Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
639 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400
Petitioners Smt. Pooja and another filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and directing police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted Aadhaar copies to prove they are adults and asserted that …
The petitioners, Smt. Gunja and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction directing the respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, not to interfere in their marital life and to provide them protection. The petitioners alleged they were in a live-in relationship and …
The petitioners, Smt. Anshika Mishra and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide them protection. They submitted evidence of their adult status, including school mark sheets, and a …
Smt. Srishti and another filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a permanent injunction and police protection against family members who were allegedly threatening them and interfering with their marital life. The petitioners submitted school certificates and a marriage …
The petitioners, an adult interfaith couple in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the respondents to refrain from interfering in their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection. They alleged threats and harassment from family members, claiming …
The petitioners, an adult husband and wife, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction and police protection against family members who were threatening them and attempting to interfere with their marital life. They submitted school mark sheets to prove they are both above 18 years and …
The petitioners, Kareena Devi and another, filed a writ petition seeking a protection order against family members who were allegedly threatening them for their marriage. The petitioners submitted school mark sheets to prove they are adults and submitted a marriage registration application. The …
The petitioners, a married couple, filed a writ petition seeking a protection order (Rit) to prevent any interference by family members and to obtain police protection, alleging threats to their lives. The petitioners submitted evidence of their adult status, including school mark sheets, and a …
The petitioners, a married couple, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction (RIT) directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide them police protection. They submitted evidence of their adult status, joint affidavits, and a pending application …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a permanent injunction directing that no one, including family members, interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and that police provide them protection. They alleged threats …
The petitioners, Alisha and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents and their families from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. They submitted school mark sheets to prove they are adults and a copy of their …
The petitioners, Smt. Jyoti and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including the State of Uttar Pradesh and private individuals, from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection due to alleged threats from family …
The petitioners, a married couple, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction directing respondents and their family members not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide them police protection. They submitted identity proof and a marriage registration application, …
The petitioners, an adult husband and wife, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining any interference in their peaceful marital life and requesting police protection against threats from private respondents and family members. The court examined the petitioner's claim that …
The petitioners, an adult husband and wife, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents and their family members from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. They submitted identity documents to prove they are of legal age and alleged …
The petitioners, Om Kumar and another adult, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a protection order against interference by family members who were threatening them for living together in a live‑in relationship. The court noted that the facts were identical to a prior …
Petitioners Shalini Singh and another, both adult unmarried women living together in a live‑in relationship, alleged threats and harassment from family members and sought a protection order under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Court noted that a similar petition (RIT‑35171/2025) had been …
The petitioners, a married adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining family members and other respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. They submitted their marriage certificate and school certificates to establish that …
The petitioners, Gauri and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a protection order against family members who were allegedly threatening them for their marriage. The petitioners submitted identity documents and a marriage registration application, asserting that they are adults who have …
The petitioners, Raj Laxmi Yadav and another, filed a writ petition seeking a protection order against the respondents, alleging that family members were threatening their safety and interfering with their marital life. They submitted evidence that both are adults, have voluntarily married, and …
The petitioners, Priya Seth and another, filed a writ petition seeking a protection order (RIT) to prevent any interference by family members in their marital life and to obtain police protection. They asserted that both are adults who have voluntarily married and are living together, attaching …
The petitioners, Shrimati Sangam Goswami and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including the State of U.P. and police officials, from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. They submitted evidence of their …
The petitioners, Muskan Verma and another, filed a writ petition seeking a protection order against private respondents who were allegedly threatening their peaceful marital life. The petitioners submitted evidence of their adult status, consent to marriage, and pending marriage registration. …
