Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
639 judgments · newest first · showing 601–639
The Allahabad High Court considered bail application No. 9354 of 2026 filed by Arvind, who was arrested under sections 64(1) and 351(3) of the B.N.S. at Khoda police station, Ghaziabad. The applicant contended that the allegations were false, pointing to contradictions in the victim’s statements and …
The applicant, Santosh Pal, was arrested in connection with FIR No. 70/2025 alleging offences under Sections 74, 352, 351(3) and 69 of the Indian Penal Code. He claimed the allegations were false, motivated by personal enmity, and that the FIR was lodged with undue delay. The prosecution argued that …
The applicant, Parvez, was arrested in FIR No. 184/2025 under IPC sections 69 and 351(2) and applied for bail. He alleged that the case was false, that he was threatened by the police, and that he had not committed any offence. The State opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the charges. The …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Naim Khan (applicant) under Section 64(1) of the CrPC in connection with offences under Sections 123 and 351(3) of the IPC. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, pointing out inconsistencies in the FIR dates and lack of photographic or …
The applicant, Deepak Raidas, was arrested under sections 137(2) and 64(1) of the B.N.S. Act and sections 5 and 6 of the Poxos Act in connection with an alleged love‑affair‑related offence. He contended that the accusation was false, that both he and the alleged victim are adults who love each …
The applicant, Gagan Singh Thapa, sought bail in a criminal case (Mu. A. No. 36/2026) under Section 69 of the B.N.S., alleging that the FIR was lodged belatedly and was based on false accusations of sexual relations and non‑marriage. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the alleged acts were …
The applicant, Adil, filed a bail application in the Allahabad High Court seeking release on bail in a case registered as MU‑A‑110/2025 under Section 69 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that the applicant had committed a sexual offence, relying on the complainant’s statements and …
Kallu Singh, who has been in custody since 13 January 2026, applied for bail in connection with offences under Sections 74, 64(1) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. The State opposed the bail, alleging that the applicant was involved in the alleged offences and might tamper with evidence. The …
Anil was arrested in connection with alleged sexual offences against a 3‑4‑year‑old child, originally charged under Section 354(Ka) IPC and Section 10 of the POCSO Act, later amended to include Section 376AB IPC and Sections 5(m)/6 of the POCSO Act. The victim's medico‑legal report dated 28‑02‑2022 …
The applicant Nadeem filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.78 of 2025) involving offences under the B.N.S., POCSO Act and SC/ST Act. The prosecution alleged that the victim’s statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the B.N.S. were contradictory, with one indicating voluntary travel …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shanu, who is charged under IPC sections 363, 343, 376, 366 and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing away the informant's sister and committing serious offences. The applicant argued that the alleged victim, a consenting …
Shahnawaz filed Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 29178 of 2024 before the Allahabad High Court against the State of U.P. and three others. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel submitted that the applicant had already been acquitted in the underlying case, rendering the bail application …
The High Court of Allahabad considered bail application No. 29149 of 2025 filed by Sunil Rajbhar, who is accused in Crime No. 268 of 2025 under sections 74, 351(2), 70(2) of the B.N.S., sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act and section 67 of the Income Tax Act. The applicant pleaded innocence, citing that …
Sachin, the applicant, was arrested in connection with Crime No.98 of 2025 and has been in custody since 27 May 2025. He faces charges under sections 331(6), 351(2), 115(2), 70(2) of the B.N.S. and sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that the informant’s and victim’s statements …
Anand Gupta filed a bail application (Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30552 of 2025) after being detained since 19 July 2025 in connection with Crime No. 268 of 2025, which alleges offences under Sections 74, 351(2), 70(2) of the B.N.S., Sections 5G/6 of the POCSO Act and Section 67 of the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay Kumar, who was arrested under IPC Section 64(A) and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that the allegations were false and that the victim’s testimony during trial indicated no assault or rape. The prosecution opposed …
Dinanath Tiwari was arrested on charges under IPC sections 61(2)(k), 64(1), 127(2), 351(2) and 352 and filed a bail application claiming he was falsely implicated and that his statement was obtained under coercion. He had been in custody since 8 August 2025 and sought release on bail. The State …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Neetu @ Dudu, who had been in custody since 14 October 2025 in connection with a criminal case involving Sections 64, 351(3), 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3/4 of the POSCO Act. The court noted that a notice to the first informant had been …
The applicant, Dharmendra, filed a bail application under sections 137(2), 87 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and section 65(2) of the Indian Evidence Act in connection with FIR No. 259/2025. He alleged that the prosecution’s case was based on false statements, citing sections 180 and 183 of the …
