Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
219 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
Smt. Vimla Devi filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 34945 of 2026) in the Allahabad High Court challenging an order passed by the Collector. The petition sought relief against the Collector's decision, alleging that it was illegal or arbitrary. The Court examined the petitioner's claim and found it …
The petitioners, B-Pacs Society Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioners informed the Court that essential facts required for the petition could not be pleaded. …
Manju Kumar filed a writ petition challenging the actions of the Regional Passport Officer, Lucknow, and the Union of India. The officer issued a notice on 07.07.2026, to which the petitioner responded on 05.09.2026. The High Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, directed the Regional …
The petitioners, Sandeep Kumar Gupta and another, filed a writ petition challenging an enquiry report submitted by the District Magistrate, Gorakhpur, which investigated eleven allegations against them and found none established. The petitioners sought to object to the report, arguing that it was …
The petitioner, Adesh Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel sought to withdraw the petition, stating that certain documents could not be annexed and essential facts were not pleaded. The court considered the request and, …
The petitioners were evicted from shops under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 and have filed multiple appeals before the Additional District Magistrate, Ballia. The High Court directed that these appeals be heard expeditiously with two hearing dates each week and …
The petitioner, Rajesh Yadav, was stranded in Saudi Arabia after his Indian passport expired on 18 September 2026 and filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for the passport authority to reissue his passport. The High Court held that it could not issue a direct order for reissue under the …
The appellant, Vaibhav Sood, filed a first appeal but later informed the court that he no longer wishes to prosecute the appeal and sought leave to withdraw it. The appellant's counsel, Hitesh Pachori, made the request before the bench of Hon'ble J.J. Munir and Hon'ble Indrajeet Shukla. The court …
Gulabi Devi filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Deoria Sadar, who had decided a maintenance case under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The High Court examined the compliance with its earlier direction dated 17‑09‑2026 …
The appellant, Smt. Shalini Tomar, filed an appeal (First Appeal No. 619 of 2024) against Ashwani Kumar. The appellant later filed a civil miscellaneous withdrawal application (No. 3 of 2026) seeking to withdraw the appeal. The High Court, after hearing counsel, allowed the withdrawal application. …
Smt. Shubhi Yadav filed an appeal (First Appeal No. 591 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. Her counsel, Meraj Ahmad Khan, submitted an application to withdraw the appeal. The judges, J.J. Munir and Indrajeet Shukla, accepted the withdrawal request. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal …
The petitioners, Ajay Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking a mandamus directing the Sub‑Registrar of Tehsil Soraon to decide an application dated 11‑09‑2026 and to refrain from interfering with their peaceful possession of land comprising Gata Nos. 294 and 202 in …
The petitioner, Arshad Ali, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Uttar Pradesh and others to protect his life and property from alleged political harassment by ruling party elements. The petition was dismissed because the prayer was vague and could not be granted on that …
The petitioner, Shiv Saran Singh, was issued a show‑cause notice by the Regional Passport Officer, Lucknow, for allegedly suppressing information about a pending criminal case (Crime No. 24 of 2013) in his passport application. The petitioner contended that the case was false, that the investigating …
The petitioner, Gaurav Chaudhary, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court challenging a notice dated 07.04.2026 issued by the Regional Passport Officer, Lucknow. The petition sought relief against the annexation of evidence and the procedural steps prescribed by the officer. The Court …
The petitioner, Smt. Bhawar Kali, sought a compensation of Rs.5,00,000 under the Mukhyamantri Krishak Durghatna Kalyan Yojna, 2020 for the death of her son, Ram Kumar. The District Magistrate, Baghpat, rejected the claim with a terse order in Hindi that provided no reasons. The court held that any …
The petitioner was served a notice to remove illegal constructions encroaching a public road in Bareilly, covering 180 square feet. The petitioner filed a reply with the Executive Engineer. The High Court directed that the reply be placed before the Nagar Ayukta, who should consider the matter and …
Petitioner Hafij Ali filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 08-09-2026 registered under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner was arrested in the very case. The petitioner, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition against the State of U.P. and a bank, seeking relief. The High Court ordered the petitioner to deposit a bank draft of Rs. 7,50,000 in favour of the respondent bank by 04‑08‑2026 and to produce proof of deposit. The petitioner failed to appear, sought …
The petitioners Vinod Kumar Joshi and another filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 21 September 2026 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tajatalab, District Varanasi, which had held an application filed by respondent No. 6 under Section 23 of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and …
The petitioner, Aasif, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but the accompanying affidavit was found to be defective. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition and to file a fresh petition with a correct affidavit. The Court considered the procedural defect …
Shree Ganesh Agro Industries, the petitioner, challenged a notice issued by IDBI Bank under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act and the subsequent order rejecting its representation under Section 13(3‑A). The bank had also issued a notice under Section 13(4) and claimed the loan had become a …