Petitioners Shivani Shirohiya and another sought a permanent injunction and police protection against family members who were allegedly threatening them and interfering with their marital life. They submitted school mark sheets to prove they are adults and attached an application for marriage …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking dismissal of criminal case No. 77/2022, which involved offences under Sections 452, 354, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 7/8 of the Poxos Act. The parties had entered into a settlement agreement dated 18‑11‑2025, and the applicant’s …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Security Code seeking direction to the lower court to consider their bail petition in a criminal case (FIR No. 244/2022, Trial No. 7752/2022) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Kasia, Kushinagar. The court examined the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash the Special Session Trial and charge sheet filed under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The FIR alleged that the applicants were members of an organized …
The applicant, Mohammad Taufiq, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita seeking relief from a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued for his non‑appearance in a criminal case pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banda. The applicant’s counsel …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the order passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, in criminal case No. 9468/2026. The applicants contended that they were innocent and that the lower court's order was illegal and contrary to …
The applicant, Smt Neha, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to set aside the cognizance order and quash the charge sheet in an electricity theft case filed under Section 135 of the Electricity Act (Amendment) 2003. The applicant argued that the offence is compoundable and …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code seeking quash of FIR No. 285/2025, alleging that the complaint was malicious, delayed, and that the alleged victim was an adult. The applicant's counsel argued that no offence was made out and that the proceedings were a …
The applicant, Rajendra Prasad, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the cognizance and summoning orders and to quash the charge sheet in a criminal case under Section 138(b) of the Electricity Act (Amendment) 2003. The applicant argued that the offence is …
The applicant Arvind Kumar Gupta filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking discharge (उन्मोचन) in a criminal case (Criminal Appeal No 226/2025) pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate‑First Class, Mirzapur. The applicant contended that he was innocent and that the order …
The applicant, Kallu, filed a second bail petition (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30980 of 2026) after his first bail petition (No. 6069/2026) had been dismissed on 2 July 2026. He is charged under IPC sections 103(1), 351(3), 352 and under sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act for offences …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a removal order dated 06‑04‑2023 passed by the Special Judge under the POXSO Act in Gorakhpur, arising from case No. 390/2018 (Vivad No. 979/2023). The applicant contended that the order was issued without any …
Alok Rajput filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to set aside the charge‑sheet (M.A. No. 190/2026) and the notice and order dated 21 July 2026 issued by the Special Judge, Poxo Act/Additional Sessions Judge, Kanpur Nagar, in a case under …
The applicant Shailendra Joshi filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the order dated 27‑10‑2021 in Criminal Case No. 896/2021, which involved alleged offences under Sections 411, 414 of the Bh. D. San and Sections 3/25 and 30 of the Arms Act. The applicant argued …
The applicant, Anugar Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking the release of three mobile phones seized by the police in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The applicant argued that the phones were falsely implicated, that retaining them …
The appellant, Kundan, filed Criminal Appeal No. 1041 of 1984 before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant to argue the appeal. The State was represented by counsel A.G.A., and the court heard the learned Additional Government Pleader Rajendra Singh and examined …
The appellant Bal Kishun was convicted under IPC Section 307 for an offence committed in 1983 and sentenced to four years' rigorous imprisonment. After more than four decades, the appellant, now 77 years old and suffering from serious health ailments, sought a reduction of his sentence, arguing that …
Hari Mohan was convicted under IPC sections 395/397 (and later 307) and sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment. After serving about two and a half years, he filed a criminal appeal 42 years after the 1984 incident, now being 67 years old and on bail. The appellant argued that the sentence …
The appellant Smt. Krishna Devi filed a criminal appeal (No. 516 of 1986) against Deo Nath and others. The appellant’s counsel appeared, but no one appeared on her behalf to argue. The court was informed, via an office memo dated 07‑07‑2026, that the appellant had died. On the ground that the …
The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus and protection, claiming that they were living as husband and wife after a marriage solemnised on 20‑07‑2026. The respondents disclosed that petitioner No.2 was already married to Ray Singh on 26‑06‑2026 and that her subsequent marriage to petitioner No.1 …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals living together in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a protection order against interference by family members and others. They alleged threats to their safety and requested police protection. …
Ranveer Singh was arrested in connection with Crime No.210 of 2025, alleged to have committed offences under Sections 123, 69, 351(3), 308(5) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67A of the Information Technology Act. After a first bail application was rejected, he filed a second bail petition …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Subedar Saroj, who was arrested in connection with a rape case (Crime No.172 of 2025). The applicant argued that the victim’s statements were contradictory and that he was falsely implicated, emphasizing that the victim later recanted the …
Surendra @ Chhotu filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to have the criminal case (State Vs. Surendra) quashed on the ground that the parties had reached a settlement. The pending case involved offences under Sections 452, 354, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and …
Ajay Kumar, accused in Crime No. 417 of 2025, filed a second bail application after his first was rejected. He argued that the victim's statement, recorded by the trial court, indicated that she left his house of her own free will and returned after a month, suggesting his innocence and false …
