Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
639 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the cognizance order dated 23‑04‑2026 and to quash the charge sheet dated 07‑04‑2026 in Sessions Case No. 720 of 2026, which arose from a FIR containing offences under various sections of the BNSS and the POCSO …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 459/2026) pending under the POCSO Act. The applicant's counsel argued that no offence was made out and the prosecution was malicious, citing lack of independent …
The applicant, Virendra Tiwari, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita seeking suspension of a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in the pending criminal case State Vs. Kapilmun Pandey et al. (Session No. 4603/2010). The applicant’s counsel argued that the …
The petitioners, a married woman and her live‑in partner, filed a writ of mandamus seeking protection from alleged threats by private respondents. They claimed that without such protection their life and liberty were in danger. The State argued that the married petitioner’s cohabitation without …
The petitioners, Hina Parveen and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their life and liberty, alleging threats from private respondents due to their live‑in relationship. The respondents contended that petitioner No. 2 is already married and is cohabiting …
The applicant, Hafiz Mohammad Nizamuddin, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Security Code seeking the dismissal of criminal proceedings (State Vs. Mohd. Siddiq & others) pending under IPC Section 120B and the Uttar Pradesh Prevention of Conversion of Religion Act. He alleged that …
The petitioners, who are in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their life and liberty from alleged threats by private respondents. The petitioners claimed they faced danger of being eliminated for family honour. The State contended that …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, alleged harassment and threats from family members and sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the police to protect their life. The court noted that the facts were analogous to a prior decision (Akanksha v. …
The petitioners, a married couple who are both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted identity proof and affirmed that their …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel informed the court that a criminal FIR (Case Crime No. 218 of 2026) had already been lodged under sections 87, 61(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The …
The petitioners, Smt. Mohini Kushwah and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and others. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the respondents informed the Court that a criminal case (Case Crime No. 612 of 2026) under Section 87 …
The applicant, Pradip Gaud, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 108 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR No. 561/2024 at Kotwali Hata, Kushinagar. The applicant argued that no direct evidence or dying declaration exists against him, and therefore he should be …
The applicant, Karimuddin, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code seeking the suspension of a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in the pending trial (State vs Karimuddin, NDPS case No 52A/2001). The applicant’s counsel argued that the warrant was issued because the accused …
Surendra filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to set aside an order dated 04‑07‑2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 3, Baradari, Bareilly, which had rejected his request to release a seized Pulsar motorcycle (UP25EE7473) and 528 g of opium. He alleged …
The petitioners, who are in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their life and liberty from alleged threats by private respondents. The petitioners argued that they faced danger of being eliminated for family honour. The State contended …
The petitioners, Shilpi and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, …
The petitioners, Shirsthi Rajput and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, …
The petitioners, a married couple who are both adults, sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affirmed that their marriage was consensual …
The petitioners, Shama and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of majority and consent, and claimed they had applied for …
The petitioners, Geetanjali Kumari and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affirmed that …
Petitioners Smt Adeeba Parveen and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed that they no longer wished to pursue the petition and sought its withdrawal. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel and the private respondent's …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an action of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel informed the court that a criminal case (FIR) under Section 87 BNS had already been lodged (Case Crime No. 121 of 2026) with the police. The petitioners did not …
Subash Upadhyay filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act challenging a provisional order dated 14‑08‑2026 in FIR No. 125 of 2024 under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, which led to criminal case 65485/2026 pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, …
The petitioners, Muskan and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affirmed that their marriage …
The petitioners, Khushi Upadhyay and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing respondents not to interfere with their marital cohabitation and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of majority and affidavits confirming a voluntary …
The petitioners Suhani Gautam and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief, alleging that a criminal case was pending. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, through the Additional Chief Standing Counsel, informed the Court that an FIR had already …
The applicant Jitendra Singh filed a Section 528 application seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 378 of 2020) instituted under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The FIR alleged that he was part of an organized gang and a …
