Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
639 judgments · newest first · showing 401–600
The petitioners, two adult individuals in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection. The Court observed that both petitioners are major, referencing earlier decisions …
The petitioners, two adult individuals of different faiths, married under Section 5 of the Special Marriage Act and live together, alleging harassment and threats from a private respondent and family members. They filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere …
The petitioners, a married adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age, marriage registration, and affidavits affirming …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that the facts were analogous to a prior …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals living together in a live‑in relationship, alleged harassment and threats from family members and sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the police to protect their life and liberty. The Court examined whether the Constitution’s …
The petitioners, a married couple, sought a writ of mandamus directing the State and its officials not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide them protection against threats from family members. The court noted that both petitioners are adults, as evidenced by their Aadhaar …
Petitioners Navya and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming consensual marriage, and an …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State to refrain from interfering with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that the …
The petitioners, Pooja Singh and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and asserted that their marriage was …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, alleged harassment and threats from family members and sought a writ of mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection under Article 226. The Court noted that …
The petitioners, Riya Rajbhar and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority and …
The petitioners, who are in a live-in relationship, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State to protect their life and liberty against threats from private respondents. The State contended that petitioner No.1 is still married to another person, making the live-in relationship …
The petitioners, Gunjan and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection, alleging threats from the private respondent and family members. They submitted proof of age …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ of mandamus seeking protection from interference in their marital life and direction to the police to safeguard them. They asserted that they had married of their own free will, faced threats from family members, and had applied for marriage registration. …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against harassment by family members. The Court noted that the facts were …
The petitioners, Smt Arshi and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age (school leaving certificate …
The petitioners, two adult individuals, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital cohabitation and to provide police protection. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming a consensual marriage, and alleged …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live‑in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that the facts were …
The petitioners, Smt. Pooja Ahirwar and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging the actions of the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel informed the Court that an FIR (Case Crime No. 150 of 2026) had already been lodged under …
The petitioners, Nisha and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection. They submitted proof of majority and affirmed that their marriage was entered into voluntarily without …
The petitioners, Aaisha and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of majority and affirmed that their marriage was …
The petitioners, a consenting adult couple, sought a writ of mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their marital life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affirmed that their marriage was being registered. The Court, …
The petitioners, two adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful married life and to provide protection against threats from family members. They submitted high‑school mark‑sheets and a marriage registration certificate to prove their …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State to prevent interference by family members and to provide police protection. The court noted that the facts were analogous to a prior decision (Akanksha v. State …
The petitioners, Laxmi Devi and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted identity documents to prove majority and …
The petitioners, Ananya Gaur and another adult, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide police protection. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming a consensual marriage, and alleged …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State to protect them from harassment by family members. The Court observed that the facts were identical to a prior decision (Writ‑C No. 35171 of 2025) and …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that the facts were analogous to a prior …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted school mark sheets to prove majority and affirmed that their marriage was …
The petitioners, Mahrun Jahan and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affirmed that their …
Petitioners Smt. Sanjana and another filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of U.P. and others. The Additional Chief Standing Counsel informed the court that a criminal FIR (Case Crime No. 60 of 2026) had already been lodged under Sections 87 and 137(2) of the Indian Penal Code at …
The petitioners, a married couple who are both adults, sought a writ of mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affirmed that their marriage was consensual, …