The applicant, Rajesh alias Randeep alias Nanha, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Counsel for the applicant prayed to pass over the matter for the day. The court granted the adjournment and ordered that the case be listed afresh on 9 July 2025. The court …
The applicant Manoj filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (State vs Manoj) pending before the Special Judge under the PAKSO Act. The application was based on a settlement agreement dated 19 June 2026 between the parties, which had …
The applicant, Chandan Gupta, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings (State Vs. Chandan Gupta, SST No. 155/2023) arising from an alleged offence under the PAXO Act. He contended that he had subsequently married the alleged victim …
Anurag Saxena and another filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from family members. The petitioners submitted proof of age and a pending application for marriage …
The petitioners, Smt. Varsha Rajpoot and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including family members, from interfering in their marital life and directing the police to provide them protection. They submitted school certificates and a …
Petitioners Smt. Kanchan Rathore and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The respondents argued that the matter was already registered under Section 140(3) of the B.N.S. at the Gola temple in Gwalior district, making the …
The petitioners, adult individuals who have voluntarily married, sought a permanent injunction restraining the respondents and their families from interfering in their peaceful marital life and requested police protection. The petitioners submitted age proof, joint affidavits, and an application for …
The petitioners, two adult individuals of different faiths in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the police to protect them from harassment by family members. The respondents opposed the prayer, arguing that the petitioners were unmarried. The Court …
The applicant Vinod Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to set aside the cognizance order dated 11‑09‑2025 and to quash the charge‑sheet dated 29‑05‑2025 in a criminal case under Section 60 of the Excise Act. He alleged that no offence was disclosed …
The petitioners, a married couple who are both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted identity proof and affidavits showing the …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ seeking a mandamus to prevent the respondents and family members from interfering with their marital life and to obtain police protection. They submitted a high school marksheet and an Aadhaar card as proof of majority and claimed threats from a private …
The petitioners, Arpita Pal and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted school certificates to prove they are adults and asserted …
The petitioners, Radha and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection, alleging threats from family members. The petitioners submitted proof of majority, PAN cards, and affidavits …
The petitioners, Nisha Sonkar and her husband, are adult individuals who have married and are living together, but face threats and harassment from the private respondent and family members. They filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful …
The applicants, Saurabh Tigoria and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the cognizance and charge sheet in a special trial under the Electricity Act (Amendment) 2023 and several IPC provisions. They argued that the offence is compoundable and were ready …
The applicant, Sanjay Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No. 0059 of 2025) arising from a charge of assault under Section 323 IPC, alleged child marriage offences under the Prohibition of Child …
The applicant, Mohammad Irshad Khan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking relief. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant expressed that he no longer wished to pursue the application and requested its withdrawal. The State’s Additional Government Advocate raised no …
The applicant, Md Shahzeb Siddiqui, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to set aside an order dated 12‑02‑2026 of the Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffar Nagar, which had retained money seized in a case under Sections 8, 22 and 29 of the NDPS Act. The applicant contended …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside the cognizance order and quash the charge sheet in a Special Criminal Case involving alleged offences under various sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Protection of Children From Sexual …
Firasat Ali filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 21‑12‑2025 and the entire criminal proceeding (Case No. 7503 of 2026) arising under Section 3 of the Prevention of Damages to Public Property Act, 1984. The applicant alleged …
The petitioners, two adult women in a consensual same‑sex live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents (family members) from interfering with their cohabitation and directing police protection. The petitioners argued that …
The petitioners, a husband and wife, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to obtain protection against threats from family members. They proved they are adults by submitting school mark‑sheets and affirmed that their …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ of mandamus seeking protection from interference by family members in their marital life and requested that authorities safeguard them. They submitted proof of age and affirmed that their marriage was entered into voluntarily, with registration pending. The …
The applicant, Sameeullah, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 29‑03‑2022 issued by the Additional Sessions Judge (Special Judge POCSO) in a case under IPC sections 363, 366 and POCSO Act sections 7 and 8. He alleged …
Petitioners Pinkee Kumari and another, both major and unmarried, are living in a live-in relationship and filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere in their peaceful life and to provide protection. They alleged that the private respondent and …
The petitioners, Anita and another, who are in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the police to protect them from threats by private respondents. The first petitioner is a widow and the second is a married man; the State argued that the …
The petitioners, a live-in couple, filed a writ under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the police to protect them from threats by the private respondent and family members. The petitioners argued that they faced danger of being eliminated for family honour. The State contended that …