The applicant Amit Tripathi filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking discharge of the criminal case State vs. Amit (Criminal Writ No. 71/2025) pending before the Additional District Judge, Allahabad. He contended that no offence was made out, the prosecution …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking discharge of the criminal case State vs. Pankaj Kumar Rawat pending before the District Court, alleging that no offence was made out and that the prosecution was malicious. The applicant argued lack of …
The applicant, Adil, was charged under IPC sections 376(3), 376(1), 506 and POCSO Act sections 5(3) and 2/6 for alleged offences in Muradnagar, Ghaziabad. His first bail application (No. 24585/2024) was rejected, but he filed a second bail petition (No. 17750/2026). The defence argued that the …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Mahtab, who had been in custody since 29 June 2025 in a case under Sections 123, 70(1) and 351(2) of the B.N.S. The applicant claimed innocence, arguing that the victim's statements recorded during trial did not support the prosecution's …
The applicant, Prashant Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 3115370 of 2025) that arose under several IPC sections and Section 66D of the IT Act. The trial court had verified that the parties had reached a written compromise, …
The petitioners, Sabanam and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their marital life and to provide police protection against threats from a private respondent and family members. They submitted identity proof and affidavits …
The applicant, Saurabh Vagiyal, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 18 September 2024 issued by the Additional District Judge/F.T.C‑I, Bareilly in a case under Sections 8 and 21 of the NDPS Act. He alleged that no offence was disclosed …
The petitioners, who are in a live-in relationship, filed a writ of mandamus seeking protection of their life and liberty, alleging threats from private respondents. The court noted that petitioner No.1 is already married and is cohabiting with petitioner No.2 without a divorce, which could …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The court noted that the facts were …
The petitioners, Anjali Saket and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. Both petitioners are adults, as evidenced by their school marksheets and …
The petitioners, a married couple, approached the Allahabad High Court seeking a writ of mandamus to prevent any interference in their peaceful married life and to obtain police protection against threats from the private respondent and family members. The court noted that no FIR had been lodged and …
The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the State, but counsel informed the court that an FIR had already been lodged under Section 137(2) of the B.N.S. Police Station Lehariyasarai, District Darbhanga, Bihar. The court held that the existence of the pending FIR rendered the petition …
The applicants, Dwarika Prasad Jha and three others, were charged in Special Sessions Trial No. 1165 of 2024 under various provisions of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme Act, 2019 and the BNS Act. They filed an application under Section 528 of the BNS Act seeking to quash the charge‑sheet …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ of mandamus seeking protection from interference by family members in their consensual marriage and requested that authorities prevent any threat to their lives. The court examined the petitioners' age and consent, noting that they had submitted school …
The applicants, Dwarika Prasad Jha and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme (BNS) Act seeking to quash the Special Sessions trial (No. 1167 of 2024) arising from Crime No. 687 of 2024. They contended that the investigating police had …
The petitioners, Zinat and another adult, are in a live-in relationship across different religions and face threats and intimidation from family members. They filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a protection order directing the respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh …
Smt Shamsheeda Bano filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bareilly, which had rejected her request for release of her vehicle (UP 21 CT 5098) seized under Sections 4 and 21 of the Mines and Minerals Act. The applicant …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in a criminal case (Case No. 380 of 2026) arising from an FIR alleging offences under Section 420 IPC and Section 66D of the Income Tax Act. The High Court examined the record and …
The petitioners, two adult women, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction and police protection against the respondents, who they allege are interfering with their peaceful marital life and threatening their safety. They submitted PAN cards and an application for marriage registration …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order and the entire proceeding in a criminal case alleging offences under Section 351(2) of the BNSS and Section 66D of the Income Tax Act. They contended that no offence was disclosed …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 17‑05‑2024 issued in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 352, 354‑B, 323 and 506 IPC. The applicant alleged that the prosecution was malicious and that no …
The petitioners, two adult individuals, filed a writ seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including family members, from interfering in their marital life and directing the police to provide them protection. They submitted age proof, identity documents, and an application for …
The petitioners, Vandana Bind and another, sought a protection order directing respondents not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide police protection. They submitted evidence of being adults, their consent to marriage, and an application for marriage registration. The court, …
The petitioners, Smt Parvati and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from private respondents and family members. They submitted high school …