The petitioners, M/s. Agnihotri Motor and another, filed Writ No. 38194 of 2026 in the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners sought to withdraw the petition, referencing an earlier writ petition (Writ No. 11830 of 2026). The court accepted the withdrawal request. …
The petitioner, Sakir, challenged the sale and impending dispossession of his house by the Bank of India after the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) had ordered a stay on confirming the sale. Despite the DRT’s interim order, the bank sold the property and the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate directed possession …
M/s Sharda Metals and others filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 02‑09‑2026 passed by the Additional District Magistrate (Finance and Revenue), Aligarh under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act. The petitioners contended that they were aggrieved by a possession notice issued under Section …
The petitioner, Smt. Jyoti Jhanji, sought relief from a home loan recovery proceeding initiated by Canara Bank. The bank stipulated that if the petitioner deposited the overdue amount of Rs.1,62,000 before the auction date of 28 September 2026, the loan would be regularized. The court ordered that …
Vikram Sharma applied for a re‑issue of his passport but the Regional Passport Officer raised objections on the ground that two criminal matters—one under the IPC and SC/ST Act and another under the Public Gambling Act—were pending and allegedly suppressed. Sharma submitted affidavits claiming …
The District Magistrate/District Election Officer of Prayagraj shifted polling stations 145‑147 from Prathmik Vidyalay Kolhuwa to Prathmik Vidyalay Jethupur Khas by an order dated 18‑03‑2021, acting on directions issued in response to a representation filed by three Gram Sabha members. The …
Premila Yadav filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the District Magistrate of Azamgarh to act on a representation dated 31 July 2026. The Court examined whether a petition for the mere decision of a non‑statutory representation is maintainable. It …
The petitioner, Jitendra Nagar, filed a writ petition seeking a directive to State authorities (respondents 2‑5) to act on applications dated 02‑04‑2026 and 27‑07‑2026, and also sought relief against respondent 6 for alleged trespass into his house. The Court observed that the grievance stems from a …
The petitioner, Vikram Pratap Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. and others to return Rs.29,42,500 as security deposit and Rs.1,17,700 as stamp paper with 18% interest. The petition had been pending for over 16 years and the State failed to file a …
Smt. Vimla Mishra filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking an order for mutation of her property. The respondents, including the State of U.P., filed a compliance affidavit stating that the application for mutation had already been decided by an order dated 03.09.2026, and the …
The petitioners, Anil Singh and another, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel, Kripa Shanker Pandey, informed the court that the petitioners no longer wished to pursue the writ. The court considered whether a petition can continue when …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Nishad, filed a writ petition seeking a court order directing the District Magistrate of Gautam Buddh Nagar to comply with a recovery certificate dated 06‑06‑2025 issued by another respondent. The respondent District Magistrate assured the court of prompt compliance. …
The petitioner, Pratham Kumar, filed writ petition No. 35536 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner, Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, informed the Court that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the writ petition. The respondent State of U.P. and another …
The petitioner Kavita filed a writ petition against the State of Uttar Pradesh and two others seeking relief, likely a monetary payment. The respondents submitted a compliance affidavit confirming that the required payment had already been made to the petitioner, which the petitioner’s counsel …
Basdeb Singh filed a writ petition against the Union of India and four other respondents. After hearing arguments, the petitioner sought dismissal of the petition with liberty to approach the appropriate authority for relief, which he had not yet done. The Court noted that the petitioner had not …
Petitioners Rajani Devi and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel prayed that the petition be dismissed as not pressed and that they be given liberty to file a fresh petition. The Court allowed the prayer and dismissed the writ petition as not pressed, granting …
Mobin filed a writ petition challenging a final assessment order dated 04-04-2026 issued by the Executive Engineer of the Electricity Department. The respondents submitted the order to the court, and the petitioner, through counsel, subsequently sought to withdraw the petition and asked the court to …
The petitioner, Infinite Enterprises, challenged a possession‑cum‑sale notice issued by Punjab National Bank demanding repayment of Rs 17,30,271.09. The petitioner offered to pay 25% of the amount before the scheduled auction on 18‑09‑2026 and the balance in installments, seeking a stay of the …
Petitioner Vidhata Chauhan, residing in Dubai, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Regional Passport Office, Lucknow to reissue her passport (No. P4808135) within a court‑specified time. The respondents argued that the re‑issuance must follow the procedure laid down in sub‑section …
Petitioner Ishtiyak Ahmad filed a writ petition challenging a final assessment order dated 18 March 2026 issued by the Uttar Pradesh Electricity Department. The petitioner sought to withdraw the petition and was granted liberty to file an appeal under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The …
Shyam Sunder Sharma filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to the Sub‑Divisional Officer, Tehsil Ghaziabad, to decide a pending case (Case No. 24325 of 2025) under Section 23 of the U.P. Maintenance and Welfare Act, 2007, which had been pending since 29‑Oct‑2025 without a final …
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a decision on a representation dated 26 July 2026 submitted to the Branch Manager of a bank. The bank served a notice to the petitioner under subsection (2) of Section 13 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of …