The petitioners, a married couple who are both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, …
The petitioners, Shantika Chauhan and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove they are adults and …
The petitioners, an adult married couple, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They proved their majority with school marksheets, submitted a marriage …
The petitioners, Ishita Sahu and her partner, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and others not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove they …
The petitioners, a married couple who are both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school certificates to prove majority and …
The petitioners, two adult individuals, filed a writ of mandamus seeking protection from interference by family members in their marital life and requested that authorities ensure their safety. They submitted school mark sheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming a consensual marriage, and …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They had applied for registration of their marriage and feared that the private respondent …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school mark sheets to prove majority and affidavits confirming a consensual …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live‑in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. Relying on Article 21 of the Constitution, they argued …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school mark‑sheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming free …
The petitioners, a married couple who are both adults, sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affidavits confirming their voluntary …
The applicant, Jyoti Prakash Dubey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summons dated 07-10-2020, the entire criminal proceeding (S.T. No.12/2020) arising from a case registered in 2018 under Sections 354(Ka) and 506 of the IPC and Sections 9 and …
The petitioners, Reena and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to prevent any interference in their marital life and to obtain protection from threats by a private respondent and family members. They submitted identity proof and affidavits confirming their free and …
The applicant, Lucky Kumar Bhartiya, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside the cognizance order dated 12‑07‑2023 and to quash the charge sheet dated 08‑04‑2022 in a case under Section 60(2) of the Excise Act. The court examined the FIR and the …
The petitioners, Annu Devi and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of majority— a high school marksheet and an Aadhar …
The petitioners, Vashnavi Yadav and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, …
The petitioners, a husband and wife who are both adults, sought a writ of mandamus to prevent any interference in their marital life and to obtain police protection, alleging threats from the private respondent and family members. The husband had earlier been implicated in a criminal case under IPC …
Petitioners Parul Pal and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The State's standing counsel informed the Court that an FIR had already been lodged in Crime No. 167 of 2026 under Section 87, rendering the petition unnecessary. Petitioners did not contest this submission. The …
Petitioners Rajne Devi and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The standing counsel for the respondents informed the court that an FIR had already been registered in Crime No. 368 of 2026 under Sections 87, 352 …
The petitioners, a married couple who are both adults, sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. The court noted that the petitioners have provided proof of age and …
The petitioners, Priyanka Devi and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection. They submitted proof of majority, a marriage certificate, and alleged threats from a private …
The petitioners, a married couple who are both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted identity proof and affidavits confirming …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted identity proof and affidavits confirming a consensual marriage and alleged …
Mashkoor applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the CrPC in a case where he was charged with offences including rape, dowry prohibition violations, and various IPC offences. This was his second anticipatory bail application; the first had been dismissed after the charge sheet was filed. …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 13‑11‑2025 in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 352, 351(3) of the IPC, Section 109 of the B.N.S and Section 30 of the …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 CrPC filed by Omendra Singh in a case involving IPC offences 420, 467, 468 and 471. The applicant argued that he had no criminal antecedents, no coercive process had been initiated, and that the charge sheet had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 09‑08‑2025 and related proceedings under Section 318(4) of the BNSS and Sections 8, 11 and 12 of the Molasses Control Act. They alleged that no offence was disclosed against them and that the …
The applicant, Akhand Pratap Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of an FIR and charge sheet registered under Section 3(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. He contended that the FIR failed to …
The petitioners, two adult women in a live‑in relationship, approached the Allahabad High Court seeking a permanent injunction directing the State and police not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide them protection against threats from family members. The petition arose after …
Petitioners Disha Katiyar and her partner, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of U.P. and private respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from family members. The petitioners submitted …
The petitioners Aradhna Yadav and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a decision of the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The petition was filed under Section 137(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The respondents argued that the same matter had already …
The petitioners, Smt. Afsha and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere in their marital relationship and to provide them protection. The respondents contended that petitioner No. 2 was already married to another woman and had contracted a second …
Petitioners Archana and another filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, the State of U.P. and three others, from interfering in their live‑in relationship and requesting police protection. The petition was supported only by a single affidavit and lacked a …