The petitioners, a married adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including family members, from interfering in their peaceful marital life and requesting police protection. They submitted identity documents and a pending application for …
The petitioners, two adult individuals in a live-in relationship of different religions, alleged threats and harassment from family members and sought a protection order under Article 226 of the Constitution. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, opposed the relief. The Court noted …
The petitioners, Nitu and her partner, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. They submitted proof of adulthood and a pending application for marriage …
The petitioners, Smt. Rajni and another, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 39638 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of U.P. and others. The respondents contended that the matter had already been registered as MU A S 491/2026 under Sections 87 and 137(2) of …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and directing the police to provide them security, alleging threats from family members. They submitted age certificates, joint affidavits and an …
The petitioners, two adult individuals of different faiths in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The respondents argued that a final report had …
Petitioners Soni and another, an adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, who are family members, from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. The petitioners submitted school certificates and an application for …
The petitioners, Simran and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from private respondents and family members. They submitted proof of age and a pending …
Smt. Soniya Kumari and another filed Writ Petition No. 39578 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petitioners sought relief, but the respondent counsel pointed out that the same dispute had already been registered as case MU‑0‑A‑0‑S 305/2026 …
The petitioners Rukshar Khatoon and another filed writ petition No. 39534 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. The respondents, the State of UP and others, contested the petition. The learned permanent advocate argued that the matter was already registered as Mu. A.0. San 494/2026 under Section …
Arti Devi and her spouse filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of U.P. and other respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. The petitioners submitted proof of age, affidavits, and an application for marriage registration, …
The petitioners, Smt. Vishesha Devi and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition was opposed by the respondents, who argued that the matter was already pending in another case, Mu. A. S. No. …
The petitioners, Nisha and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of Uttar Pradesh and other respondents from interfering in their peaceful marital life and directing police protection. They submitted proof of age, marriage registration, and alleged …
The petitioners, Nisha Gond and another, filed a writ petition seeking a protection order to prevent the respondents and family members from interfering in their marital life and to obtain police protection. They submitted school certificates and a marriage registration application to demonstrate …
The applicant, Ajay Kushwaha (Ajay Kumar Singh), filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking bail in a criminal case (State vs. Ajay Kumar Singh) pending before the Court No. 25, Deoria. The High Court examined the FIR filed under Section 275 of 2023 and Section 3 of the Public …
The applicant, Dalpat Singh, filed a petition under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the Special Sessions Trial No. 352 of 2018, which involved charges under Section 363 of the IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act, as well as to set aside the charge‑sheet and …
The petitioners, Shivani Kumari and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging that they are adults who voluntarily married on 21‑09‑2026. The respondents pointed out that …
The petitioners, Samreen and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including the State of U.P., from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. They submitted proof of age, affidavits, and an application for marriage …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried women in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a protection order against interference by family members and to direct police to ensure their safety. They alleged threats and harassment, claiming a violation …
Petitioners Smt. Radhika and another, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of U.P. and other respondents from interfering in their peaceful marital life, alleging threats from family members. They submitted proof of age, marriage registration, and …
The case arose from an alleged kidnapping of a girl (referred to as “X”) on 4 November 1985, for which an FIR was lodged under Sections 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code. The trial court convicted Devendra Singh, sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment for both offences. On appeal, the appellant …
The applicant, Ramkrishna, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 3135 of 2014) and the non‑bailable warrant issued against him, alleging that he had been mistakenly identified as Ram Kishan Sharma. He contended that he was not …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 CrPC seeking to quash the proceedings (S.C.No.21 of 2025) initiated under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, which were based on a predicate offence (Case Crime No.220 of 2023 under IPC sections 420 and 506) …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal proceedings initiated under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The FIR alleged that the applicant was part of an organized criminal gang, and a gang‑chart was …
The applicant Rajaram filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 22 September 2024 and the cognizance order dated 26 November 2024 in Criminal Case No. 24878 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 182, 200, 506 IPC and …