The petitioners, Anshika and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted school mark sheets to prove majority and …
The petitioners, Jyoti and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted Aadhaar cards to prove majority and claimed they had …
The petitioners, a married couple, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted their marriage registration certificate and school marksheets to …
The petitioners, Antima Devi and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide police protection against threats from family members. They submitted school mark sheets to prove majority, …
The petitioners, Farheen and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital cohabitation and to provide police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted proof of age and affirmed that their …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide police protection, alleging threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority and affirmed that their marriage was …
The petitioners, both adults of different faiths, married under Section 5 of the Special Marriage Act and live together, but face threats and harassment from family members. They filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful life and to …
The applicants, Mohammad Ali and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Citizens Security Code seeking relief from a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued under Section 138(B) of the Indian Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2019 in case No. 520/2019. The NBW was issued because the …
The petitioners, two adults who have married of their own free will, sought a writ of mandamus directing that no one, including family members, interfere with their peaceful married life and that they be provided protection. They submitted school mark sheets to prove majority and affidavits …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharat Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to set aside a charge sheet filed under IPC Section 420 and IT Act Section 66, and an order of the Small Cause Court dated 29‑09‑2023. They contended that no offence was made out against them …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita seeking relief from a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued after they failed to appear at a scheduled hearing in criminal case 79606/2025. The High Court examined the applicants' request to have the NBW …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Citizens Security Code seeking relief from a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in the pending case State Vs. Santosh Kumar @ Vishal and others (SST No. 319/2021). The warrant was issued because the applicant failed to appear before …
Usman Ali applied for anticipatory bail under CrPC Section 482 in connection with FIR No. 67/2025 alleging offences under IPC sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2). He claimed innocence, asserted that the charges were filed out of personal enmity, and argued that no reliable evidence …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that the facts were similar to a prior …
The petitioners, Shaitan Singh Yadav and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of the criminal proceedings initiated against them under the Arms Act and NDPS Act. They argued that no offence was made out and that the prosecution was …
The applicant, Firoz, had been granted bail in eight separate criminal cases but was required to furnish a distinct personal bond and two sureties for each case. Unable to arrange eight sureties, he filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking the trial court’s direction to accept a …
The applicant Neeti Agnihotri filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to set aside a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in connection with a case (State vs. Akhilesh & others, S. No. 4784/2019). The applicant argued that the NBW was issued because she …
The applicant, Rehana, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside orders dated 18‑06‑2025 and 09‑07‑2026 that seized her vehicle under the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955. She claimed to be the registered owner of the vehicle and argued that its …
The applicant, Khushbo Sonkar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Trial No. 1503/2025) initiated under various statutes including the Indian Citizens Security Act, Pakso Act, and Income Tax Act. The applicant argued that no specific …
The applicant, Rakesh Kumar Bind, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside a order dated 25‑11‑2025 passed by a Civil Judge in a case under the Uttar Pradesh Gauvandhan Nivaran Act. The applicant contended that no offence was made out as all eight …
Vijay Kumar Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (IPC sections 419, 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120B and IT Act section 66D) that arose from FIR No. 0718/2021. He contended that no offence was made out, the prosecution was malicious, the FIR was …
Garima Srivastava and another filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No. 470/2025 and the subsequent civil suit No. 5401/2026. They contended that no offence was made out, the prosecution was malicious, and there was no direct evidence against …
Rishabh Sharma filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS challenging a sanction order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muradabad, in a case instituted under Sections 3/25 of the Arms Act and 9(k)/1(k) of the Explosive Substances Act. The applicant alleged that no offence was made out …
The applicant, Brijesh Pal, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking discharge in criminal case No. 557/2026. He argued that he is innocent, that no direct evidence exists against him, and that the lower court's order is illegal. The State opposed the application. The High Court …
The applicant, Sandeep Rajbhar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking relief from a non-bailable warrant (NBW) issued by the District and Sessions Judge, Azamgarh, on 12‑06‑2025 in connection with a trial under the Arms Act (Section 4/25). The …