The applicant, Muvin Khan, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to set aside the cognizance order dated 14‑08‑2023 and to quash the charge sheet filed on 18‑04‑2023 in a case of alleged electricity theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act (Amendment) 2003. The …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court examined …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals living in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The respondents …
Ashish Kumar and another filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of U.P. and two private respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. The petitioners, both adults, submitted school certificates and an application for marriage …
The petitioners, Smt Ranju and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent order restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and directing police protection. The petitioners submitted evidence of their adulthood and consent to marriage, along with an application for …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The respondents opposed the prayer, …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure challenging the cognizance order dated 24‑12‑2018 and the charge sheet dated 20‑02‑2018 in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant contended that the cognizance …
The petitioners, an adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents and family members from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. They submitted proof of age, joint affidavits, and an application for marriage registration, …
Shankar Mandal filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the order of the Additional Sessions Judge that had retained his vehicle (OD 30G 2978) at the police station in connection with a criminal case under the NDPS Act. The applicant asserted that he is the registered …
The petitioners, Smt. Shanti Sharma @ Laxmi and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of U.P. and private respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. They submitted school certificates and a pending …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The respondents opposed the prayer. The …
The petitioners, Smt Divya and another, filed a writ seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and directing police protection. The court examined the petitioners' age, consent, marriage registration, and alleged threats from family members, …
Petitioners Smt. Taniya Sharma and another, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted age proof, joint affidavits, and an …
The petitioners, adult individuals, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction and police protection to prevent the respondents, who are family members, from interfering in their marital life. They submitted PAN cards and an application for marriage registration to demonstrate their age …
The petitioners, Sandeep Kumar Nishad and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents and family members from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. They submitted proof of age, joint affidavits, and an application for …
The petitioners, Smt. Madhuri and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and an application for marriage …
Petitioners Km Khushi Mishra and another, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining respondents from interfering in their peaceful marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted school certificates and an …
Gajala and another filed writ petition No. 35765 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The respondents filed a counter‑affidavit and the permanent advocate argued that the same matter is already pending as MU A S No. 728/2026 under Sections 87 …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals living together in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The respondents opposed …
The petitioners, Vandana and her spouse, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, who are family members, from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. They submitted evidence of being adults, including high school certificates, and …
Petitioners Palak @ Shabbo Parveen and her spouse filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining respondents, including family members, from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. The petitioners submitted school certificates and affidavits establishing …
Arvind Kumar and another petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from family members after their adult marriage. The petitioners submitted age proof, joint …
The petitioners, Priya Devi and another, filed a writ seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents and their families from interfering with the petitioners' live‑in relationship and requesting police protection. The petitioners submitted age proof and joint affidavits asserting their …
The petitioners, Akanksha Tiwari and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including the State of Uttar Pradesh, from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from family members. The petitioners …
The petitioners, Afsha and her spouse, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the State of Uttar Pradesh and private respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. They submitted proof of adulthood and evidence of a consensual marriage, …
Petitioners Deepa Vishwakarma and another filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including family members, from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection. The petitioners submitted school certificates and affidavits to prove they …
The applicant, Rajeev Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash a summons issued on 21‑06‑2022 in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court noted that the contentions raised were essentially factual …
The petitioners, Smt. Tanu Sharma and another, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 35666 of 2026) before the Allahabad High Court. The respondents, the State of U.P. and others, opposed the petition on the ground that the same matter had already been registered as Mu. A. 0. San 455/2026 under Section …
Petitioners Pratibha Gautam and another, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted school certificates and a pending …
The petitioners, Smt Shouvi Masudi and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted evidence of being adults, including high …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 1142 of 2025) pending against him, alleging that no offence was disclosed and that the prosecution was malicious. The court examined whether, at the stage of a …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 1143 of 2025) pending against him in the Kanpur Sessions Court. He alleged that no offence was disclosed against him and that the prosecution was instituted with …