The petitioner, M/s R.C. Group of Companies, challenged the cancellation of its mining lease and subsequent recovery orders issued by the District Magistrate/District Mining Officer of Gorakhpur. The petitioner claimed it had already filed a detailed reply before the Commissioner on 17.08.2026, but …
The petitioner, Mohammad Adil, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn. The request was unopposed by the standing counsel for respondent No.6 and the counsel for the respondent bank. …
The petitioner, Ghanshyam Tiwari, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing IDBI Bank to remove the lien and de‑freeze his savings account, which had been frozen due to two suspicious transactions of Rs.1,10,000 and Rs.8,00,000 under investigation. The bank argued that the …
The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the Branch Manager of H.D.F.C. Bank to act on a representation dated 29 August 2026. The petitioner alleged that the bank had not taken appropriate action on his representation. No opposition was filed by the respondents. The …
Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue), Jhansi, to dispose of its pending SARFAESI Act, Section 14 case (No. 486/2026). The petition relied on the Supreme Court’s earlier …
Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue), District Jhansi to dispose of a pending SARFAESI Act case (Case No. 5107/2025) as per the Supreme Court's earlier decision in …
The petitioners, Cholamandalam Investment & Finance Co. Ltd., a secured creditor under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, sought a writ of mandamus directing the Additional District Magistrate (Finance & Revenue), District Jhansi, to dispose of a pending SARFAESI case (No. 487/2026). The petition …
Ramveer Singh filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking an order for the disposal of an interim injunction application pending in Suit No. 279 of 2021 before the Civil Judge, Kol, Aligarh. The petitioner’s counsel limited the prayer to this specific application after arguments. The …
Rajendra Kumar filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the District Magistrate, Kanpur Nagar, to pass an appropriate order on his representation dated 08‑06‑2026 against a State Government application dated 13‑10‑2022. The petitioners argued that the District Magistrate should decide the matter …
Lallu Ram appealed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 challenging a Family Court order that set aside an ex‑parte divorce decree dated 17‑12‑1990. The decree had been obtained after the respondent, Shiv Kumari Devi, failed to appear despite service of summons deemed sufficient. The …
Vijay Narayan Ram filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State and Prayagraj Development Authority to pay fair compensation with interest under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 for 303 sq. yd. …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Singh, challenged the suspension of his contract issued by the Divisional Food Controller, Azamgarh Division, on 21 August 2026. The District Magistrate/Collector of Gorakhpur issued a revised character certificate on 4 September 2026. The High Court examined whether the …
The petitioner, M/s Chaurasiya Khan Vikraita, challenged the suspension of its fertilizer licence after 60 bags of DAP were seized, allegedly shipped by an unlicensed consigner under an invoice in the petitioner's name. The High Court held that the suspension should be stayed pending a hearing, …
A writ petition was filed by Prakash Chand against the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and only the standing counsel appeared for one of the respondents. No representation was made for the other respondent. The Court …
The petitioners sought a writ of habeas corpus directing the State respondents to produce Smt. Neelam, the wife of petitioner No.1, and to release her from the custody of respondents No.4‑6. The court examined the age and status of Neelam, who produced a high school certificate showing a birth date …
Petitioner Siddheshwar Construction Co. filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash an auction sale notice dated 22 April 2026, arguing that the auction was to be held on the same day and no presiding officer was available at the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) Allahabad to …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged in Crime No.103 of 2024, which alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the State's Additional …
The petitioners, Shahid alias Sadiq and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (chargesheet no. A-383/24) filed in Crime No.0465 of 2024 under several sections of the BNS. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State’s …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 226 seeking a direction to the respondent bank to defreeze two of their accounts that had been frozen during a police investigation related to a criminal complaint against one of them. The petitioners argued that no court order of attachment existed and …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the filing of a charge sheet (chargesheet no. A-383/24) in Crime No.0465 of 2024, which alleged their involvement under several sections of the B.N.S. Act. No petitioner counsel appeared before the Court, though the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (Writ No. 38399 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to pursue the petition. The court noted the absence of any representation and consequently dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. The interim …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (WRIT-C No. 40417 of 2025) against Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. The Court observed that the petition was not being prosecuted. Consequently, the petition was dismissed …
The petitioner, Sanjay Mishra, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the petition had become infructuous. The court, noting the petition was no longer viable, consigned the petition to …
The petitioners, creditors of a leaseholder (respondent No.15) of the Ghaziabad Development Authority, challenged coercive recovery actions by revenue authorities, including illegal detention and forced signing of cheques. During the pendency of the writ petition, insolvency proceedings were …