Vijendra Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside an order dated 24‑07‑2026 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in criminal case 873/2018 (Ganga Saran v. Vijendra Singh). The applicant …
Arpit Raj filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings arising from FIR No. 66/2025, which alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 308(2), 319(2), 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66 of the IT Act. The applicant argued that no offence was made …
Ashok Kumar Singh filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to set aside a prior order and obtain bail in a case where he is alleged to have committed offences under IPC sections 420, 419, 468, 471 and Section 15(3) of the IMC Act. The High Court …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to quash an order dated 08‑03‑2021 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra, in a criminal case initiated under Section 381 of the Bharatiya Dand Sanhita and Sections 65/66 of the …
The applicant, Sudesh Paswan, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and proceedings in case No. 60338 of 2026, alleging that he was not originally named in the FIR and that the prosecution was malicious. The court examined the FIR, which disclosed a …
Petitioners Priti Devi and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. The standing counsel for the State informed the Court that an FIR had already been lodged in Crime No. 218 of 2026 under Sections 87 and 137(2) of the B.N.S. at Amaria Police Station, Pilibhit. The petitioners …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a prosecution order dated 25-10-2024 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bulandshahr. The court examined the allegations, which involved offences under Section 420 of the IPC and Section 66D of the IT Act, and …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital cohabitation and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming voluntary …
Pawan Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to set aside a prosecution order dated 23.01.2025 and to obtain bail, alleging that he had not yet been arrested and that the police were attempting to arrest him. The court examined the allegations, noting they pertained to …
The petitioners, Smt Sadhana and her husband, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority and …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of criminal proceedings initiated under Sections 272, 273, 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 59 of the Food Safety and Standards Act. The applicant argued that no offence was made out and the prosecution was …
Petitioners Smt Kajal Singh and another filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The Court was informed that an FIR had already been lodged in the matter. The petitioners' counsel could not dispute this information. The Court held that the filing of the FIR rendered …
The applicant, Raj Kumar @ Raju, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to set aside the order of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑5, Bareilly dated 22‑04‑2026, and to quash the criminal proceedings against him. The High Court examined the allegations, noting that …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school mark sheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming free …
The applicant, Ramkumar @ Bade, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a non-bailable warrant (NBW) dated 17-06-2022 issued by the Civil Judge (J.D.) of Jalaun in a case arising from an Arms Act charge (Section 3/25). The applicant argued that the NBW was issued …
The petitioners, a married couple, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They established that both are adults by submitting a high school mark sheet and …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals living together in a live‑in relationship, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State not to interfere with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court …
The petitioners, adult husband and wife, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets and a marriage registration certificate …
The applicants, Amit Sikarwar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking bail after an FIR dated 11‑08‑2023 alleged offences under IPC sections 332, 353, 504 and 506 and the Public Property Damage Prevention Act. The Judicial …
Petitioners Sandhya and another filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 35507 of 2026) before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The petition was presented by counsel Sarfaraz Ahmad and Shri Ram Mishra. The respondents, the State of U.P. and three others, were represented by C.S.C. The learned …
The petitioners, who are adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital cohabitation and to provide them protection. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming free consent, and alleged threats from family …
The petitioners, an adult couple, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted Aadhaar cards to prove majority and affidavits confirming that their …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and others not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming free consent to marriage, …
Petitioners Smt Alisha Gupta and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others. The petition was challenged by the Standing Counsel for the respondents, who submitted that an FIR had already been lodged in Crime No. 79 of 2026 under …
The petitioners, a married couple who are both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide them protection. They submitted school marksheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming free consent, and alleged …
The petitioners, both adults, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their marital life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school mark sheets to prove majority, affidavits confirming a consensual …
The petitioners, a married couple, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted proof of majority and affirmed that their marriage was entered …
