, by a group of accused who formed an unlawful assembly armed with lathis, battle‑axes, swords and rods. Two close relatives of the victims, Madhubala Bai (PW‑1) and Saraswati Bai (PW‑3), witnessed the killings and ident…
ANUP SARMAHversusBHOLA NATH SHARMA AND ORS.
2012 INSC 49630 October 2012Dismissed
The petitioner bought a vehicle on hire‑purchase and alleged that the financier forcibly repossessed it, filing a criminal complaint. The Judicial Magistrate ordered interim custody to the petitioner, but the High Court of Assam quashed the criminal proceedings. The Supreme Court examined whether a financier’s reposses…
MUNNI @ SYED AKBARversusSTATE OF INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, GOBICHETTIPALAYAM, ERODE
2014 INSC 75029 October 2014Dismissed
The appellant, Munni @ Syed Akbar, was convicted for murdering his wife Gulsara Banu by strangulation using a cable wire, and also for offences under Sections 498A and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Post‑mortem examination and a Forensic Science Laboratory report established asphyxia by strangulation and ligature marks …
RATHNAVATHI & ANOTHERversusKAVITA GANASHAMDAS
2014 INSC 75129 October 2014Disposed off
The plaintiff entered into a 1989 agreement to purchase a house from defendant No.2, paid the full consideration, but the seller failed to execute the sale deed. The plaintiff filed two suits: one for permanent injunction to prevent dispossession by defendant No.1 and No.2, and another for specific performance of the s…
DHIANKAURversusEAST PUNJAB URBAN RENT RESTRICTION ACT, 1949
2014 INSC 102129 October 2014Disposed off
The landlady Dhiankaur filed eviction proceedings against tenant Prem Pal Sran under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, alleging arrears of rent from December 1994. The Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority both held that the agreed rent was Rs.1,500 per month and that the tenant was in arrears for…
NARENDER SINGH & ORS.versusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2015 INSC 70929 September 2015Dismissed
The case concerned the murder of a village Sarpanch on 27 June 1997, for which six accused were convicted under Sections 302, 148 and 149 of the IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The appellants challenged the conviction on grounds that the FIR was ante‑dated, the injured eye‑witness (PW‑3) fabricated his injuries…
M/S UMESH GOELversusHIMACHAL PRADESH COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.
2016 INSC 45729 June 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, an unregistered partnership firm, entered into a construction contract with the respondent and later contested the respondent's claim in arbitration. The respondent argued that Section 69(3) of the Partnership Act, 1932 barred the firm from participating in arbitral proceedings because "other proceedings…
KHUBRAMversusDALBIR SINGH & ORS.
2015 INSC 37329 April 2015Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the appointment of Khub Ram as Chief Inspector in Haryana Roadways, finding that his experience certificates were fraudulent and did not satisfy the statutory requirement of two years in a Government or semi‑government undertaking. Consequently, his appointment was declared invalid and the di…
K. RAVI KUMARversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2014 INSC 82028 November 2014Disposed off
The appellant K. Ravi Kumar was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and cruelty under Section 498‑A IPC for stabbing and setting his wife on fire. He appealed, contending that the killing occurred during a sudden quarrel without pre‑meditation, thus falling within Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC. The Supreme Court…
R.P.S. YADAVversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
2015 INSC 95828 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, a Municipal Corporation of Delhi employee, was accused of demanding a bribe of Rs.1,500 for issuing a licence. The CBI organised a trap involving the complainant, a shadow witness and a middle‑man who handed over the money, after which it was recovered. The trial court and the Delhi High Court convicted …
ASHOK KUMAR GIRIversusGOVT. OF INDIA AND ORS.
2016 INSC 34727 April 2016Disposed off
Ashok Kumar Giri, a person with disability, filed a writ petition seeking the 3% reservation guaranteed under Sections 32 and 33 of the Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995. The Patna High Court had refused relief, holding that the reservation could not be applied because the vacancies in the identified post amounted to…
THE MANAGER, VKNM VOCATIONAL HIGHER 'SECONDARY SCHOOLversusTHE STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS ETC.