Petitioner Mahendra Singh and another filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel, Mohit Kumar Singh, submitted an application to withdraw the petition, stating that the petitioner no longer wishes to pursue the matter. The respondents' …
The petitioners, Satendra Singh and three others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners expressed that they no longer wished to pursue the petition. The respondents' counsel raised no objection to this request. The court considered the …
Petitioners filed Writ No. 45001 of 2023 before the Allahabad High Court. The petitioners, through counsel Mohit Kumar Singh, filed an application to withdraw the petition, stating they no longer wish to pursue it. The respondents' counsel raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court, after …
The petitioner, Manisha Singh, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Settlement Officer Consolidation, Azamgarh to decide Appeal No.1407/5415600002968 under Section 11(1) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act within a specific time. The State’s standing counsel informed the …
The petitioner Jamil Khan filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a First Information Report and subsequent charge sheet in Crime No. 78 of 2023, which alleged offences under Section 366 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act. No …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 121 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 363, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the charge sheet filed in Crime No. 198 of 2022, which alleged their involvement under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, 504, 506 and 406 of the erstwhile IPC. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the State's …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 272/2022) in Crime No. 118 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …
Smt. Meena filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged in Crime No. 37 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The …
The petitioners, Smt. Aarti Verma and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged in Crime No. 941 of 2021, which alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 406 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No. 663 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional …
The petitioner, Pankaj Kumar Upadhyay, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a refund of money he had deposited with the High Court's Mediation and Conciliation Centre after the opposite parties failed to appear, causing mediation to fail. The petitioner argued that, since the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the subsequent charge sheet filed in Crime No. 30 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 323, 494, 498A, 504, 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. No …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 41 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 308, 323 and 504 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the filing of a charge sheet (CS 383/2023) in Crime No. 122 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 452, 504 and 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the subsequent filing of a charge sheet (CS 262/2022) in Crime No. 267 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 377, 307, 504, 506 of the erstwhile IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 83 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 406, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The police …
The petitioners, Brijesh and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 97 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 498A and DP Act sections 3 and 4. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the subsequent charge sheet filed in Crime No. 182 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 120B, 420, 406, 323, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 172/2023) filed in Crime No. 76 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. No …
The petitioners, Ankit Kumar and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the filing of a charge sheet (CS 182/2023) in Crime No. 138 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 308, 323, 504 and 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet in Crime No. 170 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Domestic Violence (Protection) Act. No petitioner counsel appeared …
The petitioners challenged the filing of a First Information Report and subsequent charge sheet in a case involving offences under several IPC sections and the Criminal Law Amendment Act. They argued that the counter‑affidavit had not been filed and sought relief from the High Court. The police, …
The petitioners Arman and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 79 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376, 377, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. No petitioner …
The petition, filed by Sunil Verma (a minor), sought to challenge the First Information Report (FIR) relating to Crime No. 133 of 2023, which alleged offences under Section 376 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No representative appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State's Additional …
The petitioner, Ajay Singh, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet filed in Crime No.69 of 2023, which alleged offences under several IPC sections and the SC/ST Act. The petition sought judicial intervention to quash the FIR/charge sheet. The …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR under Section 380 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 79 of 2023. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The police had …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 170/2023) in Crime No. 138 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376(2)(m), 352, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State’s …
The petitioners, Nivas Ali and another, filed a writ petition (C No. 34330 of 2014) before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief. The matter was listed under the "Oldest Pending Cases" priority hearing, but the petitioners failed to appear even after a revised call. The State respondents, …
The petitioners sought a writ of certiorari under Article 226 to quash a notice dated 26‑10‑2023 issued by a private bank under section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The respondents argued that the High Court lacks jurisdiction to interfere in such matters, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in …