The petitioners, Smt. Saniya Khan and her husband, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with their peaceful married life and to provide them protection against threats from family members. They submitted school marksheets to prove they are adults, …
The petitioners, two adult unmarried individuals in a live-in relationship, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the State to refrain from interfering with their peaceful cohabitation and to provide police protection against threats from family members. The Court noted that the …
The applicant, Ibrahim, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking the trial court’s permission to accept a single personal bond and two sureties for all four criminal cases pending against him. He had already been granted bail in each case but was unable to furnish separate surety …
The petitioners, an adult married couple, filed a writ petition seeking a permanent injunction and police protection against alleged threats and interference by private respondents and family members. They submitted Aadhaar copies and a marriage registration application, asserting that they married …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to set aside a civil order dated 30.05.2019 passed by the Civil Judge (J.D.) in Kushinagar, which was based on a criminal case under Sections 323, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicants …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNNS seeking discharge of a criminal case (Criminal Appeal No. 842/2020) in which they were charged under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 427 and 452. The trial court had earlier dismissed a discharge application filed on 03.12.2025, and the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to refer a civil dispute (originally filed under Sections 323, 504, 506) to a mediation centre. The lower civil judge had issued a summons order dated 10‑09‑2025, which the applicants challenged, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking to set aside a complaint order dated 11‑12‑2025 in case 425/2024 (Kanya Devi v. Sarvesh & others). The High Court examined the procedural history, noting that the complainant’s statement was …
The applicant, Banno Nisha, filed a Section 528 application challenging several orders of the subordinate criminal court that denied her the opportunity to testify under Section 244 of the CrPC in a sexual assault case. The trial court had earlier issued summons under IPC Sections 354 and 504 …
Sunil and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 2433/2016) pending before the Hapur court, which involved offences under Sections 323, 452, 504 and 506 IPC. The applicants asserted that a settlement agreement dated …
The applicant, Pankaj Dubey, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Evidence Act seeking modification of a maintenance order dated 28‑03‑2026 and 02‑05‑2026 issued by the Additional District Judge, Jaunpur. The order required the applicant to pay Rs 3,000 per month to the respondent …
Mohit Sharma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (No. 3014 of 2022) seeking bail. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, while counsel for the State of U.P. and another party were present. The court noted the absence of representation for the applicant and …
The applicant sought relief under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code to set aside an ex‑parte order dated 16‑10‑2020 passed by the Municipal Corporation of Meerjapur under Sections 145 and 146 of the CrPC, which had withdrawn an earlier attachment order on a disputed house. The dispute arose …
The petitioner sought to quash the trial court’s order under Section 528 of the CrPC granting bail to the accused in a case involving alleged dowry death. The facts involved the suicide of a daughter‑in‑law shortly after her marriage, with the prosecution alleging dowry harassment and filing charges …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an FIR registered on 20-04-2022 under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, alleging that the allegations disclose a cognizable offence. …
The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash a criminal complaint (Case No. 226 of 2020) filed under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The High Court noted that the matter had been referred to mediation, which failed, and that the issues …
The applicants filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash the Sessions Trial No. 950 of 2006, which stemmed from an FIR alleging offences under Sections 323, 326, 307, 504 and 506 IPC. The trial court verified that the parties had entered into a written compromise, and the key prosecution …
The applicant, Ashutosh Dwivedi, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (CrPC 173(8)) arising from a dowry‑death case (Sections 498A, 304B IPC and Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act). He alleged that the investigating officer had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. No further submissions or evidence were presented by the applicants. The learned counsel for the opposite party appeared, but the applicants failed to prosecute the application. Consequently, the …
The applicant Rakesh Pratap filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 9295 of 2022) arising from an FIR alleging offences under Sections 420 and 406 IPC. The parties had resolved their dispute through a written compromise mediated by the Court's Mediation …
The applicants Lakhan, Malkhan and Karan were charged under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and 392 in a case registered at Kailua police station, Jalaun. They filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC after a prior bail application had been dismissed on 11‑04‑2025. The …
The applicants, Krishn Ji and two others, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC in connection with FIR No. 335/2025 alleging offences under IPC Sections 115(2), 110, 352 and 351(3). The learned court examined the seriousness of the alleged offences, the applicants' …