2016 INSC 9527 January 2016Appeal(s) allowed
The Manager of VKNM Vocational Higher Secondary School (appellant) challenged a Kerala High Court order that directed it to appoint a teacher (the 5th respondent) under Rule 51‑A, claiming a preferential right based on her earlier short‑term service in the school in 1997‑98. The school argued that the amendment to Rule…
STATE OF J & KversusLAKHWINDER KUMAR & ORS.
2013 INSC 27925 April 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned a BSF constable and a commandant who, after a quarrel with local youths, caused the death of a teenager. The State of Jammu & Kashmir sought to have the accused tried in a criminal court, while the BSF exercised its power under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act to transfer the case to a Sec…
PREM KAURversusSTATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
2013 INSC 28025 April 2013Appeal(s) allowed
Prem Kaur, a labourer, was abducted, beaten and allegedly raped by a father, his son and others. She was hospitalized, but the FIR was lodged three days later. The trial court acquitted the accused, citing the delay in filing the FIR and the improbability of a father and son raping together, without providing reasoned …
DONESH RAJPUT & ORS.versusPRADEEP KUMAR SHUKLA & ORS.
[2014] 10 S.C.R. 61723 September 2014Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined applications filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh seeking clarification on the number of pharmacist vacancies and the eligibility of candidates who had not applied to the 2007 advertisement. The Court reiterated its earlier decision in State of Uttar Pradesh v. Santosh Kumar Mishra that the be…
RAJENDRA KUMAR AGRAWALversusSTATE OF U.P. & ORS.
2014 INSC 67123 September 2014Disposed off
The case concerned the selection for the vacant post of Chief Engineer in the U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad. After a prior Supreme Court judgment removed a status‑quo on promotion, the Parishad, following the State Government’s advice, relaxed the five‑year service requirement under Regulation 20 to include additional …
BHEEMRAYAversusSUNEETHA
2013 INSC 64523 September 2013Appeal(s) allowed
Both parties were minors when they allegedly married. The wife filed two suits—one to restrain the husband from remarrying and another seeking a perpetual injunction against alienation of property, claiming a one‑third share for herself and her daughter. She also filed a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage A…
SOMNATH CHAKRABORTY AND ANR.versusAPPOLLO GLENEAGLES HOSPITALS LTD. & ORS.
2014 INSC 50323 July 2014Disposed off
The appellants, Somnath Chakraborty and others, owned 11.659 cottah of land that was later notified as surplus under the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976. The State of West Bengal leased the land to Appollo Gleneagles Hospitals Ltd. for 30 years. The appellants challenged the notification, and the Calcutta H…
M/S. SHINHAN APEX CORPORATIONversusMIS. EURO APEX B.V.
2016 INSC 33322 April 2016
The dispute arose from a licence agreement that contained an arbitration clause. An arbitral tribunal issued a Partial Final Award (PFA) directing the respondent to transfer its Indian patent rights to the appellant and to execute the necessary transfer deed within a stipulated period. The respondent sent a draft deed …
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusSCHAN LAL SAYAL & ORS.
2015 INSC 95521 January 2015Disposed off
The case concerned the promotion of thousands of Junior Telecommunication Officers (Junior Engineers) to Assistant Engineer posts and whether seniority for promotion should be based on the order of passing a departmental qualifying examination or the order of recruitment/entry. Earlier Supreme Court decisions had given…
H. DOHIL CONSTRUCTIONS CO. (P) LTD.versusNAHAR EXPORTS LTD. & ANR.
2014 INSC 99420 August 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined the High Court's order that condoned a 9‑day delay in filing regular first appeals and a 1727‑day delay in refiling those appeals filed by Nahar Exports Ltd. and others. The Court held that the respondents failed to provide a bona‑fide explanation for the inordinate delay, showing gross negli…
PUDHU RAJA & ANR.versusSTATE, REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE
2012 INSC 41119 September 2012Dismissed
The case involved the murder of Jayalakshmi, who was set on fire in a house she shared with her husband Pudhu Raja (A-1) and his mother (A-2). The prosecution alleged that the accused killed her to extort dowry, invoking Sections 302 r/w 34, 304(b) and 201 of the IPC, while the trial court acquitted them citing contrad…
MEENA CHAUDHARYversusCOMMISSIONER OF DELHI POLICE AND ORS.