The petitioners sought a writ of certiorari under Article 226 to quash an order dated 15.04.2026 passed by the District Magistrate, Bijnor, invoking Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act in a debt recovery case. The respondents argued that the High Court should not interfere with actions of a private bank …
The petitioner, owner of 0.018 hectare of plot No. 470 in Bhadohi district, filed a petition under Article 226 seeking a writ of mandamus to restrain the Public Works Department (PWD) from interfering with his possession. The State had already compensated the petitioner for a larger portion (0.071 …
The petitioner, Mohd. Saleem, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the release of his hypothecated vehicle seized by the respondent bank for default on loan EMIs. The bank argued that seizure was lawful due to the default. The petitioner offered to pay a lump sum of Rs 15,00,000 within 30 …
The petitioner, Trisha Saxena, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash a notice dated 30.02.2026 issued by an Advocate Commissioner that led to possession of her property by a bank. She argued that only the bank, not the Advocate Commissioner, was authorized to issue such notice. …
The petitioner, Mrityunjay Tiwari, filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 11579 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel was absent while the respondents’ counsel and the standing counsel were present. The court noted the non‑appearance of the petitioner’s …
A public interest litigation was filed by Vijay Bharadwaj and nine others against the State of Uttar Pradesh and six other respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, while the State respondents and one respondent were represented. The Court dismissed the writ petition on the …
Petitioner Rajneesh Pathak filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to decide a representation filed on 5 January 2026 within a stipulated period. The respondent's standing counsel did not object to the petition, provided the representation is decided in a …
Petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction for the State respondents to deliver possession of secured assets in favor of the secured creditor. They relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in C. Bright v. District Collector, contending that a nodal officer and police …
The petitioner, a borrower, challenged an order of a financial institution under the SARFAESI Act, seeking time to clear outstanding dues of Rs. 3,24,882.46. The bank agreed to accept an initial payment of Rs. 1.5 lakh by 6 June 2026 and the balance in two bimonthly installments, provided the …
Sharada Devi filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking compensation ordered under Section 5(1) of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The petitioner alleged that despite an order dated 26 July 2024, no compensation had been paid by the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court and subsequently sought to withdraw it. The petitioner’s counsel requested that the petition be dismissed as withdrawn, and the respondents’ counsel raised no objection. The court, noting the mutual consent and lack of any pending …
Petitioner Rajendra Prasad Goel filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Collector/District Magistrate of Gautam Buddh Nagar to enforce a recovery certificate dated 27‑01‑2026 issued by the Secretary of the U.P. Real Estate Authority under Section 40 of the U.P. Real …
Petitioner Pawananjay Kumar Jain filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the Collector/District Magistrate of Gautam Buddh Nagar to enforce a recovery certificate dated 27 November 2025 issued by the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Authority (RERA) under …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a certiorari to quash an auction notice dated 08.06.2022 issued by Aadhar Housing Finance Ltd. under the SARFAESI Act. The respondents argued that the High Court lacks jurisdiction to interfere in the enforcement …
Petitioner Amrendra Kumar Jaiswal filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing Union Bank of India to return possession of secured assets, claiming he had repaid all dues. The bank contended that the petitioner had already filed a petition under Section 17 of the SARFAESI …
HDFC Bank Ltd. filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State respondent (No.3) to pass an order in SARFAESI proceedings (Case No. 5136/2021) and to hand over physical possession of the secured asset. The petition relied on the Supreme Court’s earlier decision in …
The petitioner, Siddarth Raja Parmar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking protection from the police after the police had submitted a charge-sheet in the magistrate's court. The petitioner argued that the first information report (FIR) should be considered at this stage. The High …
The petitioners, Sushma Keshari and two others, filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. Their counsel, Sitaram Yadav, informed the court that the petition had become infructuous and should be dismissed. The standing counsel for the State of U.P., Rupesh Tiwari, raised no objection. …
The petitioners, Ashok Kumar and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the subsequent charge sheet filed in Crime No.787 of 2022, which alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …
Petitioners Jagdish Chandra Saini and two others filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, while counsel for the respondents were present. The court noted that the matter, listed in 2015, was an old pending case and …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 25 of 2023, which involved offences under various sections of the erstwhile IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act, and the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019. No petitioner appeared before …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No. 89 of 2023 under Section 306 of the erstwhile IPC, alleging their involvement. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The police had already …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 320/2023) in Crime No.197 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376 and 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Delhi Police Act. No petitioner counsel …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR under Section 363 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 26 of 2023, alleging their involvement. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, though the State's Additional Government …