The Allahabad High Court heard Criminal Appeal No. 1420 of 1983 filed by the remaining appellant, Parmal, against his conviction for attempt to murder and voluntarily causing hurt under Sections 307/34 and 324/34 IPC, for which he had been sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment and six …
The appellants Jaipal and Ranvir were convicted by the Sessions Court for offences including rioting, voluntarily causing hurt and common intention under Sections 147, 148, 323 and 149 of the IPC, and were released on probation bonds. They appealed, contending that the prosecution witnesses were …
The applicants, Rajeev Kumar and three others, were charged under IPC sections 452, 323, 504 and 506 in Criminal Case No. 9760 of 2019. They filed a Section 482 application seeking quash of the proceedings, alleging that the dispute with the key prosecution witness (Opposite Party No.2) had been …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Evidence Act challenging an interim maintenance order dated 15‑07‑2025 passed by the Additional District Judge, Barabanki, under Section 125 of the CrPC. The applicant claimed that the order requiring a monthly payment of Rs.5,000 to …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside two interlocutory orders dated 04-10-2024 and 21-09-2024 passed by the trial court in a criminal case (MU/AS 559/2019) involving alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 307 of the IPC and the Dowry …
The applicant filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash a charge sheet dated 11‑06‑2021 and the proceedings of case No. 2576 of 2022 (State vs Vindhyachal et al.) arising from a 2018 offence under IPC sections 272, 273 and Excise Act sections 60, 72. The applicant alleged that no offence …
Satendra Singh, the husband, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an ex parte maintenance order and a recovery suit under Section 147 BNSS that had been passed in his absence. He contended that the order was issued without notice, that his wife had deserted him, and …
The applicant filed a Section 482 CrPC petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 3497 of 2021) arising from an FIR alleging rape (Sec. 376 IPC) and criminal intimidation (Sec. 506 IPC). The parties had entered into a written compromise, which was verified by the trial court, and the …
The appellants Munna, Radhir, Bhanwra and Bhura were convicted under Sections 307 and 34 of the IPC and sentenced to five years' rigorous imprisonment. While three appellants died during the pendency of the appeal, the case proceeded against Bhura, now about 95 years old, who does not contest the …
The applicant filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash a Sessions trial (Criminal Case No. 427 of 2019) involving offences under Sections 504, 506 and 376 IPC. The parties had reached a written compromise, which was verified by the trial court, and the key prosecution witness indicated …
The applicants filed a Section 482 CrPC application seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 2445 of 2020) arising from offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 452 and 308. The trial court had verified that the parties had reached a written compromise, and the State AGA and the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking a stay of the criminal proceedings and bail, alleging that they had not yet been arrested and that the lower court's order of detention was unwarranted. The High Court examined the allegations, noting that they pertained to …
The applicant Vikas filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash a summoning order dated 25‑09‑2025 issued by the Additional Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate in a complaint case under Sections 115(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. The applicant argued that the magistrate had taken …
The applicant, Mohd Shahid, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking relief from criminal proceedings under Sections 420, 504 and 506 of the IPC and from two NBW orders dated 17‑03‑2023 and 23‑03‑2026. He contended that the NBW orders were improperly issued and requested a stay of …
The applicant, Amit Ahuja, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Evidence Act seeking modification of an interim maintenance order dated 27‑05‑2025, which required him to pay Rs 20,000 per month to two claimants under Section 125 of the CrPC. The applicant argued that the order was …
The applicant, Satyapal (also known as Sanjay), filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Evidence Act seeking modification of an interim maintenance order dated 20‑03‑2025 issued by the Family Court, Handras, under Section 125(3) of the CrPC. The applicant contended that the order …
The applicants Din Dayal and four others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS and Section 482 of the CrPC seeking a stay of the criminal proceedings (Case No. 1693/2025) pending a mediation process. The court heard the petitioner's and the non‑governmental respondent's arguments and …
The applicant, Kartik Sehgal, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to set aside an interim maintenance order dated 16‑02‑2026 issued by the Family Court, Meerut, which required him to pay Rs 8,000 per month to the respondent. The applicant argued that the order …
The applicant filed a Section 482 CrPC application to quash Special Sessions Trial No.148 of 2019, which involved offences under IPC sections 420, 494, 354‑Gha, 366, 376 and 506, on the ground that the parties had reached a written compromise verified by the trial court. The State and the informant …
Anil Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant later informed the court that he does not wish to pursue the relief under Section 528 and seeks to withdraw the application. The court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the application as …
The applicant, Mohammad Haseen, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside an interim maintenance order dated 06‑04‑2026 passed by the Family Court, Amroha, which required him to pay Rs 4,500 per month to the respondent. He contended that the order was …