The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 482 of the CrPC to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 16 of 2021) against Rishi Tyagi and others under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicants …
The petitioners, Suman Patel and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted school mark sheets to prove they are major and …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals of different faiths in a live‑in relationship, alleged harassment and threats from family members and sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the police to protect them. The court observed that a similar matter had been decided in Noori …
The petitioners, Simran and her partner, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They asserted that they had solemnised their marriage of …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried women in a live‑in relationship, alleged threats and harassment from family members and sought a protection order under Article 226 of the Constitution. The High Court noted that the facts were identical to a prior decision (RIT‑35171/2025) and held that adult …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Tripurari Prakash Tripathi @ Sonu Tiwari after an earlier application was rejected. The applicant argued that the victim’s testimony did not contain any allegation of rape, suggesting a low probability of conviction, and highlighted his …
The petitioners, an unmarried couple in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the police to protect them from harassment by family members. The second petitioner is a minor, and the respondents argued that protection cannot be granted. The Court …
The applicant Rakesh Dubey filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking discharge of criminal proceedings initiated under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. He alleged that the FIR and charge‑sheet mistakenly identified him, confusing his name …
Petitioners Neha Yadav and another, both adult unmarried individuals in a live‑in relationship, alleged threats and harassment from family members and sought a protection order under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioners argued that their right to live together peacefully is a facet of …
The petitioners, a married adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents and their families from interfering in their peaceful marital life and directing police protection. They submitted proof of age, identity documents, and a registered marriage …
The petitioners, a man and woman who are both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection. They alleged that family members were threatening and harassing them, and they had applied for …
The petitioners, two adult individuals of different faiths in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that the facts …
The petitioners, Jagdamba @ Sanvi and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including family members, from interfering in their marital life and requested police protection. They submitted school certificates proving they are above 18 and …
Petitioners Sonam Gautam and another filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel submitted that a criminal case (FIR) under Sections 87 and 61(2) BNS had already been lodged, rendering the petition unnecessary. The petitioners did …
The petitioners, Roshni Parihar and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. They submitted school certificates and a marriage registration application to demonstrate that both …
The petitioners, Smt. Bharatlali and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection. Both parties are adults who voluntarily solemnised their marriage and have applied for its …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from private respondents. They submitted proof of age and affidavits confirming a consensual …
The petitioners, Chhavi and another, adult unmarried individuals in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a protection order directing the police not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide security. They claimed they were …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried women in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a protection order against interference by family members and a directive to the police to ensure their safety. They alleged threats and harassment that endangered their peaceful …
The petitioners, two adult interfaith partners in a live‑in relationship, sought a permanent injunction under Article 226 of the Constitution directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The court …
The applicant, Rakesh Singh alias Dabbu, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking quash of the criminal proceedings, charge sheet, and cognizance order instituted under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The trial court …
The petitioners, Gaura Devi and her partner, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affirmed that they have …
The petitioners, Roshni Devi and her partner, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted proof of majority and affirmed that they have …
The petitioners, an adult husband and wife, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their peaceful marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from family members. The petitioners submitted proof of age, affidavits, and …
The petitioners, Birendra Prajapati and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and directing police protection. They asserted that both are of legal age, have voluntarily married, have registered their …
The petitioners, adult individuals, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including family members, from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. They submitted proof of age, affidavits, and an application for marriage …
The petitioners, a consenting adult couple, applied for registration of their marriage and sought a writ of mandamus to prevent any interference in their peaceful married life by family members who threatened them. They submitted proof of age and affidavits confirming their free will to cohabit. The …