The petitioners sought a writ to quash the First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No. 130 of 2022, which alleged offences under various sections of the erstwhile IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the State’s Additional Government Advocate was …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No.125 of 2023, alleging offences under Sections 406, 504 and 506 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State’s …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No.63 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the erstwhile IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on …
Petitioners Rishabh and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet in Crime No. 17 of 2023, which alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 504, 506 and Section 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and seeking quashing of the charge sheet filed in Crime No. 50 of 2023 under Sections 420 and 406 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the learned Additional Government …
Petitioners Kapil Sharma and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 318/2023) in Crime No.66 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before …
The petitioners sought to challenge the First Information Report (FIR) and the subsequent charge sheet filed in a criminal case under Sections 498-A, 323, 406, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. No petitioner counsel appeared before the Court, though the State’s …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a First Information Report and subsequent charge sheet (A-120/2023) in Crime No.101 of 2023 under Section 366 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of an FIR under Section 420 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code in Crime No.124 of 2023. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The police had …
The petitioner, Aman Nigan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and subsequent charge sheet (CS 212/2023) in Crime No.91 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 504, 506, 354, 354(Gh), 354(Gha) of the erstwhile IPC and Sections 7 and 8 of the POCSO Act. No …
Petitioners Rajesh Gupta and another filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the FIR and seeking to question the charge sheet filed in a criminal case under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B IPC. The High Court noted that the charge sheet (No. A‑175/2023) had …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR in Crime No.43 of 2022 under Sections 3 and 5 of the Prevention of Damages of Public Property Act, 1984. No petitioner appeared before the court, though the State’s Additional Government Advocate was present. The court …
The petitioner, Rajesh Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No. 281 of 2021, which alleged offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, while the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered under Section 363 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 217 of 2021. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The police had already …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) in Crime No.106 of 2022, which alleged offences under Sections 363 and 504 of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State’s …
Petitioners Ankish Tripathi and others filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the FIR in Crime No. 0024 of 2025, alleging that no charge sheet had been filed. The court examined the police’s office report dated 27 April 2026, which indicated that a charge sheet (CS‑145/25) had indeed …
The petitioner, Ankit Gautam, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR lodged under Section 108 of the BNS in Crime No.68 of 2025. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State's Additional Government Advocate was present. The State submitted that a charge sheet …
The University Grant Commission filed a special appeal in 2012 against the Board of Directors of Ewing Christian College. No counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant when the matter was listed for a priority hearing. The court observed that the appeal had remained pending for an extended period …
The petitioner, Meer Singh, challenged a final assessment order dated 9 May 2025 that imposed liability for alleged theft of electricity. He had earlier filed a reply on 16 January 2025 contesting the assessment, but the assessing authority considered only the fact that the connection was domestic …
Petitioner Badan Singh filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the development authority to pay compensation of Rs.9,000 per square meter for acquired land. The respondent, represented by counsel, submitted that the compensation award had already been finalized and paid, and that any …
The petitioner, M/s Amree Pharmaceuticals, filed a petition under Article 226 challenging a Commercial Court order that rejected its application to deposit 75% of a award because it had not deposited interest. The award issued by the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council specified only …
A.U. Small Finance Bank Ltd. filed a review petition challenging the High Court's order dated 3 April 2026, which had directed the prescribed authority merely to dispose of a Section 14 application under the SARFAESI Act, 2002. The bank argued that the Section 14 application had already been …
The petitioners, claiming ownership of Plot No. 401 Minjumla, filed a writ under Article 226 challenging a SARFAESI Act Section 14 order and a subsequent letter issued by the respondent bank. The bank contended that the property belonged to the borrower based on a will and revenue records showing …
Petitioner Shahrukh filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing a private bank (respondent no.3) to open the seal on his house. The bank contended that the High Court cannot interfere with actions taken under the SARFAESI Act, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in S. Shobha …
Petitioner Sanjay Upreti filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Collector/District Magistrate of Gautam Budh Nagar to execute a Recovery Certificate issued by RERA on 27 July 2024 for a sum of Rs.19,70,506.02 with interest. The respondents, including RERA and the …