The applicant Amit Prakash Mishra filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The matter was listed on 21 April 2026, where the court noted that no one appeared on behalf of the applicant and only the State's counsel was present. The court vacated any …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 478 of 2021) filed against them under IPC sections 406, 323 and 506. They alleged that the case was false, motivated by malafides and that proceeding would …
The applicant Subham Sharma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The matter was listed for hearing on 21 April 2026, but the applicant failed to appear. On the revised list, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant. Consequently, the High Court …
The applicant, Sanjay Kumar, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction. No opposition was filed against the application, and the respondent side was represented only by a government lawyer. The Court noted the absence of any …
The applicants, Santosh Kumar and three others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The learned counsel for the applicants argued that the passage of time had rendered the …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a recovery warrant issued under Section 128 by the Family Court, which was based on a maintenance order of Rs.3,500 per month granted to his wife and two minor children under Section 125. The applicant …
On 21 April 2026 the Allahabad High Court listed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Rajesh Mishra and two others against the State of Uttar Pradesh. The court issued an interim order and directed the matter to be listed in ordinary course. When the case was …
The applicant Amar Chandani and co‑applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (case No. 347/2021) instituted under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 377 and Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. They asserted that a …
Heera Lal Chandra and four co‑applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. The court was asked to entertain the application and pass appropriate orders. The primary …
The applicant, Ajay Chahar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a recovery warrant issued by the Family Court, Mathura, under Section 144(3) BNSS for non‑payment of maintenance ordered in a Section 125 Cr.P.C. case. He contended that the maintenance amount of …
The petitioners, led by Smt. Shayda Hashmi, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS and Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to stay the execution of a decree and the continuation of criminal proceedings in case No. 9641/2021, which involved charges under Sections 406, 504, …
The applicant Sadanand filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking modification of an interim maintenance order dated 07‑01‑2026, which required him to pay Rs.800 per month to the respondent (Defendant No. 2). He contended that the order was unjust because his …
The applicant, Sushil Kumar Katiyar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No.11258/2025, which alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 324 and 506, and also sought bail. The High Court examined the material and held that the allegations disclose …
Harendra Sharma filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 17‑07‑2025 and a Family Court order dated 31‑05‑2025 that directed him to pay maintenance arrears to his estranged wife and her minor son. He contended that the …
The applicant, Saket Gupta, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS and Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a stay of the criminal proceedings (Criminal Revision No. 5294/2021 and Criminal Re‑examination No. 270/2024) pending a possible settlement between the parties. The …
The applicants, Smt. Nanki Devi and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the order dated 21 February 2026 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge (Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption Act) in Kanpur Nagar. The impugned order had allowed a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 06‑05‑2025 and the entire criminal proceeding (Complaint Case No. 408 of 2018) pending before the Judicial Magistrate‑I, Budaun. They alleged that no offence was disclosed against them and …
The applicant, Ajay Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to set aside a charge-sheet order dated 17‑08‑2023 and a subsequent bail‑warrant order dated 20‑11‑2025 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Garotha, Jhansi. The applicant argued that …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a stay of the criminal proceedings and bail, challenging a cognizance order and a non‑bailable warrant dated 29‑05‑2018 and a non‑bailable warrant dated 13‑02‑2026. The court examined the allegations, noting …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the quashing of a summoning order dated 09.03.2026 and the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 1627 of 2024 (Raghav v. Sitampbar @ Deendayal). The High Court examined the complaint and found that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 12‑11‑2019 and the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 40 of 2019, as well as a later order dated 11‑11‑2025 passed in Criminal Revision No. 12 of 2020. The court examined the record and …
The applicant, Vimala Shahi, a senior citizen of about 81 years, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Civil Security Code seeking the setting aside of an order dated 06.04.2026 in case 1735/2025 (Mahesh Shahi v. Sanjay Singh & Others). She alleged that her son and his family had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking bail in a case where they were alleged to have committed offences under Sections 323, 380 and 504 of the IPC, as recorded in a police report dated 10-11-2025 and an order dated 25-02-2026. The High Court examined the material …
The application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was filed by Jatin Chauhan against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The counsel for the applicant was Shekhar Singh and for the opposite parties were G.A. and Preete Chaudhary. The matter was listed before Hon'ble …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Criminal Appeal No. 1934/2022) arising from a case registered under Sections 498A, 323, 506 of the IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties claimed that they had reached …