The petitioners, both adults, sought a writ of mandamus to prevent any interference in their marital cohabitation and to obtain police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted Aadhaar proof of age, FIR details, and statements under Sections 161 and 164 of the Cr.P.C. …
The petitioners, a consenting adult couple, approached the Allahabad High Court seeking a writ of mandamus to prevent any interference in their peaceful married life and to obtain police protection against threats from the private respondent and family members. They submitted evidence of their age …
The petitioners, Afreen and another, filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three other respondents. Respondent No.4, represented by Advocate R.K. Tiwari, submitted a vakalatnama stating that a First Information Report (FIR) had already been lodged in the matter, …
The petitioners, Smt Sanjana and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Pradeep Kumar, later informed the court that he did not wish to pursue the petition and sought its dismissal as ‘not pressed’, requesting liberty to file a better petition later. The …
The petitioners, Anjali and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of U.P. and other respondents from interfering in their peaceful marital life, alleging threats from family members. They submitted proof of age, PAN/Aadhaar copies, and a marriage …
The petitioners, Kanchan Singh and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted evidence of their ages, joint affidavits, and that …
The petitioners, two adults who have voluntarily solemnised a marriage, sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection. They alleged threats and harassment from family members and submitted proof of their …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quashing of a charge sheet and the POCSO trial (S.T. No. 363 of 2021) arising from alleged offences under several IPC sections and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. The parties had entered into a written compromise, which was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of a charge sheet dated 17‑11‑2020 and the pending criminal trial (S.T. No. 50 of 2023) involving offences under various IPC sections. The parties had entered into a written compromise, which was verified by the trial …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the Sessions trial and summoning order issued under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The FIR alleged that the applicants were members of an organised criminal …
The petitioners, a married adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a protection order to prevent the respondents and their families from interfering in their peaceful marital life and to obtain police protection. They submitted identity documents to prove they are both over 18 and consented to …
The petitioners, Rinki and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction directing the respondents not to interfere with their live-in relationship and to provide them protection. They asserted that both are adults, have voluntarily cohabited, and face threats from family members, …
The applicant filed a petition under CrPC Section 482 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings, charge sheet and summons issued under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The petition argued that the Act does not create a substantive offence and that the …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No.122 of 2024, which involved offences under the IPC and the POCSO Act, as well as the charge sheet and cognizance order. The parties attempted mediation, which failed, and the …
The applicant, Raj Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Crime No. 696 of 2021) instituted by the State of U.P. under Section 135 of the Electricity Act Amendment, 2003. He argued that the offence is compoundable and …
The petitioners, two adult women in a live‑in relationship, sought a permanent protection order under Article 226 of the Constitution, alleging threats and harassment from family members and requesting police protection for their peaceful cohabitation. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and …
The applicant, Sandeep Singh, filed an application under Section 528 seeking modification of pleadings and a stay of prosecution in a power theft case initiated under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act. The court allowed the requested amendments and considered the applicant's request to …
The applicant, Umesh Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS. After some deliberation, the applicant's counsel expressed a desire to no longer pursue the relief sought and to withdraw the application. The court was informed that the applicant no longer wishes to press the Section …
The petitioners, adult individuals who have solemnised a marriage of their own free will, sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection. They alleged threats and harassment from family members and intended to …
The petitioners, Roshmin and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a matter related to a live-in relationship. The senior counsel for the petitioners highlighted that, based on the Aadhaar card, petitioner No.1 was born on 01-01-2010 and was therefore a minor of …
The applicant Rajkumar filed a second anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC in FIR No. 8151/2020 alleging offences under IPC sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471. He claimed innocence and asserted that the charges were filed with malice, and offered to cooperate with the investigation. …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant, the process under Section 82 CrPC, the charge‑sheet dated 5 January 2026 and the cognizance order dated 22 January 2016 in a case arising under Section 60(1) of the Excise …
Petitioners Ruchi Kumari and her spouse, both adults, married on 07‑09‑2026 and residing in Uttar Pradesh, alleged that private respondents (family members) were threatening and harassing them to prevent them from living together. They filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining …
The petitioners, two adult individuals in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a protection order against interference by the respondents and their families, alleging threats and harassment. They submitted identity documents to establish their age and voluntary …
The applicant, Mo Anees, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking discharge of criminal proceedings (Special Session Case No. 47/2025, Offence No. 565/2024) that had been ordered to proceed by the Special Judge under the Poxo Act. The applicant's counsel argued that no offence was …
The applicants, Ram Milan and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 21421 of 2025) and the charge sheet filed under Sections 329(3) of the B.N.S. and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, 1984. …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) dated 24‑01‑2016 that had been issued after the applicant’s failure to appear before the trial court. The applicant’s counsel argued that the warrant should be vacated and that the …
The applicant, Huzaifa, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 24‑01‑2016 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bulandshahar, in Criminal Case No. 724 of 2016. The warrant arose from charges under several IPC sections (147, 148, …
The petitioners, a married couple who are both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affidavits confirming that …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State to prevent interference by family members and to provide police protection. The court noted that the facts were analogous to a prior decision (Akanksha & …
The applicants, Raj Bahadur and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to set aside the summons dated 09‑12‑2024, quash the charge‑sheet dated 13‑04‑2024 and the entire proceeding (Case No. 353 of 2024) arising under Sections 2 and 3 of the …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a permanent injunction to prevent the respondents and family members from interfering with their peaceful cohabitation and to obtain police protection. They alleged threats and …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to set aside an order dated 04‑06‑2012 under Section 135 of the Electricity Act and to have the proceedings stayed. Both parties’ counsel appeared, and the applicant expressed willingness to settle the dispute by …
Petitioners Lilawati and her spouse filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of Uttar Pradesh, other respondents and private family members from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats and harassment. They submitted proof …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a protection order against interference by family members and requesting police protection. They submitted identity documents to establish adulthood. The …
The petitioners, Smt. Priya Devi and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent restraining order against certain family members who were allegedly threatening and interfering with their peaceful marital life after they married on 11 September 2026. Both parties are adults, as evidenced by …
Ajeet Singh, the owner of vehicle UP25EM2866, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking release of the vehicle that had been seized by the police in connection with NDPS case MU‑A‑155/2026. The seizure order was passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bareilly on 3 July 2026. The …
The petitioners, an adult married couple, sought a permanent injunction restraining the respondents and their families from interfering with their peaceful marital life and requested police protection. They submitted proof of age, marriage registration, and affidavits establishing that both are sui …
The petitioners Anjali Patel and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The senior advocate for the respondents informed the Court that an FIR under Munsif No. 350 of 2026, Section 87 of the B.N.S., had already been lodged on 9 September 2026 at Madiyahu police station, case …
The petitioners, Priyanka Chauhan and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The court was informed that an FIR (First Information Report) had already been registered under MCO No. 343 of 2026, Section 87 of the B.N.S., at Kasimabad police station on 10 September 2026 …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals living in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted …
The petitioners, Komit Sirohi and another, filed a writ seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. They asserted that both are adults, have voluntarily married, and have submitted school certificates and joint …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking dismissal of criminal proceedings arising from case No. 69822/2024, which involved alleged offences under Sections 380, 427, 454, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 5 of the Arms …
The petitioners Reena Yadav and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The senior permanent advocate informed the court that an FIR under Section 87 of the B.N.S. (case No. MU‑A‑S‑417 of 2026) had already been registered on 15 September 2026 at Bilgram police station, Hardoi …
The petitioners, Smt Sundara Devi and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent protection order against the respondents, alleging that family members were threatening them and interfering with their peaceful marital life after they married on 12‑09‑2026. The petitioners submitted proof of …
The petitioners, Archana and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining respondents, including family members, from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. They submitted proof of age, marriage registration, and alleged threats to …
The applicant, Gautam Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act challenging a charge sheet dated 26‑07‑2023 that alleged offences under Section 420 IPC, the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission Act and the Information Technology Act. The applicant’s counsel argued that no …
The petitioners, Prerna Verma and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and a marriage application, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal case (Criminal Appeal No. 57/2022 arising from FIR No. 53/2021) and the order dated 05.01.2022 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Sonbhadra. The applicants contended that no offence was made out against …