Petitioners M/s Famous Electronic and others filed Writ Petition No. 16625 of 2026 before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief related to an auction. Respondents raised a preliminary objection that the petition was a second filing on the same cause, the earlier petition (Writ C No. 28347 of 2024) …
Tata Housing Finance Ltd. filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the State of U.P. (respondent No.3) to pass an order and hand over physical possession of a secured asset in a SARFAESI Act case (Case No. 5084 of 2025). The petition relied on the Supreme Court’s earlier …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar Gupta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the respondent bank to allow him to deposit the balance loan amount in easy installments as fixed by the court. The respondents, including the Union of India, contended that the …
Petitioner Ashwani Kumar Kamboj filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a certiorari to quash a sale notice dated 20.03.2026 issued by a private finance company. The respondents contended that the High Court lacks jurisdiction to interfere with actions taken under the SARFAESI Act, relying …
The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar Gupta, filed a writ petition challenging the disciplinary proceedings initiated by the Bar Council of India. The petition sought the court's intervention in the conduct of the disciplinary process, including the scheduling of cross‑examination of a witness on …
The petitioner, Manoj Kumar Pandey, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Mathura judgeship to provide a copy of an order dated 27 January 2025 (originally O.S. No. 26 of 1968). He claimed to be the successor sebat of a temple and argued that the order was needed …
The petitioner filed a writ petition (Writ‑C No. 42325 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition and sought liberty to file a fresh petition if needed. The respondent’s standing counsel raised no objection to the …
The petitioner, Bijendra Pratap Tiwari, filed Writ No. 42330 of 2025 before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition and sought liberty to file a fresh petition if required. The respondent’s standing counsel raised no …
The petitioners sought a writ to challenge the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 285 of 2025, alleging their involvement based on the FIR under Section 108 BNS. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The police had already …
The petitioner, Smt. Manju, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the charge sheet filed in Crime No. 285 of 2025 under Section 108 BNS. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court noted that …
Madhu and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 285 of 2025 under Section 108 BNS. No petitioner appeared before the court; only the Additional Government Advocate for the State was present. The court …
The petitioners, Mohd Asif and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the State for renewal of their market licence for Gata No.79 & 100, Ward No.12, Kasba/Nagar Panchayat, Shergarh, Bareilly. The respondents, the State of Uttar Pradesh and …
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the respondent to release contractual dues of Rs.5,05,240 with interest and to decide the petitioner’s application dated 19‑03‑2025. The standing counsel raised no objection to the petitioner's application being …
The petitioner, a former LIC agent, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus directing the respondent to pay his agent gratuity for service from 27‑01‑1987 to 23‑03‑2006. The respondent contended that the petitioner’s claim had already been rejected by an order …
The petitioner, Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to the competent authority to execute its Section 14 order dated 27 December 2021 for possession of secured assets. The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in C. Bright v. District …
The petitioner, Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a direction to the competent authority to execute its Section 14 order dated 27 December 2021 for possession of secured assets. The petitioner relied on the Supreme Court judgment in C. Bright v. District …
The petitioner, Satyendra Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the Regional Passport Office, Lucknow, to re‑issue his passport without delay. His application was pending because a criminal case (Cr. No. 307 of 2016) involving offences under Sections 323, 504, …
The petitioners sought a writ to challenge the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0129 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under IPC sections 352 and 351(3) BNS and CrPC section 115(2). No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 329 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the IPC. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional …
The petitioner, Arun Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet (Crime No. 218 of 2025) under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 351(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an …
The petitioners, Arsheen Parvez and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and seeking relief in connection with Crime No. 208 of 2025, alleged under Section 87 B.N.S. in Gorakhpur. No petitioner appeared before the Court; only the …
Manu Kumari and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and charge‑sheet filed in Crime No. 195 of 2025 under Sections 137(2) and 61(2). No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State’s Additional Government Advocate was …
The petitioners sought a writ challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0214 of 2025 under Sections 85, 109 and 115(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The police had already …
The petitioner, Mange Ram, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0385 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the …
The petitioners sought a writ challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 49 of 2025, alleging improprieties in the FIR and investigation under various IPC and D.P. Act provisions. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge‑sheet in Crime No. 0119 of 2025 under Section 137(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. They sought to quash the FIR and the charge‑sheet on the ground that the police had not properly investigated. The …