2014 INSC 101018 September 2014Disposed off
Meena Chaudhary, married in 1973, claimed that her husband (Respondent No.4) deserted her in 1989 and that subsequent divorce decrees from Bhutan, England and Jorhat were invalid. She filed a suit under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 seeking protection, residence, monetary relief and compensat…
BONNIE ANNA GEORGEversusMEDICAL COUNCIL OF INDIA &ANR.
2014 INSC 101218 September 2014Case Partly allowed
Bonnie Anna George, a medical student, sought a writ of mandamus to compel Christian Medical College, Ludhiana and the Medical Council of India to allow her to shift from MD Pathology to a vacant MD General Medicine seat under the NRI quota. The college denied her request, citing its counselling schedule and procedural…
SHANTILAL GULABCHAND MUTHAversusTATA ENGINEERING & LOCOMOTIVE CO. LTD. & ANR.
[2013] 2 S.C.R. 43218 March 2013Disposed off
The appellant purchased five Tata diesel vehicles and paid the price through eight bills of exchange drawn on his banker. The respondent sued for the balance amount, but the appellant, believing the debt settled, failed to file a written statement. The trial court passed a decree under Order VIII Rule 10 of the CPC wit…
SHANTILAL GULABCHAND MUTHAversusTATA ENGINEERING & LOCOMOTIVE CO. LTD. & ANR.
2013 INSC 17218 March 2013Disposed off
Shantilal purchased five Tata diesel vehicles and paid the price through a series of bills of exchange. Tata Engineering filed a suit for recovery of Rs.5,66,000 plus interest, but Shantilal did not file a written statement, believing the amount had been paid. The trial court passed an ex parte decree under Order VIII …
RAJINDER SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2014 INSC 88417 December 2014Case Partly allowed
The appellant Rajinder Singh was convicted for the murder of Suraj Mal and Shri Ram and for violating Section 27 of the Arms Act after a violent altercation following a Holi celebration. The incident involved a quarrel between a juvenile and another party, after which the appellant allegedly fired his licensed double‑b…
BALKAR SINGHversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2014 INSC 102917 November 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The case involved the murder of Satinder Sekhon, for which A‑10 (Balkar Singh) was convicted under Sections 120B (conspiracy) and 302 read with 34 of the IPC, based largely on circumstantial evidence. The trial court and the Punjab & Haryana High Court upheld the conviction, while the accused argued that there was no m…
ANNAPURNAversusSTATE OF U.P.
2013 INSC 26317 April 2013Dismissed
The Supreme Court reviewed an appeal by the mother‑in‑law convicted of murdering her daughter‑in‑law, who died within two months of marriage after being burnt with kerosene. The victim’s dying declaration alleged that the appellant poured kerosene on her because of dowry demands. The trial and High Courts had relied on…
M. MAHENDAR KUMARversusM. MANI & ORS.
2015 INSC 23217 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed
M. Mahendar Kumar, an accused in Crime No.147 of 2009, challenged a Madras High Court order that, under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., transferred the investigation to the CBCID, Chennai. The transfer was sought by the de facto complainant, M. Mani, who had previously applied under Section 173(8) for further investigation…
NAWAL KISHORE MISHRA & ORS. ETC.versusHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR GENERAL & ORS. ETC.
2015 INSC 12717 February 2015Dismissed
The appellants, successful candidates in the direct‑recruitment exam for District Judges, challenged the Allahabad High Court’s appointment of 34 unfilled reserved vacancies by promoting in‑service candidates, alleging non‑compliance with the Uttar Pradesh Reservation Act, 1994 and that they should have been considered…
NARENDER KUMARversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI
2015 INSC 93216 December 2015Dismissed
The appellants, three police constables, were convicted for the murder of Laxman Singh under Sections 302 read with 34 (and 330) of the IPC. The prosecution's case rested on a dying declaration recorded by a Metropolitan Magistrate after the victim was taken to hospital, where he alleged severe beatings and being set o…
MAHESH JOGIversusTHE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
2014 INSC 104316 December 2014Disposed off
Mahesh Jogi was convicted for an offence committed on 20 January 1985 when he was 17 years and 4 months old. The conviction and sentence were imposed before the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 came into force. The Supreme Court was asked to determine whether Jogi qualified as a juvenile und…
NAND KLSHOREversusSTATE OF M.P.