The petitioners, Smt. Sunny Yadav and another, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. They informed the court that they are residents of Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand and are currently residing together in Uttarakhand. The petitioners expressed that they no longer wish to pursue the …
The petitioners, Smt. Kavita and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The court observed that a First Information Report (FIR) under MCO 310 of 2026, invoking sections 87, 137(2) and 351(3) of the B.N.S., had already been …
The petitioners, Khushi Fatma and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of majority and asserted that their marriage was …
The applicants Dwarika and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside an order dated 05‑01‑2022 passed by the Additional Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate that stayed the criminal proceedings against them. The High Court examined the allegations, which disclosed …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a Special Chief Judicial Magistrate’s order dated 23‑03‑2015 and a Non‑Bailable Warrant (NBW) issued on 24‑07‑2026, which were based on a complaint under the Lok Sampatti Kshati Nivaran Adhiniyam, §§3‑5. The court …
Petitioners Smt Pinki and another filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction and police protection against interference in their marital life, alleging threats from private respondents and family members. They asserted that they are adults who voluntarily married on 12 September 2026, …
Aasia Parveen and another petitioners filed a writ of Rit seeking a protection order directing the respondents, who are family members, not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide them security. The petitioners submitted age proof, Aadhaar/HSC copies and a marriage registration …
Arman filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. challenging the order dated 23‑06‑2026 of the Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO Act)‑II, Hapur, which had rejected his request to recall the victim‑witness for further cross‑examination. The trial court observed that the accused had already …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSSS seeking to set aside a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) and an order dated 25‑07‑2026 passed by the ACJM II Kasganj. The lower court had issued the NBW because the applicants failed to appear on the scheduled date. The High Court heard …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affirmed that their marriage was entered into …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the FIR and related proceedings arising from a criminal case (Criminal No. 225/2025). They argued that no offence was made out against them and that the prosecution was malicious. The court examined the submissions …
The applicants, Umaresh alias Neta and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a case involving offences under Sections 452, 354, 323, 504, 506, 34 of the IPC and Section 8 of the POCSO Act. They …
The petitioners, an adult husband and wife, filed a writ petition seeking a protection order to prevent the respondents and private family members from interfering with their peaceful marital life and to obtain police protection. They submitted age proof and joint affidavits confirming their …
The petitioners, Bharati Nag and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief concerning a live-in relationship, asserting that both families had consented to their marriage, which the court noted as contradictory. During the hearing, the petitioner's senior counsel …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State to prevent interference and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that the facts were analogous to a prior decision …
The petitioners Diksha and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of U.P. and others. The court noted that a First Information Report had already been registered under M.P. No. 546 of 2026, Section 87 of the B.N.S., at Kotwali Urai, Jaunpur …
Petitioners Soni Devi and her spouse filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including family members, from interfering in their peaceful marital life and requesting police protection. The petitioners, both adults, married on 16‑09‑2026 and submitted school …
The petitioners, an adult married couple, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction to prevent any interference in their marital life and to obtain police protection, alleging threats from private respondents and family members. They submitted proof of age and a joint affidavit confirming …
The petitioners, Smt. Pooja and another, filed a writ petition challenging the registration of their marriage on the ground that the birthdate entered online (18-02-2005) conflicted with the birthdate on their affidavit and Aadhaar card (18-02-2006). The petition alleged that this discrepancy …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. challenging a trial court order that rejected his request, under Section 348 B.N.S.S. and Section 311 Cr.P.C., to summon prosecution witness P.W.13 for further cross‑examination. The applicant argued that certain questions remained …
The petitioners, Saniya Khan and another, both adults in a live‑in relationship, alleged threats and interference from family members and sought a permanent injunction under Article 226. They requested that the respondents and police be directed not to disturb their peaceful cohabitation and to …
The petitioners, Smt Karishma and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent protection order to prevent the respondents, including the State of U.P., from interfering in their marital life and to obtain police protection, alleging threats from family members. They asserted that they are …
Kajoli Devi and another adult petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including family members, from interfering in their peaceful marital life and requesting police protection. The petitioners submitted evidence of their adult status, a joint …