The petitioner, Amit Verma, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0354 of 2025, which alleged his involvement under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 352 and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, while …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0217 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under Sections 142, 87, 74 and 61(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was …
The petitioner, Umesh Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the subsequent filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0312 of 2024 under Section 103 BNS. The petition sought judicial intervention to question the police's investigation and the charge sheet. The High …
Manish and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 402 of 2025 under Section 316(2) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The …
The petitioners sought a writ to quash the First Information Report and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0216 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under various IPC sections and the D.P. Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government …
The petitioners Shashank @ Shashank Bind @ Bholu filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 442 of 2025 under Sections 137(2) and 87 BNS. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by Additional Government …
The petitioner, Pramod Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 176 of 2025, which alleged his involvement under Sections 69, 191(2), 115(2) and 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, while …
The petitioners, Yogendra Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 177 of 2025 under Sections 329(3) of the BNS and Sections 2, 3, 5 of the Prevention of Damages of Public Property Act, 1984. The High Court noted that the charge …
The petitioners, Amar Singh and two others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0183 of 2025 under various sections of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by Additional …
The petitioner, Narottam Das Patel, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0077 of 2025 under Section 137(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petition was filed despite the petitioner’s absence, and the State was represented by an …
The petitioner, Deepak Chauhan, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet (Crime No. 0860 of 2025) under Sections 310(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an …
The petitioner, Sanjay Alias Sanju Pateria, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet (Crime No. 232 of 2025) under several sections of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The petition sought to quash the charge sheet on the ground that the FIR was …
Krishna Shukla alias Golo Shukla filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition (No. 21133 of 2025) before the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 300 of 2025, which alleged his involvement under several IPC sections. No petitioner appeared before the court, …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0256 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under various IPC and D.P. Act provisions. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional …
Smt. Vimlesh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 199 of 2025 under Sections 87 BNS. The petition was presented without any petitioner appearing before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government …
The petitioners, represented by counsel, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 331 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under Sections 69, 351(3) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act. No petitioner …
The petitioners, Smt. Prachi and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 533 of 2025 under Section 87 of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional …
The petitioners, Nandkesh Mishra and three others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0020 of 2025 under Sections 85, 80(2), 352 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dangerous Drugs and …
The petitioners Vinay @ Vijay Singh and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0263 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 80(2) of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dangerous Drugs …
The petitioner, Radha, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR (Crime No. 0367 of 2024) that alleged her involvement in offences under Sections 352, 115(2), 333, 109, 118(2) and 191(1) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner counsel appeared before the Court, while the State …
The petitioners, Khalid and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 113 of 2025, which alleged their involvement under various IPC sections. No petitioner counsel appeared before the court, while the State was represented by the …
The petitioner, Smt. Neha, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0087 of 2025, which involved offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought to question the first information report and the subsequent charge …
Petitioners Rajkumar and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet in Crime No. 383 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 61(2)(a), 111, 318(4), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, …
The petitioners sought a writ to quash the First Information Report and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 254 of 2025, alleging their involvement in offences under various IPC sections. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The …
Brijendra Kumar Yadav and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 136 of 2025 under Sections 80, 85, 351(2), 352 of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dangerous Drugs Act. The petitioners were not present to press the writ, while the …
The petitioners Hemlata and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 223 of 2024, which alleged their involvement under Sections 85, 80 BNS read with Sections 3 and 4 of the D.P. Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, while …
The petitioner, Sonu Yadav, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0313 of 2025, which alleged his involvement under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an …