Rohit Kumar Sah was arrested under sections 65(1) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code and sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act for alleged sexual offences. The applicant contended that the accusation was false, citing the victim's age of 18, prior acquaintance, and lack of corroborative medical evidence. …
Prem Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No.106 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 87, 137(2), 65(1) of the B.N.S. and Section 5L/6 of the POSCO Act. The victim’s ossification test indicated an age of about 21 years, and the applicant’s counsel argued that the victim was a …
Rahul Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 3809 of 2026) before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The applicant was represented by counsel Dileep Singh Yadav, while the State was represented by Yashwant Singh, G.A. The matter was listed before Hon'ble Dr. Gautam …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Rajendra Singh, who was arrested on 16‑10‑2025 in connection with offences under sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S. Act and sections 3(2) and 4(2) of the POCSO Act. The alleged victim, a minor born on 22‑07‑2011, gave a statement indicating …
Mohammad Aadil applied for bail before the Allahabad High Court in Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9295 of 2026, seeking release on charges under IPC sections 302, 64, 123 and IT Act section 66E. The applicant alleged that the case was fabricated, that the alleged victim had falsely …
Yusuf was charged under Sections 351(2), 123 and 64(1) of the B.N.S. for allegedly raping a divorcee woman after taking her to a graveyard, during which a video showing the victim in a nude position was recovered and certified under Section 65‑B of the Indian Evidence Act. The defence argued that …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sandeep Kumar, who was arrested under sections 61(2), 115(2), 351(2), 352 and 69 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged sexual assault and related offences. The applicant's counsel argued that the FIR was false, delayed, and motivated …
The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed by Sunil Kumar Kushwaha, who was arrested under sections 64(2)F, 64(2)(M) and 351(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Act, 2023, alleging false implication in a crime. The applicant contended that the FIR was lodged seven months after the alleged …
The victim testified that she is lawfully married to the applicant, Amit Kumar, and lives with him and their child, alleging that the FIR was filed by her step‑father to harass the family. The applicant, charged under sections 87, 65(1), 115(2), 352 of the B.N.S., sections 5J(2)/6 of the POCSO Act …
The applicant, Dharmendra Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case involving a 16‑year‑old victim, as established by an ossification report. The applicant's counsel argued that the victim's statement under Section 183 of the B.N.S. showed no offence under Section 64, contending that the …
The High Court of Allahabad considered bail application No. 35381 of 2025 filed by Krishna alias Pradumm, who is accused in Crime No. 324 of 2025 under sections 137(2), 87, 65(1) of the B.N.S. and sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, relying on …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu Sahu, who had been in custody since 30‑10‑2025 in connection with a case involving alleged offences under Sections 87, 137(2), 65(1) of the B.N.S., and Sections 5L/6 of the POSCO Act. An ossification test revealed that the alleged victim was …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raghuveer Nishad, who had been in custody since 18 September 2025 in connection with a case involving a 17‑year‑old victim. An ossification test confirmed the victim’s age as 17, but the applicant’s counsel argued that the victim was a major and …
The High Court of Allahabad heard bail application No. 43256 of 2025 filed by Rizwan Ansari, who was arrested in connection with FIR No. 155/2025 under provisions of the Indian Constitution (Articles 64(1), 351(3), 3/4(2)) and alleged offences. The applicant contended that the case was false, that …
The bail application No. 16641 of 2025 filed by Sahil Kumar against the State of U.P. and others was listed before Hon’ble Justice Krishan Pahal on 27 May 2026. No factual background, legal issues, reasoning or decision are recorded in the excerpt. The counsel for the applicant were Karunesh Pratap …
The High Court considered bail applications filed by Boby and Rahul, who were charged under sections 137(2), 64(2)(ड), 87 of the B.N.S. and sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act for allegedly enticing two minors, aged 17 and 15, to elope and engage in sexual relations. The defence argued that the older …
Rahul filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application (No. 41856 of 2025) before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, seeking release from custody in a case titled State of U.P. and 3 Others versus Rahul. The applicant was represented by counsel Ajay Kumar Pandey and Birendra Kumar Mishra, …
Vishal filed a criminal miscellaneous bail application before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant sought permission to file a supplementary affidavit disclosing his criminal history. The court considered whether such a filing was permissible at this stage of the proceedings. Relying on …
Aadil filed Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 38687 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant was not present, while a senior government pleader appeared on his behalf. The court noted the absence of the applicant and the presence of counsel for both parties. No substantive …
The applicant, Ankush @ Sukka, was arrested in connection with a rape case (Case Crime No.503 of 2024) alleged to have occurred on 29 September 2024. The prosecution alleged that the applicant dragged the victim to a sugarcane field, threatened her, and caused injury, while the victim’s statements …