Gopal Tiwari filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash two orders that rejected his request to release two mobile phones seized in a criminal case (Criminal Case No. 3803 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 189, 170, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the IPC and Section 66 …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The respondents opposed …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried women living in a live‑in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the police to protect them from harassment and threats by family members. The court noted that the facts were analogous to the earlier decision in Noori v. State of …
Petitioners Anjali Patel and another, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including members of their families and the State of U.P., from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection due to alleged threats. They …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The respondents opposed the prayer, …
Petitioners Mohni and another, an adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents from interfering in their peaceful marital life and directing police protection. They submitted proof of age, affidavits, and an application for marriage registration, …
The petitioners, Ritika Sonkar and her partner, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction and police protection to prevent family members from interfering with their consensual adult marriage. They submitted proof of age, affidavits, and an application for marriage registration, alleging …
The petitioners, Hina Parveen and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including the State of U.P., from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection due to threats from family members. They submitted proof of age, …
The petitioners, a married adult couple, sought a permanent injunction restraining the respondents and family members from interfering in their marital life and requested police protection. They submitted school certificates and a pending application for marriage registration to prove they are …
Petitioners Shilpi Kumari and another, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including the State of U.P., from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from family members. The petitioners submitted …
The petitioners, Smt. Shabana and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents, including the State of U.P., from interfering in their marital life and requesting police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted proof of age …
The applicant, Shrikant Agrawal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to set aside the cognizance and quash the charge sheet in a criminal case under the Essential Commodities Act. He contended that no offence was disclosed and that the prosecution was …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the police to protect them from harassment by family members. The court noted that the facts were analogous to the earlier decision in Noori v. State of U.P., where …
The petitioners, two adult individuals in a live-in relationship, filed a writ seeking a permanent injunction restraining the respondents and their families from interfering with their cohabitation and requesting police protection. They submitted age proof and joint affidavits to demonstrate …
The petitioners, both adults, claimed to have married of their own free will and sought a writ of mandamus to prevent interference by the father of one petitioner, alleging threats to their life and liberty. The State counsel argued that the marriage was void or voidable because the male petitioner …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State to prevent interference by family members and to provide police protection against threats and harassment. The respondents opposed the prayer. The Court …
The petitioners, Sonal Singh and another, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction directing the respondents and their family members not to interfere with their peaceful marital life and to provide police protection. The petitioners submitted school certificates and an application for …
Vishal Khurana filed an application under Section 528 of the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 424 of 2025) arising from Crime No. 687 of 2024, which were based on a charge‑sheet filed under several provisions of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Scheme Act, …
The appeal concerned the conviction of seven accused under IPC sections 147, 148, 304 and 149 for the fatal assault of Bankey Lal during a land‑dispute. The prosecution proved that the accused, armed with lathis and a sickle, assaulted the deceased, causing multiple injuries corroborated by medical …
Deepak Shukla, detained since 20 November 2023 in connection with a 2020 case under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC, filed a second bail application after an earlier denial. No charge had been framed and a request for a separate trial remained pending, prompting the counsel to invoke …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide them protection. They submitted proof of age and asserted that they had married of their own free will, but faced threats from the private …
The petitioners, adult individuals who have voluntarily married, sought a writ of mandamus to prevent the respondents and family members from interfering with their peaceful married life and to obtain police protection. They alleged threats to their safety and claimed that any interference could …
The petitioners, Sabana and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners despite the listing. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim order that had been granted earlier was vacated. No …
The petitioners, a married couple, sought a writ of mandamus to prevent any interference in their peaceful married life and to obtain police protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of majority and affirmed that their marriage was consensual. The Court, relying on Supreme …
The petitioners, Riya Shah and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority and …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to obtain police protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age (high school marksheet and Aadhar) and asserted that …
The petitioners sought a one‑week extension to file a supplementary affidavit annexing the receipt of registry. The Court granted the requested time and ordered that the matter be listed as a fresh case on 21‑May‑2026.