2014 INSC 104116 December 2014Case Allowed
The petitioner, convicted under Section 302 of the IPC for a murder committed on 18 June 1997, claimed that he was only 17 years old at the time of the offence and therefore entitled to the benefits of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000. The Supreme Court examined documentary and oral evid…
RE. EXPLOITATION OF CHILDREN IN ORPHANAGES IN THE STATE OF TAMIL NADUversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2013 INSC 83816 December 2013
The Supreme Court heard a writ petition concerning the exploitation of children in orphanages in Tamil Nadu and the failure of several States and Union Territories to implement protective legislation. Earlier orders dated 3 January 2013 and 7 February 2013 had directed the States to operationalise the Protection of Chi…
ASHAPURA MINE-CHEM LTD.versusGUJARAT MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
2015 INSC 33016 April 2015Appeal(s) allowed
Ashapura Mine‑Chem Ltd. and Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation (GMDC) entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) in 2007 to set up a joint venture for an alumina plant. The MoU contained arbitration clauses (Clauses 26 and 27) requiring bilateral settlement first and, failing that, referral to a sole arbitra…
DILIPversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2013 INSC 25916 April 2013Dismissed
The appellant was convicted for raping a girl who was later found to be 14 years old at the time of the offence. The trial court had acquitted him on the basis that the girl was not below 16 years and had allegedly consented, but the High Court reversed this finding and sentenced him to seven years imprisonment. On app…
ALL INDIA JUDGES ASSON. & OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
2015 INSC 97016 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The All India Judges Association and other staff of subordinate courts sought enforcement of the Supreme Court's 07‑10‑2009 order approving the Shetty Commission recommendations for non‑judicial staff. They contended that several states had reverted to the 5th Pay Commission scales after 31‑Dec‑2005, ignoring the highe…
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & OTHERSversusHITKISHORE GOSWAMI
2015 INSC 12116 February 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The respondent, a former lecturer in government schools (1963-1966), voluntarily resigned to join a lecturer position in a government degree college in 1966 and later retired in 2004. He sought to have his earlier service counted for pension and gratuity calculations, filing a writ petition. The State argued that the r…
NAGARAJA RAOversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
2015 INSC 95416 January 2015Case Partly allowed
The appellant, a postal sorting assistant, was convicted of theft of a registered insured parcel containing a gold chain under Section 381 IPC and of a breach of duty under Section 52 of the Indian Post Office Act. Both offences arose from the same incident and were tried together, resulting in separate six‑month simpl…
BAR COUNCIL OF ANDHRA PRADESHversusB. NARAYAN SWAMY & ANR.
2014 INSC 100415 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The Bar Council of Andhra Pradesh disciplined advocate B. Narayan Swamy for attesting blank stamp papers in his capacity as a Notary, finding him in violation of the Notaries Act and Section 35 of the Advocates Act. The State Bar Council imposed a lifetime debarment, which the Bar Council of India stayed and set aside,…
VEERENDRA KR. GAUTAM AND OTHERSversusKARUNA NIDHAN UPADHYAY AND OTHERS
2016 INSC 53315 July 2016Dismissed
The Supreme Court examined the selection of principals for degree and postgraduate colleges in Uttar Pradesh, where the Higher Education Services Commission had varied its screening norms and called an excessive number of candidates, some of whom were allegedly ineligible. The petitioners argued that earlier withdrawn …
PRASAD SHRIKANT PUROHITversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR
2015 INSC 32515 April 2015Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined whether the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act (MCOCA) applied to a series of bomb blasts in Parbhani (2003), Jalna (2004) and Malegaon (2008) and whether bail could be denied under Section 21(4) of MCOCA. It held that cognizance of an offence taken by a Judicial Magistrate under Sect…
RATNESH KUMAR PANDEYversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
2015 INSC 95315 January 2015Dismissed
The appellant, Ratnesh Kumar Pandey, was convicted of murdering his wife Suman under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including a knife and a blood‑stained sweater recovered from the scene, and a post‑mortem report showing twenty incised wounds. The appellant clai…
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.versusHONBLE MR. JUSTICE (RETD) RAMESH AMRITLAL MEHTA & ORS.