The appellant, Attaullah Khan, filed a criminal appeal (No. 451 of 1985) before the Allahabad High Court. The court, upon compliance with its earlier order dated 16‑03‑2021, received a report from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pilibhit, confirming that the appellant had died approximately 24 years …
The petitioner, Deep Chandra, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking bail. The State of Uttar Pradesh and another party opposed the application. The High Court observed that the petitioner did not appear before the court and there was no opposition from the …
Gudiya filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The applicant's learned counsel argued that the application had become ineffective and should not be entertained. The Court examined the pleadings and found that the application indeed lacked any operative …
Amit Sharma filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking bail. The State of U.P. and another party were served as respondents. No opposition counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant, and no other parties were present. The High Court observed that in the absence of …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Appeal No. 04 of 2021) pending before the Civil Judge/FTC, Jalaun, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry …
The petitioners Praveen Kaushik and two others filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court (Application No. 3223 of 2022) seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. The matter was listed before Hon’ble Justice Gautam …
Ashish Kumar Dixit filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. No representative of the applicant appeared before the court, and the appointed senior counsel, Mr. Satyvrat Tripathi, was also absent. The court noted the absence of any party or counsel to argue the …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to set aside an order dated 23 February 2022 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, which had allowed a criminal revision filed by the opposite party against an order of attachment of land made by the …
The applicants, Indra Pal and three others, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief from pending criminal proceedings. The High Court examined whether it could exercise its inherent powers to quash the proceedings. Relying on the precedent set in Smt. …
Shankar Lal filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita challenging a order dated 24‑03‑2025 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Jaunpur, and a criminal revision order dated 27‑01‑2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jaunpur. The applicant …
The Allahabad High Court considered three applications under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking to quash Criminal Complaint Case No. 586 of 2019, which alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC. The complaint arose from a civil dispute over land and sale deeds, where the complainant …
Sudha and Sapna filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) challenging a provisional order dated 23‑01‑2026 passed by the Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate of Bhognipur, Kanpur Dehat in FIR No. 1736 of 2023 under IPC Sections 354 and 506. The High Court …
An application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed by Rajvati Devi and four others seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, presided by Justice Gautam Chowdhary, allowed the application. The order refers to a …
The applicants, Munishwar Singh and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 30‑09‑2025 issued by the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)‑II, Bareilly in a criminal complaint under IPC sections 420 and 506. They alleged that the …
The complainant, the mother‑in‑law of the applicants, alleged that they conspired with bank officials to open a joint account and misappropriate Rs 10 lakh, leading to a complaint under Section 156(3) CrPC. The police report characterized the matter as a family dispute and found the allegations …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita seeking to stay the criminal proceedings arising from a dispute over a transaction, as recorded in Criminal Appeal No. 929 of 2017. The learned counsel for the applicants argued that the matter is a civil …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code challenging an interlocutory order dated 18‑02‑2026 passed by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Deoria, under Section 145 of the B.N.S.S. code. The applicant’s counsel argued that the order was not based …
The petitioners, Smt Savita and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Brijesh Kumar Srivastava, informed the court that the petitioners wished to withdraw the application and would not pursue any relief. The …
Ram Pratap Singh, the complainant, alleged that on 13 March 2025 he was forcibly stopped, robbed of Rs. 700, his mobile phone broken and assaulted with sticks, sustaining grievous injuries including a fracture of the scapula. He reported the incident to the police, who medically examined him, and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 01.04.2006 and the related criminal proceeding (Complaint Case No. 263 of 2006). The court examined the complaint and found that the allegations disclosed a cognizable offence and were …
The applicant, Anuj Sharma, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking relief from an interim maintenance order of Rs.5,000 per month imposed by the Meerut Family Court under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He contended that the order was passed without considering his …
The applicant, Piyush Mishra, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a provisional order dated 30.05.2025 passed by the Family Court, Prayagraj, in a matrimonial dispute involving alleged dowry harassment. The respondent (State of U.P. and another) had filed a FIR …