The petitioners, Resham Kumari and her husband, are adults who have cohabited and applied for marriage registration, but face threats and harassment from a private respondent and family members. They filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their …
The petitioners, Arzoo and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted identity proof and affidavits confirming a voluntary …
The petitioners, two adult individuals of different faiths in a live-in relationship, alleged harassment and threats from family members and sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the police to protect their life and liberty. The respondents opposed the prayer, arguing no legal basis …
The petitioners, a married couple, sought a writ of mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that both petitioners are adults, presented proof of age, and are living together …
The petitioners, Janvi Singh and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection. They asserted that both are adults, have married of their own free will, and face threats from family …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority and affidavits confirming a voluntary …
The petitioners, two adult individuals of different faiths in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The respondents opposed the …
The petitioners, adult husband and wife, sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide police protection. They alleged threats and harassment from family members and intended to register their marriage. The Court, relying on Supreme Court …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted identity proof and affidavits confirming a consensual marriage and …
The petitioners, a married adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affirmed that their marriage was entered …
The petitioners, Kavita Saroj and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of majority and affirmed that their marriage was entered …
Petitioners Jyoti and another filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The respondents' standing counsel submitted that a criminal FIR had already been lodged under Sections 87, 115(2) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code at B.N.S. Police Station, …
The petitioners, Shweta Yadav and her partner, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection. They alleged that they are adults who voluntarily cohabited and solemnised marriage without coercion, …
The petitioners, Sakuntla Devi and another, who are already married, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to safeguard their life and liberty, alleging threats and harassment from family members due to their live‑in relationship. They submitted Aadhaar proof of majority and …
The petitioners, Simran Kumari and another, are adult individuals who have solemnised a marriage of their own free will and seek a writ of mandamus to prevent any interference in their peaceful married life and to obtain protection from threats. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority and …
The petitioners, Roshni Devi and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted evidence of their ages and joint affidavits …
The petitioners, a married couple who are both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and a private respondent not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection. They alleged threats and harassment from family members and submitted school …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals living together in a live-in relationship, alleged harassment and threats from family members and sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the police to protect their life and liberty. The court examined whether the Constitution's …
The petitioners, Sandhya Kumari and her partner, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted school mark‑sheets to prove they are adults and …
The petitioners, Sneha Singh Yadav and another, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection. They asserted that they are adults who have married of their own free will and face threats from …
The petitioners, Gudiya and her husband, are adult individuals who have married and are living together, fearing interference and threats from family members. They filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to disturb their peaceful married life and to provide police …
The petitioners, who are in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their life and liberty against threats from private respondents. The petitioners alleged that the private respondents might eliminate them for family honour. The State …
The petitioners, Shivani and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove they are major and have …
The petitioners, Sapana Kumari and her partner, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection. They asserted that they are adults who have married of their own free will, have applied for marriage …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ of mandamus seeking protection from interference in their marital life and direction to the authorities to safeguard them. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming a consensual marriage, and alleged threats from family …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live‑in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State to prevent family members from harassing them and to provide police protection. The court noted that the facts were analogous to the earlier decision in …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals of different faiths living together in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court observed …
The petitioners, an adult married couple, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age, marriage registration, and affidavits asserting …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that the facts were analogous to a prior …
The petitioners, who are in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their life and liberty from alleged threats by private respondents. The petitioners claimed they faced danger of being eliminated for family honour. The State contended that …
The petitioners, a married couple, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The court noted that both petitioners are adults, have consented to the …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. Relying on Article 226, they argued that their fundamental …