2013 INSC 16314 March 2013Dismissed
The appellant, a husband, was convicted under IPC sections 498A (dowry harassment) and 306 (abetment of suicide) for the death of his wife Girija, who committed suicide within seven years of marriage in their matrimonial home. The prosecution proved that Girija had suffered multiple physical injuries and mental cruelty…
VINOD KUMARversusGANGADHAR
2014 INSC 70813 October 2014Appeal(s) allowed
Vinod Kumar filed a suit for specific performance of a contract to purchase a house; the trial court dismissed the suit and the High Court, acting as the first appellate court, affirmed the dismissal. The appellant contended that the High Court had not examined the evidence, ignored the submissions and grounds of appea…
EITZEN BULK A/SversusASHAPURA MLNECHEM LTD. & ANR.
2016 INSC 42013 May 2016Disposed off
Eitzen Bulk A/S and Ashapura Minechem Ltd entered into a charter party that contained an arbitration clause specifying London as the seat and English law as the governing law. A dispute arose and was arbitrated in London, resulting in an award against Ashapura. Ashapura sought to set aside the award in India under Sect…
SHASIDHAR & OTHERSversusSMT.ASHWINI UMA MATHAD &ANR.
2015 INSC 3013 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned a partition suit filed by the daughters of Shashidhar against his father, step‑mother and step‑sisters over extensive family properties. The trial court granted a preliminary decree allocating shares, which the defendants appealed. The Karnataka High Court disposed of the first appeal in a brief orde…
INDIAN COUNCIL OF MEDICAL RESEARCHversusT.N. SANIKOP & ANR. ETC. ETC.
2014 INSC 102712 November 2014Case Partly allowed
The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) sought to acquire 40 guntas of land in Belgaum for a medical research centre, and the Land Acquisition Officer initially fixed compensation at Rs 1,050 per gunta. The reference court enhanced this to Rs 7,000 per gunta, and the Karnataka High Court further raised it to Rs 9…
M/S. MUNEER ENTERPRISESversusM/S RAMGAD MINERALS AND MINING LTD. & ORS.
2015 INSC 20912 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the mining lease M.L. No.2010 granted to Mis. Dalmia Cements (Bharat) Ltd for forest land in Karnataka. Mis. Dalmia surrendered the lease in stages, culminating in a letter dated 27 March 2001 and the surrender of the lease book on 16 June 2001, which was accepted by the Director of Mines and Geology…
C. P. JOHNversusBABU M. PALISSERY & ORS.
2014 INSC 62511 September 2014Dismissed
C.P. John, a losing candidate, filed an election petition challenging the election of Babu M. Palissery on grounds of bribery, false pamphlet distribution and alleged suppression of criminal convictions. The High Court dismissed the petition, holding it lacked material facts and was non‑compliant with Section 83 of the…
MOHD. JALEES ANSARI AND OTHERSversusCENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
2016 INSC 40211 May 2016Disposed off
The Supreme Court examined the appeal of sixteen accused convicted under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) for a series of bomb blasts on Indian trains in December 1993. The Court held that Section 20A(1) of TADA makes prior approval of the District Superintendent of Police an absolute pre…
LILLU @ RAJESH & ANR.versusSTATE OF HARYANA
2013 INSC 24311 April 2013Dismissed
Four accused were convicted for kidnapping and raping a girl who was 13 years and 9 months old at the time of the offence. The appellant, Lillu @ Rajesh, challenged the conviction on the ground that the victim was older, that her statement was uncorroborated, and that the two‑finger test and alleged habitual sexual act…
RAM PAL @ BUNDAversusSTATE OF HARYANA
2013 INSC 24411 April 2013Dismissed
The appellant was convicted under Sections 302 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code for the rape and murder of a young woman named Devi. The prosecution's case was built on circumstantial evidence, including the appellant's presence at the crime scene, his flight from the village, medical findings of sexual intercourse and…
MOHAN LAL & ANRversusSTATE OF PUNJAB
2013 INSC 24611 April 2013Dismissed
The appellants, teachers including Mohan Lal, were convicted for gang rape and kidnapping of a minor student under Sections 376(2)(g) and 366 IPC and sentenced to ten years' rigorous imprisonment. The Supreme Court examined whether the fiduciary relationship between teachers and a student attracted Section 376(2)(b) an…
KUM. MICHAELversusREGIONAL MANAGER ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
2013 INSC 9111 February 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, an 8‑year‑old boy, was struck by a motorcycle in 2001, sustaining a fractured right leg, permanent disability of 16% and a 1 cm shortening of the limb. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded Rs 77,000 as compensation, which the Karnataka High Court enhanced to Rs 1 lakh. The appellant appealed to the…
MD. JAMILUDIN NASIRversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2014 INSC 70710 October 2014Case Allowed
The Supreme Court delivered a judgment on 21 May 2014 in MD Jamiluddin Nasir v. State of West Bengal concerning an alleged offence of waging war against the State under IPC 121. Subsequent to that judgment, the parties filed criminal miscellaneous petitions seeking correction of typographical and factual errors in the …
SREE BALAJI NAGAR RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATIONversusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.