The applicant filed a criminal revision under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act pending before a Special Magistrate. Mediation between the parties failed, and the court examined the factual disputes and the credibility of the …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code seeking to stay the execution of a non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued in case No. 3865/2023, which involved offences under Sections 307, 323, 504 and 506. The applicant argued that the NBW should be set aside and requested …
The applicant, Ayush Pratap Singh Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code seeking a stay of criminal proceedings (CrPC sections 323, 504, 506, 406) initiated by the Civil Judge (Junior) of Sant Kabir Nagar. The court heard arguments from the applicant’s counsel and the …
The applicant, Abhikshek Vikram, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court, seeking discharge. The respondents were the State of Uttar Pradesh and another party. Counsel for the applicant was Vijai Krishna Agnihotri and for the respondents …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Prince Yadav, who is accused in a special trial involving offences under the BNS, SC/ST Act, IT Act and POCSO Act. The applicant claimed innocence, citing a victim's statement that did not support the prosecution, and argued that he had …
The applicants, practising advocates, were accused in a criminal complaint (sections 420, 467 and 468 IPC) filed by Manjeet Singh arising out of a partition suit they were handling. A non‑bailable warrant was issued against them, and they sought to quash the warrant and the underlying proceedings by …
Ranno Devi filed a petition under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash an order of the Additional Sessions Judge who had treated her application under Section 173(4) of the B.N.S.S. as a mere complaint. The applicant alleged that her daughter was enticed away by accused No.4 and No.5 on …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 1610 of 2024) pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jaunpur, alleging that the dispute is a family matter that could be settled …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (S.S.T. No.40 of 2016) arising from Complaint No.23 of 2016 (Subhash Arya v. Deepak Kumar & others) and the summoning order dated 23‑04‑2016. They alleged that a matrimonial dispute had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 75580 of 2023) filed under Sections 452 and 323 of the IPC, alleging that the case stemmed from a civil dispute and was instituted maliciously. The court observed that …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the counsel for the applicants requested that the application be dismissed as not pressed. The Court considered the request and found no merit in proceeding with …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. seeking to quash the summoning order dated 27‑02‑2026 in Complaint Case No. 3308 of 2025, which was filed under Sections 333, 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 74 of the B.N.S. The complaint alleged a cognizable offence and was supported by …
Jitendra Rawat filed an application under Section 528 of the Indian Penal Code challenging an interim maintenance order of Rs 5,000 per month issued by the Additional Principal Judge of the Family Court, Mathura, on the ground that his income was insufficient to meet the amount. The court examined …
The applicant, Hussain, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking bail. The High Court noted that both the learned counsel for the applicant and the learned senior government counsel were present. The applicant’s counsel, Amit Kumar Pandey, requested that the …
The applicant Satish Mishra filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 37882 of 2024) before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, seeking release from custody in a case instituted by the State of Uttar Pradesh. The matter was listed before Justice Gautam Chowdhary. Counsel for the …
The applicant, Mohd. Belal Ansari, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Subsequently, the applicant's counsel informed the court that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the bail and wanted to withdraw the application. The court considered the …
The petitioners filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Both the petitioners and the State were not represented in court, though a senior government advocate was present. The court noted the absence of all parties and, as a result, dismissed the …
The applicant, Vinod Kumar, filed a bail application under Section 64(1) of the Indian Penal Code in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 42318 of 2025, seeking release from custody pending trial. The applicant argued that he had previously been granted bail under Section 69 and Section 351(3) IPC by …
The applicant, Mohd Kaif, sought bail in a criminal case (M.A. No. 69/2025) alleging offences under IPC sections 64(1), 61(2)(k), 127(2), 351(2) and 352. He contended that the allegations were false, that he was falsely implicated, and that the prosecution’s evidence was weak. The State opposed …
Lallu applied for bail in a criminal matter (MU/AS 482/2025) invoking sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the Constitution and Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The State alleged that the applicant was involved in a serious offence and sought denial of bail on grounds of possible tampering with …
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad heard bail application No. 6096 of 2026 filed by Mayank Chauhan against the State of Uttar Pradesh and three others. The applicant's counsel, Rishi Kesh Malviya, sought bail, while the opposite party was represented by G.A. The court noted that the applicant …
The applicant, Sandeep Yadav, sought bail in a case registered under IPC sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) and sections 5 and 6 of the POCSO Act, alleging that the FIR was filed fraudulently and that the alleged victim was a consenting adult in a romantic relationship with him. The prosecution opposed …