The petitioners, a husband and wife, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to obtain police protection due to threats from family members. The court observed that both parties are adults who have voluntarily …
The petitioners, who are adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets and a marriage registration certificate to prove …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a judgment and order of the Special Judge under the PoxO Act dated 16‑07‑2026, and to obtain bail pending arrest. The High Court examined the allegations, finding that they disclose a cognizable offence and that …
The petitioners, Smt. Simran Verma and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The court observed that a First Information Report (FIR) had already been registered under Munsif No. 244 of 2026, invoking Sections …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live‑in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that the facts were …
Petitioners Smt Mohini and another, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction to prevent respondents from interfering in their marital life and to obtain police protection, alleging threats from private respondents and family members after their marriage on 08‑09‑2026. They …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside an NBW order dated 05-11-2015 issued by the Special Judge under the Gangster Act (sections 2/3) in Agra. The High Court examined the arguments of both parties. The court found the applicant's grounds for quashing …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from family members after their marriage on 29‑05‑2026. The court examined Supreme Court precedents …
The applicant, Parvez @ Kala, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside the cognizance order dated 31‑07‑2024 and to quash the charge sheet dated 12‑06‑2024 in a Sessions trial involving offences under IPC Section 307, the Prevention of Cow Slaughter …
The applicant, a Russian national, entered India on a tourist visa that expired on 31 March 2020 due to the COVID‑19 lockdown. The Government later issued guidelines extending the stay of stranded foreigners up to 30 September 2021, effectively giving the applicant a valid visa on the date of the …
Manoj Yadav and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 28‑07‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 03‑09‑2024 in State vs Manoj Yadav case No. 5458 of 2024. The charge sheet alleged offences under Sections 379 and …
The petitioners, Smt. Rabeena and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel or parties appeared on either side, although a senior government advocate was present. Due to the non-appearance of both parties, the court treated the petition as withdrawn. Consequently, …
Smt. Nidhi Yadav and another filed a writ petition seeking a permanent order restraining the State of U.P. and other respondents from interfering in their marital life and directing authorities to provide them protection. The petitioners, both adults, submitted their school certificates and marriage …
Poonam Devi applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC in a case involving offences under Sections 313, 323, 498A, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. She claimed innocence and alleged that the charges were false and that she would cooperate with the investigation. …
The applicant, Rajat Sahu, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a criminal complaint (M.A. No. 413 of 2023) alleging offences under Section 420 of the IPC and Sections 63/65 of the Copyright Act, which had been ordered to be dismissed by the Special …
The applicant, Jeetu, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act challenging an order dated 02‑12‑2024 passed by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, in a case involving alleged offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and IT Act section 66. The applicant's counsel argued …
The petitioners, two adult individuals, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide them police protection. They submitted identity proof and a marriage registration application, alleging threats from …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of the FIR, charge sheet and the entire criminal proceeding (Computer Case No. 37472 of 2026) arising from offences under the IPC and Arms Act. The parties had entered into a written compromise, which was verified by the …
The applicant, Seetu alias Banti alias Viresh Kumar, was charged under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code for offences alleged to have occurred in Pehso, Bulandshahr. This was his second bail application; the first, filed on 03‑04‑2025, had been dismissed. Counsel for the …
Petitioners Payal and another filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others from interfering in their marital life and directing authorities to provide them protection. The respondents argued that the petitioners are in a live‑in …
The petitioners, a husband and wife, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction directing the respondents and their family members not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide them security. They submitted identity documents to establish that both are adults who married …
The applicant sought quashing of a Sessions Trial under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, arguing that the Act does not create a substantive offence and therefore violates the principle of nullum crimen sine lege. The State contended that a thorough …
The applicant, Akhand Pratap Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (G.T. No. 521 of 2008) initiated under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, along with IPC …
Petitioners Kamlesh and another filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of Uttar Pradesh and others from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. The respondents argued that petitioner No.1 is already married and is in a live‑in …
The petitioners, a married adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining any interference in their peaceful marital life and requesting police protection against threats from family members. They submitted school certificates and a marriage registration to prove they …
