Created by Fuzzy Cloud

INDRAJEET SHUKLA

219 judgments · newest first · showing 201–219

SMT. RADHA AND 5 OTHERSversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt. Radha and five others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 289 of 2025, which involved sections 191(2), 331(6), 351(3) and 137(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the Court; only the …

VIKRAM SINGH BHADAURIAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

The petitioner, Vikram Singh Bhadauria, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0348 of 2025, which alleged his involvement under Sections 115(2), 351(3) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the …

SACHINversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Sachin, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0087 of 2025 under Sections 316(5), 317(4) and 61(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, but the State was represented by an Additional …

GURMEET KAUR @ HEENA AND 2 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0649 of 2024, which involved Sections 115(2), 109(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 76 of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, but the State was …

RAJIT KUMAR @ RAJAT SINGHversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners sought a writ to challenge the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 327 of 2024, relating to an FIR under Section 137(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by an Additional Government Advocate. The court noted …

RAMESH PRAJAPATI AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0348 of 2024 under Sections 87, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. No petitioner appeared before the court, while an Additional Government Advocate represented the State. The …

RAHUL YADAV AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners, Rahul Yadav and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR registered under Sections 318(4), 316(2) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code in Crime No. 335 of 2024. No petitioner appeared before the Court, while the State was represented by Additional …

MOGEES AND 4 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Mogees and four others, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 384 of 2024, which was based on an FIR under Sections 82(1), 85, 351(2), 115(2) and 352 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought judicial intervention to …

RAM NAIN YADAV AND 3 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

Ram Nain Yadav and three others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 627 of 2024 under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(3) of the B.N.S. Act and Sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. No petitioner appeared before the Court; …

BUNTI @ JITENDRA AND 14 OTHERSversusState of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 514 of 2024, which involved alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 125 of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought relief against the FIR and the subsequent …

RAMU PANDIT @ RAM PATHAK AND ANOTHERversusThe State of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners Ramu Pandit and another filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge‑sheet in Crime No. 0328 of 2024, which arose from an FIR under IPC sections 109, 190, 191(2) and 191(3). The petition sought to quash the FIR/charge‑sheet on the ground that the …

RAHUL KUMARversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and the charge sheet filed in Crime No. 366 of 2024 (Sections 331(4), 305(a), 62 BNS) by the Saharanpur Police. No petitioner appeared before the court, while the State was represented by Additional …

SMT KAJAL DEVI AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners, Smt Kajal Devi and another, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the filing of a charge sheet in Crime No. 0513 of 2024, which alleged their involvement under Sections 87, 352 and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The petition sought judicial intervention to quash …

PARMJEET SINGH AND ANOTHERversusState of UP AND 2 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 333 of 2024, which alleged offences under several sections of the Indian Penal Code and a Uttar Pradesh minor minerals rule. The petition sought judicial intervention to quash the …

VAIBHAVI SRIVASTAVA ALIAS GARIMA AND 4 OTHERSversusState of UP AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR and charge sheet filed in Crime No. 0432 of 2024, which alleged their involvement under Sections 80(2) & 85 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Delhi Police Act. No petitioner appeared before the court, …

UMAR FAROOKversusSTATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

Disposed off/Decided on merits

Petitioner Umar Farook filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking to quash an FIR dated 30.05.2025 that alleged offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3) and 340(2) of the B.N.S. He contended that his firm had previously been black‑listed and the FIR was lodged again after a year and …

JABIULLAHversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

Dismissed on merits

The appellant Jabiullah filed a writ petition seeking liberty to withdraw the petition. The single judge dismissed the petition on the basis that the request to withdraw was not permitted. The appellant then filed an intra‑court appeal challenging that dismissal. The High Court examined whether an …

M/S INTRAGENIX REMEDIESversusUNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS

Petitioner M/s Intragenix Remedies filed a writ petition before the Allahabad High Court but later decided not to pursue the matter and filed a Civil Miscellaneous Withdrawal Application. The petitioner's counsel, Tanmay Sadh, indicated the desire to withdraw, and the revenue counsel, Parv Agarwal, …