2014 INSC 61710 September 2014Disposed off
The appellants, a residents' association, challenged land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for a canal scheme, where an award was made on 30‑Nov‑2006 but physical possession of the land was never taken and the proceedings were stayed by the courts. The Right to Fair Compensation an…
CHAIRMAN, RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION & ORS.versusSMT. SANTOSH & ORS.
2013 INSC 34110 May 2013Disposed off
The petition challenged a Rajasthan High Court order that placed the entire liability for compensation on the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (RSRTC) and exempted the driver and owner of a 'Jugaad' vehicle. The Supreme Court examined whether a 'Jugaad' falls within the definition of "motor vehicle" under Sec…
MD. JAMILUDIN NASIRversusSTATE OF WEST BENGAL
2015 INSC 31610 April 2015Case Allowed
The appellants were convicted under Section 121 of the Indian Penal Code for waging war against the State in a trial court in West Bengal. They appealed the conviction to the Calcutta High Court, which upheld the judgment. Subsequently, the appellants filed Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions before the Supreme Court seek…
SWAPNA SUKUMAR & ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.
2015 INSC 31410 April 2015Disposed off
The Supreme Court considered two interlocutory applications (IA No.6 and IA No.7) filed in Civil Appeals Nos. 226‑227 of 2015 arising out of Swapna Sukumar & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Ors. The applicant indicated that IA No.6 was not to be pressed, and the Court dismissed it as not pressed. IA No.7 was examined and the…
SWAROOP SINGHversusSTATE OF M.P.
2013 INSC 23410 April 2013Dismissed
In 1992, a 17‑18‑year‑old girl (PW2) was allegedly forced at knife point by Swaroop Singh to have sexual intercourse in a sugarcane field. She reported the incident immediately, and medical examination revealed a torn hymen; other witnesses corroborated her account and broken bangles were recovered from the scene. The …
KAILASH @ TANTI BANJARAversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
2013 INSC 23710 April 2013Dismissed
The appellant was convicted under Section 376 IPC for raping P.W.4, an agricultural labourer, and under Section 506B IPC for criminal intimidation. The trial court, after medical examination, concluded that the victim was about 14 years old and that the intercourse, though allegedly consensual, fell within the offence …
V.C. CHINNAPPA GOUDARversusKARNATAKA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD & ANR.
2015 INSC 96810 March 2015Dismissed
The appellants, who were public servants, were prosecuted under Section 48 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974. They contended that, as public servants, prosecution required prior sanction under Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), which was not obtained. The Supreme Court examine…
YALLAWA & ORS.versusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2015 INSC 10319 October 2015Dismissed
The case arose from a 1991 incident in which a group of accused set fire to the house of Channabasappa, resulting in the death of ten persons. The trial court acquitted the accused, but the Karnataka High Court reversed the acquittal, convicting them under various IPC provisions including murder, arson and criminal con…
STATE OF RAJASTHANversusCHANDGI RAM & ORS.
2014 INSC 6149 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Rajasthan prosecuted Chandgi Ram and others for the murder of Surender, alleging that the accused beat him to death with iron rods, pipes and lathis, constituting offences under IPC s.302 read with s.34 and s.452. The trial court convicted the accused based on the testimony of the deceased's wife, two mino…
ANIL JOSHI AND OTHERSversusSTATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AND OTHERS
2015 INSC 1829 March 2015Disposed off
The petitioners, former Range Officers of the Himachal Pradesh Forest Department, claimed that a 1983 letter from the Director of Forest Education promised them direct recruitment as Assistant Conservators of Forest, invoking promissory estoppel. The Himachal Pradesh Administrative Tribunal dismissed their applications…
NATASHA SINGHversusCBI (STATE)
2013 INSC 3268 May 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant, Natasha Singh, was charged under the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act for allegedly inflating an insurance claim. After the prosecution examined 52 witnesses, the appellant examined only one defence witness and then sought to summon three additional witnesses under Section 311 of the CrPC. The tr…
SWAPNA SUKUMAR & ORS.versusSTATE OF KERALA & ORS.
2015 INSC 9508 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned the appointment of High School Assistant (Physical Sciences) in Kerala. The appellants, who held Chemistry degrees (some with post‑graduation) and B.Ed. in Physical Sciences, were initially placed in the Service Commission’s ranking list but later had their names deleted. The High Court and Tribunal …
DR. BALWANT SINGHversusCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS.
2014 INSC 7667 November 2014Case Partly allowed
Dr. Balwant Singh, a retired Director General of Police, lived in a house opposite the Rajasthan State Assembly where frequent political rallies, loudspeakers and police‑set up barricades created constant noise and disturbance, rendering his residence uninhabitable. After his oral and written complaints to the Commissi…
RIJU PRASAD SARMA ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF ASSAM & ORS.
2015 INSC 4877 July 2015Dismissed
The case concerned the management of the Sri Sri Maa Kamakhya Temple in Assam, where the traditional custom allowed only male members of the four Bordeori families to elect the head priest (Doloi), excluding women and Deuris. Petitioners challenged the constitutionality of Section 25A of the Assam State Acquisition of …
ROHITASH KUMAR & ORS.versusOM PRAKASH SHARMA & ORS.
2012 INSC 5096 November 2012
The case concerned the seniority of Assistant Commandants in the Border Security Force who were selected in a single recruitment process but trained in two separate batches (Batch 16 starting 1‑Feb‑1993 and Batch 17 starting 2‑July‑1993). A promoted officer (respondent No.1) who joined on 15‑Mar‑1993 was placed below a…
HAKKIMversusSTATE REPRESENTED BY DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
2014 INSC 5276 August 2014Disposed off
The accused A‑1 to A‑4 entered the residence of PW‑1 armed with knives and assaulted PW‑1, his family and a friend, resulting in the death of PW‑1’s wife Sayeeda. The trial court convicted them under Sections 302, 307, 149, 109, 324 and 449 of the Indian Penal Code and imposed life imprisonment and rigorous imprisonmen…
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIAversusPANASIA ADVISORS LTD. & ANR.
2015 INSC 4836 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) debarred Panasia Advisors Ltd. and its managing director for ten years, alleging that as lead managers they facilitated a fraudulent scheme involving Global Depository Receipts (GDRs) of six Indian companies, creating a false appearance of foreign investment and harming…
STATE OF M.P.versusMANISH & ORS.
2015 INSC 4846 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed a High Court order that quashed an FIR for offences under IPC sections 307, 294, 34 and Arms Act sections 25, 27 on the ground that the victim and accused had settled the dispute out of court. The issue was whether the High Court could invoke its inherent power under Section 482 of …
SUSANTA DAS & ORS.versusSTATE OF ORISSA
2016 INSC 186 January 2016Dismissed
The appellants, five accused persons, were convicted for the murder of Padma Lochan Jena and grievous hurt to two others under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC. The prosecution proved that all five were present at the scene, armed with deadly weapons, and acted with a common object of revenge stemming from a c…
T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPADversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.
2014 INSC 9016 January 2014Disposed off
The petitioners sought compliance with the Supreme Court's order in Lafarge Umiam Mining Private Limited v. Union of India, which directed the Central Government to appoint a National Regulator under Section 3(3) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 for independent appraisal and monitoring of environmental clearan…
K.K. DIXIT & ORS. ETC.versusRAJASTHAN HOUSING BOARD & ANR. ETC.
2014 INSC 6075 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned promotion of Project Engineer (Junior) staff in the Rajasthan Housing Board. Diploma‑holder engineers who later obtained the AMIE qualification (equivalent to a degree) claimed that their service as diploma‑holders should count towards the three‑year experience required for promotion under the 20% qu…
L. LAXMIKANTAversusSTATE BY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, LOKAYUKTA
2015 INSC 975 February 2015Dismissed
The appellant, a hostel warden, was accused of demanding Rs.2000 as illegal gratification from a student seeking re‑admission to the hostel. The student complained to the Lokayukta, leading to a sting operation where the money, marked with a chemical that turned pink, was recovered from the warden's pocket. The trial c…
RAJARAM PRASAD YADAVversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ANR.
2013 INSC 4364 July 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The appellant Rajaram Prasad Yadav was convicted for offences under Sections 324, 307 and 34 IPC. After the trial, the second respondent (the informant PW‑9) sought re‑examination under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, alleging coercion. The trial court dismissed the application, but the High Court allowe…
NOUSHAD@ NOUSHAD PASHAAND OTHERSversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA
2014 INSC 8313 December 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The appellants (A‑1 to A‑3) were convicted under IPC sections 143, 147, 148, 448, 302 and 149 for participating in an unlawful assembly that allegedly murdered Lingaraju. The trial court found that the key eye‑witnesses, including the star witness PW‑11 and several others, were unreliable and unbelievable, leading to t…
NANA KESHAV LAGADversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA
2013 INSC 4293 July 2013Dismissed
The case arose from a land‑use dispute in Lagadwadi village where the accused assaulted the complainant (PW4) and his father with a cycle chain and stones, causing the father's death. The trial court convicted the accused under Sections 302 and 324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, relying on the testimony…
MIRZA ALI RAZA & ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
2016 INSC 1283 February 2016Disposed off
The case arose from the selection of candidates for the 36th Combined Competitive Examination in Bihar, where the reservation policy of 1978 was later superseded by a 1990 resolution that was subsequently quashed by the Supreme Court. Four general‑category candidates challenged the selection, and the State Government, …
AJAY RAMDAS RAMTEKE AND ANR.versusMAHANAGAR SUDHAR SAMITL,AKOLA& ORS.
2015 INSC 842 February 2015Appeal(s) allowed
The Supreme Court examined a dispute arising from the 2012 elections to the Akola Municipal Corporation where a post‑poll group (aghadi) called Mahanagar Sudhar Samiti was formed by elected councillors. The group applied for registration under the second proviso of Section 31A(2) of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporatio…
OSHIAR PRASAD AND OTHERSversusTHE EMPLOYERS IN RELATION TO MANAGEMENT OF SUDAMDIH COAL WASHERY OF M/S BCCL, DHANBAD, JHARKHAND
2015 INSC 822 February 2015Disposed off
The appellants, former contract workers of the Sudamdih Coal Washery project, sought to be absorbed as regular employees of Bharat Coking Coal Ltd (BCCL) and to receive retrenchment compensation. The Central Government referred their grievance to an Industrial Tribunal under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1…
SABERABIBI YAKUBBHAI SHAIKH & ORS.versusNATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ORS.
2014 INSC 22 January 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The wife and relatives of a truck driver who died in a road accident filed a claim under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 for compensation and 12% interest from the date of the accident. The Workmen's Compensation Commissioner awarded the compensation with interest from the accident date, but the Gujarat High Court…
CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATION & ANOTHERversusJASMINE KAUR & OTHERS
2014 INSC 5791 September 2014Appeal(s) allowed
The case concerned a Canadian citizen, Jasmine Kaur, who sought admission to the MBBS course under the NRI quota of the Government Medical College, Chandigarh. The prospectus required candidates in the first NRI category to prove ancestral residence and property ownership in Chandigarh, which Kaur did not satisfy. Alth…
BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LTD.versusTATA PROJECTS LTD.
2014 INSC 5781 September 2014Disposed off
Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. (BHEL) engaged Tata Projects Ltd. as a sub‑contractor to erect, test and commission two 120 MW boilers. Disputes arose and an arbitral tribunal awarded Rs.69.22 lakh on various heads and Rs.25.39 lakh as interest. BHEL challenged the award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliati…
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusM/S VIJAYA LEASING LTD. & ORS.
2013 INSC 1971 April 2013Appeal(s) allowed
The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) acquired land under the Bangalore Improvement Act, 1945, with possession handed over to the government on 9 December 1983. A de‑notification under Section 48(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was issued on 5 October 1999, and later recalled on 27 June 2000. The Karnataka Hig…